Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
2.8k Posts 123 Posters 402.5k Views 6 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • canefanC canefan

    @Machpants said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

    @ACT-Crusader said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

    @mariner4life said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

    @nostrildamus said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

    @mariner4life said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

    That final play sort of summed it up
    DMac somehow breaks the field open. Savea (who was exhausted) wasn't clean, and nor was ALB.

    I may be alone on this but I would have played DMac a lot earlier.

    No, it was clear that the game was crying out for his skill set

    If I was to be super critical of the coaches, there was a window with 10 or 11 minutes to go where I thought DMac on for Barrett and the game might open up for us. In hindsight and with the 2nd Boks YC, it probably would’ve.

    Beaudy was pretty awful, under the high ball, kicking, decisions etc. I would have put DMac back there at half time

    He just went to pieces didn't he? We were lucky he didn't take us out of the running altogether

    TordahT Offline
    TordahT Offline
    Tordah
    wrote on last edited by
    #1932

    @canefan said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

    @Machpants said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

    @ACT-Crusader said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

    @mariner4life said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

    @nostrildamus said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

    @mariner4life said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

    That final play sort of summed it up
    DMac somehow breaks the field open. Savea (who was exhausted) wasn't clean, and nor was ALB.

    I may be alone on this but I would have played DMac a lot earlier.

    No, it was clear that the game was crying out for his skill set

    If I was to be super critical of the coaches, there was a window with 10 or 11 minutes to go where I thought DMac on for Barrett and the game might open up for us. In hindsight and with the 2nd Boks YC, it probably would’ve.

    Beaudy was pretty awful, under the high ball, kicking, decisions etc. I would have put DMac back there at half time

    He just went to pieces didn't he? We were lucky he didn't take us out of the running altogether

    Only Player ever to score tries in two rwc finals

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • Chris B.C Chris B.

      @Machpants said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

      @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

      @Dodge said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

      @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

      @mariner4life said in [RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks]

      Frizzell was carded for falling over

      That's the one we were really dudded on, I think.

      "A rugby collision", O'Keefe said - and that's basically what this was. They said as much when they didn't upgrade it. And handed the Boks the early momentum.

      I didn’t know the law / focus area of not allowing people to fall on exposed knees etc - ITV had the Irish ref on call who immediately called it as an issue, Barnes then reffed it exactly as he said he should. He was actually concerned it would be red. The fact we didn’t know about it doesn’t mean it wasn’t reffed correctly

      Which law?

      If he'd done it intentionally, it would have been red. Accidentally falling on someone is an accident.

      20d, and intentionally is not mentioned in that law

      Dangerous play in a ruck or maul.

      A player may lever the jackler out of the contest at the ruck but must not drop their weight onto them or target the lower limbs.

      "Target" is the operative word.

      nostrildamusN Offline
      nostrildamusN Offline
      nostrildamus
      wrote on last edited by
      #1933

      @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

      @Machpants said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

      @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

      @Dodge said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

      @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

      @mariner4life said in [RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks]

      Frizzell was carded for falling over

      That's the one we were really dudded on, I think.

      "A rugby collision", O'Keefe said - and that's basically what this was. They said as much when they didn't upgrade it. And handed the Boks the early momentum.

      I didn’t know the law / focus area of not allowing people to fall on exposed knees etc - ITV had the Irish ref on call who immediately called it as an issue, Barnes then reffed it exactly as he said he should. He was actually concerned it would be red. The fact we didn’t know about it doesn’t mean it wasn’t reffed correctly

      Which law?

      If he'd done it intentionally, it would have been red. Accidentally falling on someone is an accident.

      20d, and intentionally is not mentioned in that law

      Dangerous play in a ruck or maul.

      A player may lever the jackler out of the contest at the ruck but must not drop their weight onto them or target the lower limbs.

      "Target" is the operative word.

      very good point SF wasn't even looking at the legs.

      Chris B.C MiketheSnowM 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • BerniesCornerB Offline
        BerniesCornerB Offline
        BerniesCorner
        wrote on last edited by
        #1934

        SA worthy winners but this great tournament deserved a better finish

        nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • TordahT Tordah

          @canefan said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

          @Machpants said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

          @ACT-Crusader said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

          @mariner4life said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

          @nostrildamus said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

          @mariner4life said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

          That final play sort of summed it up
          DMac somehow breaks the field open. Savea (who was exhausted) wasn't clean, and nor was ALB.

          I may be alone on this but I would have played DMac a lot earlier.

          No, it was clear that the game was crying out for his skill set

          If I was to be super critical of the coaches, there was a window with 10 or 11 minutes to go where I thought DMac on for Barrett and the game might open up for us. In hindsight and with the 2nd Boks YC, it probably would’ve.

          Beaudy was pretty awful, under the high ball, kicking, decisions etc. I would have put DMac back there at half time

          He just went to pieces didn't he? We were lucky he didn't take us out of the running altogether

          Only Player ever to score tries in two rwc finals

          ACT CrusaderA Offline
          ACT CrusaderA Offline
          ACT Crusader
          wrote on last edited by
          #1935

          @Tordah said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

          @canefan said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

          @Machpants said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

          @ACT-Crusader said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

          @mariner4life said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

          @nostrildamus said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

          @mariner4life said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

          That final play sort of summed it up
          DMac somehow breaks the field open. Savea (who was exhausted) wasn't clean, and nor was ALB.

          I may be alone on this but I would have played DMac a lot earlier.

          No, it was clear that the game was crying out for his skill set

          If I was to be super critical of the coaches, there was a window with 10 or 11 minutes to go where I thought DMac on for Barrett and the game might open up for us. In hindsight and with the 2nd Boks YC, it probably would’ve.

          Beaudy was pretty awful, under the high ball, kicking, decisions etc. I would have put DMac back there at half time

          He just went to pieces didn't he? We were lucky he didn't take us out of the running altogether

          Only Player ever to score tries in two rwc finals

          A Foster first then. He coached the only player to score in two RWC finals 😀

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • BerniesCornerB BerniesCorner

            SA worthy winners but this great tournament deserved a better finish

            nostrildamusN Offline
            nostrildamusN Offline
            nostrildamus
            wrote on last edited by
            #1936

            @BerniesCorner said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

            SA worthy winners but this great tournament deserved a better finish

            spot on, but problem with WR not the hosts.

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • BerniesCornerB Offline
              BerniesCornerB Offline
              BerniesCorner
              wrote on last edited by
              #1937

              Shame the weather has such a say

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • nostrildamusN nostrildamus

                @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                @Machpants said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                @Dodge said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                @mariner4life said in [RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks]

                Frizzell was carded for falling over

                That's the one we were really dudded on, I think.

                "A rugby collision", O'Keefe said - and that's basically what this was. They said as much when they didn't upgrade it. And handed the Boks the early momentum.

                I didn’t know the law / focus area of not allowing people to fall on exposed knees etc - ITV had the Irish ref on call who immediately called it as an issue, Barnes then reffed it exactly as he said he should. He was actually concerned it would be red. The fact we didn’t know about it doesn’t mean it wasn’t reffed correctly

                Which law?

                If he'd done it intentionally, it would have been red. Accidentally falling on someone is an accident.

                20d, and intentionally is not mentioned in that law

                Dangerous play in a ruck or maul.

                A player may lever the jackler out of the contest at the ruck but must not drop their weight onto them or target the lower limbs.

                "Target" is the operative word.

                very good point SF wasn't even looking at the legs.

                Chris B.C Offline
                Chris B.C Offline
                Chris B.
                wrote on last edited by
                #1938

                @nostrildamus said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                @Machpants said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                @Dodge said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                @mariner4life said in [RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks]

                Frizzell was carded for falling over

                That's the one we were really dudded on, I think.

                "A rugby collision", O'Keefe said - and that's basically what this was. They said as much when they didn't upgrade it. And handed the Boks the early momentum.

                I didn’t know the law / focus area of not allowing people to fall on exposed knees etc - ITV had the Irish ref on call who immediately called it as an issue, Barnes then reffed it exactly as he said he should. He was actually concerned it would be red. The fact we didn’t know about it doesn’t mean it wasn’t reffed correctly

                Which law?

                If he'd done it intentionally, it would have been red. Accidentally falling on someone is an accident.

                20d, and intentionally is not mentioned in that law

                Dangerous play in a ruck or maul.

                A player may lever the jackler out of the contest at the ruck but must not drop their weight onto them or target the lower limbs.

                "Target" is the operative word.

                very good point SF wasn't even looking at the legs.

                Yeah - look it it in real time. It's purely accidental in my view and a poor call.

                1 Reply Last reply
                3
                • NepiaN Offline
                  NepiaN Offline
                  Nepia
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #1939

                  I kind of wish that I wasn't reminded of Barnes admitting the penalty wasn't a penalty as I was a fairly contented (as contented as you can be) but now I'm starting to get angry about it. 🤣

                  M 1 Reply Last reply
                  7
                  • nostrildamusN nostrildamus

                    @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                    @Machpants said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                    @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                    @Dodge said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                    @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                    @mariner4life said in [RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks]

                    Frizzell was carded for falling over

                    That's the one we were really dudded on, I think.

                    "A rugby collision", O'Keefe said - and that's basically what this was. They said as much when they didn't upgrade it. And handed the Boks the early momentum.

                    I didn’t know the law / focus area of not allowing people to fall on exposed knees etc - ITV had the Irish ref on call who immediately called it as an issue, Barnes then reffed it exactly as he said he should. He was actually concerned it would be red. The fact we didn’t know about it doesn’t mean it wasn’t reffed correctly

                    Which law?

                    If he'd done it intentionally, it would have been red. Accidentally falling on someone is an accident.

                    20d, and intentionally is not mentioned in that law

                    Dangerous play in a ruck or maul.

                    A player may lever the jackler out of the contest at the ruck but must not drop their weight onto them or target the lower limbs.

                    "Target" is the operative word.

                    very good point SF wasn't even looking at the legs.

                    MiketheSnowM Offline
                    MiketheSnowM Offline
                    MiketheSnow
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #1940

                    @nostrildamus said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                    @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                    @Machpants said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                    @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                    @Dodge said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                    @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                    @mariner4life said in [RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks]

                    Frizzell was carded for falling over

                    That's the one we were really dudded on, I think.

                    "A rugby collision", O'Keefe said - and that's basically what this was. They said as much when they didn't upgrade it. And handed the Boks the early momentum.

                    I didn’t know the law / focus area of not allowing people to fall on exposed knees etc - ITV had the Irish ref on call who immediately called it as an issue, Barnes then reffed it exactly as he said he should. He was actually concerned it would be red. The fact we didn’t know about it doesn’t mean it wasn’t reffed correctly

                    Which law?

                    If he'd done it intentionally, it would have been red. Accidentally falling on someone is an accident.

                    20d, and intentionally is not mentioned in that law

                    Dangerous play in a ruck or maul.

                    A player may lever the jackler out of the contest at the ruck but must not drop their weight onto them or target the lower limbs.

                    "Target" is the operative word.

                    very good point SF wasn't even looking at the legs.

                    Which is why it stayed as a YC

                    Penalised for the neck roll
                    YC for dropping his weight on the jackaler
                    YC because it wasn’t deliberate and ‘targeted’

                    P 1 Reply Last reply
                    2
                    • NepiaN Nepia

                      I kind of wish that I wasn't reminded of Barnes admitting the penalty wasn't a penalty as I was a fairly contented (as contented as you can be) but now I'm starting to get angry about it. 🤣

                      M Offline
                      M Offline
                      mooshld
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #1941

                      @Nepia said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                      I kind of wish that I wasn't reminded of Barnes admitting the penalty wasn't a penalty as I was a fairly contented (as contented as you can be) but now I'm starting to get angry about it. 🤣

                      All he had to do was keep his mouth shut!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • StargazerS Offline
                        StargazerS Offline
                        Stargazer
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #1942

                        Did any of the players who were the "victim" of those head clashes go off for a HIA?

                        MajorPomM NTAN 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • StargazerS Stargazer

                          Did any of the players who were the "victim" of those head clashes go off for a HIA?

                          MajorPomM Offline
                          MajorPomM Offline
                          MajorPom
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #1943

                          @Stargazer said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                          Did any of the players who were the "victim" of those head clashes go off for a HIA?

                          I don't believe so. No doubt the would have been tactical subs though, not HIA.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          2
                          • StargazerS Stargazer

                            Did any of the players who were the "victim" of those head clashes go off for a HIA?

                            NTAN Offline
                            NTAN Offline
                            NTA
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #1944

                            @Stargazer said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                            Did any of the players who were the "victim" of those head clashes go off for a HIA?

                            That bit is irritating; if it is so dangerous, them the victim should get seen to off the field.

                            Makes a 7-1 bench a bit of a risk 😜

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            3
                            • canefanC Online
                              canefanC Online
                              canefan
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #1945

                              Screenshot_20231029_122505_WhatsApp.jpg

                              MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

                                @W32 said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                                Commiserations guys. The ABs showed what class they are.

                                Enjoy it bro. Four more years of being labeled World Champs.

                                I genuinely interested in what the Boks will do when it comes to how they select their side. Will today’s win give justification for it? Other than in set piece play, the Boks midfield are hardly ever in the game. So continue to play like this and the forward selections will be the focus.

                                It was noticeable in that last 10 that the ABs expended a lot of energy covering for Cane’s RC.

                                W Offline
                                W Offline
                                W32
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #1946

                                @ACT-Crusader said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                                @W32 said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                                Commiserations guys. The ABs showed what class they are.

                                Enjoy it bro. Four more years of being labeled World Champs.

                                I genuinely interested in what the Boks will do when it comes to how they select their side. Will today’s win give justification for it? Other than in set piece play, the Boks midfield are hardly ever in the game. So continue to play like this and the forward selections will be the focus.

                                It was noticeable in that last 10 that the ABs expended a lot of energy covering for Cane’s RC.

                                Think horses for courses. Yes, the win justifies the selection today. But if they (coaches) had lost it would have catastrophic and could have been a blowout. They backed themselves and it worked out. Barely. I think rassie is smarter than fossie…. As hard as that is to accept for some.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                3
                                • canefanC Online
                                  canefanC Online
                                  canefan
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #1947

                                  Funnily enough I felt like our tactics were generally very good today. We should have been more direct, but our exits were deeper. I'll put a bunch of stuff on the players' failure to execute today. Which is tough because their efforts were immense

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  8
                                  • MajorPomM Offline
                                    MajorPomM Offline
                                    MajorPom
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #1948

                                    Our exits were better, but did anybody else notice that our long exit kicks were significantly better in open play than in free kicks / penalties?

                                    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
                                    4
                                    • MajorPomM MajorPom

                                      Our exits were better, but did anybody else notice that our long exit kicks were significantly better in open play than in free kicks / penalties?

                                      canefanC Online
                                      canefanC Online
                                      canefan
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #1949

                                      @MajorRage said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                                      Our exits were better, but did anybody else notice that our long exit kicks were significantly better in open play than in free kicks / penalties?

                                      What is that about? I hope that DMac at 10 can peel off more distance with our exits next season

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • MiketheSnowM MiketheSnow

                                        @nostrildamus said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                                        @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                                        @Machpants said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                                        @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                                        @Dodge said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                                        @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                                        @mariner4life said in [RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks]

                                        Frizzell was carded for falling over

                                        That's the one we were really dudded on, I think.

                                        "A rugby collision", O'Keefe said - and that's basically what this was. They said as much when they didn't upgrade it. And handed the Boks the early momentum.

                                        I didn’t know the law / focus area of not allowing people to fall on exposed knees etc - ITV had the Irish ref on call who immediately called it as an issue, Barnes then reffed it exactly as he said he should. He was actually concerned it would be red. The fact we didn’t know about it doesn’t mean it wasn’t reffed correctly

                                        Which law?

                                        If he'd done it intentionally, it would have been red. Accidentally falling on someone is an accident.

                                        20d, and intentionally is not mentioned in that law

                                        Dangerous play in a ruck or maul.

                                        A player may lever the jackler out of the contest at the ruck but must not drop their weight onto them or target the lower limbs.

                                        "Target" is the operative word.

                                        very good point SF wasn't even looking at the legs.

                                        Which is why it stayed as a YC

                                        Penalised for the neck roll
                                        YC for dropping his weight on the jackaler
                                        YC because it wasn’t deliberate and ‘targeted’

                                        P Offline
                                        P Offline
                                        PecoTrain
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #1950

                                        @MiketheSnow said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                                        @nostrildamus said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                                        @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                                        @Machpants said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                                        @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                                        @Dodge said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                                        @Chris-B said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

                                        @mariner4life said in [RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks]

                                        Frizzell was carded for falling over

                                        That's the one we were really dudded on, I think.

                                        "A rugby collision", O'Keefe said - and that's basically what this was. They said as much when they didn't upgrade it. And handed the Boks the early momentum.

                                        I didn’t know the law / focus area of not allowing people to fall on exposed knees etc - ITV had the Irish ref on call who immediately called it as an issue, Barnes then reffed it exactly as he said he should. He was actually concerned it would be red. The fact we didn’t know about it doesn’t mean it wasn’t reffed correctly

                                        Which law?

                                        If he'd done it intentionally, it would have been red. Accidentally falling on someone is an accident.

                                        20d, and intentionally is not mentioned in that law

                                        Dangerous play in a ruck or maul.

                                        A player may lever the jackler out of the contest at the ruck but must not drop their weight onto them or target the lower limbs.

                                        "Target" is the operative word.

                                        very good point SF wasn't even looking at the legs.

                                        Which is why it stayed as a YC

                                        Penalised for the neck roll
                                        YC for dropping his weight on the jackaler
                                        YC because it wasn’t deliberate and ‘targeted’

                                        YC for attempting to avoid Kitshoffs forearm that still managed to connect with Frizells head?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • BovidaeB Offline
                                          BovidaeB Offline
                                          Bovidae
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #1951

                                          I don't think I have the energy to read through all the comments during the match.

                                          My reaction at the final whistle was a mixture of pride and disappointment.

                                          Despite Cane's RC and the Barnes/Foley comedy show the ABs still had the opportunity to win this game. JB and Mo'unga will rue their missed kicks. One of them would have done.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          11
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search