Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Exodus

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
allblacks
3.2k Posts 137 Posters 405.0k Views 7 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • HigginsH Offline
    HigginsH Offline
    Higgins
    wrote on last edited by
    #1819

    These never ending departures will surely be having a big effect on club rugby here in NZ this coming season, particularly in the front row where reasonable props were hard enough to come by even before this mass exodus gathered steam.

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • HigginsH Higgins

      These never ending departures will surely be having a big effect on club rugby here in NZ this coming season, particularly in the front row where reasonable props were hard enough to come by even before this mass exodus gathered steam.

      StargazerS Offline
      StargazerS Offline
      Stargazer
      wrote on last edited by
      #1820

      @Higgins Yep, the departure of the better players is diminishing our Super depth and will make it difficult to find replacements when injury strikes, and the departure of all players is bad for club rugby. But if they get paid somewhere else for playing rugby and they get the opportunity to see other parts of the world, then it makes totally sense from a player's point of view.

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • mikedogzM Online
        mikedogzM Online
        mikedogz
        wrote on last edited by
        #1821

        You would hope that once the competition is well established that they have a limit on the number of foreign players match day squad.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • TimT Away
          TimT Away
          Tim
          wrote on last edited by
          #1822

          https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all-blacks/300768903/nz-rugby-offered-contract-exemption-to-all-blacks-star-beauden-barrett

          ChrisC M 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • TimT Tim

            https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all-blacks/300768903/nz-rugby-offered-contract-exemption-to-all-blacks-star-beauden-barrett

            ChrisC Offline
            ChrisC Offline
            Chris
            wrote on last edited by
            #1823

            @Tim said in Exodus:

            https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all-blacks/300768903/nz-rugby-offered-contract-exemption-to-all-blacks-star-beauden-barrett

            I can not see why they would want to sign a almost 36 year old BB in 2025.

            mariner4lifeM NepiaN 2 Replies Last reply
            4
            • ChrisC Chris

              @Tim said in Exodus:

              https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all-blacks/300768903/nz-rugby-offered-contract-exemption-to-all-blacks-star-beauden-barrett

              I can not see why they would want to sign a almost 36 year old BB in 2025.

              mariner4lifeM Offline
              mariner4lifeM Offline
              mariner4life
              wrote on last edited by
              #1824

              @Chris said in Exodus:

              @Tim said in Exodus:

              https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all-blacks/300768903/nz-rugby-offered-contract-exemption-to-all-blacks-star-beauden-barrett

              I can not see why they would want to sign a almost 36 year old BB in 2025.

              an extraordinarily stupid use of resources.

              1 Reply Last reply
              4
              • ChrisC Chris

                @Tim said in Exodus:

                https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all-blacks/300768903/nz-rugby-offered-contract-exemption-to-all-blacks-star-beauden-barrett

                I can not see why they would want to sign a almost 36 year old BB in 2025.

                NepiaN Offline
                NepiaN Offline
                Nepia
                wrote on last edited by
                #1825

                @Chris said in Exodus:

                @Tim said in Exodus:

                https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all-blacks/300768903/nz-rugby-offered-contract-exemption-to-all-blacks-star-beauden-barrett

                I can not see why they would want to sign a almost 36 year old BB in 2025.

                I guess Razor has indicated he wants him in his AB squad.

                But to be serious. WTF!!!

                Dan54D 1 Reply Last reply
                3
                • NepiaN Nepia

                  @Chris said in Exodus:

                  @Tim said in Exodus:

                  https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all-blacks/300768903/nz-rugby-offered-contract-exemption-to-all-blacks-star-beauden-barrett

                  I can not see why they would want to sign a almost 36 year old BB in 2025.

                  I guess Razor has indicated he wants him in his AB squad.

                  But to be serious. WTF!!!

                  Dan54D Away
                  Dan54D Away
                  Dan54
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #1826

                  @Nepia said in Exodus:

                  @Chris said in Exodus:

                  @Tim said in Exodus:

                  https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all-blacks/300768903/nz-rugby-offered-contract-exemption-to-all-blacks-star-beauden-barrett

                  I can not see why they would want to sign a almost 36 year old BB in 2025.

                  I guess Razor has indicated he wants him in his AB squad.

                  But to be serious. WTF!!!

                  Well we don't know what he was offered, if any money, it could well of been should we make a contracxt where you go overseas and could be used in ABs??
                  FFS why is everything so negative? RA use players that are contracted overseas, they only get paid when playing for Wallabies!! I would guess it was simialr idea for just in case and the NZR board said no anyway.

                  ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Dan54D Dan54

                    @Nepia said in Exodus:

                    @Chris said in Exodus:

                    @Tim said in Exodus:

                    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all-blacks/300768903/nz-rugby-offered-contract-exemption-to-all-blacks-star-beauden-barrett

                    I can not see why they would want to sign a almost 36 year old BB in 2025.

                    I guess Razor has indicated he wants him in his AB squad.

                    But to be serious. WTF!!!

                    Well we don't know what he was offered, if any money, it could well of been should we make a contracxt where you go overseas and could be used in ABs??
                    FFS why is everything so negative? RA use players that are contracted overseas, they only get paid when playing for Wallabies!! I would guess it was simialr idea for just in case and the NZR board said no anyway.

                    ChrisC Offline
                    ChrisC Offline
                    Chris
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #1827

                    @Dan54 said in Exodus:

                    @Nepia said in Exodus:

                    @Chris said in Exodus:

                    @Tim said in Exodus:

                    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all-blacks/300768903/nz-rugby-offered-contract-exemption-to-all-blacks-star-beauden-barrett

                    I can not see why they would want to sign a almost 36 year old BB in 2025.

                    I guess Razor has indicated he wants him in his AB squad.

                    But to be serious. WTF!!!

                    Well we don't know what he was offered, if any money, it could well of been should we make a contracxt where you go overseas and could be used in ABs??
                    FFS why is everything so negative? RA use players that are contracted overseas, they only get paid when playing for Wallabies!! I would guess it was simialr idea for just in case and the NZR board said no anyway.

                    Yep that worked out well for them with another aging First Five.
                    36 year old First Five who is declining in his ability at 32 let alone in 4 more years.
                    Maybe money should be spent elsewhere and not to mention it opens up doors for all our AB's to play overseas that would hurt our domestic comps and make them 3rd Rate.

                    I wonder if TV monies will be as big if that happens I would say not.
                    Just a silly idea by NZR again with no real benefit to the game in NZ through the tiers.

                    taniwharugbyT Dan54D 2 Replies Last reply
                    2
                    • ChrisC Chris

                      @Dan54 said in Exodus:

                      @Nepia said in Exodus:

                      @Chris said in Exodus:

                      @Tim said in Exodus:

                      https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all-blacks/300768903/nz-rugby-offered-contract-exemption-to-all-blacks-star-beauden-barrett

                      I can not see why they would want to sign a almost 36 year old BB in 2025.

                      I guess Razor has indicated he wants him in his AB squad.

                      But to be serious. WTF!!!

                      Well we don't know what he was offered, if any money, it could well of been should we make a contracxt where you go overseas and could be used in ABs??
                      FFS why is everything so negative? RA use players that are contracted overseas, they only get paid when playing for Wallabies!! I would guess it was simialr idea for just in case and the NZR board said no anyway.

                      Yep that worked out well for them with another aging First Five.
                      36 year old First Five who is declining in his ability at 32 let alone in 4 more years.
                      Maybe money should be spent elsewhere and not to mention it opens up doors for all our AB's to play overseas that would hurt our domestic comps and make them 3rd Rate.

                      I wonder if TV monies will be as big if that happens I would say not.
                      Just a silly idea by NZR again with no real benefit to the game in NZ through the tiers.

                      taniwharugbyT Offline
                      taniwharugbyT Offline
                      taniwharugby
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #1828

                      @Chris you'd think they'd have learnt from Julian Savea and more recently Codie Taylor, the latter battling with form in 2022 and he's signed on through 2025....

                      ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                        @Chris you'd think they'd have learnt from Julian Savea and more recently Codie Taylor, the latter battling with form in 2022 and he's signed on through 2025....

                        ChrisC Offline
                        ChrisC Offline
                        Chris
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #1829

                        @taniwharugby said in Exodus:

                        @Chris you'd think they'd have learnt from Julian Savea and more recently Codie Taylor, the latter battling with form in 2022 and he's signed on through 2025....

                        Yep exactly they dig a hole for themselves with this sort of thing.

                        For me if you go overseas then that is your career over seas you can not have it both ways.
                        Were is the incentive for players to stay with their SR teams and NPC teams we are already seeing it with all these players off to MRL if that grows bigger and you have Europe and Japan.
                        We will have our top 40 or 50 players not playing in NZ comps.

                        taniwharugbyT Dan54D 2 Replies Last reply
                        3
                        • ChrisC Chris

                          @taniwharugby said in Exodus:

                          @Chris you'd think they'd have learnt from Julian Savea and more recently Codie Taylor, the latter battling with form in 2022 and he's signed on through 2025....

                          Yep exactly they dig a hole for themselves with this sort of thing.

                          For me if you go overseas then that is your career over seas you can not have it both ways.
                          Were is the incentive for players to stay with their SR teams and NPC teams we are already seeing it with all these players off to MRL if that grows bigger and you have Europe and Japan.
                          We will have our top 40 or 50 players not playing in NZ comps.

                          taniwharugbyT Offline
                          taniwharugbyT Offline
                          taniwharugby
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #1830

                          @Chris yeah sabbaticals are one thing for long term players, but surely they need to consider that most players come back worse than when they left.

                          Do the Irish still get some kind of tax exemption once they retire? Would be good if we could get a way for our guys to spend thier last years playing here more often, this is where our next generation are missing out.

                          ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                            @Chris yeah sabbaticals are one thing for long term players, but surely they need to consider that most players come back worse than when they left.

                            Do the Irish still get some kind of tax exemption once they retire? Would be good if we could get a way for our guys to spend thier last years playing here more often, this is where our next generation are missing out.

                            ChrisC Offline
                            ChrisC Offline
                            Chris
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #1831

                            @taniwharugby said in Exodus:

                            @Chris yeah sabbaticals are one thing for long term players, but surely they need to consider that most players come back worse than when they left.

                            Do the Irish still get some kind of tax exemption once they retire? Would be good if we could get a way for our guys to spend thier last years playing here more often, this is where our next generation are missing out.

                            100%

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • ChrisC Chris

                              @Dan54 said in Exodus:

                              @Nepia said in Exodus:

                              @Chris said in Exodus:

                              @Tim said in Exodus:

                              https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all-blacks/300768903/nz-rugby-offered-contract-exemption-to-all-blacks-star-beauden-barrett

                              I can not see why they would want to sign a almost 36 year old BB in 2025.

                              I guess Razor has indicated he wants him in his AB squad.

                              But to be serious. WTF!!!

                              Well we don't know what he was offered, if any money, it could well of been should we make a contracxt where you go overseas and could be used in ABs??
                              FFS why is everything so negative? RA use players that are contracted overseas, they only get paid when playing for Wallabies!! I would guess it was simialr idea for just in case and the NZR board said no anyway.

                              Yep that worked out well for them with another aging First Five.
                              36 year old First Five who is declining in his ability at 32 let alone in 4 more years.
                              Maybe money should be spent elsewhere and not to mention it opens up doors for all our AB's to play overseas that would hurt our domestic comps and make them 3rd Rate.

                              I wonder if TV monies will be as big if that happens I would say not.
                              Just a silly idea by NZR again with no real benefit to the game in NZ through the tiers.

                              Dan54D Away
                              Dan54D Away
                              Dan54
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #1832

                              @Chris said in Exodus:

                              @Dan54 said in Exodus:

                              @Nepia said in Exodus:

                              @Chris said in Exodus:

                              @Tim said in Exodus:

                              https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all-blacks/300768903/nz-rugby-offered-contract-exemption-to-all-blacks-star-beauden-barrett

                              I can not see why they would want to sign a almost 36 year old BB in 2025.

                              I guess Razor has indicated he wants him in his AB squad.

                              But to be serious. WTF!!!

                              Well we don't know what he was offered, if any money, it could well of been should we make a contracxt where you go overseas and could be used in ABs??
                              FFS why is everything so negative? RA use players that are contracted overseas, they only get paid when playing for Wallabies!! I would guess it was simialr idea for just in case and the NZR board said no anyway.

                              Yep that worked out well for them with another aging First Five.
                              36 year old First Five who is declining in his ability at 32 let alone in 4 more years.
                              Maybe money should be spent elsewhere and not to mention it opens up doors for all our AB's to play overseas that would hurt our domestic comps and make them 3rd Rate.

                              I wonder if TV monies will be as big if that happens I would say not.
                              Just a silly idea by NZR again with no real benefit to the game in NZ through the tiers.

                              For christ sake have you 2 read the report? It was suggested as a possibilty and was that any further discussion would take place if NZR board agreed!

                              “All parties were aware that further discussion and decision on this remained subject to NZR board decision.

                              NZR board didn't agree so it was never offered!! Geez bloody christ talk about take what you want that's anti out of a press report!!

                              ChrisC Crazy HorseC boobooB taniwharugbyT 4 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • Dan54D Dan54

                                @Chris said in Exodus:

                                @Dan54 said in Exodus:

                                @Nepia said in Exodus:

                                @Chris said in Exodus:

                                @Tim said in Exodus:

                                https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all-blacks/300768903/nz-rugby-offered-contract-exemption-to-all-blacks-star-beauden-barrett

                                I can not see why they would want to sign a almost 36 year old BB in 2025.

                                I guess Razor has indicated he wants him in his AB squad.

                                But to be serious. WTF!!!

                                Well we don't know what he was offered, if any money, it could well of been should we make a contracxt where you go overseas and could be used in ABs??
                                FFS why is everything so negative? RA use players that are contracted overseas, they only get paid when playing for Wallabies!! I would guess it was simialr idea for just in case and the NZR board said no anyway.

                                Yep that worked out well for them with another aging First Five.
                                36 year old First Five who is declining in his ability at 32 let alone in 4 more years.
                                Maybe money should be spent elsewhere and not to mention it opens up doors for all our AB's to play overseas that would hurt our domestic comps and make them 3rd Rate.

                                I wonder if TV monies will be as big if that happens I would say not.
                                Just a silly idea by NZR again with no real benefit to the game in NZ through the tiers.

                                For christ sake have you 2 read the report? It was suggested as a possibilty and was that any further discussion would take place if NZR board agreed!

                                “All parties were aware that further discussion and decision on this remained subject to NZR board decision.

                                NZR board didn't agree so it was never offered!! Geez bloody christ talk about take what you want that's anti out of a press report!!

                                ChrisC Offline
                                ChrisC Offline
                                Chris
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #1833

                                @Dan54 said in Exodus:

                                @Chris said in Exodus:

                                @Dan54 said in Exodus:

                                @Nepia said in Exodus:

                                @Chris said in Exodus:

                                @Tim said in Exodus:

                                https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all-blacks/300768903/nz-rugby-offered-contract-exemption-to-all-blacks-star-beauden-barrett

                                I can not see why they would want to sign a almost 36 year old BB in 2025.

                                I guess Razor has indicated he wants him in his AB squad.

                                But to be serious. WTF!!!

                                Well we don't know what he was offered, if any money, it could well of been should we make a contracxt where you go overseas and could be used in ABs??
                                FFS why is everything so negative? RA use players that are contracted overseas, they only get paid when playing for Wallabies!! I would guess it was simialr idea for just in case and the NZR board said no anyway.

                                Yep that worked out well for them with another aging First Five.
                                36 year old First Five who is declining in his ability at 32 let alone in 4 more years.
                                Maybe money should be spent elsewhere and not to mention it opens up doors for all our AB's to play overseas that would hurt our domestic comps and make them 3rd Rate.

                                I wonder if TV monies will be as big if that happens I would say not.
                                Just a silly idea by NZR again with no real benefit to the game in NZ through the tiers.

                                For christ sake have you 2 read the report? It was suggested as a possibilty and was that any further discussion would take place if NZR board agreed!

                                “All parties were aware that further discussion and decision on this remained subject to NZR board decision.

                                NZR board didn't agree so it was never offered!! Geez bloody christ talk about take what you want that's anti out of a press report!!

                                hahaha calm down mate its the idea that is stupid.
                                Stupid NZR again.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • Dan54D Dan54

                                  @Chris said in Exodus:

                                  @Dan54 said in Exodus:

                                  @Nepia said in Exodus:

                                  @Chris said in Exodus:

                                  @Tim said in Exodus:

                                  https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all-blacks/300768903/nz-rugby-offered-contract-exemption-to-all-blacks-star-beauden-barrett

                                  I can not see why they would want to sign a almost 36 year old BB in 2025.

                                  I guess Razor has indicated he wants him in his AB squad.

                                  But to be serious. WTF!!!

                                  Well we don't know what he was offered, if any money, it could well of been should we make a contracxt where you go overseas and could be used in ABs??
                                  FFS why is everything so negative? RA use players that are contracted overseas, they only get paid when playing for Wallabies!! I would guess it was simialr idea for just in case and the NZR board said no anyway.

                                  Yep that worked out well for them with another aging First Five.
                                  36 year old First Five who is declining in his ability at 32 let alone in 4 more years.
                                  Maybe money should be spent elsewhere and not to mention it opens up doors for all our AB's to play overseas that would hurt our domestic comps and make them 3rd Rate.

                                  I wonder if TV monies will be as big if that happens I would say not.
                                  Just a silly idea by NZR again with no real benefit to the game in NZ through the tiers.

                                  For christ sake have you 2 read the report? It was suggested as a possibilty and was that any further discussion would take place if NZR board agreed!

                                  “All parties were aware that further discussion and decision on this remained subject to NZR board decision.

                                  NZR board didn't agree so it was never offered!! Geez bloody christ talk about take what you want that's anti out of a press report!!

                                  Crazy HorseC Offline
                                  Crazy HorseC Offline
                                  Crazy Horse
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #1834

                                  @Dan54 said in Exodus:

                                  @Chris said in Exodus:

                                  @Dan54 said in Exodus:

                                  @Nepia said in Exodus:

                                  @Chris said in Exodus:

                                  @Tim said in Exodus:

                                  https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all-blacks/300768903/nz-rugby-offered-contract-exemption-to-all-blacks-star-beauden-barrett

                                  I can not see why they would want to sign a almost 36 year old BB in 2025.

                                  I guess Razor has indicated he wants him in his AB squad.

                                  But to be serious. WTF!!!

                                  Well we don't know what he was offered, if any money, it could well of been should we make a contracxt where you go overseas and could be used in ABs??
                                  FFS why is everything so negative? RA use players that are contracted overseas, they only get paid when playing for Wallabies!! I would guess it was simialr idea for just in case and the NZR board said no anyway.

                                  Yep that worked out well for them with another aging First Five.
                                  36 year old First Five who is declining in his ability at 32 let alone in 4 more years.
                                  Maybe money should be spent elsewhere and not to mention it opens up doors for all our AB's to play overseas that would hurt our domestic comps and make them 3rd Rate.

                                  I wonder if TV monies will be as big if that happens I would say not.
                                  Just a silly idea by NZR again with no real benefit to the game in NZ through the tiers.

                                  For christ sake have you 2 read the report? It was suggested as a possibilty and was that any further discussion would take place if NZR board agreed!

                                  “All parties were aware that further discussion and decision on this remained subject to NZR board decision.

                                  NZR board didn't agree so it was never offered!! Geez bloody christ talk about take what you want that's anti out of a press report!!

                                  Surely you have been around here long enough to know that reading reports is not needed to form an opinion or substantiate a rant?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  2
                                  • Dan54D Dan54

                                    @Chris said in Exodus:

                                    @Dan54 said in Exodus:

                                    @Nepia said in Exodus:

                                    @Chris said in Exodus:

                                    @Tim said in Exodus:

                                    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all-blacks/300768903/nz-rugby-offered-contract-exemption-to-all-blacks-star-beauden-barrett

                                    I can not see why they would want to sign a almost 36 year old BB in 2025.

                                    I guess Razor has indicated he wants him in his AB squad.

                                    But to be serious. WTF!!!

                                    Well we don't know what he was offered, if any money, it could well of been should we make a contracxt where you go overseas and could be used in ABs??
                                    FFS why is everything so negative? RA use players that are contracted overseas, they only get paid when playing for Wallabies!! I would guess it was simialr idea for just in case and the NZR board said no anyway.

                                    Yep that worked out well for them with another aging First Five.
                                    36 year old First Five who is declining in his ability at 32 let alone in 4 more years.
                                    Maybe money should be spent elsewhere and not to mention it opens up doors for all our AB's to play overseas that would hurt our domestic comps and make them 3rd Rate.

                                    I wonder if TV monies will be as big if that happens I would say not.
                                    Just a silly idea by NZR again with no real benefit to the game in NZ through the tiers.

                                    For christ sake have you 2 read the report? It was suggested as a possibilty and was that any further discussion would take place if NZR board agreed!

                                    “All parties were aware that further discussion and decision on this remained subject to NZR board decision.

                                    NZR board didn't agree so it was never offered!! Geez bloody christ talk about take what you want that's anti out of a press report!!

                                    boobooB Offline
                                    boobooB Offline
                                    booboo
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #1835

                                    @Dan54 said in Exodus:

                                    @Chris said in Exodus:

                                    @Dan54 said in Exodus:

                                    @Nepia said in Exodus:

                                    @Chris said in Exodus:

                                    @Tim said in Exodus:

                                    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all-blacks/300768903/nz-rugby-offered-contract-exemption-to-all-blacks-star-beauden-barrett

                                    I can not see why they would want to sign a almost 36 year old BB in 2025.

                                    I guess Razor has indicated he wants him in his AB squad.

                                    But to be serious. WTF!!!

                                    Well we don't know what he was offered, if any money, it could well of been should we make a contracxt where you go overseas and could be used in ABs??
                                    FFS why is everything so negative? RA use players that are contracted overseas, they only get paid when playing for Wallabies!! I would guess it was simialr idea for just in case and the NZR board said no anyway.

                                    Yep that worked out well for them with another aging First Five.
                                    36 year old First Five who is declining in his ability at 32 let alone in 4 more years.
                                    Maybe money should be spent elsewhere and not to mention it opens up doors for all our AB's to play overseas that would hurt our domestic comps and make them 3rd Rate.

                                    I wonder if TV monies will be as big if that happens I would say not.
                                    Just a silly idea by NZR again with no real benefit to the game in NZ through the tiers.

                                    For christ sake have you 2 read the report? It was suggested as a possibilty and was that any further discussion would take place if NZR board agreed!

                                    “All parties were aware that further discussion and decision on this remained subject to NZR board decision.

                                    NZR board didn't agree so it was never offered!! Geez bloody christ talk about take what you want that's anti out of a press report!!

                                    Should never have been raised as a possibility.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    4
                                    • Dan54D Dan54

                                      @Chris said in Exodus:

                                      @Dan54 said in Exodus:

                                      @Nepia said in Exodus:

                                      @Chris said in Exodus:

                                      @Tim said in Exodus:

                                      https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all-blacks/300768903/nz-rugby-offered-contract-exemption-to-all-blacks-star-beauden-barrett

                                      I can not see why they would want to sign a almost 36 year old BB in 2025.

                                      I guess Razor has indicated he wants him in his AB squad.

                                      But to be serious. WTF!!!

                                      Well we don't know what he was offered, if any money, it could well of been should we make a contracxt where you go overseas and could be used in ABs??
                                      FFS why is everything so negative? RA use players that are contracted overseas, they only get paid when playing for Wallabies!! I would guess it was simialr idea for just in case and the NZR board said no anyway.

                                      Yep that worked out well for them with another aging First Five.
                                      36 year old First Five who is declining in his ability at 32 let alone in 4 more years.
                                      Maybe money should be spent elsewhere and not to mention it opens up doors for all our AB's to play overseas that would hurt our domestic comps and make them 3rd Rate.

                                      I wonder if TV monies will be as big if that happens I would say not.
                                      Just a silly idea by NZR again with no real benefit to the game in NZ through the tiers.

                                      For christ sake have you 2 read the report? It was suggested as a possibilty and was that any further discussion would take place if NZR board agreed!

                                      “All parties were aware that further discussion and decision on this remained subject to NZR board decision.

                                      NZR board didn't agree so it was never offered!! Geez bloody christ talk about take what you want that's anti out of a press report!!

                                      taniwharugbyT Offline
                                      taniwharugbyT Offline
                                      taniwharugby
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #1836

                                      @Dan54 maybe you could read whats been written?

                                      Dan54D 1 Reply Last reply
                                      2
                                      • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                                        @Dan54 maybe you could read whats been written?

                                        Dan54D Away
                                        Dan54D Away
                                        Dan54
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #1837

                                        @taniwharugby said in Exodus:

                                        @Dan54 maybe you could read whats been written?

                                        Yep I did, where someone who is employed by NZR had a suggestion, that needed to go before the board before any further discussion would be had?
                                        Have I missed something, the NZR made no offer , someone was obviously looking at seeing if there was any new ideas to be had, NZR said no there wasn't!

                                        taniwharugbyT ChrisC 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • ChrisC Chris

                                          @taniwharugby said in Exodus:

                                          @Chris you'd think they'd have learnt from Julian Savea and more recently Codie Taylor, the latter battling with form in 2022 and he's signed on through 2025....

                                          Yep exactly they dig a hole for themselves with this sort of thing.

                                          For me if you go overseas then that is your career over seas you can not have it both ways.
                                          Were is the incentive for players to stay with their SR teams and NPC teams we are already seeing it with all these players off to MRL if that grows bigger and you have Europe and Japan.
                                          We will have our top 40 or 50 players not playing in NZ comps.

                                          Dan54D Away
                                          Dan54D Away
                                          Dan54
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #1838

                                          @Chris said in Exodus:

                                          @taniwharugby said in Exodus:

                                          @Chris you'd think they'd have learnt from Julian Savea and more recently Codie Taylor, the latter battling with form in 2022 and he's signed on through 2025....

                                          Yep exactly they dig a hole for themselves with this sort of thing.

                                          For me if you go overseas then that is your career over seas you can not have it both ways.
                                          Were is the incentive for players to stay with their SR teams and NPC teams we are already seeing it with all these players off to MRL if that grows bigger and you have Europe and Japan.
                                          We will have our top 40 or 50 players not playing in NZ comps.

                                          Yep and exactly why NZR , didn't allow there to be any discussion on it!! I agree wholeheartedly that they shouldn't be given, so do NZR apparently.
                                          So seems you calling NZR idiots for agreeing with you huh???

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search