Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Foster, Robertson etc

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
allblacks
5.7k Posts 131 Posters 759.9k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • BerniesCornerB Offline
    BerniesCornerB Offline
    BerniesCorner
    wrote on last edited by
    #5143

    A strong coaching record should be the basis of selecting an AB coach. So how did we get to where we are at

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • BerniesCornerB BerniesCorner

      A strong coaching record should be the basis of selecting an AB coach. So how did we get to where we are at

      CrucialC Offline
      CrucialC Offline
      Crucial
      wrote on last edited by Crucial
      #5144

      @BerniesCorner said in Foster, Robertson etc:

      A strong coaching record should be the basis of selecting an AB coach. So how did we get to where we are at

      Because Foster had a strong (Assistant) Coaching record, had good references, had international experience (knew how prep for travel/ tours, last minute contingencies etc worked) and was, originally, the prime candidate. To the point that the other other two viable contenders took the offers they had elsewhere rather than end up a dog with two bones.

      The next phase was (by accounts) due to Razor not presenting well at interview.

      KiwiwombleK HigginsH taniwharugbyT 3 Replies Last reply
      0
      • CrucialC Crucial

        @BerniesCorner said in Foster, Robertson etc:

        A strong coaching record should be the basis of selecting an AB coach. So how did we get to where we are at

        Because Foster had a strong (Assistant) Coaching record, had good references, had international experience (knew how prep for travel/ tours, last minute contingencies etc worked) and was, originally, the prime candidate. To the point that the other other two viable contenders took the offers they had elsewhere rather than end up a dog with two bones.

        The next phase was (by accounts) due to Razor not presenting well at interview.

        KiwiwombleK Offline
        KiwiwombleK Offline
        Kiwiwomble
        wrote on last edited by
        #5145

        @Crucial was the "not presenting well" just the confidence we've heard mentioned as a negative?

        CrucialC nostrildamusN Victor MeldrewV 3 Replies Last reply
        0
        • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

          @Crucial was the "not presenting well" just the confidence we've heard mentioned as a negative?

          CrucialC Offline
          CrucialC Offline
          Crucial
          wrote on last edited by
          #5146

          @Kiwiwomble said in Foster, Robertson etc:

          @Crucial was the "not presenting well" just the confidence we've heard mentioned as a negative?

          It's a rumour. Like much in this thread. Gossip that went around saying he flunked the interview/ didn't read the room etc
          Has happened to others as well. Deans, Smith....

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • CrucialC Crucial

            @BerniesCorner said in Foster, Robertson etc:

            A strong coaching record should be the basis of selecting an AB coach. So how did we get to where we are at

            Because Foster had a strong (Assistant) Coaching record, had good references, had international experience (knew how prep for travel/ tours, last minute contingencies etc worked) and was, originally, the prime candidate. To the point that the other other two viable contenders took the offers they had elsewhere rather than end up a dog with two bones.

            The next phase was (by accounts) due to Razor not presenting well at interview.

            HigginsH Offline
            HigginsH Offline
            Higgins
            wrote on last edited by Higgins
            #5147

            @Crucial said in Foster, Robertson etc:

            The next phase was (by accounts) due to Razor not presenting well at interview.

            Obviously they must have different levels in force at the Crusaders where he clearly must have "presented well at interview".

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

              @Crucial was the "not presenting well" just the confidence we've heard mentioned as a negative?

              nostrildamusN Offline
              nostrildamusN Offline
              nostrildamus
              wrote on last edited by
              #5148

              @Kiwiwomble might have been the breakdancing, not up to prop standard, apparently!
              https://www.rugbypass.com/news/im-smashing-my-tv-former-all-black-unhappy-with-crusaders-coach-robertson/

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • CrucialC Crucial

                @BerniesCorner said in Foster, Robertson etc:

                A strong coaching record should be the basis of selecting an AB coach. So how did we get to where we are at

                Because Foster had a strong (Assistant) Coaching record, had good references, had international experience (knew how prep for travel/ tours, last minute contingencies etc worked) and was, originally, the prime candidate. To the point that the other other two viable contenders took the offers they had elsewhere rather than end up a dog with two bones.

                The next phase was (by accounts) due to Razor not presenting well at interview.

                taniwharugbyT Offline
                taniwharugbyT Offline
                taniwharugby
                wrote on last edited by
                #5149

                @Crucial his International experience was limited to his time as Assistant in the ABs wasnt it?

                BovidaeB CrucialC 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                  @Crucial his International experience was limited to his time as Assistant in the ABs wasnt it?

                  BovidaeB Offline
                  BovidaeB Offline
                  Bovidae
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #5150

                  @taniwharugby said in Foster, Robertson etc:

                  @Crucial his International experience was limited to his time as Assistant in the ABs wasnt it?

                  Co-coach of the JABs who played other international teams.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                    @Crucial his International experience was limited to his time as Assistant in the ABs wasnt it?

                    CrucialC Offline
                    CrucialC Offline
                    Crucial
                    wrote on last edited by Crucial
                    #5151

                    @taniwharugby said in Foster, Robertson etc:

                    @Crucial his International experience was limited to his time as Assistant in the ABs wasnt it?

                    Yes but it wasn't just as an underling. Hansen promoted him heavily as part of a coaching/management team. Although he didn't carry head coach responsibilities he was doing a fair bit of head coach like duties.
                    For me the 'international' part is simply that the picture is very different planning wise.
                    Razor is excellent at planning SR campaigns but a test programme/ RWC is entirely different. You don't have the same rotation luxuries, you don't get to try things out as much, the season can be very different year to year (eg facing Ireland cold last year), the pool of international quality players is smaller than SR level for selction...

                    I'm not saying that Razor couldn't deal with all of that just that he hasn't experienced it yet.

                    F 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • CrucialC Crucial

                      @taniwharugby said in Foster, Robertson etc:

                      @Crucial his International experience was limited to his time as Assistant in the ABs wasnt it?

                      Yes but it wasn't just as an underling. Hansen promoted him heavily as part of a coaching/management team. Although he didn't carry head coach responsibilities he was doing a fair bit of head coach like duties.
                      For me the 'international' part is simply that the picture is very different planning wise.
                      Razor is excellent at planning SR campaigns but a test programme/ RWC is entirely different. You don't have the same rotation luxuries, you don't get to try things out as much, the season can be very different year to year (eg facing Ireland cold last year), the pool of international quality players is smaller than SR level for selction...

                      I'm not saying that Razor couldn't deal with all of that just that he hasn't experienced it yet.

                      F Offline
                      F Offline
                      Frank
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #5152

                      @Crucial said in Foster, Robertson etc:

                      Razor is excellent at planning SR campaigns but a test programme/ RWC is entirely different. You don't have the same rotation luxuries, you don't get to try things out as much, the season can be very different year to year (eg facing Ireland cold last year), the pool of international quality players is smaller than SR level for selction...

                      Woah!!! Sounds like it might be to hard for him.
                      Needs a few more years at Super level for the massive change.

                      CrucialC Rancid SchnitzelR 2 Replies Last reply
                      1
                      • F Frank

                        @Crucial said in Foster, Robertson etc:

                        Razor is excellent at planning SR campaigns but a test programme/ RWC is entirely different. You don't have the same rotation luxuries, you don't get to try things out as much, the season can be very different year to year (eg facing Ireland cold last year), the pool of international quality players is smaller than SR level for selction...

                        Woah!!! Sounds like it might be to hard for him.
                        Needs a few more years at Super level for the massive change.

                        CrucialC Offline
                        CrucialC Offline
                        Crucial
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #5153

                        @Frank said in Foster, Robertson etc:

                        @Crucial said in Foster, Robertson etc:

                        Razor is excellent at planning SR campaigns but a test programme/ RWC is entirely different. You don't have the same rotation luxuries, you don't get to try things out as much, the season can be very different year to year (eg facing Ireland cold last year), the pool of international quality players is smaller than SR level for selction...

                        Woah!!! Sounds like it might be to hard for him.
                        Needs a few more years at Super level for the massive change.

                        Nice of you not to quote the full post just so you could make a pithy remark.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Frank

                          @Crucial said in Foster, Robertson etc:

                          Razor is excellent at planning SR campaigns but a test programme/ RWC is entirely different. You don't have the same rotation luxuries, you don't get to try things out as much, the season can be very different year to year (eg facing Ireland cold last year), the pool of international quality players is smaller than SR level for selction...

                          Woah!!! Sounds like it might be to hard for him.
                          Needs a few more years at Super level for the massive change.

                          Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
                          Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
                          Rancid Schnitzel
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #5154

                          @Frank said in Foster, Robertson etc:

                          @Crucial said in Foster, Robertson etc:

                          Razor is excellent at planning SR campaigns but a test programme/ RWC is entirely different. You don't have the same rotation luxuries, you don't get to try things out as much, the season can be very different year to year (eg facing Ireland cold last year), the pool of international quality players is smaller than SR level for selction...

                          Woah!!! Sounds like it might be to hard for him.
                          Needs a few more years at Super level for the massive change.

                          Yes I'm sure a full-time professional coach with international ambitions would be completely unaware of those insurmountable obstacles.

                          CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Rancid SchnitzelR Rancid Schnitzel

                            @Frank said in Foster, Robertson etc:

                            @Crucial said in Foster, Robertson etc:

                            Razor is excellent at planning SR campaigns but a test programme/ RWC is entirely different. You don't have the same rotation luxuries, you don't get to try things out as much, the season can be very different year to year (eg facing Ireland cold last year), the pool of international quality players is smaller than SR level for selction...

                            Woah!!! Sounds like it might be to hard for him.
                            Needs a few more years at Super level for the massive change.

                            Yes I'm sure a full-time professional coach with international ambitions would be completely unaware of those insurmountable obstacles.

                            CrucialC Offline
                            CrucialC Offline
                            Crucial
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #5155

                            @Rancid-Schnitzel said in Foster, Robertson etc:

                            @Frank said in Foster, Robertson etc:

                            @Crucial said in Foster, Robertson etc:

                            Razor is excellent at planning SR campaigns but a test programme/ RWC is entirely different. You don't have the same rotation luxuries, you don't get to try things out as much, the season can be very different year to year (eg facing Ireland cold last year), the pool of international quality players is smaller than SR level for selction...

                            Woah!!! Sounds like it might be to hard for him.
                            Needs a few more years at Super level for the massive change.

                            Yes I'm sure a full-time professional coach with international ambitions would be completely unaware of those insurmountable obstacles.

                            See the problem when you block a person then comment on their misquoted posts?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                              to me it feels like he is the one creating the 'distraction', creating an issue for his players to grab hold of.

                              Maybe if he told his team, win, lose or draw, I'm done post RWC (assuming this was his plan, but by the sounds of it, it isn't...) it would remove any 'distractions' but at the same time, he should have told all his main squad not to annouce thier intentions post-RWC as well, cos 'distractions'

                              kiwi_expatK Offline
                              kiwi_expatK Offline
                              kiwi_expat
                              wrote on last edited by kiwi_expat
                              #5156

                              @taniwharugby said in Foster, Robertson etc:

                              to me it feels like he is the one creating the 'distraction', creating an issue for his players to grab hold of.

                              Maybe if he told his team, win, lose or draw, I'm done post RWC (assuming this was his plan, but by the sounds of it, it isn't...) it would remove any 'distractions' but at the same time, he should have told all his main squad not to annouce thier intentions post-RWC as well, cos 'distractions'

                              yep, well said.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • ChrisC Offline
                                ChrisC Offline
                                Chris
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #5157

                                am I reading this correctly from the foster interview with Mike Hosking it sounds like Foster thinks Robertson will be the next coach and it almost a done deal.

                                Two weeks ago frontrunner Robertson told media at a Crusaders training session that the ‘next two weeks is big’ in reference to the All Blacks job. Foster eluded that NZR were favouring the Crusaders coach.

                                “I’m pretty sure they’ve got a clear idea and you know and that’s up to them to voice that. But it does seem to be reasonably obvious. I thought there was an interview with the coach last week that made it look like there was already plans in place to go early. And that was frustrating to hear that from another voice,” he told Mike Hosking.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • gt12G gt12

                                  I think Foster has a point that this is really about Razor’s timeline.

                                  I also think he’s doing the wrong thing by making this a public discussion. This won’t be a problem for the All Blacks unless he makes it one. Save that shit for the book Fozzie.

                                  M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  Machpants
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #5158

                                  @gt12 said in Foster, Robertson etc:

                                  I think Foster has a point that this is really about Razor’s timeline.

                                  I also think he’s doing the wrong thing by making this a public discussion. This won’t be a problem for the All Blacks unless he makes it one. Save that shit for the book Fozzie.

                                  The timeline is nothing to do with razor, it is to do with last time almost all the coaches had already got a job, cos they weren't going to wait around for abs. The same still applies.

                                  Foster should announce his retirement now, and then we can all get on with it. If the team is so mentally weak they can't take coaching speculation, that's a worry. And another black mark against their head coach

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  5
                                  • Windows97W Offline
                                    Windows97W Offline
                                    Windows97
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #5159

                                    The shambles continues...

                                    If the NZRU had wanted to get rid of Foster they should have just sacked him straight up and advertised the role - that's starting the process before the WC all right.

                                    But it appears they couldn't - for whatever reason's and instead sacked his assistants.

                                    And now they announce they're selecting a coach prior to the RWC much to the surprise or at the least certainly not the support of the current coach going off Fosters interview.

                                    So NZ now heads into the RWC with a coach who clearly knows the NZRU don't back him and want to give the job to someone else.

                                    I don't rate Foster but FFS - either sack him or give him everything he needs to win the RWC.

                                    Were stumbling into this WC like a patched together Frankenstein monster rather than a well oiled machine all heading in the same direction.

                                    My main gripe with Fosters reappointment was that it appeared the NZRU doctored the process to simply get "their man" - in this case Foster.

                                    Now moving on 4 years it appears nothing has changed, the NZRU has doctored the process to get "their man" now in this case Robertson.

                                    It appears appointing the next AB coach has little to do with their ability and competency as a coach and more with their ability to play political subterfuge in darkened corridors at the NZR...

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    2
                                    • nostrildamusN Offline
                                      nostrildamusN Offline
                                      nostrildamus
                                      wrote on last edited by nostrildamus
                                      #5160

                                      If I was the coach and I knew they were giving the next RWC phase to someone else I'd use that as motivation to prove the bastards wrong. Or maybe I'd have enough motivation anyway, having failed at the last RWC...

                                      And I am not sure what Foster needs from NZR that he is missing to win the RWC. Perhaps he will enlighten us.
                                      In the jobs I know you don't do a good job in your current contract only if you get promised another contract afterwards. Maybe I have worked for the wrong bosses?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      2
                                      • canefanC Offline
                                        canefanC Offline
                                        canefan
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #5161

                                        If Fozzie doesn't realise how lucky he is to still be coach he is delusional. We were a rabble under his watch, as a result the NZRFU forced Schmidt and Ryan on him, which resulted in significant improvement. But if he lost that game in SA he was a goneburger. I want him to stop talking in the media acting all butt hurt, and fucken just get on with trying to win the Bled and the RWC. I'll be more than happy if he does this as a big FU to the union on his way out the door

                                        Windows97W 1 Reply Last reply
                                        6
                                        • Chester DrawsC Offline
                                          Chester DrawsC Offline
                                          Chester Draws
                                          wrote on last edited by Chester Draws
                                          #5162

                                          This is only a "distraction" for one reason -- Foster's record is so poor that the vultures are circling. If his team were playing well, we would not be having this discussion.

                                          Most coaches go into the RWC either knowing that they will retire after, or hoping a good result will allow them to stay on. Foster, however, goes in knowing that he is toast, and unhappy about it. His fault entirely.

                                          His complaint seems, to me, to be "stop noticing that my results are shit, and let me get on with delivering some more of the same uninterrupted."

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          2
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search