• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

All Blacks 2025

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
allblacks
8.0k Posts 146 Posters 246.5k Views
All Blacks 2025
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • nzzpN Online
    nzzpN Online
    nzzp
    replied to Chris B. last edited by
    #7917

    @Chris-B said in All Blacks 2025:

    And AB coaches with worse winning percentages than Razor - McDonald, Morrison, Marslin, Sullivan, Vodanovic, Stewart, Watson, Mains, Smith, Foster.

    We definitely shouldn't appoint anyone whose name begins with M or S - sorry Joe! 🙂

    so good work circling the Cantab wagons and setting up a straw man.

    Question for me is this: would Razor have been better off coaching in a different environment after a few years of success - ie heading offshore in 2019. I would say yes - the experience you get is huge and drives massive development as a coach.

    Sir Graham talked about how much he learned and changed as a coach as a result of Wales and particularly the Lions. It matters. More of the same doesn't lead to growth or prepare you for the different challenges that get thrown your way.

    Anyway, it is what it is. The conservatism in selection is what has amazed me the most. I still can't understand the thinking behind it.

    MN5M Chris B.C 2 Replies Last reply
    5
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to nzzp last edited by
    #7918

    @nzzp said in All Blacks 2025:

    @Chris-B said in All Blacks 2025:

    And AB coaches with worse winning percentages than Razor - McDonald, Morrison, Marslin, Sullivan, Vodanovic, Stewart, Watson, Mains, Smith, Foster.

    We definitely shouldn't appoint anyone whose name begins with M or S - sorry Joe! 🙂

    so good work circling the Cantab wagons and setting up a straw man.

    Question for me is this: would Razor have been better off coaching in a different environment after a few years of success - ie heading offshore in 2019. I would say yes - the experience you get is huge and drives massive development as a coach.

    Sir Graham talked about how much he learned and changed as a coach as a result of Wales and particularly the Lions. It matters. More of the same doesn't lead to growth or prepare you for the different challenges that get thrown your way.

    Anyway, it is what it is. The conservatism in selection is what has amazed me the most. I still can't understand the thinking behind it.

    He has out Fostered Foster in this regard. Really odd. I expected a raft of changes in mid 2024 that never happened.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    wrote last edited by Chris
    #7919

    No doubt the litmus test will be this tour we need to go through unbeaten in my eyes,Build something for next year we can not stumble through 2026 with a WC looming.
    I always thought the coaching group looked unbalanced with too many people all thinking in slightly different directions.
    If BB is back at 10 and we put Ioane in to the 23 or Proctor ends up back at 13 then Fucked if I know,Because a blue print for selection was that Perth test v Australia.
    Darry needs to be on the bench with what we have for this tour LF starting or on the Bench or Clarke either way around works.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    replied to Victor Meldrew last edited by nostrildamus
    #7920

    @Victor-Meldrew said in All Blacks 2025:

    @nostrildamus said in All Blacks 2025:

    But with the de-internationalisation of Super, the longterms effects of COVID isolationism (perhaps), coaching drain overseas, and arguably a much richer international competition overseas that we are not part of, I think I under-estimated it.

    Funnily enough, anyone arguing these very same points between 2021-23 was immediately labelled a Foster apologist.

    Progress in a way, I guess - but at a cost.

    I love how you compress and conflate everything!
    Wanting to get rid of Foster doesn't mean one becomes a Razor fanatic.
    I would have been happy with Joe, JJ./Brown or perhaps McMillan or Rennie.
    Not Rangi or Warren. Not sure about Cotter.
    I thought Razor would be better than he has been so far, I still think Razor is a better coach than Foster.
    The difference was Joe but I don't recall if he expressed interest in continuing if Foster returned.
    Ryan worked for both.
    And I wouldn't have chosen the assistant coaches Razor did (or had to).
    Whitelock is right, being stuck with assistants before being chosen has its disadvantages.
    Regardless, Foster had to go. Whoever thinks they knew all along Razor's team would be as conservative and muddled as Foster's is just polishing their crystal balls.

    Victor MeldrewV 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote last edited by
    #7921

    The other issue is that both of the last 2 coaching regimes were seen as a done deal, so some who should have had a shot, didnt take thier shot, and some that did, weren't given a fair shake, not to mention the fact you must roll up with your assistants in tow.

    That should be part of the same process, have applicants for head coach, assistants, defence etc, then find out which will be the best fit.

    Instead, we get what got.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to nzzp last edited by
    #7922

    @nzzp said in All Blacks 2025:

    @Chris-B said in All Blacks 2025:

    And AB coaches with worse winning percentages than Razor - McDonald, Morrison, Marslin, Sullivan, Vodanovic, Stewart, Watson, Mains, Smith, Foster.

    We definitely shouldn't appoint anyone whose name begins with M or S - sorry Joe! 🙂

    so good work circling the Cantab wagons and setting up a straw man.

    Question for me is this: would Razor have been better off coaching in a different environment after a few years of success - ie heading offshore in 2019. I would say yes - the experience you get is huge and drives massive development as a coach.

    Sir Graham talked about how much he learned and changed as a coach as a result of Wales and particularly the Lions. It matters. More of the same doesn't lead to growth or prepare you for the different challenges that get thrown your way.

    Anyway, it is what it is. The conservatism in selection is what has amazed me the most. I still can't understand the thinking behind it.

    @No-Quarter said, "he's currently right down the bottom of the list of AB coaches by win rate. " I was just pointing out that he's really not. He's slightly below average.

    A thing about guys disappearing overseas is that many or even most of them don't come back - at least not in the window when they're at their peak. The AB coaching job only comes up occasionally and if you're under contract elsewhere then you miss out.

    I'd forgotten about Ryan and Fiji.

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to taniwharugby last edited by
    #7923

    @taniwharugby I sort of wonder whether all the people who should be contenders see coaching the ABs (or NZ Super teams) as a really plum job.

    When Fozzie got the job it seemed like just Fozzie vs Razor and when Razor got the job, Razor vs Joseph.

    Did other coaches think it was just a done deal or did they - just maybe - not want the pressure/pay/aggravation?

    Certainly, some of the Super appointments have been a bit underwhelming in recent years. I seem to recall Tony Brown pretty much had to be coerced to take on the Head Coach role at the Highlanders, because no-one else apparently wanted it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to Chris B. last edited by
    #7924

    @Chris-B said in All Blacks 2025:

    @nzzp said in All Blacks 2025:

    @Chris-B said in All Blacks 2025:

    And AB coaches with worse winning percentages than Razor - McDonald, Morrison, Marslin, Sullivan, Vodanovic, Stewart, Watson, Mains, Smith, Foster.

    We definitely shouldn't appoint anyone whose name begins with M or S - sorry Joe! 🙂

    so good work circling the Cantab wagons and setting up a straw man.

    Question for me is this: would Razor have been better off coaching in a different environment after a few years of success - ie heading offshore in 2019. I would say yes - the experience you get is huge and drives massive development as a coach.

    Sir Graham talked about how much he learned and changed as a coach as a result of Wales and particularly the Lions. It matters. More of the same doesn't lead to growth or prepare you for the different challenges that get thrown your way.

    Anyway, it is what it is. The conservatism in selection is what has amazed me the most. I still can't understand the thinking behind it.

    @No-Quarter said, "he's currently right down the bottom of the list of AB coaches by win rate. " I was just pointing out that he's really not. He's slightly below average.

    A thing about guys disappearing overseas is that many or even most of them don't come back - at least not in the window when they're at their peak. The AB coaching job only comes up occasionally and if you're under contract elsewhere then you miss out.

    I'd forgotten about Ryan and Fiji.

    1. Just disproven as the ABs literally took Ryan from his Fiji contract.

    2. Also, if he had been under contract until a WC, he would have been in an ideal situation to take over the position.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to gt12 last edited by
    #7925

    @gt12 I'm really talking about some of the big guns who should be contenders as ABs coach, who did their overseas time with big teams - Deans, Gatland, Rennie, Cotter.

    Vern's come back, but it's too late for him - I believe he's only taking the Blues on a year-by-year basis? Too late for Robbie and Warren. Rennie's into his 60s, as well - is he an option for 2031?

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to Chris B. last edited by
    #7926

    @Chris-B said in All Blacks 2025:

    @gt12 I'm really talking about some of the big guns who should be contenders as ABs coach, who did their overseas time with big teams - Deans, Gatland, Rennie, Cotter.

    Vern's come back, but it's too late for him - I believe he's only taking the Blues on a year-by-year basis? Too late for Robbie and Warren. Rennie's into his 60s, as well - is he an option for 2031?

    Vern Cotter: 63
    Robbie Deans: 66
    Gatland: 62
    Rennie: 61

    Razor: 51

    One of these things is not like the other.

    I notice you didn't bring up Jamie Joseph (55), who has been overseas and is now back looking for the role and is a contemporary.
    McMillan is now overseas and will likely have a great CV to challenge (especially for an Asst. role) in a couple of years.

    Had Razor gone overseas in 2019 after being passed over for the AB role, he would have been the ideal age to come and have a go at the role.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to gt12 last edited by
    #7927

    @gt12 said in All Blacks 2025:

    @Chris-B said in All Blacks 2025:

    @gt12 I'm really talking about some of the big guns who should be contenders as ABs coach, who did their overseas time with big teams - Deans, Gatland, Rennie, Cotter.

    Vern's come back, but it's too late for him - I believe he's only taking the Blues on a year-by-year basis? Too late for Robbie and Warren. Rennie's into his 60s, as well - is he an option for 2031?

    Vern Cotter: 63
    Robbie Deans: 66
    Gatland: 62
    Rennie: 61

    Razor: 51

    Had Razor gone overseas in 2019 after being passed over for the AB role, he would have been the ideal age to come and have a go at the role.

    If he'd come back. He might have been locked in with Scotland or whomever and missed the boat.

    Those other guys left and didn't come back is the point I'm making.

    Jamie's one who has come back and competed.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    wrote last edited by
    #7928

    Cotter is literally back in the country.
    Joseph is literally back in the country.
    Schmidt was back in the country and left again.

    There would have been plenty of options available even if Razor was not. Arguably better options.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    wrote last edited by
    #7929

    Schmidt doesn't want anything to do with the current NZR leadership. The NZRU board at the time botched the selection process that appointed Fozzie and stuffed up Razor's too. First move might be to fire the board

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to gt12 last edited by
    #7930

    @gt12 Yeah - but, did they apply?

    Jamie did.

    I'm pretty certain Joe didn't.

    If there were other applicants, they weren't made public and didn't appear to make the final rounds. It seemed pretty clearly Razor vs Jamie.

    If Razor wasn't there, it might have been Fozzie vs Jamie.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    brodean
    replied to Chris B. last edited by
    #7931

    @Chris-B said in All Blacks 2025:

    And AB coaches with worse winning percentages than Razor - McDonald, Morrison, Marslin, Sullivan, Vodanovic, Stewart, Watson, Mains, Smith, Foster.

    We definitely shouldn't appoint anyone whose name begins with M or S - sorry Joe! 🙂

    Now days its fair to compare Razor to pro era coaches compared to amatuers. In that context Razors win rate is similar to Wayne Smiths and Fosters. It might be marginally better but its in the same range.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    brodean
    wrote last edited by brodean
    #7932

    Personally I think once you hit 60+ most coaches are past their best. Guys like Gatland and Jones are well past their best.

    Coaches who played in the pro era with bigger players are probably more prone to CTE etc too. So it may be younger from this time on when coaches reach their best.

    The only other viable options were probably Schmidt and Joseph as head coach. Schmidt seemed to rule himself didn't he?

    So it was just Joseph. He's a valid option but at the time Robertson was selected there wasn't really a lot of resistance. In hindsight maybe Robertson wasn't the best pick and he kind of bottled it with his jobs for the boys picks.

    That said I do think Robertson would have benefited with someone like Cotter in his team and I do think he would make a better forwards coach and selector than Ryan whos a good tight five coach but an abject failure as a loose forward coach.

    Chris B.C MN5M 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to brodean last edited by Chris B.
    #7933

    @brodean Yeah.

    And the reality is that at 7/9 this year, Razor's not remotely close to getting sacked. As long as he avoids 0/4 on the EOYT he's pretty much locked in for RWC2027 (he probably is regardless).

    So the earliest someone like Dave Rennie is getting the job is a couple of years from now - and he's going to be 67 going to RWC 2031. Can't see it happening.

    I reckon late-40s/early-50s is the ideal age.

    Who's floating around in that age bracket for 2027 if Razor fails at RWC?

    nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    African Monkey
    wrote last edited by
    #7934

    Yeah, Razor ain't going anywhere pre 2027 WC.

    I'd however, be surprised if he was our coach in 2028 whatever happens at the World Cup.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    wrote last edited by
    #7935

    I think you'll find that a lack of applicants may be due to the fact that it was clear to everyone that the job was Razors...

    The best example here is Graham Henry.
    Passed over for the big job, went overseas. Was successful and not, but when he came back he knew what to do to make us the best in the world.

    Strangely enough, he was the one (from reports floating around here, at least) who wanted Razor to have some real world experience overseas.

    NZRU under Robinson or Ted, hard decision to decide who to trust there.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    replied to Chris B. last edited by
    #7936

    @Chris-B said in All Blacks 2025:

    I reckon late-40s/early-50s is the ideal age.

    Who's floating around in that age bracket for 2027 if Razor fails at RWC?

    If my maths is right, Mark Hammett will be 55 in July 2027..
    Also in your golden period target area is Nick Evans!
    Oh and Carlos Spencer!

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    1

All Blacks 2025
Sports Talk
allblacks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.