Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
2.8k Posts 123 Posters 402.6k Views 6 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

    @mariner4life said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

    @nostrildamus said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

    @mariner4life said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

    That final play sort of summed it up
    DMac somehow breaks the field open. Savea (who was exhausted) wasn't clean, and nor was ALB.

    I may be alone on this but I would have played DMac a lot earlier.

    No, it was clear that the game was crying out for his skill set

    If I was to be super critical of the coaches, there was a window with 10 or 11 minutes to go where I thought DMac on for Barrett and the game might open up for us. In hindsight and with the 2nd Boks YC, it probably would’ve.

    kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelb
    wrote on last edited by
    #1931

    @ACT-Crusader said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

    @mariner4life said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

    @nostrildamus said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

    @mariner4life said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

    That final play sort of summed it up
    DMac somehow breaks the field open. Savea (who was exhausted) wasn't clean, and nor was ALB.

    I may be alone on this but I would have played DMac a lot earlier.

    No, it was clear that the game was crying out for his skill set

    If I was to be super critical of the coaches, there was a window with 10 or 11 minutes to go where I thought DMac on for Barrett and the game might open up for us. In hindsight and with the 2nd Boks YC, it probably would’ve.

    They have hardly used him at all ,

    In the previous games I assumed the thinking is , we are ahead and we aren’t crying out for what he brings,

    This game was a different set of circumstances, we were behind and we needed a spark

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
    • canefanC canefan

      @Machpants said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

      @ACT-Crusader said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

      @mariner4life said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

      @nostrildamus said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

      @mariner4life said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

      That final play sort of summed it up
      DMac somehow breaks the field open. Savea (who was exhausted) wasn't clean, and nor was ALB.

      I may be alone on this but I would have played DMac a lot earlier.

      No, it was clear that the game was crying out for his skill set

      If I was to be super critical of the coaches, there was a window with 10 or 11 minutes to go where I thought DMac on for Barrett and the game might open up for us. In hindsight and with the 2nd Boks YC, it probably would’ve.

      Beaudy was pretty awful, under the high ball, kicking, decisions etc. I would have put DMac back there at half time

      He just went to pieces didn't he? We were lucky he didn't take us out of the running altogether

      TordahT Offline
      TordahT Offline
      Tordah
      wrote on last edited by
      #1932

      @canefan said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

      @Machpants said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

      @ACT-Crusader said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

      @mariner4life said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

      @nostrildamus said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

      @mariner4life said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

      That final play sort of summed it up
      DMac somehow breaks the field open. Savea (who was exhausted) wasn't clean, and nor was ALB.

      I may be alone on this but I would have played DMac a lot earlier.

      No, it was clear that the game was crying out for his skill set

      If I was to be super critical of the coaches, there was a window with 10 or 11 minutes to go where I thought DMac on for Barrett and the game might open up for us. In hindsight and with the 2nd Boks YC, it probably would’ve.

      Beaudy was pretty awful, under the high ball, kicking, decisions etc. I would have put DMac back there at half time

      He just went to pieces didn't he? We were lucky he didn't take us out of the running altogether

      Only Player ever to score tries in two rwc finals

      ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • Chris B.C Chris B.

        @Machpants said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

        @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

        @Dodge said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

        @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

        @mariner4life said in [RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks]

        Frizzell was carded for falling over

        That's the one we were really dudded on, I think.

        "A rugby collision", O'Keefe said - and that's basically what this was. They said as much when they didn't upgrade it. And handed the Boks the early momentum.

        I didn’t know the law / focus area of not allowing people to fall on exposed knees etc - ITV had the Irish ref on call who immediately called it as an issue, Barnes then reffed it exactly as he said he should. He was actually concerned it would be red. The fact we didn’t know about it doesn’t mean it wasn’t reffed correctly

        Which law?

        If he'd done it intentionally, it would have been red. Accidentally falling on someone is an accident.

        20d, and intentionally is not mentioned in that law

        Dangerous play in a ruck or maul.

        A player may lever the jackler out of the contest at the ruck but must not drop their weight onto them or target the lower limbs.

        "Target" is the operative word.

        nostrildamusN Offline
        nostrildamusN Offline
        nostrildamus
        wrote on last edited by
        #1933

        @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

        @Machpants said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

        @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

        @Dodge said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

        @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

        @mariner4life said in [RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks]

        Frizzell was carded for falling over

        That's the one we were really dudded on, I think.

        "A rugby collision", O'Keefe said - and that's basically what this was. They said as much when they didn't upgrade it. And handed the Boks the early momentum.

        I didn’t know the law / focus area of not allowing people to fall on exposed knees etc - ITV had the Irish ref on call who immediately called it as an issue, Barnes then reffed it exactly as he said he should. He was actually concerned it would be red. The fact we didn’t know about it doesn’t mean it wasn’t reffed correctly

        Which law?

        If he'd done it intentionally, it would have been red. Accidentally falling on someone is an accident.

        20d, and intentionally is not mentioned in that law

        Dangerous play in a ruck or maul.

        A player may lever the jackler out of the contest at the ruck but must not drop their weight onto them or target the lower limbs.

        "Target" is the operative word.

        very good point SF wasn't even looking at the legs.

        Chris B.C MiketheSnowM 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • BerniesCornerB Offline
          BerniesCornerB Offline
          BerniesCorner
          wrote on last edited by
          #1934

          SA worthy winners but this great tournament deserved a better finish

          nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • TordahT Tordah

            @canefan said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

            @Machpants said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

            @ACT-Crusader said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

            @mariner4life said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

            @nostrildamus said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

            @mariner4life said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

            That final play sort of summed it up
            DMac somehow breaks the field open. Savea (who was exhausted) wasn't clean, and nor was ALB.

            I may be alone on this but I would have played DMac a lot earlier.

            No, it was clear that the game was crying out for his skill set

            If I was to be super critical of the coaches, there was a window with 10 or 11 minutes to go where I thought DMac on for Barrett and the game might open up for us. In hindsight and with the 2nd Boks YC, it probably would’ve.

            Beaudy was pretty awful, under the high ball, kicking, decisions etc. I would have put DMac back there at half time

            He just went to pieces didn't he? We were lucky he didn't take us out of the running altogether

            Only Player ever to score tries in two rwc finals

            ACT CrusaderA Offline
            ACT CrusaderA Offline
            ACT Crusader
            wrote on last edited by
            #1935

            @Tordah said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

            @canefan said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

            @Machpants said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

            @ACT-Crusader said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

            @mariner4life said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

            @nostrildamus said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

            @mariner4life said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

            That final play sort of summed it up
            DMac somehow breaks the field open. Savea (who was exhausted) wasn't clean, and nor was ALB.

            I may be alone on this but I would have played DMac a lot earlier.

            No, it was clear that the game was crying out for his skill set

            If I was to be super critical of the coaches, there was a window with 10 or 11 minutes to go where I thought DMac on for Barrett and the game might open up for us. In hindsight and with the 2nd Boks YC, it probably would’ve.

            Beaudy was pretty awful, under the high ball, kicking, decisions etc. I would have put DMac back there at half time

            He just went to pieces didn't he? We were lucky he didn't take us out of the running altogether

            Only Player ever to score tries in two rwc finals

            A Foster first then. He coached the only player to score in two RWC finals 😀

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • BerniesCornerB BerniesCorner

              SA worthy winners but this great tournament deserved a better finish

              nostrildamusN Offline
              nostrildamusN Offline
              nostrildamus
              wrote on last edited by
              #1936

              @BerniesCorner said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

              SA worthy winners but this great tournament deserved a better finish

              spot on, but problem with WR not the hosts.

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • BerniesCornerB Offline
                BerniesCornerB Offline
                BerniesCorner
                wrote on last edited by
                #1937

                Shame the weather has such a say

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • nostrildamusN nostrildamus

                  @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                  @Machpants said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                  @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                  @Dodge said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                  @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                  @mariner4life said in [RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks]

                  Frizzell was carded for falling over

                  That's the one we were really dudded on, I think.

                  "A rugby collision", O'Keefe said - and that's basically what this was. They said as much when they didn't upgrade it. And handed the Boks the early momentum.

                  I didn’t know the law / focus area of not allowing people to fall on exposed knees etc - ITV had the Irish ref on call who immediately called it as an issue, Barnes then reffed it exactly as he said he should. He was actually concerned it would be red. The fact we didn’t know about it doesn’t mean it wasn’t reffed correctly

                  Which law?

                  If he'd done it intentionally, it would have been red. Accidentally falling on someone is an accident.

                  20d, and intentionally is not mentioned in that law

                  Dangerous play in a ruck or maul.

                  A player may lever the jackler out of the contest at the ruck but must not drop their weight onto them or target the lower limbs.

                  "Target" is the operative word.

                  very good point SF wasn't even looking at the legs.

                  Chris B.C Offline
                  Chris B.C Offline
                  Chris B.
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #1938

                  @nostrildamus said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                  @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                  @Machpants said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                  @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                  @Dodge said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                  @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                  @mariner4life said in [RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks]

                  Frizzell was carded for falling over

                  That's the one we were really dudded on, I think.

                  "A rugby collision", O'Keefe said - and that's basically what this was. They said as much when they didn't upgrade it. And handed the Boks the early momentum.

                  I didn’t know the law / focus area of not allowing people to fall on exposed knees etc - ITV had the Irish ref on call who immediately called it as an issue, Barnes then reffed it exactly as he said he should. He was actually concerned it would be red. The fact we didn’t know about it doesn’t mean it wasn’t reffed correctly

                  Which law?

                  If he'd done it intentionally, it would have been red. Accidentally falling on someone is an accident.

                  20d, and intentionally is not mentioned in that law

                  Dangerous play in a ruck or maul.

                  A player may lever the jackler out of the contest at the ruck but must not drop their weight onto them or target the lower limbs.

                  "Target" is the operative word.

                  very good point SF wasn't even looking at the legs.

                  Yeah - look it it in real time. It's purely accidental in my view and a poor call.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  3
                  • NepiaN Offline
                    NepiaN Offline
                    Nepia
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #1939

                    I kind of wish that I wasn't reminded of Barnes admitting the penalty wasn't a penalty as I was a fairly contented (as contented as you can be) but now I'm starting to get angry about it. 🤣

                    M 1 Reply Last reply
                    7
                    • nostrildamusN nostrildamus

                      @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                      @Machpants said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                      @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                      @Dodge said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                      @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                      @mariner4life said in [RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks]

                      Frizzell was carded for falling over

                      That's the one we were really dudded on, I think.

                      "A rugby collision", O'Keefe said - and that's basically what this was. They said as much when they didn't upgrade it. And handed the Boks the early momentum.

                      I didn’t know the law / focus area of not allowing people to fall on exposed knees etc - ITV had the Irish ref on call who immediately called it as an issue, Barnes then reffed it exactly as he said he should. He was actually concerned it would be red. The fact we didn’t know about it doesn’t mean it wasn’t reffed correctly

                      Which law?

                      If he'd done it intentionally, it would have been red. Accidentally falling on someone is an accident.

                      20d, and intentionally is not mentioned in that law

                      Dangerous play in a ruck or maul.

                      A player may lever the jackler out of the contest at the ruck but must not drop their weight onto them or target the lower limbs.

                      "Target" is the operative word.

                      very good point SF wasn't even looking at the legs.

                      MiketheSnowM Offline
                      MiketheSnowM Offline
                      MiketheSnow
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #1940

                      @nostrildamus said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                      @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                      @Machpants said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                      @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                      @Dodge said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                      @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                      @mariner4life said in [RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks]

                      Frizzell was carded for falling over

                      That's the one we were really dudded on, I think.

                      "A rugby collision", O'Keefe said - and that's basically what this was. They said as much when they didn't upgrade it. And handed the Boks the early momentum.

                      I didn’t know the law / focus area of not allowing people to fall on exposed knees etc - ITV had the Irish ref on call who immediately called it as an issue, Barnes then reffed it exactly as he said he should. He was actually concerned it would be red. The fact we didn’t know about it doesn’t mean it wasn’t reffed correctly

                      Which law?

                      If he'd done it intentionally, it would have been red. Accidentally falling on someone is an accident.

                      20d, and intentionally is not mentioned in that law

                      Dangerous play in a ruck or maul.

                      A player may lever the jackler out of the contest at the ruck but must not drop their weight onto them or target the lower limbs.

                      "Target" is the operative word.

                      very good point SF wasn't even looking at the legs.

                      Which is why it stayed as a YC

                      Penalised for the neck roll
                      YC for dropping his weight on the jackaler
                      YC because it wasn’t deliberate and ‘targeted’

                      P 1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • NepiaN Nepia

                        I kind of wish that I wasn't reminded of Barnes admitting the penalty wasn't a penalty as I was a fairly contented (as contented as you can be) but now I'm starting to get angry about it. 🤣

                        M Offline
                        M Offline
                        mooshld
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #1941

                        @Nepia said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                        I kind of wish that I wasn't reminded of Barnes admitting the penalty wasn't a penalty as I was a fairly contented (as contented as you can be) but now I'm starting to get angry about it. 🤣

                        All he had to do was keep his mouth shut!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • StargazerS Offline
                          StargazerS Offline
                          Stargazer
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #1942

                          Did any of the players who were the "victim" of those head clashes go off for a HIA?

                          MajorPomM NTAN 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • StargazerS Stargazer

                            Did any of the players who were the "victim" of those head clashes go off for a HIA?

                            MajorPomM Offline
                            MajorPomM Offline
                            MajorPom
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #1943

                            @Stargazer said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                            Did any of the players who were the "victim" of those head clashes go off for a HIA?

                            I don't believe so. No doubt the would have been tactical subs though, not HIA.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            2
                            • StargazerS Stargazer

                              Did any of the players who were the "victim" of those head clashes go off for a HIA?

                              NTAN Offline
                              NTAN Offline
                              NTA
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #1944

                              @Stargazer said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                              Did any of the players who were the "victim" of those head clashes go off for a HIA?

                              That bit is irritating; if it is so dangerous, them the victim should get seen to off the field.

                              Makes a 7-1 bench a bit of a risk 😜

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              3
                              • canefanC Online
                                canefanC Online
                                canefan
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #1945

                                Screenshot_20231029_122505_WhatsApp.jpg

                                MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

                                  @W32 said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                                  Commiserations guys. The ABs showed what class they are.

                                  Enjoy it bro. Four more years of being labeled World Champs.

                                  I genuinely interested in what the Boks will do when it comes to how they select their side. Will today’s win give justification for it? Other than in set piece play, the Boks midfield are hardly ever in the game. So continue to play like this and the forward selections will be the focus.

                                  It was noticeable in that last 10 that the ABs expended a lot of energy covering for Cane’s RC.

                                  W Offline
                                  W Offline
                                  W32
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #1946

                                  @ACT-Crusader said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                                  @W32 said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                                  Commiserations guys. The ABs showed what class they are.

                                  Enjoy it bro. Four more years of being labeled World Champs.

                                  I genuinely interested in what the Boks will do when it comes to how they select their side. Will today’s win give justification for it? Other than in set piece play, the Boks midfield are hardly ever in the game. So continue to play like this and the forward selections will be the focus.

                                  It was noticeable in that last 10 that the ABs expended a lot of energy covering for Cane’s RC.

                                  Think horses for courses. Yes, the win justifies the selection today. But if they (coaches) had lost it would have catastrophic and could have been a blowout. They backed themselves and it worked out. Barely. I think rassie is smarter than fossie…. As hard as that is to accept for some.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  3
                                  • canefanC Online
                                    canefanC Online
                                    canefan
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #1947

                                    Funnily enough I felt like our tactics were generally very good today. We should have been more direct, but our exits were deeper. I'll put a bunch of stuff on the players' failure to execute today. Which is tough because their efforts were immense

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    8
                                    • MajorPomM Offline
                                      MajorPomM Offline
                                      MajorPom
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #1948

                                      Our exits were better, but did anybody else notice that our long exit kicks were significantly better in open play than in free kicks / penalties?

                                      canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
                                      4
                                      • MajorPomM MajorPom

                                        Our exits were better, but did anybody else notice that our long exit kicks were significantly better in open play than in free kicks / penalties?

                                        canefanC Online
                                        canefanC Online
                                        canefan
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #1949

                                        @MajorRage said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                                        Our exits were better, but did anybody else notice that our long exit kicks were significantly better in open play than in free kicks / penalties?

                                        What is that about? I hope that DMac at 10 can peel off more distance with our exits next season

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • MiketheSnowM MiketheSnow

                                          @nostrildamus said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                                          @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                                          @Machpants said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                                          @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                                          @Dodge said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                                          @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                                          @mariner4life said in [RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks]

                                          Frizzell was carded for falling over

                                          That's the one we were really dudded on, I think.

                                          "A rugby collision", O'Keefe said - and that's basically what this was. They said as much when they didn't upgrade it. And handed the Boks the early momentum.

                                          I didn’t know the law / focus area of not allowing people to fall on exposed knees etc - ITV had the Irish ref on call who immediately called it as an issue, Barnes then reffed it exactly as he said he should. He was actually concerned it would be red. The fact we didn’t know about it doesn’t mean it wasn’t reffed correctly

                                          Which law?

                                          If he'd done it intentionally, it would have been red. Accidentally falling on someone is an accident.

                                          20d, and intentionally is not mentioned in that law

                                          Dangerous play in a ruck or maul.

                                          A player may lever the jackler out of the contest at the ruck but must not drop their weight onto them or target the lower limbs.

                                          "Target" is the operative word.

                                          very good point SF wasn't even looking at the legs.

                                          Which is why it stayed as a YC

                                          Penalised for the neck roll
                                          YC for dropping his weight on the jackaler
                                          YC because it wasn’t deliberate and ‘targeted’

                                          P Offline
                                          P Offline
                                          PecoTrain
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #1950

                                          @MiketheSnow said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                                          @nostrildamus said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                                          @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                                          @Machpants said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                                          @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                                          @Dodge said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                                          @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                                          @mariner4life said in [RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks]

                                          Frizzell was carded for falling over

                                          That's the one we were really dudded on, I think.

                                          "A rugby collision", O'Keefe said - and that's basically what this was. They said as much when they didn't upgrade it. And handed the Boks the early momentum.

                                          I didn’t know the law / focus area of not allowing people to fall on exposed knees etc - ITV had the Irish ref on call who immediately called it as an issue, Barnes then reffed it exactly as he said he should. He was actually concerned it would be red. The fact we didn’t know about it doesn’t mean it wasn’t reffed correctly

                                          Which law?

                                          If he'd done it intentionally, it would have been red. Accidentally falling on someone is an accident.

                                          20d, and intentionally is not mentioned in that law

                                          Dangerous play in a ruck or maul.

                                          A player may lever the jackler out of the contest at the ruck but must not drop their weight onto them or target the lower limbs.

                                          "Target" is the operative word.

                                          very good point SF wasn't even looking at the legs.

                                          Which is why it stayed as a YC

                                          Penalised for the neck roll
                                          YC for dropping his weight on the jackaler
                                          YC because it wasn’t deliberate and ‘targeted’

                                          YC for attempting to avoid Kitshoffs forearm that still managed to connect with Frizells head?

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search