• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Black Caps v England

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
713 Posts 46 Posters 29.7k Views
Black Caps v England
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #312

    @MN5 I guess the counter-argument is that Kane is our most technically proficient batsman so he's best equipped to survive the new ball at 3 and can shelter those behind.

    I like having my best batsman protected though.

    My ideal career progression for a world-class middle order batsman is probably something like:

    6 - learning to play test cricket
    3 - honing technical proficiency
    4 - best batsman in the team
    5 - elder statesman

    If you could cycle a series of batsmen broadly through this progression I think it works well.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #313

    this is some start to a career for Brook

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #314

    @Chris-B said in Black Caps v England:

    @Rapido said in Black Caps v England:

    @Chris-B said in Black Caps v England:

    I like seeing Kane listed at 4!!!

    I hate seeing Kane listed at 4.

    I'll live in hope that the cricinfo version is correct, as it has him listed at 3.

    I like having our best batsman at 4 - giving him an extra layer of protection from the new ball in case of an early wicket.

    When we had Rossco at 4, I didn't mind Kane at 3 - but, we have Latham, Conway and Young all used to batting in the top 3 at the top and I would definitely use them there to help mitigate the new ball risk to Kane.

    My take. I don't see Kane as having a technique that needs shielding. Unlike Kohli and Smith whipping straight/offish stuff to leg, or Root not getting far forward. Although, tbh, all of those guys are/were more than capable of batting 3 at the peak of their powers. But I'd have doubts as they age (especially Kohli and Smith's techniques).

    Secondly. I also don't see Kane as having the higher gears, or looseness, that benfits from batting lower.

    With his dodgy elbow, even more so I doubt we see him becoming a quicker-scoring 4, more likely he becomes a dour(er) 3.

    Thirdly, Despite Young opening for Blackcps, this is never, not a single occasion, something he has done for CD. Only ever for NZA and Blackcaps. Although he bats 3 for CD for ages now, this is as a 'graduated strokemaking' 4 who has tightened his game and taken on more responsibility. I'd see him as quite an ideal 4 at international level, if he can translate it to test level.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Rapido on last edited by
    #315

    @Rapido said in Black Caps v England:

    @Chris-B said in Black Caps v England:

    @Rapido said in Black Caps v England:

    @Chris-B said in Black Caps v England:

    I like seeing Kane listed at 4!!!

    I hate seeing Kane listed at 4.

    I'll live in hope that the cricinfo version is correct, as it has him listed at 3.

    I like having our best batsman at 4 - giving him an extra layer of protection from the new ball in case of an early wicket.

    When we had Rossco at 4, I didn't mind Kane at 3 - but, we have Latham, Conway and Young all used to batting in the top 3 at the top and I would definitely use them there to help mitigate the new ball risk to Kane.

    My take. I don't see Kane as having a technique that needs shielding. Unlike Kohli and Smith whipping straight/offish stuff to leg, or Root not getting far forward. Although, tbh, all of those guys are/were more than capable of batting 3 at the peak of their powers. But I'd have doubts as they age (especially Kohli and Smith's techniques).

    Secondly. I also don't see Kane as having the higher gears, or looseness, that benfits from batting lower.

    With his dodgy elbow, even more so I doubt we see him becoming a quicker-scoring 4, more likely he becomes a dour(er) 3.

    Thirdly, Despite Young opening for Blackcps, this is never, not a single occasion, something he has done for CD. Only ever for NZA and Blackcaps. Although he bats 3 for CD for ages now, this is as a 'graduated strokemaking' 4 who has tightened his game and taken on more responsibility. I'd see him as quite an ideal 4 at international level, if he can translate it to test level.

    Looks likely especially given Nicholls recent form.

    It’s probably too much to expect either of them to be the next Rossco though.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    wrote on last edited by
    #316

    21/3, now they look very very comfrotable. We are just not troubling them, they're pumping us all over the park.

    Henry did bloody well against Brook, but we're leaking now. Two inside edges past teh stumps, and a good LBW shout, and that's about it (well, from what I've seen).

    Well played England; we're struggling

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #317

    @nzzp I'm only watching on Cricinfo - but, I had a bad feeling when Mitch came on at first change that this was a hook we were going to let them off.

    DonsteppaD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    wrote on last edited by Rapido
    #318

    Wow, just checked the score, they are getting absolutely thrashed again already.

    Some of that doesn't surprise. E.g. they're a bit shit now anyway, but I also expected them to struggle when the ball got old. As mentioned about 3rd/4th bowler balance earlier in thread.

    The signs on Wagner have been pretty clear for a while now. Not just the last dumpster fire match by him. This was a poor selection. It's clear they need a role player like Tickner so the group can bowl to an actual near-functional plan, Wagner isn't up to it anymore.

    Not that I'm actually watching any of it .this is just some cricinfo live scoring based 'analysis' ... I couldn't bring myself to pull out the credit card and turn Spark back on when I saw the squad for the first test, Stead drifters. I'm very unenthused.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #319

    @Chris-B said in Black Caps v England:

    @nzzp I'm only watching on Cricinfo - but, I had a bad feeling when Mitch came on at first change that this was a hook we were going to let them off.

    To be fair to Daryl, he's got Wagner supplying the medium-fast half trackers to the buffet once again. 12 overs 0 - 81 thus far. Not that there are many knocking down the door with top performances to replace Wags.

    Ish might have been pleased to sit this one out on the current run rate!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Rapido on last edited by MN5
    #320

    @Rapido said in Black Caps v England:

    Wow, just checked the score, they are getting absolutely thrashed again already.

    Some of that doesn't surprise. E.g. they're a bit shit now anyway, but I also expected them to struggle when the ball got old. As mentioned about 3rd/4th bowler balance earlier in thread.

    The signs on Wagner have been pretty clear for a while now. Not just the last dumpster fire match by him. This was a poor selection. It's clear they need a role player like Tickner so the group can bowl to an actual near-functional plan, Wagner isn't up to it anymore.

    Not that I'm actually watching any of it .this is just some cricinfo live scoring based 'analysis' ... I couldn't bring myself to pull out the credit card and turn Spark back on when I saw the squad for the first test, Stead drifters. I'm very unenthused.

    Yeah, turns out you can’t just use a different email to get a free trial you actually have to provide a different credit card each time.

    Crafty fluffybunnies.

    Back on topic in case I get told off again, England are really putting the BCs to the sword at a rapid rate.

    This nerdy looking new kid sure can bat

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #321

    Brook's live average is currently 98.75 - 10 more runs to average 100.

    #Betterthanbradman

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #322

    There it is - well done Brook!

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #323

    @Chris-B said in Black Caps v England:

    There it is - well done Brook!

    retire immediately

    Chris B.C 2 Replies Last reply
    4
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by Chris B.
    #324

    @mariner4life He's done it at a strike rate of 99.62!!!

    800 runs in 803 balls.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #325

    @mariner4life said in Black Caps v England:

    @Chris-B said in Black Caps v England:

    There it is - well done Brook!

    retire immediately

    Still got Andy to knock off!

    https://www.espncricinfo.com/cricketers/andy-ganteaume-51874

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #326

    The Don had a decent innings in life - getting to 92.

    But, Andy went past him there too - making it to 95. I bet he had a beer the night he passed Don's tally there, too!! 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #327

    send them in and they're 308/3 after 63

    things looked so much better 57 overs ago. Hell of a partnership

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by MN5
    #328

    @Chris-B said in Black Caps v England:

    Brook's live average is currently 98.75 - 10 more runs to average 100.

    #Betterthanbradman

    Steady on, Jimmy Adams averaged 87 after 12 tests….look how he turned out.

    Vinod Kambli is another who springs to mind. Mike Hussey maybe too.

    This kid probably isn’t even as good as our boy Conway

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #329

    At least we can count on the Wellington weather to reduce the scoring rate 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #330

    @MN5 Lawrence Rowe momentarily averaged 336.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #331

    @Chris-B said in Black Caps v England:

    @MN5 Lawrence Rowe momentarily averaged 336.

    Conway 200 too.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    1

Black Caps v England
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.