Movie review thread...
-
<p>that's normally the first bad decision</p>
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="mariner4life" data-cid="397345" data-time="1381746296">
<div>
<p>It's not easy to put movies in to those catagories. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Where would you put "Showgirls" which had fucking heaps of tits, and muff, and maybe Kyle MacLachlan's cock, but sucked, really really hard?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>I'm glad there's a comma after sucked in that post. I had to read it twice to check.</p> -
<blockquote class='ipsBlockquote' data-author="mariner4life" data-cid="397345" data-time="1381746296"><p>It's not easy to put movies in to those catagories. <br />
<br />
Where would you put "Showgirls" which had fucking heaps of tits, and muff</p></blockquote>
<br />
Stop right there.<br /> -
<p>you are a simple man</p>
-
<p>Is that like being an "owner/operator"</p>
-
[quote name="NTA" post="397389" timestamp="1381764443"]<br><br>
Stop right there.[/quote)<br><br>
If only life was as simple as you Nick. About Schmidt has tits and arse but it's Kathy bates tits and arse and I think we'd all like that kind of nudity qualified before we watch something of that traumatising nature. -
[quote name="jegga" post="397398" timestamp="1381767358"]
If only life was as simple as you Nick. About Schmidt has tits and arse but it's Kathy bates tits and arse and I think we'd all like that kind of nudity qualified before we watch something of that traumatising nature.[/quote]
Well then we are talking about a definition of tits. And like a five stars rating system, it's everyone's opinion.Ergo, those aren't tits, because Kathy Bates.
-
<p>GRAVITY - I'll give it an 8. The visuals are stunning (10), the suspense and sudden bursts of mayhem & action are fantastic (9), a lot the dialogue suffers (6) and I'm not sure about some of the science, but the film is short (90 mins) so a big recommendation to see it on a big-screen in 3D. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>I know Cauron likes to throw playful head-scratchers into his films, like the floating pig at Battersea power station in Children of Men, and this time there's a Marvin the Martian toy floating in a space station with a short pan past a dead person that had several audience members whispering "Carrot-Top...?!?!!" It carried a lot of conversation afterwards... was that really Carrot-top?</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="red terror" data-cid="397618" data-time="1381942149">
<div>
<p>GRAVITY - I'll give it an 8. The visuals are stunning (10), the suspense and sudden bursts of mayhem & action are fantastic (9), a lot the dialogue suffers (6) and I'm not sure about some of the science, but the film is short (90 mins) so a big recommendation to see it on a big-screen in 3D. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>I know Cauron likes to throw playful head-scratchers into his films, like the floating pig at Battersea power station in Children of Men, and this time there's a Marvin the Martian toy floating in a space station with a short pan past a dead person that had several audience members whispering "Carrot-Top...?!?!!" It carried a lot of conversation afterwards... was that really Carrot-top?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Been away RT?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Yeah, I liked Gravity too. Very claustrophobic.</p> -
<p>Work. Deadlines. Buried in them. Watch a movie now-and-again. Saw a trailer for the next Hobbit before Gravity. The dragon looks awesome.</p>
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Tim" data-cid="397805" data-time="1382044919">
' title=""><u></u></a></div>
<div>
<p> </p>
<div>Ed Lauter kill count.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Death Wish 3:</div>
<div> </div>
<div><a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='
<div> </div>
<div>Even bagged himself a Bill S. Preston, Esq.</div>
<p> </p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Not even a single like, let alone a reply!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>None of you philistines would've been invited to one of <em>Winner's Dinners</em>. ;)</p> -
<p>If he had killed Ted "Theodore" Logan, I would have been impressed. He knows kung fu!</p>
-
<p>i watched "World War Z" last night. Thought it was ok, but a complete absence of any real gore for a zombie flick. some glaring issues throughout, but it was creepy enough that i didn't mind it.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>No tits though. </p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="mariner4life" data-cid="398509" data-time="1382314466">
<div>
<p>i watched "World War Z" last night. Thought it was ok, but a complete absence of any real gore for a zombie flick. some glaring issues throughout, but it was creepy enough that i didn't mind it.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>No tits though. </p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>I didn't expect World War Z to be a gore type zombie flick going in TBH and don't think it was marketed that way. I've heard the same said about Warm Bodies as well. I think they're different movies than the zombie flicks of Romero etc.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I'm interested to see what they do with the sequels, assuming they made enough coin back. I think that's where the 'war' part is going to get going. Hopefully Pitt's character [spoiler]wont be the bringer of death to all those around him again.[/spoiler]</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="jegga" data-cid="398888" data-time="1382463453">
<div>
<p>I didn't know there was going to be any sequels, it's completely different to the book too.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Warm bodies had near nudity and<strong> a hotter female lead.</strong></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>I watched an Aussie movie she made before she went to US and got famous-ish where she got starkers ... can't for the life of me remember the name of it. :(</p>
