• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

FFS get a grip

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
70 Posts 22 Posters 647 Views
FFS get a grip
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #26

    Our leaders seem to have a consistent record of making duff decisions when things are critical. Contrast the Ford droppies with the potential three pointers we declined to kick, at least one of which was a gimme!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to pakman on last edited by Kiwiwomble
    #27

    @pakman said in FFS get a grip:

    When we get behind (as all teams do occasionally) we just need to work through our processes and let our superiority count. NO NEED FOR MIRACLE PLAYS.

    this is the problem though....our whole game plan for the last 6 years has been about attack from anywhere with miracle plays....ive seen nothing over the last several years to believe we can change gears, selections are all centred around individual brilliance

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #28

    In Europe after the rains, my favoutite 80s album. Nothing to do with losing by 30 points three times per year

    Fuck off with that loser shit. I like cool synth music

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #29

    think the first half on Sunday morning was good because we were ahead on the scoreboard is some box score bullshit.
    the starters ARE a problem.

    Are we completely fucked? no
    Does it look like we are getting better? also no

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #30
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #31

    @mariner4life the scoreboard on Saturday is an indictment. With competent substitution we’d have been 17-5 or more up at halftime. Mind you I don’t place that much store on that because English were pants.

    mariner4lifeM R 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #32

    @pakman said in FFS get a grip:

    @mariner4life the scoreboard on Saturday is an indictment. With competent substitution we’d have been 17-5 or more up at halftime. Mind you I don’t place that much store on that because English were pants.

    what do you mean by this?

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    reprobate
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #33

    @pakman said in FFS get a grip:

    @mariner4life the scoreboard on Saturday is an indictment. With competent substitution we’d have been 17-5 or more up at halftime. Mind you I don’t place that much store on that because English were pants.

    The poms blew definitely 2 maybe 3 try scoring opportunities in the first half, and couldn't win a lineout. We were not good at all.

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #34

    credit where it's due, our defensive lineout was fucking ace on the weekend, and the scrum was good right up until the card.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by pakman
    #35

    @mariner4life said in FFS get a grip:

    @pakman said in FFS get a grip:

    @mariner4life the scoreboard on Saturday is an indictment. With competent substitution we’d have been 17-5 or more up at halftime. Mind you I don’t place that much store on that because English were pants.

    what do you mean by this?

    When your 10 can neither kick for touch nor take shots at goal competent substitution would be to replace him with someone who can.

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to reprobate on last edited by pakman
    #36

    @reprobate IMO ABs in H1 were 10 points the better team. But by no means vintage.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #37

    @pakman said in FFS get a grip:

    When we get behind (as all teams do occasionally) we just need to work through our processes and let our superiority count. NO NEED FOR MIRACLE PLAYS.

    of all this sort of weird rant, this is the bit that stands out as being the issue.

    our "processes" are actually the problem and contributing enormously to why we are failing. The process, on either side of the ball, seem to be adding pressure to ourselves rather than the opposition.
    What, exactly, is this superiority you think we just need fall back on? Our powerful forwards? Superior kicking accuracy? Fast, creative backs? what exactly is it you see that i don't?

    R P 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #38

    @pakman said in FFS get a grip:

    @mariner4life said in FFS get a grip:

    @pakman said in FFS get a grip:

    @mariner4life the scoreboard on Saturday is an indictment. With competent substitution we’d have been 17-5 or more up at halftime. Mind you I don’t place that much store on that because English were pants.

    what do you mean by this?

    When your 10 can neither kick for touch nor take shots at goal competent substitution would be to replace him with someone who can.

    the problem is playing him at all. He's the very definition of washed. which goes back to the issues that everyone is talking about and you seem to be ignoring.

    B CatograndeC 2 Replies Last reply
    5
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    reprobate
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by reprobate
    #39

    @mariner4life the lineout is our only area of superiority.
    Edit: and only with Taylor on.

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    replied to reprobate on last edited by
    #40

    @reprobate said in FFS get a grip:

    @mariner4life the lineout is our only area of superiority.
    Edit: and only with Taylor on.

    ah, edit got me. it is right up until it's not.

    Also we make the weirdest lineout calls at crucial times. Most of the time we run a pretty simple but effective set of movements, but then when we feel pressure we resort to overly complicated, three movement calls that we seem to fuck up more than we win.

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #41

    @mariner4life said in FFS get a grip:

    @pakman said in FFS get a grip:

    When we get behind (as all teams do occasionally) we just need to work through our processes and let our superiority count. NO NEED FOR MIRACLE PLAYS.

    of all this sort of weird rant, this is the bit that stands out as being the issue.

    our "processes" are actually the problem and contributing enormously to why we are failing. The process, on either side of the ball, seem to be adding pressure to ourselves rather than the opposition.
    What, exactly, is this superiority you think we just need fall back on? Our powerful forwards? Superior kicking accuracy? Fast, creative backs? what exactly is it you see that i don't?

    That’s a very broad question. But in general phase play ABs are very good at finding and exploiting space, and historically very efficient at finishing opportunities.

    mariner4lifeM KiwiwombleK 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #42

    @pakman said in FFS get a grip:

    @mariner4life said in FFS get a grip:

    @pakman said in FFS get a grip:

    When we get behind (as all teams do occasionally) we just need to work through our processes and let our superiority count. NO NEED FOR MIRACLE PLAYS.

    of all this sort of weird rant, this is the bit that stands out as being the issue.

    our "processes" are actually the problem and contributing enormously to why we are failing. The process, on either side of the ball, seem to be adding pressure to ourselves rather than the opposition.
    What, exactly, is this superiority you think we just need fall back on? Our powerful forwards? Superior kicking accuracy? Fast, creative backs? what exactly is it you see that i don't?

    That’s a very broad question. But in general phase play ABs are very good at finding and exploiting space, and historically very efficient at finishing opportunities.

    the 2025 team i firmly disagree.

    historically? yes

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #43

    I think we can both agree that 2025 edition is well below historical levels at this.

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #44

    @pakman said in FFS get a grip:

    @mariner4life said in FFS get a grip:

    @pakman said in FFS get a grip:

    When we get behind (as all teams do occasionally) we just need to work through our processes and let our superiority count. NO NEED FOR MIRACLE PLAYS.

    of all this sort of weird rant, this is the bit that stands out as being the issue.

    our "processes" are actually the problem and contributing enormously to why we are failing. The process, on either side of the ball, seem to be adding pressure to ourselves rather than the opposition.
    What, exactly, is this superiority you think we just need fall back on? Our powerful forwards? Superior kicking accuracy? Fast, creative backs? what exactly is it you see that i don't?

    That’s a very broad question. But in general phase play ABs are very good at finding and exploiting space, and historically very efficient at finishing opportunities.

    im not sure if youre watching replays from several years ago or what

    for the last several years we've hugely struggled to get the ball into space, largely due to some slow passing from previous 9's and current 10's....a rushing defence shuts us down quick...unless you mean the kick passes that come off 1/4 times?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #45

    @pakman said in FFS get a grip:

    I think we can both agree that 2025 edition is well below historical levels at this.

    so what the fuck are you actually talking about then?

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    3

FFS get a grip
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.