Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Crusaders v Blues

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
crusadersblues
637 Posts 59 Posters 47.4k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • BovidaeB Bovidae

    I bet Jackson and Burke don't even take the field.

    BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #498

    @bovidae said in Crusaders v Blues:

    I bet Jackson and Burke don't even take the field.

    As I predicted. 🤣

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
    • ACT CrusaderA Offline
      ACT CrusaderA Offline
      ACT Crusader
      wrote on last edited by
      #499

      @duluth said in Crusaders v Blues:

      Blues loosies got through plenty of tackles

      Robinson 10 (2 misses)
      Papali'i 21 (0 misses)
      Sotutu 15 (0 misses)

      Worth mentioning Ioanes defensive game too: 16 tackles, 2 misses. That's an usually high number of tackles for a centre

      One stat site had Sotutu at 20 tackles and Papali’i at 23.

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • Billy TellB Billy Tell

        A lot of posts about dalton and sotutu but I thought Robinson was outstanding in the first half. His ruck clear outs were top class: efficient, accurate, repetitive.

        I like Leicester but he has to have a Reece work rate if he wants higher honours.

        Provided the selectors make the right choices the ABs should have a good team. They really need to back the younger props coming thru. Ofa was great for the blues but the crusaders newell was also very good when he came on.

        Crusaders are really missing a genuine top class loose forward. Best of the bunch is probably blackadder but grace is all sorts of meh.

        Crazy HorseC Offline
        Crazy HorseC Offline
        Crazy Horse
        wrote on last edited by
        #500

        @billy-tell said in Crusaders v Blues:

        A lot of posts about dalton and sotutu but I thought Robinson was outstanding in the first half. His ruck clear outs were top class: efficient, accurate, repetitive.

        I like Leicester but he has to have a Reece work rate if he wants higher honours.

        Provided the selectors make the right choices the ABs should have a good team. They really need to back the younger props coming thru. Ofa was great for the blues but the crusaders newell was also very good when he came on.

        Crusaders are really missing a genuine top class loose forward. Best of the bunch is probably blackadder but grace is all sorts of meh.

        @billy-tell said in Crusaders v Blues:
        crusaders newell was also very good when he came on.

        In the lead up to that tackle on Gardiner in the corner there was a passage of play where Newell was barging towards the line with a couple of Blues on him. He was being assisted by a Crusader I think. Anyway, a third Blue just managed to keep hold of Newell's foot when Newell had momentum and was a metre or so from the line. That was a definite try saving effort. And this was a long winded way of saying yep, I agree, Newell did well.

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • BovidaeB Bovidae

          Every other NZ team has beaten the Crusaders in Christchurch in recent years so this isn't exactly a new phenomenon.

          ACT CrusaderA Offline
          ACT CrusaderA Offline
          ACT Crusader
          wrote on last edited by
          #501

          @bovidae said in Crusaders v Blues:

          Every other NZ team has beaten the Crusaders in Christchurch in recent years so this isn't exactly a new phenomenon.

          Look at these Chiefs supporters trying to minimise the Blues moment in the sun, breaking an 18 year hoodoo….

          1 Reply Last reply
          5
          • TimT Away
            TimT Away
            Tim
            wrote on last edited by
            #502

            Any news on Goodhue or Moody?

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • TimT Tim

              Just saw Hodgman up and talking to the fans. Hopefully a good sign!

              boobooB Online
              boobooB Online
              booboo
              wrote on last edited by
              #503

              @tim said in Crusaders v Blues:

              Just saw Hodgman up and talking to the fans. Hopefully a good sign!

              Surely sitting a few out though.

              Hopefully less than Barrett ...

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • BovidaeB Bovidae

                Those talking up Perofeta for the ABs were premature. He showed a lack of big game temperament in this game.

                Papali'i - the best player on the field.

                I'm going to praise Fraser as well, who didn't get fooled by either team trying to milk penalties.

                No idea how the commentary was I didn't listen to it! 🙂

                boobooB Online
                boobooB Online
                booboo
                wrote on last edited by booboo
                #504

                @bovidae said in Crusaders v Blues:

                Those talking up Perofeta for the ABs were premature. He showed a lack of big game temperament in this game.

                Papali'i - the best player on the field.

                I'm going to praise Fraser as well, who didn't get fooled by either team trying to milk penalties.

                No idea how the commentary was I didn't listen to it! 🙂

                Nah. Still think he's been the next best 10, and went ok.

                Compare his efforts to Mo'unga who also missed kicks and tackles.

                Edit: was not previously a fan.

                TimT Victor MeldrewV 2 Replies Last reply
                1
                • BovidaeB Bovidae

                  Every other NZ team has beaten the Crusaders in Christchurch in recent years so this isn't exactly a new phenomenon.

                  nzzpN Offline
                  nzzpN Offline
                  nzzp
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #505

                  @bovidae said in Crusaders v Blues:

                  Every other NZ team has beaten the Crusaders in Christchurch in recent years so this isn't exactly a new phenomenon.

                  Nope. To me the difference is the crusaders playing poorly and losing, and them targeting a game, getting up for it, playing well and then losing.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • boobooB booboo

                    @bovidae said in Crusaders v Blues:

                    Those talking up Perofeta for the ABs were premature. He showed a lack of big game temperament in this game.

                    Papali'i - the best player on the field.

                    I'm going to praise Fraser as well, who didn't get fooled by either team trying to milk penalties.

                    No idea how the commentary was I didn't listen to it! 🙂

                    Nah. Still think he's been the next best 10, and went ok.

                    Compare his efforts to Mo'unga who also missed kicks and tackles.

                    Edit: was not previously a fan.

                    TimT Away
                    TimT Away
                    Tim
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #506

                    @booboo Parsons predicted Perofeta to make the ABs in his season preview. Will be interesting to see if he gets a shot - another who might go up a level after being in the system.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    4
                    • Crazy HorseC Offline
                      Crazy HorseC Offline
                      Crazy Horse
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #507

                      While it turned into a very good game in the end, I still think the cards spoiled it a bit in terms of knowing where each team is really at in relation to the other. I suspect the Blues have their noses in front based on the play before the two cards, but we still have to keep in mind the Blues very nearly let this game slip/the Crusaders very nearly won.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                        @nzzp tbf they haven't had to step up much and still win, they were doing what they needed to, which is what good sides do, maybe lacking a ruthless edge though.

                        Don't get me wrong they aren't up there with some of the great crusader sides, but they are still a very good side, and how often are good teams dragged down to the level of the opposition, which tbf ain't been that great in recent times

                        But last night they were ready for a different Blues team, and stepped up, as above, I hope this lights thier fire to move up a notch now which will push the blues too, in turn driving the Chiefs and hopefully those other 3 teams too 😀

                        nzzpN Offline
                        nzzpN Offline
                        nzzp
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #508

                        @taniwharugby they are really good, but sides will back themselves to get up. Their ceiling isn't what past sides have been.

                        More importantly, the conveyor belt of talent is weaker than it's been for ages

                        Crazy HorseC 1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • boobooB booboo

                          @bovidae said in Crusaders v Blues:

                          Those talking up Perofeta for the ABs were premature. He showed a lack of big game temperament in this game.

                          Papali'i - the best player on the field.

                          I'm going to praise Fraser as well, who didn't get fooled by either team trying to milk penalties.

                          No idea how the commentary was I didn't listen to it! 🙂

                          Nah. Still think he's been the next best 10, and went ok.

                          Compare his efforts to Mo'unga who also missed kicks and tackles.

                          Edit: was not previously a fan.

                          Victor MeldrewV Offline
                          Victor MeldrewV Offline
                          Victor Meldrew
                          wrote on last edited by Victor Meldrew
                          #509

                          @booboo said in Crusaders v Blues:

                          Nah. Still think he's been the next best 10, and went ok.

                          Didn't watch too much of him last year, but he seems to be turning into a pretty mature player. Not his best game today, but he'll learn from that.

                          @tim I think Foster will want to have a good look at him in the AB camp at the very least and to give Foster some credit, he has done well picking and handling new ABs

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • sharkS Offline
                            sharkS Offline
                            shark
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #510

                            I've only seen a YouTube highlights package but have to say well played to the Blues, a deserved win. Papali'i clearly the star turn in either forward pack but Jordan seems to have also had another big night. It's now a Papali'i vs Savea debate for mine.

                            As an aside, I was quite dismayed by the lack of gas shown by Dom Gardiner as he pretty much lumbered towards the corner. He had a head start and the angle from around 22 out but was easily mown down well short of the corner. He's supposed to be a 6 (albeit covering lock in this 23) and should be able to make more of a contest of that situation.

                            boobooB Billy TellB voodooV 3 Replies Last reply
                            2
                            • nzzpN nzzp

                              @taniwharugby they are really good, but sides will back themselves to get up. Their ceiling isn't what past sides have been.

                              More importantly, the conveyor belt of talent is weaker than it's been for ages

                              Crazy HorseC Offline
                              Crazy HorseC Offline
                              Crazy Horse
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #511

                              @nzzp said in Crusaders v Blues:

                              @taniwharugby they are really good, but sides will back themselves to get up. Their ceiling isn't what past sides have been.

                              More importantly, the conveyor belt of talent is weaker than it's been for ages

                              Agree, I and other Sader fans have been beating this drum for a while now. There is not the depth there once was and there are some positions where the starters are just Super level at best. In saying that a couple of youngsters have popped their heads up high enough this year to suggest that there is still some talent coming through.

                              sharkS kiwi_expatK 2 Replies Last reply
                              3
                              • sharkS shark

                                I've only seen a YouTube highlights package but have to say well played to the Blues, a deserved win. Papali'i clearly the star turn in either forward pack but Jordan seems to have also had another big night. It's now a Papali'i vs Savea debate for mine.

                                As an aside, I was quite dismayed by the lack of gas shown by Dom Gardiner as he pretty much lumbered towards the corner. He had a head start and the angle from around 22 out but was easily mown down well short of the corner. He's supposed to be a 6 (albeit covering lock in this 23) and should be able to make more of a contest of that situation.

                                boobooB Online
                                boobooB Online
                                booboo
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #512

                                @shark said in Crusaders v Blues:

                                I've only seen a YouTube highlights package but have to say well played to the Blues, a deserved win. Papali'i clearly the star turn in either forward pack but Jordan seems to have also had another big night. It's now a Papali'i vs Savea debate for mine.

                                As an aside, I was quite dismayed by the lack of gas shown by Dom Gardiner as he pretty much lumbered towards the corner. He had a head start and the angle from around 22 out but was easily mown down well short of the corner. He's supposed to be a 6 (albeit covering lock in this 23) and should be able to make more of a contest of that situation.

                                It was Ioane who was chasing him.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • Crazy HorseC Crazy Horse

                                  @nzzp said in Crusaders v Blues:

                                  @taniwharugby they are really good, but sides will back themselves to get up. Their ceiling isn't what past sides have been.

                                  More importantly, the conveyor belt of talent is weaker than it's been for ages

                                  Agree, I and other Sader fans have been beating this drum for a while now. There is not the depth there once was and there are some positions where the starters are just Super level at best. In saying that a couple of youngsters have popped their heads up high enough this year to suggest that there is still some talent coming through.

                                  sharkS Offline
                                  sharkS Offline
                                  shark
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #513

                                  @crazy-horse said in Crusaders v Blues:

                                  @nzzp said in Crusaders v Blues:

                                  @taniwharugby they are really good, but sides will back themselves to get up. Their ceiling isn't what past sides have been.

                                  More importantly, the conveyor belt of talent is weaker than it's been for ages

                                  Agree, I and other Sader fans have been beating this drum for a while now. There is not the depth there once was and there are some positions where the starters are just Super level at best. In saying that a couple of youngsters have popped their heads up high enough this year to suggest that there is still some talent coming through.

                                  Yes and no. I don't think we're any worse off than any other side in terms of fringe or even inadequate players. The depth is not what it once was. There are literally dozens of players in and around the squads these days who never would have had a look in before we started losing substantial quantities of players overseas, combined with vast inexperience as lots of U20s are pressed immediately into service. Looking at our side last night, the only areas we were a bit exposed were at lock / lock cover and hooker cover. But even at lock, Gallagher looks immediately at home. Compare that to the Blues sporting the likes of Eklund, old man Romano, Goodhue, Lam, Lay, Choat and Heem, none of whom would have been required in Super Rugby's hey day, and we look a cut above, on paper.

                                  TimT 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • TimT Away
                                    TimT Away
                                    Tim
                                    wrote on last edited by Tim
                                    #514

                                    Ioane/Papalii cover tackle on Gardiner:

                                    https://streamable.com/iz3bzo

                                    BTW, the last tackle of the game was made by Sotutu - hard hit with the shoulder that produced a knock-on.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    2
                                    • sharkS shark

                                      @crazy-horse said in Crusaders v Blues:

                                      @nzzp said in Crusaders v Blues:

                                      @taniwharugby they are really good, but sides will back themselves to get up. Their ceiling isn't what past sides have been.

                                      More importantly, the conveyor belt of talent is weaker than it's been for ages

                                      Agree, I and other Sader fans have been beating this drum for a while now. There is not the depth there once was and there are some positions where the starters are just Super level at best. In saying that a couple of youngsters have popped their heads up high enough this year to suggest that there is still some talent coming through.

                                      Yes and no. I don't think we're any worse off than any other side in terms of fringe or even inadequate players. The depth is not what it once was. There are literally dozens of players in and around the squads these days who never would have had a look in before we started losing substantial quantities of players overseas, combined with vast inexperience as lots of U20s are pressed immediately into service. Looking at our side last night, the only areas we were a bit exposed were at lock / lock cover and hooker cover. But even at lock, Gallagher looks immediately at home. Compare that to the Blues sporting the likes of Eklund, old man Romano, Goodhue, Lam, Lay, Choat and Heem, none of whom would have been required in Super Rugby's hey day, and we look a cut above, on paper.

                                      TimT Away
                                      TimT Away
                                      Tim
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #515

                                      @shark said in Crusaders v Blues:

                                      Compare that to the Blues sporting the likes of Eklund, old man Romano, Goodhue, Lam, Lay, Choat and Heem, none of whom would have been required in Super Rugby's hey day

                                      You mean in the glory days of Corey Flynn, Ross Filipo, Con Barrell, Sam Broomhall, and Adam Whitelock? All those players you named are high quality at Super Rugby level. Lay was very solid for Bristol in the UK Premiership.

                                      sharkS 1 Reply Last reply
                                      6
                                      • S Offline
                                        S Offline
                                        Steven Harris
                                        wrote on last edited by Steven Harris
                                        #516

                                        Credit to Mike Fraser ,a couple of things he could of looked at , but what I do like about his style , he’s not fooled by players trying to hold other players in and he has an understanding and awareness of where players who have made a tackle are , many times you see officials immediately penalise a trapped players , but I saw on least 2 occasions there was still a channel for the ball to be freed up , we saw this with a collapsed maul that the Blues had held up ,but saw an opportunity for the Crusaders to free the ball up .
                                        The YC for Havilli whilst it might have seemed harsh , if you did that anywhere else on the paddock it’s a penalty , but when a team gets that far in behind that deep , I thought Fraser was right on the money .

                                        chimoausC 1 Reply Last reply
                                        6
                                        • S Steven Harris

                                          Credit to Mike Fraser ,a couple of things he could of looked at , but what I do like about his style , he’s not fooled by players trying to hold other players in and he has an understanding and awareness of where players who have made a tackle are , many times you see officials immediately penalise a trapped players , but I saw on least 2 occasions there was still a channel for the ball to be freed up , we saw this with a collapsed maul that the Blues had held up ,but saw an opportunity for the Crusaders to free the ball up .
                                          The YC for Havilli whilst it might have seemed harsh , if you did that anywhere else on the paddock it’s a penalty , but when a team gets that far in behind that deep , I thought Fraser was right on the money .

                                          chimoausC Offline
                                          chimoausC Offline
                                          chimoaus
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #517

                                          @steven-harris Totally agree, I thought he had a great game and contributed to the competition. Like you say several times the halfback tried to milk it with the trapped player but he wasn't having it.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          2
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search