Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksireland
1.8k Posts 90 Posters 151.8k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Billy TellB Billy Tell

    So Havili, Goodhue, the 2 coaches and Jordan of all people are rabid anti-vaxxers…

    kiwi_expatK Offline
    kiwi_expatK Offline
    kiwi_expat
    wrote on last edited by kiwi_expat
    #208
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Chris B.C Chris B.

      @TheMojoman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

      Things are going from bad to worse in terms of preparation. I know the team is putting on a brave face but disruption is never good especially when the AB's are most vulnerable in their first test of the June series.

      I had picked AB's to clean sweep based on the strength of Super Rugby and an end of season 5-Test series for the Irish (Maori's may as well be test matches) but now I think that's narrowed.

      TAB still has us at $1.27 and Ireland at $3.60 - anyone know what the odds were before covid struck?

      That's good money for Ireland!

      B Offline
      B Offline
      bobily2
      wrote on last edited by
      #209

      @Chris-B said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

      @TheMojoman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

      Things are going from bad to worse in terms of preparation. I know the team is putting on a brave face but disruption is never good especially when the AB's are most vulnerable in their first test of the June series.

      I had picked AB's to clean sweep based on the strength of Super Rugby and an end of season 5-Test series for the Irish (Maori's may as well be test matches) but now I think that's narrowed.

      TAB still has us at $1.27 and Ireland at $3.60 - anyone know what the odds were before covid struck?

      That's good money for Ireland!

      It was $4.20 a few days back

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • TheMojomanT TheMojoman

        @mariner4life said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

        lol i love AB fans

        We have Jordan, Reece, and Clarke, players very much to top tier international talent. And that's with the long established left wing now a centre. 3 players and an emergency for two positions

        But yeah, we have a depth problem because there isn't another top level winger or two just ready to bring in.

        I reckon the Blues boys wouldn't look out of place, and Rayasi could be lethal as well.

        It's not just about plucking a good winger, it's also about balance of the back 3 as a unit. Jordan, J.Barrett & Reece/Clarke/Fainga'anuku has a great balance basically playing two fullbacks and a power winger.

        With Jordan out (and no Bridge) to maintain that balance you'd prob have to put Beaudy at the back and shift Jordie to 14 which is not ideal. What's less ideal is playing two power wingers.

        mariner4lifeM Offline
        mariner4lifeM Offline
        mariner4life
        wrote on last edited by
        #210

        @TheMojoman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

        What's less ideal is playing two power wingers.

        i reckon that thinking is 5 years out of date

        and i would struggle to call many of those blokes "power" wingers. The only power winger is also really good under the high ball.

        F ACT CrusaderA 2 Replies Last reply
        5
        • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

          @TheMojoman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

          What's less ideal is playing two power wingers.

          i reckon that thinking is 5 years out of date

          and i would struggle to call many of those blokes "power" wingers. The only power winger is also really good under the high ball.

          F Offline
          F Offline
          Frye
          wrote on last edited by
          #211

          @mariner4life said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

          @TheMojoman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

          What's less ideal is playing two power wingers.

          i reckon that thinking is 5 years out of date

          and i would struggle to call many of those blokes "power" wingers. The only power winger is also really good under the high ball.

          You don't think Faainganuku is a power winger?

          Anyway, I think Reece has the work rate and skill to make sure the back 3 has a decent balance.

          Kicking is certainly a concern though, Tupaea is far from a traditional second five. If it's wet we could be in a bit of trouble if it turns into a kickfest.

          1 Reply Last reply
          2
          • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

            @TheMojoman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

            What's less ideal is playing two power wingers.

            i reckon that thinking is 5 years out of date

            and i would struggle to call many of those blokes "power" wingers. The only power winger is also really good under the high ball.

            ACT CrusaderA Offline
            ACT CrusaderA Offline
            ACT Crusader
            wrote on last edited by
            #212

            @mariner4life said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

            @TheMojoman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

            What's less ideal is playing two power wingers.

            i reckon that thinking is 5 years out of date

            and i would struggle to call many of those blokes "power" wingers. The only power winger is also really good under the high ball.

            The way the ABs set up defensively we tend to drop our 1st 5 back to help with the kick reception plus to get 3 or even 4 players behind the ball to counter from. So you want strong attackers out wide, and for me it doesn’t matter whether they get over the gain line by tackle busts or beating their man by stepping or outside pace. Either creates opportunities.

            I think the whole Dagg/Mils, Dagg/Bender, Jane, Jordie etc was more about getting the best players on the field and then having the gameplan that those players with their skill sets could execute.

            Henry didn’t mind the Rok/Sivi combo from time to time either.

            CrucialC taniwharugbyT F 3 Replies Last reply
            4
            • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

              @mariner4life said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

              @TheMojoman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

              What's less ideal is playing two power wingers.

              i reckon that thinking is 5 years out of date

              and i would struggle to call many of those blokes "power" wingers. The only power winger is also really good under the high ball.

              The way the ABs set up defensively we tend to drop our 1st 5 back to help with the kick reception plus to get 3 or even 4 players behind the ball to counter from. So you want strong attackers out wide, and for me it doesn’t matter whether they get over the gain line by tackle busts or beating their man by stepping or outside pace. Either creates opportunities.

              I think the whole Dagg/Mils, Dagg/Bender, Jane, Jordie etc was more about getting the best players on the field and then having the gameplan that those players with their skill sets could execute.

              Henry didn’t mind the Rok/Sivi combo from time to time either.

              CrucialC Offline
              CrucialC Offline
              Crucial
              wrote on last edited by
              #213

              @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

              @mariner4life said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

              @TheMojoman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

              What's less ideal is playing two power wingers.

              i reckon that thinking is 5 years out of date

              and i would struggle to call many of those blokes "power" wingers. The only power winger is also really good under the high ball.

              The way the ABs set up defensively we tend to drop our 1st 5 back to help with the kick reception plus to get 3 or even 4 players behind the ball to counter from. So you want strong attackers out wide, and for me it doesn’t matter whether they get over the gain line by tackle busts or beating their man by stepping or outside pace. Either creates opportunities.

              I think the whole Dagg/Mils, Dagg/Bender, Jane, Jordie etc was more about getting the best players on the field and then having the gameplan that those players with their skill sets could execute.

              Henry didn’t mind the Rok/Sivi combo from time to time either.

              Who was that Cantab that had these qualities in abundance? Recent AB? Amazing work under the high ball too.

              M 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

                @mariner4life said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                @TheMojoman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                What's less ideal is playing two power wingers.

                i reckon that thinking is 5 years out of date

                and i would struggle to call many of those blokes "power" wingers. The only power winger is also really good under the high ball.

                The way the ABs set up defensively we tend to drop our 1st 5 back to help with the kick reception plus to get 3 or even 4 players behind the ball to counter from. So you want strong attackers out wide, and for me it doesn’t matter whether they get over the gain line by tackle busts or beating their man by stepping or outside pace. Either creates opportunities.

                I think the whole Dagg/Mils, Dagg/Bender, Jane, Jordie etc was more about getting the best players on the field and then having the gameplan that those players with their skill sets could execute.

                Henry didn’t mind the Rok/Sivi combo from time to time either.

                taniwharugbyT Offline
                taniwharugbyT Offline
                taniwharugby
                wrote on last edited by
                #214

                @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                then having the gameplan that those players with their skill sets could execute

                thats the key isnt it....this is where we seem to have struggled in recent times, possibly the cattle unable to execute or the game plan not best suited to the cattle

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

                  @TheMojoman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                  Things are going from bad to worse in terms of preparation. I know the team is putting on a brave face but disruption is never good especially when the AB's are most vulnerable in their first test of the June series.

                  I had picked AB's to clean sweep based on the strength of Super Rugby and an end of season 5-Test series for the Irish (Maori's may as well be test matches) but now I think that's narrowed.

                  The probability of disruption like this was very high given every Super team experienced it at some point this year.

                  Ireland also have a COVID case.

                  So I don’t think it will phase them too much. I’m sure they had their first choice lineup in mind, but next man up which is something you always have to plan for with last minute injuries, illness etc.

                  The worst disruption will be if the Media Manager gets COVID and doesn’t publish the team list on Thursday. Then we are in trouble.

                  M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Machpants
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #215

                  @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                  The worst disruption will be if the Media Manager gets COVID and doesn’t publish the team list on Thursday. Then we are in trouble.

                  The lazy fluffybunny won't be doing it at 0600 like the good old days, sadly

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • CrucialC Crucial

                    @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                    @mariner4life said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                    @TheMojoman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                    What's less ideal is playing two power wingers.

                    i reckon that thinking is 5 years out of date

                    and i would struggle to call many of those blokes "power" wingers. The only power winger is also really good under the high ball.

                    The way the ABs set up defensively we tend to drop our 1st 5 back to help with the kick reception plus to get 3 or even 4 players behind the ball to counter from. So you want strong attackers out wide, and for me it doesn’t matter whether they get over the gain line by tackle busts or beating their man by stepping or outside pace. Either creates opportunities.

                    I think the whole Dagg/Mils, Dagg/Bender, Jane, Jordie etc was more about getting the best players on the field and then having the gameplan that those players with their skill sets could execute.

                    Henry didn’t mind the Rok/Sivi combo from time to time either.

                    Who was that Cantab that had these qualities in abundance? Recent AB? Amazing work under the high ball too.

                    M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Machpants
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #216

                    @Crucial said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                    @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                    @mariner4life said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                    @TheMojoman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                    What's less ideal is playing two power wingers.

                    i reckon that thinking is 5 years out of date

                    and i would struggle to call many of those blokes "power" wingers. The only power winger is also really good under the high ball.

                    The way the ABs set up defensively we tend to drop our 1st 5 back to help with the kick reception plus to get 3 or even 4 players behind the ball to counter from. So you want strong attackers out wide, and for me it doesn’t matter whether they get over the gain line by tackle busts or beating their man by stepping or outside pace. Either creates opportunities.

                    I think the whole Dagg/Mils, Dagg/Bender, Jane, Jordie etc was more about getting the best players on the field and then having the gameplan that those players with their skill sets could execute.

                    Henry didn’t mind the Rok/Sivi combo from time to time either.

                    Who was that Cantab that had these qualities in abundance? Recent AB? Amazing work under the high ball too.

                    Dan Carter would be the last one.

                    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • KiwiMurphK Offline
                      KiwiMurphK Offline
                      KiwiMurph
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #217

                      More than the individuals i'm more worried about the attacking shape.

                      Of course test 1 will be rusty and i'm imagining they will keep things quite simple with a limited/disrupted build up i'm just hoping to see some variety in the attacking shape. Yes some better ball carriers will help but we need to put them in positions to succeed - bodies in motion, variety etc to get the Irish defense line on the back foot a tad.

                      Just biffing it out to a forward/forward pod isn't going to achieve much.

                      CrucialC kiwi_expatK 2 Replies Last reply
                      1
                      • M Machpants

                        @Crucial said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                        @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                        @mariner4life said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                        @TheMojoman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                        What's less ideal is playing two power wingers.

                        i reckon that thinking is 5 years out of date

                        and i would struggle to call many of those blokes "power" wingers. The only power winger is also really good under the high ball.

                        The way the ABs set up defensively we tend to drop our 1st 5 back to help with the kick reception plus to get 3 or even 4 players behind the ball to counter from. So you want strong attackers out wide, and for me it doesn’t matter whether they get over the gain line by tackle busts or beating their man by stepping or outside pace. Either creates opportunities.

                        I think the whole Dagg/Mils, Dagg/Bender, Jane, Jordie etc was more about getting the best players on the field and then having the gameplan that those players with their skill sets could execute.

                        Henry didn’t mind the Rok/Sivi combo from time to time either.

                        Who was that Cantab that had these qualities in abundance? Recent AB? Amazing work under the high ball too.

                        Dan Carter would be the last one.

                        CrucialC Offline
                        CrucialC Offline
                        Crucial
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #218

                        @Machpants said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                        @Crucial said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                        @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                        @mariner4life said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                        @TheMojoman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                        What's less ideal is playing two power wingers.

                        i reckon that thinking is 5 years out of date

                        and i would struggle to call many of those blokes "power" wingers. The only power winger is also really good under the high ball.

                        The way the ABs set up defensively we tend to drop our 1st 5 back to help with the kick reception plus to get 3 or even 4 players behind the ball to counter from. So you want strong attackers out wide, and for me it doesn’t matter whether they get over the gain line by tackle busts or beating their man by stepping or outside pace. Either creates opportunities.

                        I think the whole Dagg/Mils, Dagg/Bender, Jane, Jordie etc was more about getting the best players on the field and then having the gameplan that those players with their skill sets could execute.

                        Henry didn’t mind the Rok/Sivi combo from time to time either.

                        Who was that Cantab that had these qualities in abundance? Recent AB? Amazing work under the high ball too.

                        Dan Carter would be the last one.

                        Nah. I was thinking George someone…..not Whitelock

                        M ACT CrusaderA 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

                          More than the individuals i'm more worried about the attacking shape.

                          Of course test 1 will be rusty and i'm imagining they will keep things quite simple with a limited/disrupted build up i'm just hoping to see some variety in the attacking shape. Yes some better ball carriers will help but we need to put them in positions to succeed - bodies in motion, variety etc to get the Irish defense line on the back foot a tad.

                          Just biffing it out to a forward/forward pod isn't going to achieve much.

                          CrucialC Offline
                          CrucialC Offline
                          Crucial
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #219

                          @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                          More than the individuals i'm more worried about the attacking shape.

                          Of course test 1 will be rusty and i'm imagining they will keep things quite simple with a limited/disrupted build up i'm just hoping to see some variety in the attacking shape. Yes some better ball carriers will help but we need to put them in positions to succeed - bodies in motion, variety etc to get the Irish defense line on the back foot a tad.

                          Just biffing it out to a forward/forward pod isn't going to achieve much.

                          I’m more concerned about the defence.
                          The Ireland attack structure is all about forcing correct decisions. Combos and communication will be critical.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • BovidaeB Offline
                            BovidaeB Offline
                            Bovidae
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #220

                            Schmidt is taking charge of the defence this week, but I am hoping he also has some input into the attack.

                            With a disrupted preparation reverting to some SR combos (where sensible) seems to be the best option.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

                              More than the individuals i'm more worried about the attacking shape.

                              Of course test 1 will be rusty and i'm imagining they will keep things quite simple with a limited/disrupted build up i'm just hoping to see some variety in the attacking shape. Yes some better ball carriers will help but we need to put them in positions to succeed - bodies in motion, variety etc to get the Irish defense line on the back foot a tad.

                              Just biffing it out to a forward/forward pod isn't going to achieve much.

                              kiwi_expatK Offline
                              kiwi_expatK Offline
                              kiwi_expat
                              wrote on last edited by kiwi_expat
                              #221

                              @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                              Just biffing it out to a forward/forward pod isn't going to achieve much.

                              Welcome to Fozzie ball.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • CrucialC Crucial

                                @Machpants said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                                @Crucial said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                                @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                                @mariner4life said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                                @TheMojoman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                                What's less ideal is playing two power wingers.

                                i reckon that thinking is 5 years out of date

                                and i would struggle to call many of those blokes "power" wingers. The only power winger is also really good under the high ball.

                                The way the ABs set up defensively we tend to drop our 1st 5 back to help with the kick reception plus to get 3 or even 4 players behind the ball to counter from. So you want strong attackers out wide, and for me it doesn’t matter whether they get over the gain line by tackle busts or beating their man by stepping or outside pace. Either creates opportunities.

                                I think the whole Dagg/Mils, Dagg/Bender, Jane, Jordie etc was more about getting the best players on the field and then having the gameplan that those players with their skill sets could execute.

                                Henry didn’t mind the Rok/Sivi combo from time to time either.

                                Who was that Cantab that had these qualities in abundance? Recent AB? Amazing work under the high ball too.

                                Dan Carter would be the last one.

                                Nah. I was thinking George someone…..not Whitelock

                                M Offline
                                M Offline
                                Machpants
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #222

                                @Crucial said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                                @Machpants said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                                @Crucial said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                                @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                                @mariner4life said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                                @TheMojoman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                                What's less ideal is playing two power wingers.

                                i reckon that thinking is 5 years out of date

                                and i would struggle to call many of those blokes "power" wingers. The only power winger is also really good under the high ball.

                                The way the ABs set up defensively we tend to drop our 1st 5 back to help with the kick reception plus to get 3 or even 4 players behind the ball to counter from. So you want strong attackers out wide, and for me it doesn’t matter whether they get over the gain line by tackle busts or beating their man by stepping or outside pace. Either creates opportunities.

                                I think the whole Dagg/Mils, Dagg/Bender, Jane, Jordie etc was more about getting the best players on the field and then having the gameplan that those players with their skill sets could execute.

                                Henry didn’t mind the Rok/Sivi combo from time to time either.

                                Who was that Cantab that had these qualities in abundance? Recent AB? Amazing work under the high ball too.

                                Dan Carter would be the last one.

                                Nah. I was thinking George someone…..not Whitelock

                                Nope, got nothing. George 'Brett' Cameron?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • CrucialC Crucial

                                  @Machpants said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                                  @Crucial said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                                  @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                                  @mariner4life said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                                  @TheMojoman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                                  What's less ideal is playing two power wingers.

                                  i reckon that thinking is 5 years out of date

                                  and i would struggle to call many of those blokes "power" wingers. The only power winger is also really good under the high ball.

                                  The way the ABs set up defensively we tend to drop our 1st 5 back to help with the kick reception plus to get 3 or even 4 players behind the ball to counter from. So you want strong attackers out wide, and for me it doesn’t matter whether they get over the gain line by tackle busts or beating their man by stepping or outside pace. Either creates opportunities.

                                  I think the whole Dagg/Mils, Dagg/Bender, Jane, Jordie etc was more about getting the best players on the field and then having the gameplan that those players with their skill sets could execute.

                                  Henry didn’t mind the Rok/Sivi combo from time to time either.

                                  Who was that Cantab that had these qualities in abundance? Recent AB? Amazing work under the high ball too.

                                  Dan Carter would be the last one.

                                  Nah. I was thinking George someone…..not Whitelock

                                  ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                  ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                  ACT Crusader
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #223

                                  @Crucial said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                                  @Machpants said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                                  @Crucial said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                                  @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                                  @mariner4life said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                                  @TheMojoman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

                                  What's less ideal is playing two power wingers.

                                  i reckon that thinking is 5 years out of date

                                  and i would struggle to call many of those blokes "power" wingers. The only power winger is also really good under the high ball.

                                  The way the ABs set up defensively we tend to drop our 1st 5 back to help with the kick reception plus to get 3 or even 4 players behind the ball to counter from. So you want strong attackers out wide, and for me it doesn’t matter whether they get over the gain line by tackle busts or beating their man by stepping or outside pace. Either creates opportunities.

                                  I think the whole Dagg/Mils, Dagg/Bender, Jane, Jordie etc was more about getting the best players on the field and then having the gameplan that those players with their skill sets could execute.

                                  Henry didn’t mind the Rok/Sivi combo from time to time either.

                                  Who was that Cantab that had these qualities in abundance? Recent AB? Amazing work under the high ball too.

                                  Dan Carter would be the last one.

                                  Nah. I was thinking George someone…..not Whitelock

                                  He actually did have that game back in 18-19, which probably seems like an eternity ago for young George

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • T Offline
                                    T Offline
                                    The Docter
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #224

                                    First post here on SF btw. So far not ideal preparation but hopefully the situation can galvanise us. Given the forwards at this stage are in effected, I would go with a backline of;

                                    1. A Smith
                                    2. B Barrett
                                    3. C Clarke
                                    4. Q Tupaea
                                    5. R Ioane
                                    6. S Reece
                                    7. J Barrett

                                    Bench:
                                    Fakatava, M’unga, Fainga’anuku

                                    Pretty decent and plenty of go forward

                                    KiwiMurphK M kiwiinmelbK 3 Replies Last reply
                                    7
                                    • T The Docter

                                      First post here on SF btw. So far not ideal preparation but hopefully the situation can galvanise us. Given the forwards at this stage are in effected, I would go with a backline of;

                                      1. A Smith
                                      2. B Barrett
                                      3. C Clarke
                                      4. Q Tupaea
                                      5. R Ioane
                                      6. S Reece
                                      7. J Barrett

                                      Bench:
                                      Fakatava, M’unga, Fainga’anuku

                                      Pretty decent and plenty of go forward

                                      KiwiMurphK Offline
                                      KiwiMurphK Offline
                                      KiwiMurph
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #225

                                      @The-Docter Welcome!

                                      T 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

                                        @The-Docter Welcome!

                                        T Offline
                                        T Offline
                                        The Docter
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #226

                                        @KiwiMurph cheers Mate!

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • ChrisC Offline
                                          ChrisC Offline
                                          Chris
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #227

                                          I can’t wait to see Fozzies new plan to beat the rushing defense.
                                          Or am I going to be bitterly disappointed again by the smarts of the coaching team.

                                          T 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search