• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Movie review thread...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off Topic
19.8k Posts 163 Posters 3.2m Views
Movie review thread...
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #16245

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #16246

    @antipodean said in Movie review thread...:

    Jay and Silent Bob don’t seem to age at all.

    Dante and Randal look FUCKEN old though, I guess all those years serving custies take their toll.

    Will go and see this but in typical “sequel coming out years later” fashion I won’t hold my breath it is any good.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by MN5
    #16247

    Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2022

    Look, I’m not @Kruse, I did go into this thinking it could be pretty decent but fuck me I’m sick of invincible weirdos who get that way simply by living in their Mums basement for 40 years ( forget AB conditioning programmes, if you want to be a unit just be disfigured and hide for decades )

    Utter shit, only lasted about 45 minutes. You know a movie is gonna be terrible when they don’t even have the budget to film in Texas, apparently this was made in Bulgaria.

    The only hot chick bagged it early on, fuck knows what happened to the others cos I’d turned off by then. The way Leatherface killed the cop in the car was absolutely beyond stupid, using his own wrist bone to stab him, what the fuck ?

    Avoid this like the plague

    1 didn’t even see a chainsaw out of 5 why didn’t the cop just shoot him ?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KruseK Offline
    KruseK Offline
    Kruse
    wrote on last edited by Kruse
    #16248

    The Contractor

    This was bad.
    But I can't really say WHY it was bad.
    Just... really weird 'pacing', if that's a thing?
    Or maybe I'm just a bigot, and all the bothering of god early on in the piece put me off. God-botherers and uber-patriotic seppos.... ugh.
    Anyway... the latest Captain Kirk... Chris something? Pine? As an Army Ranger. Who gets laid off, coz he's popping drugs for his fucked up knee. But he's broke. And wants to fix his roof. Gets recruited by his mate into a supposedly legit semi-private military contracting firm. It's run by a Sutherland. Guess what... spoiler... it's maybe not so legit. An op in Berlin goes sideways. Shit happens. More shit happens. The stiltedness of this review matches the movie. He comes back to the US. Expected Twist! Maybe undo that twist! Let's go after Sutherland! Very subdued showdown. The end.

    • Flashbacks... I'm getting pretty fucked off with flashbacks. Once again, this bad movie was padded out with bad flashbacks. Of a 10 year old getting a tattoo. Boo fucking hoo.
    • TItwatch: zero. Which is probably for the best, the only female character was played by Gillian Jacobs, and as far as I'm aware, her personal Titwatch is zero.

    1 over-the-top fully spec-ops kitted out op to take out 1 scientist, out of 5 under-kitted-out forays into the world by a man who believes he's being hunted by spec-ops teams.

    And for those concerned about my well-being with this latest flurry of absolute shit movies... to be fair, I have interspersed then with some less-shit (Moonfall, Uncharted, Matrix: 4, etc), and a re-watch of guilty-pleasure Nobody.
    But mostly - I've had a carrot dangling at the end of all this... I am looking forward very much to Everything Everywhere All At Once - I've got it downloaded, but now see it's still playing at the local cinema this weekend - so might indulge in that.

    M CatograndeC NepiaN 3 Replies Last reply
    1
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Kruse on last edited by
    #16249

    @Kruse You're a masochist

    KruseK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KruseK Offline
    KruseK Offline
    Kruse
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #16250

    @Machpants said in Movie review thread...:

    @Kruse You're a masochist

    I'm currently doing a mini-binge of The Boys to balance out the movie-shit.
    Soooo good.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CatograndeC Offline
    CatograndeC Offline
    Catogrande
    replied to Kruse on last edited by
    #16251

    @Kruse

    I struggled through The Contractor and completely agree with your review. I didn’t bail only because I was hoping for an ending twist in the same way that “All the old knives” went.

    I was disappointed.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CatograndeC Offline
    CatograndeC Offline
    Catogrande
    wrote on last edited by
    #16252

    Missed the F1 and having seen the result thought I’d just wait for the highlights and was channel hopping. Clicked on the last 10 minutes, if that, of The Godfather. Less than ten minutes and you can see what a perfect film it was.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor Meldrew
    wrote on last edited by
    #16253

    It's anything but a Fern movie, but we ended up watching The Railway Children from 1970 with the family. Feel-good family movie which I actually, surprisingly enjoyed.

    3.5 young Jenny Agutter's out of 5 steam locomotives

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    wrote on last edited by
    #16254

    The Phantom of the Open (2021) ⭐ 7.0 | Biography, Comedy, Drama

    The Phantom of the Open (2021) ⭐ 7.0 | Biography, Comedy, Drama

    1h 46m | PG-13

    Just see it

    Mark Rylance is a hoot

    5 fores out of 5 Opens

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KruseK Offline
    KruseK Offline
    Kruse
    wrote on last edited by Kruse
    #16255

    The Harder They Fall
    To be fair, I didn't know what I was watching when I started this.
    First - I assumed a Western with all black(/Black?) actors/characters - and I figured... sure, why not?
    But, I soon suspected this was not that good...
    Eventually I realised it was a "modern Blaxploitation Western"... and it started to make more sense.
    And I could enjoy some of the aspects...

    • Particularly: Style over realism
    • Style over realism can be good, and was good. Stupidly stylistic gunfights. Stupidly stylistic dance-shows/decor in western taverns.
    • Contemporary music, dancin', etc
    • over-the-top "it's-a-white-town" commentary

    But - it was missing some critical aspects...

    • Titwatch: zero

    AND - there's one aspect of Blaxploitation and similar genres which I've never been able to cope with, and which this movie decided to stay true to....

    • fucking stupid plot holes

    Fuck, I hate stupid/ridiculous plot. This would have been a reasonably enjoyable romp, but for that.
    2 inexplicable early-plot decisions by the baddies out of 5 inexplicable middle-plot decisions by the goodies.

    Edit: the more I think about this, the more angry I get... who takes a genre, takes some time, and keeps "stupid plot" but throws away "gratuitious nudity"? What the actual fuck?

    MiketheSnowM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to Kruse on last edited by MiketheSnow
    #16256

    @Kruse said in Movie review thread...:

    The Harder They Fall
    To be fair, I didn't know what I was watching when I started this.
    First - I assumed a Western with all black(/Black?) actors/characters - and I figured... sure, why not?
    But, I soon suspected this was not that good...
    Eventually I realised it was a "modern Blaxploitation Western"... and it started to make more sense.
    And I could enjoy some of the aspects...

    • Particularly: Style over realism
    • Style over realism can be good, and was good. Stupidly stylistic gunfights. Stupidly stylistic dance-shows/decor in western taverns.
    • Contemporary music, dancin', etc
    • over-the-top "it's-a-white-town" commentary

    But - it was missing some critical aspects...

    • Titwatch: zero

    AND - there's one aspect of Blaxploitation and similar genres which I've never been able to cope with, and which this movie decided to stay true to....

    • fucking stupid plot holes

    Fuck, I hate stupid/ridiculous plot. This would have been a reasonably enjoyable romp, but for that.
    2 inexplicable early-plot decisions by the baddies out of 5 inexplicable middle-plot decisions by the goodies.

    Edit: the more I think about this, the more angry I get... who takes a genre, takes some time, and keeps "stupid plot" but throws away "gratuitious nudity"? What the actual fuck?

    File under 'Right On and fuck right off'

    Unlike the Blaxploitation movies of the 70s, no-one will be talking about this 50 years hence.

    NO ONE

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #16257

    Operation Mincemeat

    I enjoyed this. Excellent acting, great story, Ian Fleming. 4 bloated corpses out of five budding spy novelists

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by
    #16258

    @MiketheSnow what a story, I really hope they didnt embellish it!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #16259

    Hey @Kruse

    Force of Nature (2020) ⭐ 4.6 | Action, Adventure, Crime

    Force of Nature (2020) ⭐ 4.6 | Action, Adventure, Crime

    1h 31m | R

    KruseK 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • KruseK Offline
    KruseK Offline
    Kruse
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #16260

    @Bones Fuck you. And the horse that I hope fucks you too.
    Added to download list.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #16261

    Thread:

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #16262

    @Tim said in Movie review thread...:

    Thread:

    Bond movies are great despite the shitty FX. There’s nothing new here.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #16263

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KruseK Offline
    KruseK Offline
    Kruse
    replied to Bones on last edited by Kruse
    #16264

    @Bones said in Movie review thread...:

    Hey @Kruse

    Force of Nature (2020) ⭐ 4.6 | Action, Adventure, Crime

    Force of Nature (2020) ⭐ 4.6 | Action, Adventure, Crime

    1h 31m | R

    Once again... fuck you @Bones.

    Force of Nature
    I'm too tired to really give this a proper go, but...

    • Hire a shitty anonymous stucco apartment building for a couple-days
    • Throw Mel Gibson a few lines of coke
    • Pour some water around occasionally, to suggest there's a "Force-fucking-5" hurricane outside
    • And... this is key... do NOT show any titties. That's right... tit-watch: zero

    ... you get Force of Nature

    Movie was summed up for me in the very first scene, which is a clever "actually, this happens later in the movie, but we'll set the scene for you with a flash-forward"... (very clever... I can't believe this isn't done more often by hacks, no... wait... )... has Mel Gibson with a pistol, agonising over how to make a precision shot on two guys fighting (how do I shoot the bad guy when he's so close to the good guy, when I've only got this shitty pistol!?). While a bint behind him is holding a scoped rifle.
    Throw in some semi-nonsensical main plot, some majorly-nonsensical attempts at late-plot "twists", an overly telegraphed "gag-death" which turns out to actually be the ultimate death/climax - and... you get an underwhelming stew of... fuck you Bones.
    BTW - What is it with these shit movies and their attempts at one-liners? I can understand shitty effects. I can understand shitty acting. I can kinda understand shitty plot/general-dialogue. But... for somebody to WRITE some ultra-shitty "gag", then somebody to actually SAY that same ultra-shitty "gag", and THEN... for somebody editing the movie to not delete that ultra-shitty "gag"... genuinely confuses me. It just reeks of "ahhh... fuck it. leave it in, I can't be arsed trying for anything better."

    Fuck you Bones.

    1 mish-mash-of-a-bad-guy out of 5 mish-mashes-of-good-guys.

    Did I mention tit-watch was zero? Which was a shame, as the chick-cop looked to have potential, despite doing her best(/worst) cutesy-wutesy Tina-Fey type impression.
    (Google confirms - Stephanie Cayo, Peruviana - can be hot-as-fuck when permitted to be)

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    3

Movie review thread...
Off Topic
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.