Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Foster, Robertson etc

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
allblacks
5.7k Posts 131 Posters 759.5k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Billy TellB Billy Tell

    @Daffy-Jaffy said in Foster must go:

    103dfef9-0a2d-4d6a-9100-698fc356580a-image.png

    But I don't understand. Rennie is a brilliant coach...

    CatograndeC Offline
    CatograndeC Offline
    Catogrande
    wrote on last edited by
    #659

    @Billy-Tell said in Foster must go:

    @Daffy-Jaffy said in Foster must go:

    103dfef9-0a2d-4d6a-9100-698fc356580a-image.png

    But I don't understand. Rennie is a brilliant coach...

    It’s also about your opponents. 16 of Rennie’s 23 games have been France, England, New Zealand and South Africa. Not much padding going on there,

    nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
    4
    • R reprobate

      @Victor-Meldrew It's a high performance role, and the standards should be high. if they're not met, changes should happen. That requires a significant change from the NZRU, who gave us a debacle of a selection process then appointed a coach without successful head coaching experience, then extended his contract far further that they should have based on nothing.
      To go from that to dropping someone in the deep end taking over a rabble with bugger-all prep before SA in SA and then judging them on that would be fish-tailing. There should be a sensible middle ground, with clear goals, and a little leeway for the short notice.
      Regardless the current coaches have to go. Not only is there no visible improvement, they are going backwards.

      Victor MeldrewV Away
      Victor MeldrewV Away
      Victor Meldrew
      wrote on last edited by
      #660

      @reprobate said in Foster must go:

      There should be a sensible middle ground, with clear goals, and a little leeway for the short notice.

      9 Tests to see some significant approval seems more than reasonable to me.

      Regardless the current coaches have to go. Not only is there no visible improvement, they are going backwards.

      And we should apply exactly the same criteria to any new coaches after the November EOYT.

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • KiwiMurphK Online
        KiwiMurphK Online
        KiwiMurph
        wrote on last edited by
        #661

        When looking at improvement i think you'd need to look at how they are playing not just purely results - especially when the new coach would be asked to go Africa for 2 tests straight away.

        The problem with Foster isn't just the results - it's how they are playing.

        1 Reply Last reply
        5
        • chimoausC Offline
          chimoausC Offline
          chimoaus
          wrote on last edited by
          #662

          What is an acceptable win rate in this ultra-competitive environment? France with 73% is the high water mark, perhaps we just need to accept that the Henry/Hansen area will likely never be repeated and if we go to the Nations League system, we will play the top teams once every year. With such competition I don't think we can except the dominance we once had.

          I think for me a goal should be 70% and the losses are close and we can see a gameplan etc.

          Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • MN5M MN5

            @antipodean said in Foster must go:

            @Crucial said in Foster must go:

            @antipodean said in Foster must go:

            @taniwharugby

            “That statement from the CEO really annoys me,” Kirwan said.

            “Why doesn’t Mark Robinson come out and say we’ve got faith [in Ian Foster]? The CEO needs to come out and go ‘we’ve done a review six months ago, we’re confident of turning it around, [it’s] only three test matches.’

            “He’s throwing his coach under the bus, people!”

            Well, he'd know all about that.
            Situation maybe feeling a bit to familiar to him perhaps?

            Well it might be, but I'm not very sympathetic to it. Quite frankly I'm sick of seeing "mental health" used as a synonym for "don't critique me" for poor performances in professional settings. These aren't amateurs who stepped up to the plate because no one else would do it.

            There will be MASSIVE pressure on Foster as there should be and you’re right. He could have said no to the job and he’s been paid a huge salary. On face value it is very easy to put the boot in.

            ……but the more empathetic side of me does feel for him a bit and how stressed, unhappy and unhealthy he looks when he fronts the media.

            He just looks utterly resigned to a shit situation and bereft of ideas of how to sort it.

            JCJ Offline
            JCJ Offline
            JC
            wrote on last edited by
            #663

            @MN5 said in Foster must go:

            @antipodean said in Foster must go:

            @Crucial said in Foster must go:

            @antipodean said in Foster must go:

            @taniwharugby

            “That statement from the CEO really annoys me,” Kirwan said.

            “Why doesn’t Mark Robinson come out and say we’ve got faith [in Ian Foster]? The CEO needs to come out and go ‘we’ve done a review six months ago, we’re confident of turning it around, [it’s] only three test matches.’

            “He’s throwing his coach under the bus, people!”

            Well, he'd know all about that.
            Situation maybe feeling a bit to familiar to him perhaps?

            Well it might be, but I'm not very sympathetic to it. Quite frankly I'm sick of seeing "mental health" used as a synonym for "don't critique me" for poor performances in professional settings. These aren't amateurs who stepped up to the plate because no one else would do it.

            There will be MASSIVE pressure on Foster as there should be and you’re right. He could have said no to the job and he’s been paid a huge salary. On face value it is very easy to put the boot in.

            ……but the more empathetic side of me does feel for him a bit and how stressed, unhappy and unhealthy he looks when he fronts the media.

            He just looks utterly resigned to a shit situation and bereft of ideas of how to sort it.

            I don’t disagree with that. Ironically I suspect that Foster is a good bloke and would be fun to have a beer and a yarn with. But he just doesn’t seem to know what to do to get this group of talented athletes working coherently together.

            CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
            4
            • chimoausC chimoaus

              What is an acceptable win rate in this ultra-competitive environment? France with 73% is the high water mark, perhaps we just need to accept that the Henry/Hansen area will likely never be repeated and if we go to the Nations League system, we will play the top teams once every year. With such competition I don't think we can except the dominance we once had.

              I think for me a goal should be 70% and the losses are close and we can see a gameplan etc.

              Chris B.C Offline
              Chris B.C Offline
              Chris B.
              wrote on last edited by
              #664

              @chimoaus For Fozzie to be up with Hansen and Henry he basically only needs to have won four games that he didn't.

              Cards have a bit more influence on outcomes than in the Henry era especially, but it's not hard to find Foster games that a better coach would have won.

              The TAB pretty clearly thought Saturday's game. The loss to the Argies. The first draw vs Australia. Any loss to Australia. 🙂

              GrooterG 1 Reply Last reply
              4
              • Chris B.C Chris B.

                @chimoaus For Fozzie to be up with Hansen and Henry he basically only needs to have won four games that he didn't.

                Cards have a bit more influence on outcomes than in the Henry era especially, but it's not hard to find Foster games that a better coach would have won.

                The TAB pretty clearly thought Saturday's game. The loss to the Argies. The first draw vs Australia. Any loss to Australia. 🙂

                GrooterG Offline
                GrooterG Offline
                Grooter
                wrote on last edited by
                #665

                @Chris-B if blenheim's favorite son Jamie Joe was coaching the Abs in any of those games then the results would've been flipped is what you're saying🙂

                Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • GrooterG Grooter

                  @Chris-B if blenheim's favorite son Jamie Joe was coaching the Abs in any of those games then the results would've been flipped is what you're saying🙂

                  Chris B.C Offline
                  Chris B.C Offline
                  Chris B.
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #666

                  @FakatavaAllBlack What - a dirty Marlborough bastard?!! 🙂

                  A hypothetical better coach - he doesn't need a name he's just quantifiably better.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • JCJ JC

                    @MN5 said in Foster must go:

                    @antipodean said in Foster must go:

                    @Crucial said in Foster must go:

                    @antipodean said in Foster must go:

                    @taniwharugby

                    “That statement from the CEO really annoys me,” Kirwan said.

                    “Why doesn’t Mark Robinson come out and say we’ve got faith [in Ian Foster]? The CEO needs to come out and go ‘we’ve done a review six months ago, we’re confident of turning it around, [it’s] only three test matches.’

                    “He’s throwing his coach under the bus, people!”

                    Well, he'd know all about that.
                    Situation maybe feeling a bit to familiar to him perhaps?

                    Well it might be, but I'm not very sympathetic to it. Quite frankly I'm sick of seeing "mental health" used as a synonym for "don't critique me" for poor performances in professional settings. These aren't amateurs who stepped up to the plate because no one else would do it.

                    There will be MASSIVE pressure on Foster as there should be and you’re right. He could have said no to the job and he’s been paid a huge salary. On face value it is very easy to put the boot in.

                    ……but the more empathetic side of me does feel for him a bit and how stressed, unhappy and unhealthy he looks when he fronts the media.

                    He just looks utterly resigned to a shit situation and bereft of ideas of how to sort it.

                    I don’t disagree with that. Ironically I suspect that Foster is a good bloke and would be fun to have a beer and a yarn with. But he just doesn’t seem to know what to do to get this group of talented athletes working coherently together.

                    CrucialC Offline
                    CrucialC Offline
                    Crucial
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #667

                    @JC said in Foster must go:

                    @MN5 said in Foster must go:

                    @antipodean said in Foster must go:

                    @Crucial said in Foster must go:

                    @antipodean said in Foster must go:

                    @taniwharugby

                    “That statement from the CEO really annoys me,” Kirwan said.

                    “Why doesn’t Mark Robinson come out and say we’ve got faith [in Ian Foster]? The CEO needs to come out and go ‘we’ve done a review six months ago, we’re confident of turning it around, [it’s] only three test matches.’

                    “He’s throwing his coach under the bus, people!”

                    Well, he'd know all about that.
                    Situation maybe feeling a bit to familiar to him perhaps?

                    Well it might be, but I'm not very sympathetic to it. Quite frankly I'm sick of seeing "mental health" used as a synonym for "don't critique me" for poor performances in professional settings. These aren't amateurs who stepped up to the plate because no one else would do it.

                    There will be MASSIVE pressure on Foster as there should be and you’re right. He could have said no to the job and he’s been paid a huge salary. On face value it is very easy to put the boot in.

                    ……but the more empathetic side of me does feel for him a bit and how stressed, unhappy and unhealthy he looks when he fronts the media.

                    He just looks utterly resigned to a shit situation and bereft of ideas of how to sort it.

                    I don’t disagree with that. Ironically I suspect that Foster is a good bloke and would be fun to have a beer and a yarn with. But he just doesn’t seem to know what to do to get this group of talented athletes working coherently together.

                    Kirwan summed it up best on the Breakdown. He admitted his own experience of being a crap coach and how it doesn't matter what your plans and ideas are you will fall short in you can't get those messages across clearly and it becomes a downward spiral held together by close results that mask the primary issue.

                    Chris B.C taniwharugbyT 2 Replies Last reply
                    8
                    • CrucialC Crucial

                      @JC said in Foster must go:

                      @MN5 said in Foster must go:

                      @antipodean said in Foster must go:

                      @Crucial said in Foster must go:

                      @antipodean said in Foster must go:

                      @taniwharugby

                      “That statement from the CEO really annoys me,” Kirwan said.

                      “Why doesn’t Mark Robinson come out and say we’ve got faith [in Ian Foster]? The CEO needs to come out and go ‘we’ve done a review six months ago, we’re confident of turning it around, [it’s] only three test matches.’

                      “He’s throwing his coach under the bus, people!”

                      Well, he'd know all about that.
                      Situation maybe feeling a bit to familiar to him perhaps?

                      Well it might be, but I'm not very sympathetic to it. Quite frankly I'm sick of seeing "mental health" used as a synonym for "don't critique me" for poor performances in professional settings. These aren't amateurs who stepped up to the plate because no one else would do it.

                      There will be MASSIVE pressure on Foster as there should be and you’re right. He could have said no to the job and he’s been paid a huge salary. On face value it is very easy to put the boot in.

                      ……but the more empathetic side of me does feel for him a bit and how stressed, unhappy and unhealthy he looks when he fronts the media.

                      He just looks utterly resigned to a shit situation and bereft of ideas of how to sort it.

                      I don’t disagree with that. Ironically I suspect that Foster is a good bloke and would be fun to have a beer and a yarn with. But he just doesn’t seem to know what to do to get this group of talented athletes working coherently together.

                      Kirwan summed it up best on the Breakdown. He admitted his own experience of being a crap coach and how it doesn't matter what your plans and ideas are you will fall short in you can't get those messages across clearly and it becomes a downward spiral held together by close results that mask the primary issue.

                      Chris B.C Offline
                      Chris B.C Offline
                      Chris B.
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #668

                      @Crucial Yeah - that was the most interesting comment I've heard from JK in a while.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • BovidaeB Offline
                        BovidaeB Offline
                        Bovidae
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #669

                        One other thing mentioned by Newshub was that Foster is well liked and respected by the players. Perhaps he has some credit in the bank as an assistant coach that won a RWC. This wasn't true of some of the current assistant coaches.

                        But in the end, the head coach is responsible for the overall plan and vision so if the assistant coaches aren't up to it they need to be replaced. AB coaches don't have a history of going all-Eddie Jones though.

                        F CrucialC 2 Replies Last reply
                        2
                        • CrucialC Crucial

                          @JC said in Foster must go:

                          @MN5 said in Foster must go:

                          @antipodean said in Foster must go:

                          @Crucial said in Foster must go:

                          @antipodean said in Foster must go:

                          @taniwharugby

                          “That statement from the CEO really annoys me,” Kirwan said.

                          “Why doesn’t Mark Robinson come out and say we’ve got faith [in Ian Foster]? The CEO needs to come out and go ‘we’ve done a review six months ago, we’re confident of turning it around, [it’s] only three test matches.’

                          “He’s throwing his coach under the bus, people!”

                          Well, he'd know all about that.
                          Situation maybe feeling a bit to familiar to him perhaps?

                          Well it might be, but I'm not very sympathetic to it. Quite frankly I'm sick of seeing "mental health" used as a synonym for "don't critique me" for poor performances in professional settings. These aren't amateurs who stepped up to the plate because no one else would do it.

                          There will be MASSIVE pressure on Foster as there should be and you’re right. He could have said no to the job and he’s been paid a huge salary. On face value it is very easy to put the boot in.

                          ……but the more empathetic side of me does feel for him a bit and how stressed, unhappy and unhealthy he looks when he fronts the media.

                          He just looks utterly resigned to a shit situation and bereft of ideas of how to sort it.

                          I don’t disagree with that. Ironically I suspect that Foster is a good bloke and would be fun to have a beer and a yarn with. But he just doesn’t seem to know what to do to get this group of talented athletes working coherently together.

                          Kirwan summed it up best on the Breakdown. He admitted his own experience of being a crap coach and how it doesn't matter what your plans and ideas are you will fall short in you can't get those messages across clearly and it becomes a downward spiral held together by close results that mask the primary issue.

                          taniwharugbyT Offline
                          taniwharugbyT Offline
                          taniwharugby
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #670

                          @Crucial said in Foster must go:

                          Kirwan summed it up best on the Breakdown. He admitted his own experience of being a crap coach and how it doesn't matter what your plans and ideas are you will fall short in you can't get those messages across clearly and it becomes a downward spiral held together by close results that mask the primary issue.

                          isnt that part of the role though?

                          @Bovidae which is all well and good, but is this stopping him from making some hard calls? His job is the 1st part, he can be mates after, and professional players need to know he is thier 'boss' first, and mate second too, and decisions he has to make, are in the interest of the team, not personal.

                          CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • KiwiMurphK Online
                            KiwiMurphK Online
                            KiwiMurph
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #671

                            Yes I very much get the sense Foster has created a 'happy' environment in that he is well liked and treats people well.

                            The problem is he hasn't created a high performance environment.

                            F M MrDenmoreM sparkyS 4 Replies Last reply
                            13
                            • BovidaeB Bovidae

                              One other thing mentioned by Newshub was that Foster is well liked and respected by the players. Perhaps he has some credit in the bank as an assistant coach that won a RWC. This wasn't true of some of the current assistant coaches.

                              But in the end, the head coach is responsible for the overall plan and vision so if the assistant coaches aren't up to it they need to be replaced. AB coaches don't have a history of going all-Eddie Jones though.

                              F Offline
                              F Offline
                              Frye
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #672

                              @Bovidae said in Foster must go:

                              One other thing mentioned by Newshub was that Foster is well liked and respected by the players. Perhaps he has some credit in the bank as an assistant coach that won a RWC. This wasn't true of some of the current assistant coaches.

                              But in the end, the head coach is responsible for the overall plan and vision so if the assistant coaches aren't up to it they need to be replaced. AB coaches don't have a history of going all-Eddie Jones though.

                              He wasn't there in 2015.

                              KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • F Frye

                                @Bovidae said in Foster must go:

                                One other thing mentioned by Newshub was that Foster is well liked and respected by the players. Perhaps he has some credit in the bank as an assistant coach that won a RWC. This wasn't true of some of the current assistant coaches.

                                But in the end, the head coach is responsible for the overall plan and vision so if the assistant coaches aren't up to it they need to be replaced. AB coaches don't have a history of going all-Eddie Jones though.

                                He wasn't there in 2015.

                                KiwiMurphK Online
                                KiwiMurphK Online
                                KiwiMurph
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #673

                                @Frye said in Foster must go:

                                @Bovidae said in Foster must go:

                                One other thing mentioned by Newshub was that Foster is well liked and respected by the players. Perhaps he has some credit in the bank as an assistant coach that won a RWC. This wasn't true of some of the current assistant coaches.

                                But in the end, the head coach is responsible for the overall plan and vision so if the assistant coaches aren't up to it they need to be replaced. AB coaches don't have a history of going all-Eddie Jones though.

                                He wasn't there in 2015.

                                Yes he was. Foster has been an assistant since 2012.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Victor MeldrewV Victor Meldrew

                                  @Catogrande said in Foster must go:

                                  @TheMojoman said in Foster must go:

                                  Foster by the numbers - https://i.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all-blacks/300639756/the-charts-that-put-ian-fosters-all-blacks-coaching-record-in-sharp-perspective

                                  Looking at those stats, you have to feel a bit sorry for the flak that Vodanovich is getting on here. 40% of his tests were against a very good Lions side I think.

                                  He wasn't rated by the players from what I've read. According to them, his idea of coaching was to simply train the team to exhaustion and hope for the best tactics-wise on the day. Zero innovation.

                                  There was a huge exodus of experienced players from the AB's after the 1970 tour and some have given him as the reason. IIRC Chris Laidlaw was particularly scathing.

                                  Chris B.C Offline
                                  Chris B.C Offline
                                  Chris B.
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #674

                                  @Victor-Meldrew said in Foster must go:

                                  @Catogrande said in Foster must go:

                                  @TheMojoman said in Foster must go:

                                  Foster by the numbers - https://i.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all-blacks/300639756/the-charts-that-put-ian-fosters-all-blacks-coaching-record-in-sharp-perspective

                                  Looking at those stats, you have to feel a bit sorry for the flak that Vodanovich is getting on here. 40% of his tests were against a very good Lions side I think.

                                  He wasn't rated by the players from what I've read. According to them, his idea of coaching was to simply train the team to exhaustion and hope for the best tactics-wise on the day. Zero innovation.

                                  There was a huge exodus of experienced players from the AB's after the 1970 tour and some have given him as the reason. IIRC Chris Laidlaw was particularly scathing.

                                  McLean said something along the lines that he took away a rugby team and came back with a team of cross country runners.

                                  The one that is quite interesting to me is JJ Stewart, who was very highly regarded.

                                  The team he took to SA played some good rugby, but a major stumbling point was not having a decent goalkicker who could make the test side (Lozza was that man). We ended up using Sid Going and Bryan Williams and they were terrible - my memory says way below 50 percent.

                                  It was only at that point in our rugby history that we learned (almost conclusively) that a good goalkicker is a necessity. We've occasionally flirted with substandard ones since.

                                  Victor MeldrewV dogmeatD 2 Replies Last reply
                                  1
                                  • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

                                    Yes I very much get the sense Foster has created a 'happy' environment in that he is well liked and treats people well.

                                    The problem is he hasn't created a high performance environment.

                                    F Offline
                                    F Offline
                                    Frye
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #675
                                    This post is deleted!
                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

                                      Yes I very much get the sense Foster has created a 'happy' environment in that he is well liked and treats people well.

                                      The problem is he hasn't created a high performance environment.

                                      M Offline
                                      M Offline
                                      Machpants
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #676

                                      @KiwiMurph said in Foster must go:

                                      Yes I very much get the sense Foster has created a 'happy' environment in that he is well liked and treats people well.

                                      The problem is he hasn't created a high performance environment.

                                      Yeah I'm sure they're happy, they have to be George Bridge bad before they're dropped!

                                      KirwanK DuluthD 2 Replies Last reply
                                      2
                                      • M Machpants

                                        @KiwiMurph said in Foster must go:

                                        Yes I very much get the sense Foster has created a 'happy' environment in that he is well liked and treats people well.

                                        The problem is he hasn't created a high performance environment.

                                        Yeah I'm sure they're happy, they have to be George Bridge bad before they're dropped!

                                        KirwanK Offline
                                        KirwanK Offline
                                        Kirwan
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #677

                                        @Machpants said in Foster must go:

                                        @KiwiMurph said in Foster must go:

                                        Yes I very much get the sense Foster has created a 'happy' environment in that he is well liked and treats people well.

                                        The problem is he hasn't created a high performance environment.

                                        Yeah I'm sure they're happy, they have to be George Bridge bad before they're dropped!

                                        Or beat up a woman Frizzel bad.

                                        M 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • KirwanK Kirwan

                                          @Machpants said in Foster must go:

                                          @KiwiMurph said in Foster must go:

                                          Yes I very much get the sense Foster has created a 'happy' environment in that he is well liked and treats people well.

                                          The problem is he hasn't created a high performance environment.

                                          Yeah I'm sure they're happy, they have to be George Bridge bad before they're dropped!

                                          Or beat up a woman Frizzel bad.

                                          M Offline
                                          M Offline
                                          Machpants
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #678

                                          @Kirwan said in Foster must go:

                                          @Machpants said in Foster must go:

                                          @KiwiMurph said in Foster must go:

                                          Yes I very much get the sense Foster has created a 'happy' environment in that he is well liked and treats people well.

                                          The problem is he hasn't created a high performance environment.

                                          Yeah I'm sure they're happy, they have to be George Bridge bad before they're dropped!

                                          Or beat up a woman Frizzel bad.

                                          He didn't get dropped, he just got a rest to reset

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search