Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

All Blacks 2022

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
allblacks
4.7k Posts 105 Posters 981.9k Views 5 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • kiwiinmelbK kiwiinmelb

    If Jordan were to play 15 , who are most picking to play 14 ?

    I’m tipping the back 3 will be Clarke , Jordie , Jordan with tupaea starting at 12 atm .

    Not saying that’s the right way , more so how I predict they will go.

    StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #1507

    @kiwiinmelb Reece at 14.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
    • kiwiinmelbK kiwiinmelb

      If Jordan were to play 15 , who are most picking to play 14 ?

      I’m tipping the back 3 will be Clarke , Jordie , Jordan with tupaea starting at 12 atm .

      Not saying that’s the right way , more so how I predict they will go.

      DuluthD Offline
      DuluthD Offline
      Duluth
      wrote on last edited by Duluth
      #1508

      @kiwiinmelb

      I think most of them are picking Reece? He is playing well.

      I think you're right though, that back three is the most likely. Jordie was probably the best AB last year and he played at fullback (he even topped the super scientific TSF aggregate of MOTM polls)

      I think they'll be reluctant to move or demote Jordie

      kiwiinmelbK KiwiwombleK 2 Replies Last reply
      4
      • DuluthD Duluth

        @kiwiinmelb

        I think most of them are picking Reece? He is playing well.

        I think you're right though, that back three is the most likely. Jordie was probably the best AB last year and he played at fullback (he even topped the super scientific TSF aggregate of MOTM polls)

        I think they'll be reluctant to move or demote Jordie

        kiwiinmelbK Offline
        kiwiinmelbK Offline
        kiwiinmelb
        wrote on last edited by kiwiinmelb
        #1509

        @Duluth said in All Blacks 2022:

        @kiwiinmelb

        I think most of them are picking Reece? He is playing well.

        I think you're right though, that back three is the most likely. Jordie was probably the best AB last year and played at fullback (he even topped the super scientific TSF aggregate of MOTM polls)

        I think they'll be reluctant to move or demote Jordie

        End of the day, I think how well our pack goes will determine how well we go overall more so than who wears what number in the backline IMO

        taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • kiwiinmelbK kiwiinmelb

          @Duluth said in All Blacks 2022:

          @kiwiinmelb

          I think most of them are picking Reece? He is playing well.

          I think you're right though, that back three is the most likely. Jordie was probably the best AB last year and played at fullback (he even topped the super scientific TSF aggregate of MOTM polls)

          I think they'll be reluctant to move or demote Jordie

          End of the day, I think how well our pack goes will determine how well we go overall more so than who wears what number in the backline IMO

          taniwharugbyT Offline
          taniwharugbyT Offline
          taniwharugby
          wrote on last edited by
          #1510

          @kiwiinmelb and TBF, I dont think we are a million miles away from where we need to be, and maybe the involvement if Schmidt will see the tweaks needed to get us back to where we need to be with our current crop...cos you gotta say alot underperformed to what we know and expected.

          kiwiinmelbK 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

            @kiwiinmelb and TBF, I dont think we are a million miles away from where we need to be, and maybe the involvement if Schmidt will see the tweaks needed to get us back to where we need to be with our current crop...cos you gotta say alot underperformed to what we know and expected.

            kiwiinmelbK Offline
            kiwiinmelbK Offline
            kiwiinmelb
            wrote on last edited by
            #1511

            @taniwharugby said in All Blacks 2022:

            @kiwiinmelb and TBF, I dont think we are a million miles away from where we need to be, and maybe the involvement if Schmidt will see the tweaks needed to get us back to where we need to be with our current crop...cos you gotta say alot underperformed to what we know and expected.

            I dont believe we are short of talent , particularly in the backs

            M 1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • kiwiinmelbK kiwiinmelb

              @taniwharugby said in All Blacks 2022:

              @kiwiinmelb and TBF, I dont think we are a million miles away from where we need to be, and maybe the involvement if Schmidt will see the tweaks needed to get us back to where we need to be with our current crop...cos you gotta say alot underperformed to what we know and expected.

              I dont believe we are short of talent , particularly in the backs

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Machpants
              wrote on last edited by Machpants
              #1512

              @kiwiinmelb said in All Blacks 2022:

              @taniwharugby said in All Blacks 2022:

              @kiwiinmelb and TBF, I dont think we are a million miles away from where we need to be, and maybe the involvement if Schmidt will see the tweaks needed to get us back to where we need to be with our current crop...cos you gotta say alot underperformed to what we know and expected.

              I dont believe we are short of talent , particularly in the backs

              Yeah it is the fact our forwards are dominated and don't have the skills (or can't employ them) of the best teams now, and our game plan/structure hasn't really changed since 2016

              taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • M Machpants

                @kiwiinmelb said in All Blacks 2022:

                @taniwharugby said in All Blacks 2022:

                @kiwiinmelb and TBF, I dont think we are a million miles away from where we need to be, and maybe the involvement if Schmidt will see the tweaks needed to get us back to where we need to be with our current crop...cos you gotta say alot underperformed to what we know and expected.

                I dont believe we are short of talent , particularly in the backs

                Yeah it is the fact our forwards are dominated and don't have the skills (or can't employ them) of the best teams now, and our game plan/structure hasn't really changed since 2016

                taniwharugbyT Offline
                taniwharugbyT Offline
                taniwharugby
                wrote on last edited by
                #1513

                @Machpants said in All Blacks 2022:

                or can't employ them

                I think that is more the issue...there were periods when our forwards have done well, then reverted to this passive style...so IMO it is more game plan or execution than skills or ability.

                M Victor MeldrewV 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                  @Machpants said in All Blacks 2022:

                  or can't employ them

                  I think that is more the issue...there were periods when our forwards have done well, then reverted to this passive style...so IMO it is more game plan or execution than skills or ability.

                  M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Machpants
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #1514

                  @taniwharugby said in All Blacks 2022:

                  @Machpants said in All Blacks 2022:

                  or can't employ them

                  I think that is more the issue...there were periods when our forwards have done well, then reverted to this passive style...so IMO it is more game plan or execution than skills or ability.

                  Coached tactics issue, I've written the ABs off until post this RWC. A Foster doesn't change it's spots, he might talk about doing so (and has, before and after selction) but the Hansen style is still there

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  3
                  • CrucialC Offline
                    CrucialC Offline
                    Crucial
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #1515

                    I think that the approach is fair enough (ducks) in that you don't be the best by doing things the same way as everyone else and you must also play the way that comes naturally to make the most of instinctive brilliance.
                    What hasn't been shown is an indication that the current tactical approach will work. You still have to stop the opposition playing to their strengths as well. Currently we are almost encouraging other teams to play the way they want which means that if they have an 'on song' day with few mistakes it makes life very tough for us.
                    We know that NZ teams are the best (and thrive off) turnover ball. You dont get much turnover ball with rush defence. You just get endless phases and tackling until you get a scrum or the ball is kicked and the process starts over again.
                    What that means though is that teams that play that way are very well drilled in endless recycling then kicking and if you let them get a roll on moving forward they can eat metres and you are more likely to give away a penalty for offside or for desperately attacking the ball at a breakdown.
                    So it's a hard balance to find. You want turnover opportunities but the risk/reward in trying to isolate a ball carrier is high.
                    I don't want us to play like England/Ireland/France/SA which is stalemate rugby in a sense, waiting for a chance to pull the trigger. However trying to create those chances is also fraught with danger.
                    If I got to set a 'way of playing' with our resources and instincts I would probably look back to move forward and look to disrupt these very robotic defensive systems with slick plays, angled running from backs and forwards, direction switches (god I hate it when we continually hammer one side) etc. Basically smart rugby that forces defenses to make decisions
                    When on defence we need to set traps rather than just be passive. Mix things up.

                    Now where do I collect my big salary?

                    M juniorJ 2 Replies Last reply
                    2
                    • CrucialC Crucial

                      I think that the approach is fair enough (ducks) in that you don't be the best by doing things the same way as everyone else and you must also play the way that comes naturally to make the most of instinctive brilliance.
                      What hasn't been shown is an indication that the current tactical approach will work. You still have to stop the opposition playing to their strengths as well. Currently we are almost encouraging other teams to play the way they want which means that if they have an 'on song' day with few mistakes it makes life very tough for us.
                      We know that NZ teams are the best (and thrive off) turnover ball. You dont get much turnover ball with rush defence. You just get endless phases and tackling until you get a scrum or the ball is kicked and the process starts over again.
                      What that means though is that teams that play that way are very well drilled in endless recycling then kicking and if you let them get a roll on moving forward they can eat metres and you are more likely to give away a penalty for offside or for desperately attacking the ball at a breakdown.
                      So it's a hard balance to find. You want turnover opportunities but the risk/reward in trying to isolate a ball carrier is high.
                      I don't want us to play like England/Ireland/France/SA which is stalemate rugby in a sense, waiting for a chance to pull the trigger. However trying to create those chances is also fraught with danger.
                      If I got to set a 'way of playing' with our resources and instincts I would probably look back to move forward and look to disrupt these very robotic defensive systems with slick plays, angled running from backs and forwards, direction switches (god I hate it when we continually hammer one side) etc. Basically smart rugby that forces defenses to make decisions
                      When on defence we need to set traps rather than just be passive. Mix things up.

                      Now where do I collect my big salary?

                      M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Machpants
                      wrote on last edited by Machpants
                      #1516

                      @Crucial I don't think you've watched France enough recently, they are by far the most innvative and attacking team out there. And rather than waiting for opposition mistakes, they actually create attacking opportunites

                      ZOMFG that's possible? Yes it is, so Galthie has your salary already, because what you suggest is play like France 😉

                      Also Ireland are not the robots of old, even England are trying to play unstructured rugby

                      Boks, nah dull as shit

                      CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • M Machpants

                        @Crucial I don't think you've watched France enough recently, they are by far the most innvative and attacking team out there. And rather than waiting for opposition mistakes, they actually create attacking opportunites

                        ZOMFG that's possible? Yes it is, so Galthie has your salary already, because what you suggest is play like France 😉

                        Also Ireland are not the robots of old, even England are trying to play unstructured rugby

                        Boks, nah dull as shit

                        CrucialC Offline
                        CrucialC Offline
                        Crucial
                        wrote on last edited by Crucial
                        #1517

                        @Machpants said in All Blacks 2022:

                        @Crucial I don't think you've watched France enough recently, they are by far the most innvative and attacking team out there. And rather than waiting for opposition mistakes, they actually create attacking opportunites

                        ZOMFG that's possible? Yes it is, so Galthie has your salary already 😉

                        ALso Irealnd are not the robots of old, even England are trying to play unstructured rugby

                        Boks, nah dull as shit

                        They aren't complete robots (and I did hesitate to mention France) but if you can negate their attack they will resort to 10/11 man rugby for periods to control possession.
                        Any discussion like this is by nature a lot of generlisation but its also very fair to say that a lot of the way AB play and coaching is descibed here is generalisation as well. eg we don't always use a passive defence, we sometimes try a full court press and we've even seen the innovative trial of using an unexpected defensive shooter (TJP from behind the defensive line) to disrupt.
                        I think my overall point is that I don't think Foster and co are just using an old pattern and crossing their fingers. They are trying things. It's just that they don't appear to have latched onto the goose that lays the golden egg yet.

                        FrankF 1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • DuluthD Duluth

                          @kiwiinmelb

                          I think most of them are picking Reece? He is playing well.

                          I think you're right though, that back three is the most likely. Jordie was probably the best AB last year and he played at fullback (he even topped the super scientific TSF aggregate of MOTM polls)

                          I think they'll be reluctant to move or demote Jordie

                          KiwiwombleK Offline
                          KiwiwombleK Offline
                          Kiwiwomble
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #1518

                          @Duluth said in All Blacks 2022:

                          @kiwiinmelb

                          I think most of them are picking Reece? He is playing well.

                          I think you're right though, that back three is the most likely. Jordie was probably the best AB last year and he played at fullback (he even topped the super scientific TSF aggregate of MOTM polls)

                          I think they'll be reluctant to move or demote Jordie

                          100% agree this makes sense....my only "concern" and reason i'd like to see jordie given a go at 12, is we've had some world class outside backs in reece, jordan and jordie for the last couple of years...but i feel we havent even seen their full capabilities because theyre being hampered by a misfiring midfield

                          too often when we've seen jordie play well is returning the ball from deep...and thats come after we've lost it in midfield and theyve booted it back

                          CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

                            @Duluth said in All Blacks 2022:

                            @kiwiinmelb

                            I think most of them are picking Reece? He is playing well.

                            I think you're right though, that back three is the most likely. Jordie was probably the best AB last year and he played at fullback (he even topped the super scientific TSF aggregate of MOTM polls)

                            I think they'll be reluctant to move or demote Jordie

                            100% agree this makes sense....my only "concern" and reason i'd like to see jordie given a go at 12, is we've had some world class outside backs in reece, jordan and jordie for the last couple of years...but i feel we havent even seen their full capabilities because theyre being hampered by a misfiring midfield

                            too often when we've seen jordie play well is returning the ball from deep...and thats come after we've lost it in midfield and theyve booted it back

                            CrucialC Offline
                            CrucialC Offline
                            Crucial
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #1519

                            @Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks 2022:

                            @Duluth said in All Blacks 2022:

                            @kiwiinmelb

                            I think most of them are picking Reece? He is playing well.

                            I think you're right though, that back three is the most likely. Jordie was probably the best AB last year and he played at fullback (he even topped the super scientific TSF aggregate of MOTM polls)

                            I think they'll be reluctant to move or demote Jordie

                            100% agree this makes sense....my only "concern" and reason i'd like to see jordie given a go at 12, is we've had some world class outside backs in reece, jordan and jordie for the last couple of years...but i feel we havent even seen their full capabilities because theyre being hampered by a misfiring midfield

                            too often when we've seen jordie play well is returning the ball from deep...and thats come after we've lost it in midfield and theyve booted it back

                            So Jordie can play in both the midfield and back three at the same time?
                            Our midfield problem last year was that because RI was still coming on we had to use ALB at 13 rather than 12 and DH filled the gap. QT was also very raw.
                            Both RI and QT have come on well this super season plus we have Goodhue back, Ennor looking to be dropped and a new weapon in RTS.
                            Lets settle on a midfield without DH first before moving Jordie.

                            KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • CrucialC Crucial

                              @Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks 2022:

                              @Duluth said in All Blacks 2022:

                              @kiwiinmelb

                              I think most of them are picking Reece? He is playing well.

                              I think you're right though, that back three is the most likely. Jordie was probably the best AB last year and he played at fullback (he even topped the super scientific TSF aggregate of MOTM polls)

                              I think they'll be reluctant to move or demote Jordie

                              100% agree this makes sense....my only "concern" and reason i'd like to see jordie given a go at 12, is we've had some world class outside backs in reece, jordan and jordie for the last couple of years...but i feel we havent even seen their full capabilities because theyre being hampered by a misfiring midfield

                              too often when we've seen jordie play well is returning the ball from deep...and thats come after we've lost it in midfield and theyve booted it back

                              So Jordie can play in both the midfield and back three at the same time?
                              Our midfield problem last year was that because RI was still coming on we had to use ALB at 13 rather than 12 and DH filled the gap. QT was also very raw.
                              Both RI and QT have come on well this super season plus we have Goodhue back, Ennor looking to be dropped and a new weapon in RTS.
                              Lets settle on a midfield without DH first before moving Jordie.

                              KiwiwombleK Offline
                              KiwiwombleK Offline
                              Kiwiwomble
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #1520

                              @Crucial obviously not, but jordan can be as good at 15, in my opinion and we have reece 14 and clarke 11.....seem likes a way to actually get the best players on the field

                              CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • nzzpN Offline
                                nzzpN Offline
                                nzzp
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #1521

                                Will Jordan is a superb attacking player, but I think is competing with Reece for the right wing spot.

                                Jordie has to be a lock for 15, unless he's shoehorned into 12. Jordan is awesome going forward, but the reality is that there is a lot more space at Super than in Tests, and kicking and defence is far more important at 15. I love him in the side at 14, but not convinced about him as a front line 15 yet. If he's going to be there at the RWC (and I suspect Jordie has that slot right now), then he needs to be playing there, to a high level, right now.

                                antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • chimoausC Offline
                                  chimoausC Offline
                                  chimoaus
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #1522

                                  I think Jordie at 15 makes the most sense and QT or Goodhue at 12. In saying that if RTS keeps performing a BB, RTS, RI combo would work well considering they already play together.

                                  GrooterG antipodeanA 2 Replies Last reply
                                  1
                                  • chimoausC chimoaus

                                    I think Jordie at 15 makes the most sense and QT or Goodhue at 12. In saying that if RTS keeps performing a BB, RTS, RI combo would work well considering they already play together.

                                    GrooterG Offline
                                    GrooterG Offline
                                    Grooter
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #1523

                                    @chimoaus who would be the 5th and final midfielder in your squad? Sullivan, TUJ or the incumbent David Havili

                                    chimoausC 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

                                      @Crucial obviously not, but jordan can be as good at 15, in my opinion and we have reece 14 and clarke 11.....seem likes a way to actually get the best players on the field

                                      CrucialC Offline
                                      CrucialC Offline
                                      Crucial
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #1524

                                      @Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks 2022:

                                      @Crucial obviously not, but jordan can be as good at 15, in my opinion and we have reece 14 and clarke 11.....seem likes a way to actually get the best players on the field

                                      and who is your impact reserve?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • GrooterG Grooter

                                        @chimoaus who would be the 5th and final midfielder in your squad? Sullivan, TUJ or the incumbent David Havili

                                        chimoausC Offline
                                        chimoausC Offline
                                        chimoaus
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #1525

                                        @FakatavaFuture said in All Blacks 2022:

                                        @chimoaus who would be the 5th and final midfielder in your squad? Sullivan, TUJ or the incumbent David Havili

                                        I think we need to be working on another 13 as 12 is a little congested with Goodhue, RTS, ALB, HAV, T(P)UJ. Sullivan strikes me as a Conrad Smith type player who could develop as a quality 13.

                                        Goodhue is the unknown really, can he go back to 13, does he have the speed anymore or is he a 12.

                                        I think Nonu/Smith was the blueprint and we have lacked a bit of directness and size at 12 meaning when RM and HAVS were 10/12 they were just too small. I guess we did try NL at 12 for awhile but for whatever reason they werent that keen on him there.

                                        antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • mariner4lifeM Offline
                                          mariner4lifeM Offline
                                          mariner4life
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #1526

                                          @chimoaus said in All Blacks 2022:

                                          I think Nonu/Smith was the blueprint

                                          it was A blueprint yes

                                          but we are in for a world of hurt if we keep trying to replicate that

                                          C Smith had great vision and good distribution, and a slightly underrated running game. Always took good options. Great defensive communicator

                                          But was made to look amazing because the guy at 12 was a deadset freak. Physical unit who could run through you if he wanted, but had a great wide pass, a surprisingly solid kicking game, and the vision to know when to use it. Defenses were in two minds the whole time.

                                          We're unlikely to ever find another Nonu. Which means we need more than a Smith.

                                          What we have is a freakishly quick centre. Find a 12 who can hold up defenses from sliding on to him, and get the ball in to his hands. That's your new blueprint

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          11
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search