• 0 Votes
    52 Posts
    1k Views

    @kev no news on Tom, Tamati played about 25 mins even though he wasn't named

  • Auckland Rugby 2021

    Sports Talk
    0 Votes
    414 Posts
    24k Views

    @dice said in Auckland Rugby 2021:

    Not sure if Tony Tafa is with Auckland or the Warriors.

    He might be staying with rugby as they usually don't pick anyone in the NZ Schools team that has committed to RL. That Kelston no.6 being an example.

  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    97 Views

    Current voting prior to the final:

    20 Rayasi
    11 Choat
    6 AJ Lam
    6 Plummer
    5 Sullivan
    5 Adams
    4 R Ioane
    4 Ruru
    3 S Tuipulotu
    3 A Ioane
    3 Whetton
    3 Tu'ungafasi
    1 Scrafton
    1 Funaki
    1 Ta’avao

  • 0 Votes
    267 Posts
    9k Views

    @Dice said in Premiership Final - Auckland v Ta$man (Free entry):

    Congrats Ta$man and @Chris-B . Probably would've won by more if Christie's service wasn't so slow.

    He probably had his worst game for the season in the final.

  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    264 Views

    Current voting after 10 rounds

    17 Rayasi
    10 Choat
    6 AJ Lam
    6 Plummer
    4 Adams
    4 R Ioane
    3 Sullivan
    3 Ruru
    3 S Tuipulotu
    3 A Ioane
    3 Whetton
    3 Tu'ungafasi
    1 Scrafton
    1 Funaki

  • 0 Votes
    167 Posts
    5k Views

    @Crazy-Horse said in Premiership Semi-Final: Auckland v Waikato:

    @Kirwan said in Premiership Semi-Final: Auckland v Waikato:

    @Crazy-Horse said in Premiership Semi-Final: Auckland v Waikato:

    @Kirwan said in Premiership Semi-Final: Auckland v Waikato:

    @African-Monkey said in Premiership Semi-Final: Auckland v Waikato:

    I'm 50 mins into this game and geez does TJ have money on Waikato to win? Every decision that goes Auckland's way he sulks like a baby and has done nothing but rip into them when they make an error.

    It’s painful, hopefully they give Nisbo the final.

    I suspect the reason why some don’t hear it is they kind of agree with TJs anti-Auckland stance. Difference is they aren’t paid to basically promote a sport.

    Look at that Oz league commentator that makes a basic try seem like it was orgasmic. It’s almost like he likes the sport or something.

    I can't speak for others, but I am not anti Auckland, or anyone else for that matter. I just don't care enough for that shit.

    I have asked before, but someone give examples on how he is so mean to Auckland/Blues so I can see what I am missing. I recall TJ being critical and sounding frustrated at the Blues a few seasons ago when they were playing dumb rugby, but at the same time just about everyone on here were expressing the same frustrations.

    Lately I have been hearing TJ shooting his load over some of the young Auckland players - Rayasi and Sullivan spring to mind.

    Auckland does something good, muted enthusiasm. Opponent does the same thing, creams his pants.

    Auckland makes a mistake, goes on a multi minute rant. Opponent does the same thing, doesn’t get mentioned.

    Example from this game, Auckland player gets shoulder charged off the ball, with the whiplash effect it looked like it nearly knocked him out.

    He goes on and on about it was a harsh penalty.

    His job is to commentate, not cheerlead his favourites. Every other province gets a local colour commentator, and they generally keep him in check when he starts talking shit.

    If we can’t replace this dickhead, then at least pair him with an ex Auckland player that can call him out when he displays his bias, and crucially can sound enthusiastic for the Auckland team in the biggest rugby market in the country.

    Yeah I recall him going on about the shoulder charge but saw it as him not agreeing with the penalty, not an anti Auckland thing. But I acknowledge that could come across as anti Auckland if you had a horse in the race.

    Reminds me of people saying Justin Marshall favours the Crusaders in his commentary, but from my perspective as a Crusader supporter it seems the opposite. It's like he deliberately goes against the Crusaders to appear neutral. We all see and interpret things differently.

    And you would have a point if it was just me going on about his bias, but even non-Auckland fans notice it.

  • 0 Votes
    3 Posts
    266 Views

    Went with Rayasi, Scrafton and Sullivan.

  • 1 Votes
    131 Posts
    3k Views

    I had two moments of pure happiness this year - yelling at my tv until we lost the shield and yelling at my tv until we stayed up

  • 0 Votes
    6 Posts
    270 Views

    I gave the game a 2nd look and came away thinking Ta'avao and Adams were our two best in this match. For some big boys, they cover so much ground.

    I didn't realize just how good Ta'avao was on first watch. Not only was he one of our busiest players, but along with Adams, he was also our most physical player. He had some nice skillful touches too.

    What made his performance even more impressive was that this was his first match since September and he played the whole 84 minutes. Just a massive effort.

  • 3 Votes
    202 Posts
    3k Views

    @Chiefy07 I am not sure we would have won with Hawkins. We would have won with a first five eight that kicks well and leads the team around the park. Hawkins kicks have no length, he takes ages to wind up and kick and has been charged down this year because of it. I prefer Wiseguy to him because he carries at the line better. However that said Wiseguy and Johnny also need to work on their kicking games. I think thy both have more upside.

  • Auckland MOTM v Waikato

    MOTM Polls
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    98 Views

    Rayasi obviously

    Plummer apart from an early shite pass was very good

    Plenty of forwards were candidates. I went for Apisai, he spoiled a lot of Waikato attacks and got through a lot of work.

  • 0 Votes
    47 Posts
    780 Views

    @Yeetyaah said in Auckland v Waikato:

    Kinda glad I didn't watch that one. At a mates wedding drunk as shit.

    Here’s the highlights. Enjoy 🙂

  • Auckland MOTM v Harbour

    MOTM Polls
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    298 Views

    @nzzp

    He's had some good games (equal 3rd on the voting). However he really should be considered a 12 now

    The problem is Hickey is worse and it's probably too early to trust Sullivan

  • 3 Votes
    140 Posts
    4k Views

    @Tim said in North Harbour v Auckland:

    I had lunch in August in New Market next to the Blues forwards,

    Oh man here we go again...

  • Auckland MOTM v Tasman

    MOTM Polls
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    140 Views

    @ACT-Crusader said in Auckland MOTM v Ta$man:

    Rayasi, Choat, Plummer

    Ditto.

  • 0 Votes
    4 Posts
    113 Views

    @Duluth said in Auckland MOTM v Taranaki:

    @nzzp not often you can vote for two subs

    And Ruru at that!

    I liked what he and Hickey did coming on, made a real difference. Really disappointed for Plummer and Trainor, but that's life.

  • 2 Votes
    59 Posts
    1k Views

    A bit of cross promotion - free tickets for NZ Warriors members for this game.

  • Auckland MOTM v BOP

    MOTM Polls
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    131 Views

    Your reserve hooker gets my vote, not being able to throw straight helped the BoP immensely 🙂

    As I only watched the second half, its a bit difficult but for your mob.

    Rayasi took the 3 Monkley medal points (based more on first half work), but also the outside backs were making impressive counter rucks on both sides even in the second. Based on this AJ Lam gets a point for me, tackled and turnover a lot of ball out wide especially on webber, just didn't get any pies. Thought Plummers impact was impressive late too.