Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Let's talk about six, baby

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
allblacks
51 Posts 26 Posters 3.1k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ShadowTrooperS ShadowTrooper

    Ok so I'm always going to back a mullet, but these days I think Squire is only good for 40 mins before his intensity really drops off. I take the earlier point where SB came on and made a big difference, he has the height and mobility without being the 'enforcer' type we really covet at 6.
    So....we need a 6 with.....Brodie's Big Heart, Collin's Courage, Richie's Resolve and Jerome's Juddering hits. HmmmmI don't think we've found him just yet.
    This brings us to an interesting point, since Read is buggering off after 2019, it is high time we start developing an 8 - 52nd man - you know who you are get in there! I'd be happy to see Read switch to 6, and allow for Akira to come in at 8.
    Whether Seu can come back to some form, can Squire nail down the 6 spot, whether Frizzle can make more of a statement, are all interesting conundrums for 2019, and will need to be addressed with certainty before RWC.

    MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by
    #19

    @shadowtrooper said in Let's talk about six, baby:

    Ok so I'm always going to back a mullet, but these days I think Squire is only good for 40 mins before his intensity really drops off. I take the earlier point where SB came on and made a big difference, he has the height and mobility without being the 'enforcer' type we really covet at 6.
    So....we need a 6 with.....Brodie's Big Heart, Collin's Courage, Richie's Resolve and Jerome's Juddering hits. HmmmmI don't think we've found him just yet.
    This brings us to an interesting point, since Read is buggering off after 2019, it is high time we start developing an 8 - 52nd man - you know who you are get in there! I'd be happy to see Read switch to 6, and allow for Akira to come in at 8.
    Whether Seu can come back to some form, can Squire nail down the 6 spot, whether Frizzle can make more of a statement, are all interesting conundrums for 2019, and will need to be addressed with certainty before RWC.

    JC is looking down from heaven and isn't happy you didn't mention his juddering hits too.

    kiwiinmelbK 1 Reply Last reply
    2
    • C cgrant

      @kiwimurph said in Let's talk about six, baby:

      Evans and Hemopo are other names you could throw in the mix.

      Be interesting who gets the 6 shirt against Italy.

      I would add Seu as well. It's a shame he was injured this year and so missed most of the SR season. I found him outstanding during the last stages of the Mitre 10 Cup.

      BovidaeB Offline
      BovidaeB Offline
      Bovidae
      wrote on last edited by
      #20

      @cgrant said in Let's talk about six, baby:

      I would add Seu as well. It's a shame he was injured this year and so missed most of the SR season. I found him outstanding during the last stages of the Mitre 10 Cup.

      Seu looks best at 6 or lock but I fear Cooper will play him at no.8 again. He has the athleticism of Fifita but doesn't neglect his work in tight.

      C 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • MN5M MN5

        @shadowtrooper said in Let's talk about six, baby:

        Ok so I'm always going to back a mullet, but these days I think Squire is only good for 40 mins before his intensity really drops off. I take the earlier point where SB came on and made a big difference, he has the height and mobility without being the 'enforcer' type we really covet at 6.
        So....we need a 6 with.....Brodie's Big Heart, Collin's Courage, Richie's Resolve and Jerome's Juddering hits. HmmmmI don't think we've found him just yet.
        This brings us to an interesting point, since Read is buggering off after 2019, it is high time we start developing an 8 - 52nd man - you know who you are get in there! I'd be happy to see Read switch to 6, and allow for Akira to come in at 8.
        Whether Seu can come back to some form, can Squire nail down the 6 spot, whether Frizzle can make more of a statement, are all interesting conundrums for 2019, and will need to be addressed with certainty before RWC.

        JC is looking down from heaven and isn't happy you didn't mention his juddering hits too.

        kiwiinmelbK Online
        kiwiinmelbK Online
        kiwiinmelb
        wrote on last edited by
        #21

        @mn5 said in Let's talk about six, baby:

        @shadowtrooper said in Let's talk about six, baby:

        Ok so I'm always going to back a mullet, but these days I think Squire is only good for 40 mins before his intensity really drops off. I take the earlier point where SB came on and made a big difference, he has the height and mobility without being the 'enforcer' type we really covet at 6.
        So....we need a 6 with.....Brodie's Big Heart, Collin's Courage, Richie's Resolve and Jerome's Juddering hits. HmmmmI don't think we've found him just yet.
        This brings us to an interesting point, since Read is buggering off after 2019, it is high time we start developing an 8 - 52nd man - you know who you are get in there! I'd be happy to see Read switch to 6, and allow for Akira to come in at 8.
        Whether Seu can come back to some form, can Squire nail down the 6 spot, whether Frizzle can make more of a statement, are all interesting conundrums for 2019, and will need to be addressed with certainty before RWC.

        JC is looking down from heaven and isn't happy you didn't mention his juddering hits too.

        Jerry mastered the double hit , there would be the initial hit from body on body , the part where he often hurt them more , was when he slammed them into the ground , maybe if other players did that with the same brutality, especially if they were wearing black , we might see the rules committee looking at it .

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • BovidaeB Bovidae

          @cgrant said in Let's talk about six, baby:

          I would add Seu as well. It's a shame he was injured this year and so missed most of the SR season. I found him outstanding during the last stages of the Mitre 10 Cup.

          Seu looks best at 6 or lock but I fear Cooper will play him at no.8 again. He has the athleticism of Fifita but doesn't neglect his work in tight.

          C Offline
          C Offline
          cgrant
          wrote on last edited by
          #22

          @bovidae said in Let's talk about six, baby:

          @cgrant said in Let's talk about six, baby:

          I would add Seu as well. It's a shame he was injured this year and so missed most of the SR season. I found him outstanding during the last stages of the Mitre 10 Cup.

          Seu looks best at 6 or lock but I fear Cooper will play him at no.8 again. He has the athleticism of Fifita but doesn't neglect his work in tight.

          I rate him higher than Fifita and Frizell. He is much stronger than his lean frame may let it think and he's got genuine speed too. Standing at 2.01m, he is a good lineout target. Questions could be asked about his defense against big, powerful forwards running at him. I have never seen him make offensive tackles.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • sparkyS Offline
            sparkyS Offline
            sparky
            wrote on last edited by sparky
            #23

            Fifitia no thank you, too lazy. Frizell and Hemopo are worth another look perhaps. But for me Scott Barrett and Liam Squire (in that order) are the best two options at 6.

            Horses for courses. If it is dry, Squire is the better runner in space. Scott Barrett offers more at lineout time and at the maul so is better option for a game on a damp track. He was superb off the bench against England last week.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • DamoD Offline
              DamoD Offline
              Damo
              wrote on last edited by
              #24

              I want to see Scott Barrett play some more at during Super Rugby. A tight, lineout ball winning blindside flanker might be just what we need to provide balance, especially in games where Savea is playing rather than Cane.

              1 Reply Last reply
              4
              • Billy TellB Offline
                Billy TellB Offline
                Billy Tell
                wrote on last edited by
                #25

                Could Read move back to 6?? IIRC that’s where he started his AB career.

                MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • Billy TellB Billy Tell

                  Could Read move back to 6?? IIRC that’s where he started his AB career.

                  MN5M Online
                  MN5M Online
                  MN5
                  wrote on last edited by MN5
                  #26

                  @billy-tell said in Let's talk about six, baby:

                  Could Read move back to 6?? IIRC that’s where he started his AB career.

                  Great idea. Not sure if it's been mentioned on here before but maybe that could mean Akira Ioane could play No 8.

                  PaekakboyzP 1 Reply Last reply
                  5
                  • KiwiMurphK Online
                    KiwiMurphK Online
                    KiwiMurph
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #27

                    I've just had a quick look at the ESPN stats these last two weeks.

                    Liam Squire

                    v England - 3 x runs for 0 metres gained. 5 tackles made. 0 turnovers generated.

                    v Ireland - 5 x runs for 2 metres gained. 3 tackles made. 1 x penalty conceded for a high tackle. 0 turnovers generated.

                    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
                    5
                    • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

                      I've just had a quick look at the ESPN stats these last two weeks.

                      Liam Squire

                      v England - 3 x runs for 0 metres gained. 5 tackles made. 0 turnovers generated.

                      v Ireland - 5 x runs for 2 metres gained. 3 tackles made. 1 x penalty conceded for a high tackle. 0 turnovers generated.

                      taniwharugbyT Offline
                      taniwharugbyT Offline
                      taniwharugby
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #28

                      @kiwimurph shit, so he made 2m more than I did, and same amount of turnovers! 🙂

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      9
                      • M Offline
                        M Offline
                        Machpants
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #29

                        https://www.rugbypass.com/news/blindsided-is-no-6-the-all-blacks-biggest-world-cup-question-mark

                        I agree, it's not in a great place.

                        MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • sparkyS Offline
                          sparkyS Offline
                          sparky
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #30

                          Can anyone technical knowledge of backrow play see a problem with 6 Read 7 Cane or Savea 8 A. Ioane?

                          mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • BovidaeB Offline
                            BovidaeB Offline
                            Bovidae
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #31

                            Read started his AB career at 6 but hasn't played there for a long time.

                            No reason they couldn't move him there in the 2nd half and bring on a bruising no.8 instead of using Barrett to replace the starting blindside. Very unlikely to happen though as they favour having a second no.7 on the bench, while the locks usually go 80 mins.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • sparkyS sparky

                              Can anyone technical knowledge of backrow play see a problem with 6 Read 7 Cane or Savea 8 A. Ioane?

                              mariner4lifeM Online
                              mariner4lifeM Online
                              mariner4life
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #32

                              @sparky said in Let's talk about six, baby:

                              Can anyone technical knowledge of backrow play see a problem with 6 Read 7 Cane or Savea 8 A. Ioane?

                              technical? no. Time? yes. Read moving to a position he hasn't played in years, and a new guy being brought in to the team. And on top of that, all 4 of those guys play for different Super Rugby sides.

                              That's a nicely balanced trio, but it has zero chance of starting a meaningful test together.

                              rotatedR 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • taniwharugbyT Offline
                                taniwharugbyT Offline
                                taniwharugby
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #33

                                I think moving Cane to 6 would make more sense, he plays more as a 6 anyway.

                                mariner4lifeM BovidaeB 2 Replies Last reply
                                2
                                • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                                  I think moving Cane to 6 would make more sense, he plays more as a 6 anyway.

                                  mariner4lifeM Online
                                  mariner4lifeM Online
                                  mariner4life
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #34

                                  @taniwharugby said in Let's talk about six, baby:

                                  I think moving Cane to 6 would make more sense, he plays more as a 6 anyway.

                                  I'm not sure that's actually true, except for the fact that he is the guy in our pack who hits people really really hard.

                                  taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
                                  2
                                  • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                                    I think moving Cane to 6 would make more sense, he plays more as a 6 anyway.

                                    BovidaeB Offline
                                    BovidaeB Offline
                                    Bovidae
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #35

                                    @taniwharugby Interestingly Cane has sometimes moved to no.8 for the Chiefs but not to 6.

                                    It would be a brave move of Hansen and co to move players to different positions now.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

                                      @taniwharugby said in Let's talk about six, baby:

                                      I think moving Cane to 6 would make more sense, he plays more as a 6 anyway.

                                      I'm not sure that's actually true, except for the fact that he is the guy in our pack who hits people really really hard.

                                      taniwharugbyT Offline
                                      taniwharugbyT Offline
                                      taniwharugby
                                      wrote on last edited by taniwharugby
                                      #36

                                      @mariner4life not that we have had a traditional fetcher for some time, but I think he just plays more like Kaino did than any of those we have tried so far and is a bit tighter than a normal 7.

                                      Isnt as loose as Ardie, Todd sits someone in between the 2.

                                      @Bovidae yeah cant see them tinkering that much, assuming all are fit, if we were naming the starting trio for the RWC final tomorrow, I think we would see Squire, Cane, Read.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

                                        @sparky said in Let's talk about six, baby:

                                        Can anyone technical knowledge of backrow play see a problem with 6 Read 7 Cane or Savea 8 A. Ioane?

                                        technical? no. Time? yes. Read moving to a position he hasn't played in years, and a new guy being brought in to the team. And on top of that, all 4 of those guys play for different Super Rugby sides.

                                        That's a nicely balanced trio, but it has zero chance of starting a meaningful test together.

                                        rotatedR Offline
                                        rotatedR Offline
                                        rotated
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #37

                                        @mariner4life said in Let's talk about six, baby:

                                        That's a nicely balanced trio, but it has zero chance of starting a meaningful test together.

                                        Scott Barrett is logging minutes at (or in lieu of a) 6 in meaningful tests. It’s not out of the box.

                                        SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • rotatedR rotated

                                          @mariner4life said in Let's talk about six, baby:

                                          That's a nicely balanced trio, but it has zero chance of starting a meaningful test together.

                                          Scott Barrett is logging minutes at (or in lieu of a) 6 in meaningful tests. It’s not out of the box.

                                          SnowyS Offline
                                          SnowyS Offline
                                          Snowy
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #38

                                          @rotated said in Let's talk about six, baby:

                                          @mariner4life said in Let's talk about six, baby:

                                          That's a nicely balanced trio, but it has zero chance of starting a meaningful test together.

                                          Scott Barrett is logging minutes at (or in lieu of a) 6 in meaningful tests. It’s not out of the box.

                                          That might just be because of the stupid RWC restrictions on squad size. A few extra players won't hurt the budgets that much.

                                          M 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search