Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

All Blacks v Argentina II

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksargentina
1.4k Posts 84 Posters 47.9k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • nostrildamusN nostrildamus

    What happened to the Argie linespeed and aggressive defensive line?

    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #1290

    @nostrildamus said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

    What happened to the Argie linespeed and aggressive defensive line?

    Chip kicks in behind early didn't hurt

    canefanC N 2 Replies Last reply
    4
    • KruseK Offline
      KruseK Offline
      Kruse
      wrote on last edited by
      #1291

      Just watched game, haven't read thread yet, but some pretty good looking wallpaper over those cracks.
      Fuck knows how much starch was used in the glue.

      1 Reply Last reply
      2
      • boobooB Offline
        boobooB Offline
        booboo
        wrote on last edited by
        #1292

        https://twitter.com/AllBlacks/status/1824710518277599593?t=fRRvuX84r03RiGfC7zN7Ug&s=19

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

          @nostrildamus said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

          What happened to the Argie linespeed and aggressive defensive line?

          Chip kicks in behind early didn't hurt

          canefanC Online
          canefanC Online
          canefan
          wrote on last edited by
          #1293

          @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

          @nostrildamus said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

          What happened to the Argie linespeed and aggressive defensive line?

          Chip kicks in behind early didn't hurt

          Much more effective than cross kicks. Also nice to avoid too many speculators in our own half until we'd won the battle up front

          1 Reply Last reply
          2
          • boobooB Offline
            boobooB Offline
            booboo
            wrote on last edited by
            #1294

            https://twitter.com/BluesRugbyTeam/status/1824714564862124032?t=gFuH2VG1O1XoAueBShjBJw&s=19

            1 Reply Last reply
            13
            • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

              @nostrildamus said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

              What happened to the Argie linespeed and aggressive defensive line?

              Chip kicks in behind early didn't hurt

              N Offline
              N Offline
              Nevorian
              wrote on last edited by
              #1295

              @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

              @nostrildamus said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

              What happened to the Argie linespeed and aggressive defensive line?

              Chip kicks in behind early didn't hurt

              Chip kicks did come off but margins are small, might need to try something different against the Bok

              antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • sparkyS sparky

                @LatsToTheMax

                1. It was high.
                2. There was some head contact.
                LatsToTheMaxL Offline
                LatsToTheMaxL Offline
                LatsToTheMax
                wrote on last edited by
                #1296

                @sparky said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                @LatsToTheMax

                1. It was high.
                2. There was some head contact.

                How is a tackle in the ribs high? There’s head contact when the ball carrier hinges horizontal into contact. If that is yellow, then you have to PK every time a bloke drops his head running at the line.

                canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • LatsToTheMaxL LatsToTheMax

                  @sparky said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                  @LatsToTheMax

                  1. It was high.
                  2. There was some head contact.

                  How is a tackle in the ribs high? There’s head contact when the ball carrier hinges horizontal into contact. If that is yellow, then you have to PK every time a bloke drops his head running at the line.

                  canefanC Online
                  canefanC Online
                  canefan
                  wrote on last edited by canefan
                  #1297

                  @LatsToTheMax said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                  @sparky said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                  @LatsToTheMax

                  1. It was high.
                  2. There was some head contact.

                  How is a tackle in the ribs high? There’s head contact when the ball carrier hinges horizontal into contact. If that is yellow, then you have to PK every time a bloke drops his head running at the line.

                  I think you have to look at the way the tackle is ruled these days to see your argument is false. Aumua was too upright, and there is head to head contact along with the impact from the tackle to the body. You can't get away with that most of the time, as a general rule this is nothing new for the last couple of years. Of course there have been the odd incident that has been let go (Kolisi on Ardie, Porter on BBBR) for reasons I can't understand.

                  antipodeanA LatsToTheMaxL 2 Replies Last reply
                  5
                  • BonesB Bones

                    @kpkanz said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                    @Bones said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                    @kpkanz said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                    You claimed he was a defensive powerhouse..

                    I swear reading comprehension isn't taught in schools anymore.

                    You brought up how there were no linebreaks/turnovers insinuating this was Riekos doing.

                    So you agree he was ineffectual in attack, conceded the most turnovers and was a spectator in defense with a grand total of 2 tackles all game.

                    I swear reading comprehension isn't taught in schools anymore.

                    K Offline
                    K Offline
                    kpkanz
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #1298

                    @Bones said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                    @kpkanz said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                    @Bones said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                    @kpkanz said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                    You claimed he was a defensive powerhouse..

                    I swear reading comprehension isn't taught in schools anymore.

                    You brought up how there were no linebreaks/turnovers insinuating this was Riekos doing.

                    So you agree he was ineffectual in attack, conceded the most turnovers and was a spectator in defense with a grand total of 2 tackles all game.

                    I swear reading comprehension isn't taught in schools anymore.

                    You know you could clarify what you meant instead of pivoting to insults.

                    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • N Nevorian

                      @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                      @nostrildamus said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                      What happened to the Argie linespeed and aggressive defensive line?

                      Chip kicks in behind early didn't hurt

                      Chip kicks did come off but margins are small, might need to try something different against the Bok

                      antipodeanA Online
                      antipodeanA Online
                      antipodean
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #1299

                      @Nevorian said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                      @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                      @nostrildamus said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                      What happened to the Argie linespeed and aggressive defensive line?

                      Chip kicks in behind early didn't hurt

                      Chip kicks did come off but margins are small, might need to try something different against the Bok

                      Boks leave a lot of space out wide. Just need a winger that can jumped higher than Kolbe...

                      canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
                      3
                      • canefanC canefan

                        @LatsToTheMax said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                        @sparky said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                        @LatsToTheMax

                        1. It was high.
                        2. There was some head contact.

                        How is a tackle in the ribs high? There’s head contact when the ball carrier hinges horizontal into contact. If that is yellow, then you have to PK every time a bloke drops his head running at the line.

                        I think you have to look at the way the tackle is ruled these days to see your argument is false. Aumua was too upright, and there is head to head contact along with the impact from the tackle to the body. You can't get away with that most of the time, as a general rule this is nothing new for the last couple of years. Of course there have been the odd incident that has been let go (Kolisi on Ardie, Porter on BBBR) for reasons I can't understand.

                        antipodeanA Online
                        antipodeanA Online
                        antipodean
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #1300

                        @canefan said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                        @LatsToTheMax said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                        @sparky said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                        @LatsToTheMax

                        1. It was high.
                        2. There was some head contact.

                        How is a tackle in the ribs high? There’s head contact when the ball carrier hinges horizontal into contact. If that is yellow, then you have to PK every time a bloke drops his head running at the line.

                        I think you have to look at the way the tackle is ruled these days to see your argument is false. Aumua was too upright, and there is head to head contact along with the impact from the tackle to the body. You can't get away with that most of the time, as a general rule this is nothing new for the last couple of years. Of course there have been the odd incident that has been let go (Kolisi on Ardie, Porter on BBBR) for reasons I can't understand.

                        I don't understand why either but I have a suspicion that a different standard was applied to All Blacks on the receiving end. The motive can only be explained by the referee who stands out as a statistical anomaly.

                        canefanC boobooB D 3 Replies Last reply
                        3
                        • antipodeanA antipodean

                          @canefan said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                          @LatsToTheMax said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                          @sparky said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                          @LatsToTheMax

                          1. It was high.
                          2. There was some head contact.

                          How is a tackle in the ribs high? There’s head contact when the ball carrier hinges horizontal into contact. If that is yellow, then you have to PK every time a bloke drops his head running at the line.

                          I think you have to look at the way the tackle is ruled these days to see your argument is false. Aumua was too upright, and there is head to head contact along with the impact from the tackle to the body. You can't get away with that most of the time, as a general rule this is nothing new for the last couple of years. Of course there have been the odd incident that has been let go (Kolisi on Ardie, Porter on BBBR) for reasons I can't understand.

                          I don't understand why either but I have a suspicion that a different standard was applied to All Blacks on the receiving end. The motive can only be explained by the referee who stands out as a statistical anomaly.

                          canefanC Online
                          canefanC Online
                          canefan
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #1301

                          @antipodean said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                          @canefan said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                          @LatsToTheMax said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                          @sparky said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                          @LatsToTheMax

                          1. It was high.
                          2. There was some head contact.

                          How is a tackle in the ribs high? There’s head contact when the ball carrier hinges horizontal into contact. If that is yellow, then you have to PK every time a bloke drops his head running at the line.

                          I think you have to look at the way the tackle is ruled these days to see your argument is false. Aumua was too upright, and there is head to head contact along with the impact from the tackle to the body. You can't get away with that most of the time, as a general rule this is nothing new for the last couple of years. Of course there have been the odd incident that has been let go (Kolisi on Ardie, Porter on BBBR) for reasons I can't understand.

                          I don't understand why either but I have a suspicion that a different standard was applied to All Blacks on the receiving end. The motive can only be explained by the referee who stands out as a statistical anomaly.

                          It's the double edged sword that is the aura

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • antipodeanA antipodean

                            @canefan said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                            @LatsToTheMax said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                            @sparky said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                            @LatsToTheMax

                            1. It was high.
                            2. There was some head contact.

                            How is a tackle in the ribs high? There’s head contact when the ball carrier hinges horizontal into contact. If that is yellow, then you have to PK every time a bloke drops his head running at the line.

                            I think you have to look at the way the tackle is ruled these days to see your argument is false. Aumua was too upright, and there is head to head contact along with the impact from the tackle to the body. You can't get away with that most of the time, as a general rule this is nothing new for the last couple of years. Of course there have been the odd incident that has been let go (Kolisi on Ardie, Porter on BBBR) for reasons I can't understand.

                            I don't understand why either but I have a suspicion that a different standard was applied to All Blacks on the receiving end. The motive can only be explained by the referee who stands out as a statistical anomaly.

                            boobooB Offline
                            boobooB Offline
                            booboo
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #1302

                            @antipodean said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                            @canefan said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                            @LatsToTheMax said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                            @sparky said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                            @LatsToTheMax

                            1. It was high.
                            2. There was some head contact.

                            How is a tackle in the ribs high? There’s head contact when the ball carrier hinges horizontal into contact. If that is yellow, then you have to PK every time a bloke drops his head running at the line.

                            I think you have to look at the way the tackle is ruled these days to see your argument is false. Aumua was too upright, and there is head to head contact along with the impact from the tackle to the body. You can't get away with that most of the time, as a general rule this is nothing new for the last couple of years. Of course there have been the odd incident that has been let go (Kolisi on Ardie, Porter on BBBR) for reasons I can't understand.

                            I don't understand why either but I have a suspicion that a different standard was applied to All Blacks on the receiving end. The motive can only be explained by the referee who stands out as a statistical anomaly.

                            To be fair, Rugby Jesus getting off was down to the TMO due to the "sudden change of height" ...

                            juniorJ 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • antipodeanA antipodean

                              @Nevorian said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                              @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                              @nostrildamus said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                              What happened to the Argie linespeed and aggressive defensive line?

                              Chip kicks in behind early didn't hurt

                              Chip kicks did come off but margins are small, might need to try something different against the Bok

                              Boks leave a lot of space out wide. Just need a winger that can jumped higher than Kolbe...

                              canefanC Online
                              canefanC Online
                              canefan
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #1303

                              @antipodean said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                              @Nevorian said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                              @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                              @nostrildamus said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                              What happened to the Argie linespeed and aggressive defensive line?

                              Chip kicks in behind early didn't hurt

                              Chip kicks did come off but margins are small, might need to try something different against the Bok

                              Boks leave a lot of space out wide. Just need a winger that can jumped higher than Kolbe...

                              Clarke and Jordan will be a handful. If we can win or at least par the collision area/breakdown

                              boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • canefanC canefan

                                @antipodean said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                                @Nevorian said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                                @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                                @nostrildamus said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                                What happened to the Argie linespeed and aggressive defensive line?

                                Chip kicks in behind early didn't hurt

                                Chip kicks did come off but margins are small, might need to try something different against the Bok

                                Boks leave a lot of space out wide. Just need a winger that can jumped higher than Kolbe...

                                Clarke and Jordan will be a handful. If we can win or at least par the collision area/breakdown

                                boobooB Offline
                                boobooB Offline
                                booboo
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #1304

                                @canefan said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                                @antipodean said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                                @Nevorian said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                                @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                                @nostrildamus said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                                What happened to the Argie linespeed and aggressive defensive line?

                                Chip kicks in behind early didn't hurt

                                Chip kicks did come off but margins are small, might need to try something different against the Bok

                                Boks leave a lot of space out wide. Just need a winger that can jumped higher than Kolbe...

                                Clarke and Jordan will be a handful. If we can win or at least par the collision area/breakdown

                                Unpossible. The 😱 bomb squad 😧 ...

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Darth SaderD Offline
                                  Darth SaderD Offline
                                  Darth Sader
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #1305

                                  Was at the game last night. Couple of observations:

                                  • Va’ai and Ardie were very good
                                  • Jordan is a weapon obviously, but prone to making bad calls from fullback
                                  • Chips were useful on a heavy ground to turn the defense around initially, variation seems to be the key to upsetting rush defence
                                  • Scrum a big part of ABs gaining upper hand
                                  • kicking (place-kicking aside) is very average from ABs. Aimless field kicking (including box kicks) put us under pressure a few times, touch-finding never has any range. DMac and Beaudy are both wanting in those areas. Jordie with a howler near the end.
                                  • Argies didn’t turn up and seemed pretty gutted at the end
                                  • Disappointing how ABs lost shape after such a great start, but forgivable
                                  boobooB BerniesCornerB nostrildamusN 3 Replies Last reply
                                  9
                                  • Darth SaderD Darth Sader

                                    Was at the game last night. Couple of observations:

                                    • Va’ai and Ardie were very good
                                    • Jordan is a weapon obviously, but prone to making bad calls from fullback
                                    • Chips were useful on a heavy ground to turn the defense around initially, variation seems to be the key to upsetting rush defence
                                    • Scrum a big part of ABs gaining upper hand
                                    • kicking (place-kicking aside) is very average from ABs. Aimless field kicking (including box kicks) put us under pressure a few times, touch-finding never has any range. DMac and Beaudy are both wanting in those areas. Jordie with a howler near the end.
                                    • Argies didn’t turn up and seemed pretty gutted at the end
                                    • Disappointing how ABs lost shape after such a great start, but forgivable
                                    boobooB Offline
                                    boobooB Offline
                                    booboo
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #1306

                                    @Darth-Sader said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                                    kicking (place-kicking aside) is very average from ABs.

                                    Really?

                                    Felt the deep crossfield kicking aiming at the 50-22s pinned them back and worked really well.

                                    Much happier with those than the middle distance kicking last year's team employed.

                                    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
                                    7
                                    • boobooB booboo

                                      @Darth-Sader said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                                      kicking (place-kicking aside) is very average from ABs.

                                      Really?

                                      Felt the deep crossfield kicking aiming at the 50-22s pinned them back and worked really well.

                                      Much happier with those than the middle distance kicking last year's team employed.

                                      canefanC Online
                                      canefanC Online
                                      canefan
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #1307

                                      @booboo said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                                      @Darth-Sader said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

                                      kicking (place-kicking aside) is very average from ABs.

                                      Really?

                                      Felt the deep crossfield kicking aiming at the 50-22s pinned them back and worked really well.

                                      Much happier with those than the middle distance kicking last year's team employed.

                                      IMHO we need to work on our accuracy (DMac overcooked a couple for example), but the intent was good. Not a box kick in sight for much of the game. And good riddance

                                      K 1 Reply Last reply
                                      3
                                      • Darth SaderD Darth Sader

                                        Was at the game last night. Couple of observations:

                                        • Va’ai and Ardie were very good
                                        • Jordan is a weapon obviously, but prone to making bad calls from fullback
                                        • Chips were useful on a heavy ground to turn the defense around initially, variation seems to be the key to upsetting rush defence
                                        • Scrum a big part of ABs gaining upper hand
                                        • kicking (place-kicking aside) is very average from ABs. Aimless field kicking (including box kicks) put us under pressure a few times, touch-finding never has any range. DMac and Beaudy are both wanting in those areas. Jordie with a howler near the end.
                                        • Argies didn’t turn up and seemed pretty gutted at the end
                                        • Disappointing how ABs lost shape after such a great start, but forgivable
                                        BerniesCornerB Offline
                                        BerniesCornerB Offline
                                        BerniesCorner
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #1308

                                        @Darth-Sader
                                        Against SA to have any chance we must mix the attack up a bit otherwise we have no chance.
                                        Great to see long exits and not mucking around in own half.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • BerniesCornerB Offline
                                          BerniesCornerB Offline
                                          BerniesCorner
                                          wrote on last edited by BerniesCorner
                                          #1309

                                          Been flamed on here before stating Grant Fox wipers never go out of fashion. 50:22 is an added bonus.
                                          DMac is trying this.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          3
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search