• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Defending your home

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off Topic
181 Posts 35 Posters 11.9k Views
Defending your home
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • barbarianB Offline
    barbarianB Offline
    barbarian
    wrote on last edited by
    #157

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Rembrandt" data-cid="578959" data-time="1463015721">
    <div>
    <p>Contrast this story with those drunk louts foiling that Oporto robbery a couple months back</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Drunk louts = true blue aussie heroes, world wide fame!</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Is the difference here just general fitness? Aussie hero had too many pies so couldn't catch up and hold the oporto thief.</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Jesus that's a long bow. </p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>No-one is objecting to Batterham chasing down the thief, it's just what he did once he caught him that drastically crossed the line.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Are you suggesting these two blokes would have murdered the thief if they caught him??</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • jeggaJ Offline
    jeggaJ Offline
    jegga
    wrote on last edited by
    #158

    <p>Anyone else seen this weird case?  <a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='http://abcnews4.com/news/crime-news/judge-finds-probable-cause-loftis-will-stand-trial'>http://abcnews4.com/news/crime-news/judge-finds-probable-cause-loftis-will-stand-trial</a></p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #159

    <p>Don't think you're going to make a great case when you bury them. Manslaughter in self defence kind of implies you'd ring the cops straight away and tell them what happened.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>But its a stressful situation so any weird shit could happen.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    Rembrandt
    wrote on last edited by
    #160

    Well certainly not intentionally. The big guy ran after him and was pretty pissed up, who is to say what might have happened had he caught him? He clearly felt he had to intervene even without a personal affiliation to the business being robbed, probably at least thought about holding him until the police arrived.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • barbarianB Offline
    barbarianB Offline
    barbarian
    wrote on last edited by
    #161

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Rembrandt" data-cid="579007" data-time="1463019469">
    <div>
    <p>Well certainly not intentionally. The big guy ran after him and was pretty pissed up, who is to say what might have happened had he caught him? He clearly felt he had to intervene even without a personal affiliation to the business being robbed, probably at least thought about holding him until the police arrived.</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>I'm still not sure what your point is. Plenty of people every day try to apprehend criminals, generally trying to be good citizens. That isn't what makes the Batterham case remarkable, it's the actions he took once he apprehended the bloke.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Trying to paint those two blokes as potential murderers is a bit silly.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #162

    <p style="margin-left:40px;">Sitting on some numpty until the cops arrive, or giving him a smack round the ears, or bumping his head into a wall while waiting for the cops is much, much different to killing someone you have chased for 400m...</p>
    <p style="margin-left:40px;"> </p>
    <p style="margin-left:40px;">How long would the average joe take to run 400m? >80/90sec?</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • aucklandwarlordA Offline
    aucklandwarlordA Offline
    aucklandwarlord
    wrote on last edited by
    #163

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="taniwharugby" data-cid="579015" data-time="1463020983">
    <div>
    <p> </p>
    <p style="margin-left:40px;">Sitting on some numpty until the cops arrive, or giving him a smack round the ears, or bumping his head into a wall while waiting for the cops is much, much different to killing someone you have chased for 400m...</p>
    <p style="margin-left:40px;"> </p>
    <p style="margin-left:40px;">How long would the average joe take to run 400m? >80/90sec?</p>
    <p> </p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>With an off-duty cop telling him to go easy on him and cut it out. That's probably gonna be hard to explain away in court. </p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>As an aside, that interview with the shoeless and shirtless aussie guys is exceptional!</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Godder
    wrote on last edited by
    #164

    This one was tailor made for the provocation defense.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by
    #165

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="taniwharugby" data-cid="579015" data-time="1463020983">
    <div>
    <p> </p>
    <p style="margin-left:40px;">Sitting on some numpty until the cops arrive, or giving him a smack round the ears, or bumping his head into a wall while waiting for the cops is much, much different to killing someone you have chased for 400m...</p>
    <p style="margin-left:40px;"> </p>
    <p style="margin-left:40px;">How long would the average joe take to run 400m? >80/90sec?</p>
    <p> </p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>I'd back you to be in the 60-70 bracket TR :hi:</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>But yes, internet fame for those two Ozzies, hopefully a lifetime supply of "pluggers" too.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CatograndeC Offline
    CatograndeC Offline
    Catogrande
    wrote on last edited by
    #166

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="aucklandwarlord" data-cid="579056" data-time="1463030754">
    <div>
    <p><strong>With an off-duty cop telling him to go easy on him and cut it out. That's probably gonna be hard to explain away in court. </strong></p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>As an aside, that interview with the shoeless and shirtless aussie guys is exceptional!</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>This is an odd point. Why didn't the cop intervene? If he was on duty surely he would have and even off duty - well, aren't police never really off duty? I'd imagine he will have some questions to answer.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #167

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Rembrandt" data-cid="578959" data-time="1463015721">
    <div>
    <p>Contrast this story with those drunk louts foiling that Oporto robbery a couple months back</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>

    </p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Drunk louts = true blue aussie heroes, world wide fame!</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Is the difference here just general fitness? Aussie hero had too many pies so couldn't catch up and hold the oporto thief.</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Fat pissed idiot calling for people to call the cops while his mate right next to him is busy recording everything on his smartphone. In portrait mode like a fucking retard.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="NTA" data-cid="579005" data-time="1463019407">
    <div>
    <p>But its a stressful situation so any weird shit could happen.</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>True, but the test is what a reasonable person would do. Burying people isn't reasonable. Neither is chasing someone for four hundred metres so that you can bash them and choke them to death. The danger to life and property has long since passed.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by
    #168

    <p>I'm hearing talks on the Radio about some sort of "self defence" argument for people in abusive relationships. Only caught the tail end of one snippit but the gist of what I got sounded almost like "retaliation first" ie battered wife kills abusive hubby in his sleep because she wanted to get in first before he killed her ? Interested in aucklandwarlord and Godders take on this.....I'm sure I got that particular bit wrong but sounds to me like some seriously murky waters.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    wrote on last edited by
    #169

    <p>Surely it's the principle of proportionate response</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>You smack me in the head - I smack you in the head but you fall on your head and goneburger - manslaughter</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>You smack me in the head - I pull out a gun and empty the magazine at your head and body from 3 metres away - murder</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p><span style="font-size:8px;">although there's a couple of posters who I reckon you could mount a successful defence of justifiable homicide even in the second scenario</span></p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #170

    Come on, if you've had a few beers...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by
    #171

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="mariner4life" data-cid="579288" data-time="1463110855">
    <div>
    <p>Come on, if you've had a few beers...</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>How's the mood in the talk on the FB posts now this new evidence has come to light M4L ? Easy for bogans in OZ to get all high and mighty and go on about how he's a he hero and they'd all smash any fluffybunny who dared enter their house ( complete with ubiquitous use of the word "mate" to emphasize their point ) but guess I'm just interested to see if any have backtracked on their view or they reckon "the fluffybunny got what he deserved...(mate )"</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #172

    <p>Facebook? Don't be silly my friend. That particular piece of clicktivism was weeks ago. There's no traction to posting about it now, that was 6 bogan outrage trends ago. </p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • aucklandwarlordA Offline
    aucklandwarlordA Offline
    aucklandwarlord
    wrote on last edited by
    #173

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Catogrande" data-cid="579085" data-time="1463042053">
    <div>
    <p>This is an odd point. Why didn't the cop intervene? If he was on duty surely he would have and even off duty - well, aren't police never really off duty? I'd imagine he will have some questions to answer.</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Not entirely sure how it works in Aussie, but in NZ there were a heap of rules around what you should and shouldn't do when intervening off duty. If you had been drinking, the best rule of thumb was not to get involved hands on (headline reads "Drunk off duty cop bashes good samaritan"). Or if you didn't think you could safely handle it, you weren't supposed to intervene either - for example and off duty cop shouldn't get involved in a brawl where they're gonna end up getting their own head punched in as well. </p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>I would imagine that provide that off-duty cop called the police immediately, they should have their arses covered. </p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CatograndeC Offline
    CatograndeC Offline
    Catogrande
    wrote on last edited by
    #174

    <p>Thanks. Makes sense.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by
    #175

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="aucklandwarlord" data-cid="579323" data-time="1463118543">
    <div>
    <p>Not entirely sure how it works in Aussie, but in NZ there were a heap of rules around what you should and shouldn't do when intervening off duty. If you had been drinking, the best rule of thumb was not to get involved hands on (headline reads "Drunk off duty cop bashes good samaritan"). Or if you didn't think you could safely handle it, you weren't supposed to intervene either - for example and off duty cop shouldn't get involved in a brawl where they're gonna end up getting their own head punched in as well. </p>
    <p> </p>
    <p><strong>I would imagine that provide that off-duty cop called the police immediately, they should have their arses covered. </strong></p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>They always made the best informants too :hi:</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #176

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="aucklandwarlord" data-cid="579323" data-time="1463118543"><p>
    off duty cop shouldn't get involved in a brawl where they're gonna end up getting their own head punched in as well. <br></p></blockquote>
    <br>
    Hmmm ... nephew ... off duty cop ... and his mrs ... also off duty cop ... apparently intervened in some sort of dispute. Don't know the full details as we're not in Souff Straya and am only geting it third hand through Mrs Boo but he copped one and may well be forced off active duty. Think something to do with his ear and his balance. Not good.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Defending your home
Off Topic
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.