Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

All Blacks v Pumas 1

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksargentina
1.3k Posts 92 Posters 102.7k Views 5 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Chris B.C Chris B.

    @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks v Pumas 1:

    @Victor-Meldrew There's also the option to bring Perofeta on at 15.

    That's what I'd plan to do.

    I don't really hold with the idea of planned substitution of your first five - but, you need cover in case he gets hurt (or is having an absolute mare).

    I'd like to see some tests where Beaudy and Richie aren't paired, because they don't seem to have quite worked out as hoped. I think Fozzie has been playing a game of trying to keep both of them happy with game time, possibly to the detriment of the team.

    So Perofeta (or DMac) on the bench.

    No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #172

    @Chris-B said in All Blacks v Pumas 1:

    @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks v Pumas 1:

    @Victor-Meldrew There's also the option to bring Perofeta on at 15.

    That's what I'd plan to do.

    I don't really hold with the idea of planned substitution of your first five - but, you need cover in case he gets hurt (or is having an absolute mare).

    I'd like to see some tests where Beaudy and Richie aren't paired, because they don't seem to have quite worked out as hoped. I think Fozzie has been playing a game of trying to keep both of them happy with game time, possibly to the detriment of the team.

    So Perofeta (or DMac) on the bench.

    It's been an ongoing frustration that they keep pairing Beauden and Mo'unga together when it clearly hasn't been working. Even if both players are buying into the idea off the pitch, in the heat of a test we get a jumbled approach and neither really take control of the game. Mo'unga definitely benefited from being in charge last test and played a lot better as a result.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
    • M Offline
      M Offline
      Machpants
      wrote on last edited by
      #173

      Kick off is 745? What the actual fuck?

      DuluthD 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Machpants

        Kick off is 745? What the actual fuck?

        DuluthD Offline
        DuluthD Offline
        Duluth
        wrote on last edited by
        #174

        @Machpants

        I guess it's about how much time there is between the two Tests.

        The Aussie Test is at 5:30pm. I presume that would finish around 7:15ish then the broadcasters would want some time in between

        StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • DuluthD Duluth

          @Machpants

          I guess it's about how much time there is between the two Tests.

          The Aussie Test is at 5:30pm. I presume that would finish around 7:15ish then the broadcasters would want some time in between

          StargazerS Offline
          StargazerS Offline
          Stargazer
          wrote on last edited by Stargazer
          #175

          @Duluth Also remember that the Aussie tests are in Adelaide. South Australia has a weird time zone, being half an hour (not an hour) behind NSW, Queensland etc.

          ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
          2
          • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

            @Victor-Meldrew There's also the option to bring Perofeta on at 15.

            Victor MeldrewV Offline
            Victor MeldrewV Offline
            Victor Meldrew
            wrote on last edited by
            #176

            @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks v Pumas 1:

            @Victor-Meldrew There's also the option to bring Perofeta on at 15.

            Yeah, I thought that, but we have enough cover there already with Giraffe & Jordan and I suspect Foster sees Perofeta as the 3rd 10.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

              @Victor-Meldrew said in All Blacks v Pumas 1:

              @Frank said in All Blacks v Pumas 1:

              Would love to see how Perofeta goes at 10 after Mounga has played the first 60 or so(assuming we can afford to bring him on)

              Think he'll be on the bench if BB is ruled out but Ritche may well play the full 80 depending on how the game pans out.

              Just throwing it out there, but could we see the same starting backline as SA 2, but on the bench have a midfielder (QT or RTS) plus a winger (eg Reece).

              Plan to play Mo’unga for 80 and better utilise the options on the bench. If he gets crook we run with either Jordie or Havili at 10.

              Victor MeldrewV Offline
              Victor MeldrewV Offline
              Victor Meldrew
              wrote on last edited by
              #177

              @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v Pumas 1:

              @Victor-Meldrew said in All Blacks v Pumas 1:

              @Frank said in All Blacks v Pumas 1:

              Would love to see how Perofeta goes at 10 after Mounga has played the first 60 or so(assuming we can afford to bring him on)

              Think he'll be on the bench if BB is ruled out but Ritche may well play the full 80 depending on how the game pans out.

              Just throwing it out there, but could we see the same starting backline as SA 2, but on the bench have a midfielder (QT or RTS) plus a winger (eg Reece).

              Plan to play Mo’unga for 80 and better utilise the options on the bench. If he gets crook we run with either Jordie or Havili at 10.

              I think they want to win this one well and go for experience, so suspect QT on the bench instead of RTS. Foster can then give some of the newbies game time in Pumas 2.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • StargazerS Stargazer

                @Duluth Also remember that the Aussie tests are in Adelaide. South Australia has a weird time zone, being half an hour (not an hour) behind NSW, Queensland etc.

                ACT CrusaderA Offline
                ACT CrusaderA Offline
                ACT Crusader
                wrote on last edited by
                #178

                @Stargazer said in All Blacks v Pumas 1:

                @Duluth Also remember that the Aussie tests are in Adelaide. South Australia has a weird time zone, being half an hour (not an hour) behind NSW, Queensland etc.

                😉

                Quite historic, can’t recall a test match in Adelaide

                BovidaeB 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

                  @Stargazer said in All Blacks v Pumas 1:

                  @Duluth Also remember that the Aussie tests are in Adelaide. South Australia has a weird time zone, being half an hour (not an hour) behind NSW, Queensland etc.

                  😉

                  Quite historic, can’t recall a test match in Adelaide

                  BovidaeB Offline
                  BovidaeB Offline
                  Bovidae
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #179

                  @ACT-Crusader The 2003 RWC had games at Adelaide Oval, including a Wallaby pool game.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • boobooB Offline
                    boobooB Offline
                    booboo
                    wrote on last edited by booboo
                    #180

                    @ACT-Crusader @Bovidae

                    Aus v Nam 142-0 RWC 2003.

                    Also Ire v Arg RWC 2003. Was a 1 pointer IIRC. Think the Paddies got up. Boring game.

                    Also Wobs v Pac Islanders. 2004 I think. Actually went to that game. IIRC both Sivivati and Lauaki scored in the SW just in front of where I was sitting. (Will have to check the actual scorers.) Made some comment about getting them into black jerseys which I recall was greeted like a cup of cold sick ...

                    Went to Aus A v Fiji one year too.

                    But can't recall any other tests there.

                    Edit: was right about Lauaki. Other try scorer was Sireli Bobo (not Sivi)

                    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
                    3
                    • boobooB booboo

                      @ACT-Crusader @Bovidae

                      Aus v Nam 142-0 RWC 2003.

                      Also Ire v Arg RWC 2003. Was a 1 pointer IIRC. Think the Paddies got up. Boring game.

                      Also Wobs v Pac Islanders. 2004 I think. Actually went to that game. IIRC both Sivivati and Lauaki scored in the SW just in front of where I was sitting. (Will have to check the actual scorers.) Made some comment about getting them into black jerseys which I recall was greeted like a cup of cold sick ...

                      Went to Aus A v Fiji one year too.

                      But can't recall any other tests there.

                      Edit: was right about Lauaki. Other try scorer was Sireli Bobo (not Sivi)

                      ACT CrusaderA Offline
                      ACT CrusaderA Offline
                      ACT Crusader
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #181

                      @booboo cheers.

                      I guess this is the biggest test match in Adelaide in recent times.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • KiwiMurphK Offline
                        KiwiMurphK Offline
                        KiwiMurph
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #182

                        Team named at 11.30am NZT

                        taniwharugbyT M 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

                          Team named at 11.30am NZT

                          taniwharugbyT Offline
                          taniwharugbyT Offline
                          taniwharugby
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #183

                          @KiwiMurph are you sure?

                          KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • P Offline
                            P Offline
                            pakman
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #184

                            One possible wild card is Joe’s analysis of Pumas. On past form, a specific selection to probe an identified weakness wouldn’t surprise.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                              @KiwiMurph are you sure?

                              KiwiMurphK Offline
                              KiwiMurphK Offline
                              KiwiMurph
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #185

                              @taniwharugby said in All Blacks v Pumas 1:

                              @KiwiMurph are you sure?

                              Well it is Thursday after all.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

                                Team named at 11.30am NZT

                                M Offline
                                M Offline
                                Machpants
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #186

                                @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks v Pumas 1:

                                Team named at 11.30am NZT

                                No wonder the world is going to shit, team's not named at 0600 local, game is not at 1930, or 1905!

                                https://tenor.com/0Rj6.gif

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • A Offline
                                  A Offline
                                  ARHS
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #187

                                  Hope to see Reece back in the 23

                                  GrooterG CrucialC 2 Replies Last reply
                                  1
                                  • DuluthD Offline
                                    DuluthD Offline
                                    Duluth
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #188

                                    Hard to predict what will happen. There's media and some public pressure to pick the same side. Then there's the need try different players/combinations and there's not many Tests until the RWC

                                    Seems like an ideal chance to give Perofeta time from the bench. After Foster singled out Sotutu for praise earlier in the week I expect to see him on the bench.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    6
                                    • A ARHS

                                      Hope to see Reece back in the 23

                                      GrooterG Online
                                      GrooterG Online
                                      Grooter
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #189

                                      @ARHS hope to see Sotutu back in the 23..

                                      taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • A ARHS

                                        Hope to see Reece back in the 23

                                        CrucialC Offline
                                        CrucialC Offline
                                        Crucial
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #190

                                        @ARHS said in All Blacks v Pumas 1:

                                        Hope to see Reece back in the 23

                                        Dont think that will happen. Cant carry a third wing. Biggest issue there is cover at 13.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • TimT Away
                                          TimT Away
                                          Tim
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #191

                                          https://i.ibb.co/XDtY16R/Fa83q7-Ha-QAAHNNx-format-jpg-name-large.jpg

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search