• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

TV Serieseseses

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off Topic
13.3k Posts 133 Posters 2.2m Views
TV Serieseseses
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #10819

    @Nepia Jeff Bridges nephew does appear in the show.

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #10820

    @Bovidae said in TV Serieseseses:

    @Nepia Jeff Bridges nephew does appear in the show.

    I had to look up who he was, and I can't remember who he was in the show already, and I just finished watching it. 🤣

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #10821

    Yellowstone

    I've watched two seasons and quite frankly the improbability of it all makes me hesitant to continue in the assumed (well founded by experience) belief that shows tend to get more ridiculous rather than less the longer they go.

    Can anyone disabuse me of this notion?

    taniwharugbyT KruseK voodooV KiwiwombleK 4 Replies Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #10822

    @antipodean you went 1 season further than I did.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KruseK Online
    KruseK Online
    Kruse
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #10823

    @antipodean said in TV Serieseseses:

    Yellowstone

    I've watched two seasons and quite frankly the improbability of it all makes me hesitant to continue in the assumed (well founded by experience) belief that shows tend to get more ridiculous rather than less the longer they go.

    Can anyone disabuse me of this notion?

    It's all ridiculousness, and if that's not what you're looking for... yeah, give it up.
    BUT - don't let it put off you the "prequel" 1883. Different monster.
    Some ridiculousness, but a different class, and worth giving a go.

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to Kruse on last edited by
    #10824

    @Kruse said in TV Serieseseses:

    @antipodean said in TV Serieseseses:

    Yellowstone

    I've watched two seasons and quite frankly the improbability of it all makes me hesitant to continue in the assumed (well founded by experience) belief that shows tend to get more ridiculous rather than less the longer they go.

    Can anyone disabuse me of this notion?

    It's all ridiculousness, and if that's not what you're looking for... yeah, give it up.
    BUT - don't let it put off you the "prequel" 1883. Different monster.
    Some ridiculousness, but a different class, and worth giving a go.

    I watched 1883 first. So far the prequel is much better IMO.

    KruseK 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • KruseK Online
    KruseK Online
    Kruse
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #10825

    @antipodean said in TV Serieseseses:

    @Kruse said in TV Serieseseses:

    @antipodean said in TV Serieseseses:

    Yellowstone

    I've watched two seasons and quite frankly the improbability of it all makes me hesitant to continue in the assumed (well founded by experience) belief that shows tend to get more ridiculous rather than less the longer they go.

    Can anyone disabuse me of this notion?

    It's all ridiculousness, and if that's not what you're looking for... yeah, give it up.
    BUT - don't let it put off you the "prequel" 1883. Different monster.
    Some ridiculousness, but a different class, and worth giving a go.

    I watched 1883 first. So far the prequel is much better IMO.

    Yep.
    Two very different things...
    I do wonder if 1883 was somebody's project that couldn't get green-lit, only eventually ever got made by riding off the commercial (stupid-people's eyeballs) success of Yellowstone, and just shoehorning in the 'Dutton name' to make it a "prequel" and therefore suddenly a guaranteed cash-cow

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Kruse on last edited by
    #10826

    @Kruse said in TV Serieseseses:

    @antipodean said in TV Serieseseses:

    @Kruse said in TV Serieseseses:

    @antipodean said in TV Serieseseses:

    Yellowstone

    I've watched two seasons and quite frankly the improbability of it all makes me hesitant to continue in the assumed (well founded by experience) belief that shows tend to get more ridiculous rather than less the longer they go.

    Can anyone disabuse me of this notion?

    It's all ridiculousness, and if that's not what you're looking for... yeah, give it up.
    BUT - don't let it put off you the "prequel" 1883. Different monster.
    Some ridiculousness, but a different class, and worth giving a go.

    I watched 1883 first. So far the prequel is much better IMO.

    Yep.
    Two very different things...
    I do wonder if 1883 was somebody's project that couldn't get green-lit, only eventually ever got made by riding off the commercial (stupid-people's eyeballs) success of Yellowstone, and just shoehorning in the 'Dutton name' to make it a "prequel" and therefore suddenly a guaranteed cash-cow

    I don't think so as it was created by Taylor Sheridan, the (overrated) creator of Yellowstone/Wind River/Hell or Highwater. He was good as the deputy in Sons though.

    @antipodean As you may have guessed from the above I found Yellowstone to be pretty awful. All the ladies at my work loved it though - so maybe Sheridan is actually a genius as he's created show both ladies and (some) blokes love.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Kruse on last edited by
    #10827

    @Kruse said in TV Serieseseses:

    @taniwharugby said in TV Serieseseses:

    @RoninWC said in TV Serieseseses:

    The Terminal List, the latest from Chris Pratt and Amazon Prime.

    have heard that is pretty decent, is on my list...

    Am loving Modern Family, almost through S2, problem is, Mrs TR also loves it, meaning I cant watch without her!

    So many awesome characters, but Cam, Luke & Gloria are my faves at moment.

    The Terminal List
    I read the book recently, and yeah... can see it could make decent TV.
    The guy who wrote it though... actual retired Navy SEAL, very "rah rah US-A, US-A, guns are awesome, liberal snowflakes trying to stop me owning a rocket-launcher don't understand the REAL world, etc, etc".
    Also amusing - he kinda throws some shade on people in the book who "just want to say they've got a Navy SEAL as a friend". And then goes on in the LOOOONG thanks/credits - to mention the fact that he's obviously spent time hanging out with Larry Ellison, Jimmy Spithill, amongst others.
    As an employee of Larry, I certainly wouldn't want to suggest that maybe Larry is one of those chaps who bought themselves a Navy SEAL 'friend', but...

    Just finished watching, was a watchable popcorn action thriller show that Amazon seem to be corning the market on.

    One thing annoyed me which I was wondering was in the book:

    ##spoiler
    So from the first time you see Ben it was obvious, and boringly obvious, that he was going to wind up being one the "baddies". The trope of the best mate being in on the conspiracy needs to get shot on a boat and dumped in the water never to be seen in a script again.
    ##endspoiler

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #10828

    @antipodean said in TV Serieseseses:

    Yellowstone

    I've watched two seasons and quite frankly the improbability of it all makes me hesitant to continue in the assumed (well founded by experience) belief that shows tend to get more ridiculous rather than less the longer they go.

    Can anyone disabuse me of this notion?

    I loved Yellowstone (and no, I'm not a chick at @Nepia 's work).
    But you certainly do have to look past the absurdity of some of the events. I mean, right from the very start when they deal with that bloke they want out by throwing him off a cliff,...

    1883 completely different, I was engrossed, though I'm not sure if I actually "enjoyed" it!

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    Nevorian
    wrote on last edited by
    #10829

    Stated watching “the Twelve” as it was recommended. Only realised about 15 minutes in that I was watching the SBS Belgian version but it is pretty good and if you can’t keep up with the sub-titles can still follow what is going on

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    wrote on last edited by
    #10830

    Little America (TV Series 2020–2022) ⭐ 7.6 | Comedy, Drama

    Little America (TV Series 2020–2022) ⭐ 7.6 | Comedy, Drama

    | TV-14

    Fabulous series on Apple TV

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #10831

    This Rings of Power thing ain't doing it for me.

    Not a single character that has appeal or interest.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #10832

    @antipodean said in TV Serieseseses:

    Yellowstone

    I've watched two seasons and quite frankly the improbability of it all makes me hesitant to continue in the assumed (well founded by experience) belief that shows tend to get more ridiculous rather than less the longer they go.

    Can anyone disabuse me of this notion?

    we both love it, don't generally have an issue looking past the implausible

    funnily enough the storyline i enjoyed the most, might be after where youve got too but doesn't sounds like you're continuing, was Jimmy being sent off to work on the 666 range (weird that is an actual working range), felt very different feel....no crazy plots...seemed like much closer to real work on these places. I believe its also being spun off so it probably had different writers hence the feel

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #10833

    @Kiwiwomble I'm happy to ignore some stuff in order to enjoy a show, but I had already invested years into Sons of Anarchy and 1 season of Yellowstone made me think of that, on a ranch...I expect it'd be one of those shows I'd watch and enjoy enough to keep watching, but had enough stuff I really wanted to watch

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #10834

    @taniwharugby i think for me there is definitely a part where i just enjoy WHERE they live...makes me want to buy someone back in the south island...you know...when i win lotto

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    wrote on last edited by
    #10835

    i will both a good go

    alt text

    alt text

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #10836

    @Kiwiwomble said in TV Serieseseses:

    @taniwharugby i think for me there is definitely a part where i just enjoy WHERE they live...makes me want to buy someone back in the south island...you know...when i win lotto

    Not sure that's strictly legal. 😉

    Like @taniwharugby I too expected to like Yellowstone as I'm a Costner fan, but I really couldn't suspend my disbelief enough for it while realising I don't really like Taylor Sheridan's stuff.

    Funnily enough if @kruse had mentioned earlier that 1884 was different in style/tone than Yellowstone I may actually have given the first episode a watch, but my cheap Paramount subscription has now ended and I'm not going to renew it again (I watched one show in a year.)

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #10837

    @Nepia 😹 probably easier than finding somewhere affordable anywhere as beautiful as we see in Yellowstone!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    Frank
    wrote on last edited by
    #10838

    Pretty funny.

    Bad Sisters (TV Series 2022– ) ⭐ 8.2 | Comedy, Drama, Thriller

    Bad Sisters (TV Series 2022– ) ⭐ 8.2 | Comedy, Drama, Thriller

    53m | TV-MA

    MiketheSnowM 1 Reply Last reply
    1

TV Serieseseses
Off Topic
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.