Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

All Blacks 2023

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
allblacks
3.7k Posts 112 Posters 824.5k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • nostrildamusN Online
    nostrildamusN Online
    nostrildamus
    wrote on last edited by
    #2493

    Strategy smategy. Get through the pool, win the must-win sudden death matches including the final. There, fixed it for Foster.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
    • M Offline
      M Offline
      Machpants
      wrote on last edited by Machpants
      #2494

      Current rankings - assuming Oz don't beat France & not including minnows
      Pool A (who play Pool B in QFs of Death!)
      NZ 4th
      France 3rd
      Italy 13th

      Pool B Pool of Death for good teams
      SA 2nd
      Ireland 1st
      Scotland 5th
      Tonga 15th

      Pool C Real Pool of Death
      Wales 10th
      Aus 9th
      Fiji 7th
      Georgia 11th

      Pool D
      England 8th
      Japan 14th
      Argentina 6th
      Samoa 12th

      So it may be shit for teams ranked 1-5 that one can't make quarters and 3 can't make the semi. But they have ended up very tight pools, outside the real minnows

      chimoausC voodooV 2 Replies Last reply
      3
      • M Machpants

        Current rankings - assuming Oz don't beat France & not including minnows
        Pool A (who play Pool B in QFs of Death!)
        NZ 4th
        France 3rd
        Italy 13th

        Pool B Pool of Death for good teams
        SA 2nd
        Ireland 1st
        Scotland 5th
        Tonga 15th

        Pool C Real Pool of Death
        Wales 10th
        Aus 9th
        Fiji 7th
        Georgia 11th

        Pool D
        England 8th
        Japan 14th
        Argentina 6th
        Samoa 12th

        So it may be shit for teams ranked 1-5 that one can't make quarters and 3 can't make the semi. But they have ended up very tight pools, outside the real minnows

        chimoausC Offline
        chimoausC Offline
        chimoaus
        wrote on last edited by
        #2495

        @Machpants Should make for some good viewing for the neutral.

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • nostrildamusN Online
          nostrildamusN Online
          nostrildamus
          wrote on last edited by
          #2496
          This post is deleted!
          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • A Offline
            A Offline
            akan004
            wrote on last edited by akan004
            #2497

            https://twitter.com/Murray_Kinsella/status/1696188616345567470

            1 Reply Last reply
            5
            • KiwiwombleK Offline
              KiwiwombleK Offline
              Kiwiwomble
              wrote on last edited by
              #2498

              i think Barrett is bloody lucky, not only was the guy prone on the ground and barrett dove off his feet to hit him, although the initial contact is shoulder i think it definitely slipped up to the head

              I said the other week if i was an english fan id be a bit embarrassed when Farrell initially got off...im a bit embarrassed now

              StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
              3
              • M Machpants

                Current rankings - assuming Oz don't beat France & not including minnows
                Pool A (who play Pool B in QFs of Death!)
                NZ 4th
                France 3rd
                Italy 13th

                Pool B Pool of Death for good teams
                SA 2nd
                Ireland 1st
                Scotland 5th
                Tonga 15th

                Pool C Real Pool of Death
                Wales 10th
                Aus 9th
                Fiji 7th
                Georgia 11th

                Pool D
                England 8th
                Japan 14th
                Argentina 6th
                Samoa 12th

                So it may be shit for teams ranked 1-5 that one can't make quarters and 3 can't make the semi. But they have ended up very tight pools, outside the real minnows

                voodooV Offline
                voodooV Offline
                voodoo
                wrote on last edited by
                #2499

                @Machpants said in All Blacks 2023:

                Current rankings - assuming Oz don't beat France & not including minnows
                Pool A (who play Pool B in QFs of Death!)
                NZ 4th
                France 3rd
                Italy 13th

                Pool B Pool of Death for good teams
                SA 2nd
                Ireland 1st
                Scotland 5th
                Tonga 15th

                Pool C Real Pool of Death
                Wales 10th
                Aus 9th
                Fiji 7th
                Georgia 11th

                Pool D
                England 8th
                Japan 14th
                Argentina 6th
                Samoa 12th

                So it may be shit for teams ranked 1-5 that one can't make quarters and 3 can't make the semi. But they have ended up very tight pools, outside the real minnows

                Pool of Death seems to me to me a slight misuse of the term when the highest ranked team in the pool is Fiji at 7...if you can't make it out of that pool, one might question your right to be in a QF...

                M canefanC 2 Replies Last reply
                2
                • voodooV voodoo

                  @Machpants said in All Blacks 2023:

                  Current rankings - assuming Oz don't beat France & not including minnows
                  Pool A (who play Pool B in QFs of Death!)
                  NZ 4th
                  France 3rd
                  Italy 13th

                  Pool B Pool of Death for good teams
                  SA 2nd
                  Ireland 1st
                  Scotland 5th
                  Tonga 15th

                  Pool C Real Pool of Death
                  Wales 10th
                  Aus 9th
                  Fiji 7th
                  Georgia 11th

                  Pool D
                  England 8th
                  Japan 14th
                  Argentina 6th
                  Samoa 12th

                  So it may be shit for teams ranked 1-5 that one can't make quarters and 3 can't make the semi. But they have ended up very tight pools, outside the real minnows

                  Pool of Death seems to me to me a slight misuse of the term when the highest ranked team in the pool is Fiji at 7...if you can't make it out of that pool, one might question your right to be in a QF...

                  M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Machpants
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #2500

                  @voodoo Top four teams in that pool are all ranked very closely, that's probably not a good pool of death. But it will be hard to call

                  boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

                    i think Barrett is bloody lucky, not only was the guy prone on the ground and barrett dove off his feet to hit him, although the initial contact is shoulder i think it definitely slipped up to the head

                    I said the other week if i was an english fan id be a bit embarrassed when Farrell initially got off...im a bit embarrassed now

                    StargazerS Offline
                    StargazerS Offline
                    Stargazer
                    wrote on last edited by Stargazer
                    #2501

                    @Kiwiwomble Why would you feel embarrassed by something that didn't happen (head contact)?

                    mariner4lifeM KiwiwombleK boobooB 3 Replies Last reply
                    1
                    • StargazerS Stargazer

                      @Kiwiwomble Why would you feel embarrassed by something that didn't happen (head contact)?

                      mariner4lifeM Offline
                      mariner4lifeM Offline
                      mariner4life
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #2502

                      @Stargazer said in All Blacks 2023:

                      @Kiwiwomble Why would you feel embarressed by something that didn't happen (head contact)?

                      because no matter how some try to sugar coat this

                      he dived pointed shoulder first at a player on the ground away from teh ball (it was in no way a "clean out") and it was good luck not good management that meant he missed the head. He still hit the base of the neck which is still dangerous and shitty.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      9
                      • StargazerS Stargazer

                        @Kiwiwomble Why would you feel embarrassed by something that didn't happen (head contact)?

                        KiwiwombleK Offline
                        KiwiwombleK Offline
                        Kiwiwomble
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #2503

                        @Stargazer said in All Blacks 2023:

                        @Kiwiwomble Why would you feel embarressed by something that didn't happen (head contact)?

                        im a bit embarrassed he avoided any further punishment for the stuff he did even without head contact (dove off his feet, shoulder first at a player prone on the ground and not on the ball)

                        BUT, the footage ive seen looks like like the contact moves from the shoulder to the head

                        StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

                          @Stargazer said in All Blacks 2023:

                          @Kiwiwomble Why would you feel embarressed by something that didn't happen (head contact)?

                          im a bit embarrassed he avoided any further punishment for the stuff he did even without head contact (dove off his feet, shoulder first at a player prone on the ground and not on the ball)

                          BUT, the footage ive seen looks like like the contact moves from the shoulder to the head

                          StargazerS Offline
                          StargazerS Offline
                          Stargazer
                          wrote on last edited by Stargazer
                          #2504

                          @Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks 2023:

                          @Stargazer said in All Blacks 2023:

                          @Kiwiwomble Why would you feel embarressed by something that didn't happen (head contact)?

                          im a bit embarrassed he avoided any further punishment for the stuff he did even without head contact (dove off his feet, shoulder first at a player prone on the ground and not on the ball)

                          BUT, the footage ive seen looks like like the contact moves from the shoulder to the head

                          You haven't seen all the footage available to the judiciary. There was no direct contact with the head according to the available footage (so no reason for a red card). Why would you want to suspend someone for a yellow card offence? And why would you feel embarrassed by someone being correctly not suspended for a yellow card offence? He was already punished by being sent off and they found that sufficient. This is consistent with similar rulings.

                          @mariner4life said in All Blacks 2023:

                          he dived pointed shoulder first at a player on the ground away from teh ball (it was in no way a "clean out") and it was good luck not good management that meant he missed the head. He still hit the base of the neck which is still dangerous and shitty.

                          So you want to suspend someone because he had good luck (resulting in him missing the head) or in him potentially (not: certainly) hitting the head if he hadn't had that good luck? So for something hypothetical?

                          He was yellow carded. He got a red because he already had had a team yellow earlier. He was sent off. I don't see why he deserved further punishment for something that wasn't a red-card offence (either by intent, luck or otherwise).

                          KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
                          4
                          • StargazerS Stargazer

                            @Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks 2023:

                            @Stargazer said in All Blacks 2023:

                            @Kiwiwomble Why would you feel embarressed by something that didn't happen (head contact)?

                            im a bit embarrassed he avoided any further punishment for the stuff he did even without head contact (dove off his feet, shoulder first at a player prone on the ground and not on the ball)

                            BUT, the footage ive seen looks like like the contact moves from the shoulder to the head

                            You haven't seen all the footage available to the judiciary. There was no direct contact with the head according to the available footage (so no reason for a red card). Why would you want to suspend someone for a yellow card offence? And why would you feel embarrassed by someone being correctly not suspended for a yellow card offence? He was already punished by being sent off and they found that sufficient. This is consistent with similar rulings.

                            @mariner4life said in All Blacks 2023:

                            he dived pointed shoulder first at a player on the ground away from teh ball (it was in no way a "clean out") and it was good luck not good management that meant he missed the head. He still hit the base of the neck which is still dangerous and shitty.

                            So you want to suspend someone because he had good luck (resulting in him missing the head) or in him potentially (not: certainly) hitting the head if he hadn't had that good luck? So for something hypothetical?

                            He was yellow carded. He got a red because he already had had a team yellow earlier. He was sent off. I don't see why he deserved further punishment for something that wasn't a red-card offence (either by intent, luck or otherwise).

                            KiwiwombleK Offline
                            KiwiwombleK Offline
                            Kiwiwomble
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #2505

                            @Stargazer cant go back and forward if you not going to even pretend to understand what people are saying, you're happy...great

                            StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

                              @Stargazer cant go back and forward if you not going to even pretend to understand what people are saying, you're happy...great

                              StargazerS Offline
                              StargazerS Offline
                              Stargazer
                              wrote on last edited by Stargazer
                              #2506

                              @Kiwiwomble No, I fully understand what you're saying, but it just doesn't make sense to me that you want someone punished for something that is never punished with a suspension: a yellow card offence. It's the Law and the normal judicial process that has been followed.

                              KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
                              3
                              • StargazerS Stargazer

                                @Kiwiwomble No, I fully understand what you're saying, but it just doesn't make sense to me that you want someone punished for something that is never punished with a suspension: a yellow card offence. It's the Law and the normal judicial process that has been followed.

                                KiwiwombleK Offline
                                KiwiwombleK Offline
                                Kiwiwomble
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #2507

                                @Stargazer you've just proven you dont understand what we're saying, saying you do doesn't seem to make it so

                                StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

                                  @Stargazer you've just proven you dont understand what we're saying, saying you do doesn't seem to make it so

                                  StargazerS Offline
                                  StargazerS Offline
                                  Stargazer
                                  wrote on last edited by Stargazer
                                  #2508

                                  @Kiwiwomble Maybe you should be clearer in saying what you mean then.

                                  Are you arguing he deserved a red card?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • mariner4lifeM Offline
                                    mariner4lifeM Offline
                                    mariner4life
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #2509

                                    i never said i want him punished. i am embarrassed an AB player pulled a dogshit act like that and people want to defend him because he got extremely lucky. It was a shit act, and if it has been Green on Black i just know a bunch of people here would be calling for crucifiction

                                    But hey, go right ahead and keep pointing at the rule book if you like, and as usual, completely missing the point of a discussion board

                                    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
                                    7
                                    • ChrisC Offline
                                      ChrisC Offline
                                      Chris
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #2510

                                      Well thankfully Barrett did not get extra punishment that would not have been merited.
                                      Imagine going in to the French game starting Vaii and having Who ? covering Lock on the bench,
                                      A Prop or maybe one of the 5 wingers we have,as we only have 3 fit locks with Barrett and 4 fit LF's.
                                      Another reason the Selection of this Squad was and is very flawed.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      3
                                      • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

                                        i never said i want him punished. i am embarrassed an AB player pulled a dogshit act like that and people want to defend him because he got extremely lucky. It was a shit act, and if it has been Green on Black i just know a bunch of people here would be calling for crucifiction

                                        But hey, go right ahead and keep pointing at the rule book if you like, and as usual, completely missing the point of a discussion board

                                        StargazerS Offline
                                        StargazerS Offline
                                        Stargazer
                                        wrote on last edited by Stargazer
                                        #2511

                                        @mariner4life I'm not defending his act at all. I'm just saying the judicial decision is correct and I don't see any reason for being embarrassed by the correct judicial decision being taken.

                                        He should be embarrassed for committing the act and he should improve and so should countless of other professional players who have or have not been yellow carded for it. This has been blown out of proportion, because it ended up in a red because of that first yellow card. If he hadn't had the first yellow card and hence the red, we wouldn't even be talking about this anymore.

                                        mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
                                        4
                                        • StargazerS Stargazer

                                          @mariner4life I'm not defending his act at all. I'm just saying the judicial decision is correct and I don't see any reason for being embarrassed by the correct judicial decision being taken.

                                          He should be embarrassed for committing the act and he should improve and so should countless of other professional players who have or have not been yellow carded for it. This has been blown out of proportion, because it ended up in a red because of that first yellow card. If he hadn't had the first yellow card and hence the red, we wouldn't even be talking about this anymore.

                                          mariner4lifeM Offline
                                          mariner4lifeM Offline
                                          mariner4life
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #2512

                                          @Stargazer said in All Blacks 2023:

                                          we wouldn't even be talking about this anymore.

                                          you might not, for obvious reasons

                                          but many of us would be looking at yet ANOTHER Scott Barrett card for foul play and wondering if a player really is capable of change.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          9
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search