• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksireland
1.8k Posts 90 Posters 149.0k Views
All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ACT CrusaderA Do not disturb
    ACT CrusaderA Do not disturb
    ACT Crusader
    replied to TheMojoman on last edited by
    #203

    @TheMojoman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    Things are going from bad to worse in terms of preparation. I know the team is putting on a brave face but disruption is never good especially when the AB's are most vulnerable in their first test of the June series.

    I had picked AB's to clean sweep based on the strength of Super Rugby and an end of season 5-Test series for the Irish (Maori's may as well be test matches) but now I think that's narrowed.

    The probability of disruption like this was very high given every Super team experienced it at some point this year.

    Ireland also have a COVID case.

    So I don’t think it will phase them too much. I’m sure they had their first choice lineup in mind, but next man up which is something you always have to plan for with last minute injuries, illness etc.

    The worst disruption will be if the Media Manager gets COVID and doesn’t publish the team list on Thursday. Then we are in trouble.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy Horse
    wrote on last edited by
    #204

    On the bright side, at least for Foster, Covid has given him another excuse if the ABs lose. Disruptions and all that.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #205

    @mariner4life said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    Rayasi could be lethal as well

    Nope. Too inaccurate.

    B 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    bobily2
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #206

    @antipodean said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    @mariner4life said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    Rayasi could be lethal as well

    Nope. Too inaccurate.

    He'd still be lethal - just a coin toss which side he is lethal for.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to TheMojoman on last edited by
    #207

    @TheMojoman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    Things are going from bad to worse in terms of preparation. I know the team is putting on a brave face but disruption is never good especially when the AB's are most vulnerable in their first test of the June series.

    I had picked AB's to clean sweep based on the strength of Super Rugby and an end of season 5-Test series for the Irish (Maori's may as well be test matches) but now I think that's narrowed.

    TAB still has us at $1.27 and Ireland at $3.60 - anyone know what the odds were before covid struck?

    That's good money for Ireland!

    B 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • kiwi_expatK Offline
    kiwi_expatK Offline
    kiwi_expat
    replied to Billy Tell on last edited by kiwi_expat
    #208
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    bobily2
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #209

    @Chris-B said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    @TheMojoman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    Things are going from bad to worse in terms of preparation. I know the team is putting on a brave face but disruption is never good especially when the AB's are most vulnerable in their first test of the June series.

    I had picked AB's to clean sweep based on the strength of Super Rugby and an end of season 5-Test series for the Irish (Maori's may as well be test matches) but now I think that's narrowed.

    TAB still has us at $1.27 and Ireland at $3.60 - anyone know what the odds were before covid struck?

    That's good money for Ireland!

    It was $4.20 a few days back

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to TheMojoman on last edited by
    #210

    @TheMojoman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    What's less ideal is playing two power wingers.

    i reckon that thinking is 5 years out of date

    and i would struggle to call many of those blokes "power" wingers. The only power winger is also really good under the high ball.

    F ACT CrusaderA 2 Replies Last reply
    5
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    Frye
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #211

    @mariner4life said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    @TheMojoman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    What's less ideal is playing two power wingers.

    i reckon that thinking is 5 years out of date

    and i would struggle to call many of those blokes "power" wingers. The only power winger is also really good under the high ball.

    You don't think Faainganuku is a power winger?

    Anyway, I think Reece has the work rate and skill to make sure the back 3 has a decent balance.

    Kicking is certainly a concern though, Tupaea is far from a traditional second five. If it's wet we could be in a bit of trouble if it turns into a kickfest.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ACT CrusaderA Do not disturb
    ACT CrusaderA Do not disturb
    ACT Crusader
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #212

    @mariner4life said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    @TheMojoman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    What's less ideal is playing two power wingers.

    i reckon that thinking is 5 years out of date

    and i would struggle to call many of those blokes "power" wingers. The only power winger is also really good under the high ball.

    The way the ABs set up defensively we tend to drop our 1st 5 back to help with the kick reception plus to get 3 or even 4 players behind the ball to counter from. So you want strong attackers out wide, and for me it doesn’t matter whether they get over the gain line by tackle busts or beating their man by stepping or outside pace. Either creates opportunities.

    I think the whole Dagg/Mils, Dagg/Bender, Jane, Jordie etc was more about getting the best players on the field and then having the gameplan that those players with their skill sets could execute.

    Henry didn’t mind the Rok/Sivi combo from time to time either.

    CrucialC taniwharugbyT F 3 Replies Last reply
    4
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #213

    @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    @mariner4life said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    @TheMojoman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    What's less ideal is playing two power wingers.

    i reckon that thinking is 5 years out of date

    and i would struggle to call many of those blokes "power" wingers. The only power winger is also really good under the high ball.

    The way the ABs set up defensively we tend to drop our 1st 5 back to help with the kick reception plus to get 3 or even 4 players behind the ball to counter from. So you want strong attackers out wide, and for me it doesn’t matter whether they get over the gain line by tackle busts or beating their man by stepping or outside pace. Either creates opportunities.

    I think the whole Dagg/Mils, Dagg/Bender, Jane, Jordie etc was more about getting the best players on the field and then having the gameplan that those players with their skill sets could execute.

    Henry didn’t mind the Rok/Sivi combo from time to time either.

    Who was that Cantab that had these qualities in abundance? Recent AB? Amazing work under the high ball too.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #214

    @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    then having the gameplan that those players with their skill sets could execute

    thats the key isnt it....this is where we seem to have struggled in recent times, possibly the cattle unable to execute or the game plan not best suited to the cattle

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #215

    @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    The worst disruption will be if the Media Manager gets COVID and doesn’t publish the team list on Thursday. Then we are in trouble.

    The lazy fluffybunny won't be doing it at 0600 like the good old days, sadly

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #216

    @Crucial said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    @mariner4life said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    @TheMojoman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    What's less ideal is playing two power wingers.

    i reckon that thinking is 5 years out of date

    and i would struggle to call many of those blokes "power" wingers. The only power winger is also really good under the high ball.

    The way the ABs set up defensively we tend to drop our 1st 5 back to help with the kick reception plus to get 3 or even 4 players behind the ball to counter from. So you want strong attackers out wide, and for me it doesn’t matter whether they get over the gain line by tackle busts or beating their man by stepping or outside pace. Either creates opportunities.

    I think the whole Dagg/Mils, Dagg/Bender, Jane, Jordie etc was more about getting the best players on the field and then having the gameplan that those players with their skill sets could execute.

    Henry didn’t mind the Rok/Sivi combo from time to time either.

    Who was that Cantab that had these qualities in abundance? Recent AB? Amazing work under the high ball too.

    Dan Carter would be the last one.

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #217

    More than the individuals i'm more worried about the attacking shape.

    Of course test 1 will be rusty and i'm imagining they will keep things quite simple with a limited/disrupted build up i'm just hoping to see some variety in the attacking shape. Yes some better ball carriers will help but we need to put them in positions to succeed - bodies in motion, variety etc to get the Irish defense line on the back foot a tad.

    Just biffing it out to a forward/forward pod isn't going to achieve much.

    CrucialC kiwi_expatK 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #218

    @Machpants said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    @Crucial said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    @mariner4life said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    @TheMojoman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    What's less ideal is playing two power wingers.

    i reckon that thinking is 5 years out of date

    and i would struggle to call many of those blokes "power" wingers. The only power winger is also really good under the high ball.

    The way the ABs set up defensively we tend to drop our 1st 5 back to help with the kick reception plus to get 3 or even 4 players behind the ball to counter from. So you want strong attackers out wide, and for me it doesn’t matter whether they get over the gain line by tackle busts or beating their man by stepping or outside pace. Either creates opportunities.

    I think the whole Dagg/Mils, Dagg/Bender, Jane, Jordie etc was more about getting the best players on the field and then having the gameplan that those players with their skill sets could execute.

    Henry didn’t mind the Rok/Sivi combo from time to time either.

    Who was that Cantab that had these qualities in abundance? Recent AB? Amazing work under the high ball too.

    Dan Carter would be the last one.

    Nah. I was thinking George someone…..not Whitelock

    M ACT CrusaderA 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #219

    @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    More than the individuals i'm more worried about the attacking shape.

    Of course test 1 will be rusty and i'm imagining they will keep things quite simple with a limited/disrupted build up i'm just hoping to see some variety in the attacking shape. Yes some better ball carriers will help but we need to put them in positions to succeed - bodies in motion, variety etc to get the Irish defense line on the back foot a tad.

    Just biffing it out to a forward/forward pod isn't going to achieve much.

    I’m more concerned about the defence.
    The Ireland attack structure is all about forcing correct decisions. Combos and communication will be critical.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #220

    Schmidt is taking charge of the defence this week, but I am hoping he also has some input into the attack.

    With a disrupted preparation reverting to some SR combos (where sensible) seems to be the best option.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • kiwi_expatK Offline
    kiwi_expatK Offline
    kiwi_expat
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by kiwi_expat
    #221

    @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    Just biffing it out to a forward/forward pod isn't going to achieve much.

    Welcome to Fozzie ball.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #222

    @Crucial said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    @Machpants said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    @Crucial said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    @mariner4life said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    @TheMojoman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    What's less ideal is playing two power wingers.

    i reckon that thinking is 5 years out of date

    and i would struggle to call many of those blokes "power" wingers. The only power winger is also really good under the high ball.

    The way the ABs set up defensively we tend to drop our 1st 5 back to help with the kick reception plus to get 3 or even 4 players behind the ball to counter from. So you want strong attackers out wide, and for me it doesn’t matter whether they get over the gain line by tackle busts or beating their man by stepping or outside pace. Either creates opportunities.

    I think the whole Dagg/Mils, Dagg/Bender, Jane, Jordie etc was more about getting the best players on the field and then having the gameplan that those players with their skill sets could execute.

    Henry didn’t mind the Rok/Sivi combo from time to time either.

    Who was that Cantab that had these qualities in abundance? Recent AB? Amazing work under the high ball too.

    Dan Carter would be the last one.

    Nah. I was thinking George someone…..not Whitelock

    Nope, got nothing. George 'Brett' Cameron?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test
Rugby Matches
allblacksireland
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.