Movie review thread...
-
<p>Ahhh, Porkies, Revenge of the Nerds, Screwballs and others around that time....every budding teenagers dream movies!</p>
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="NTA" data-cid="397323" data-time="1381739508"><p>
If it's your wife suggesting it, then there are probably no "key plot device" bits, just a whole bunch of women making stupid decisions</p></blockquote>
<br>
The exception to that is the " psychological thriller" suggesting trance backfired on her horribly. It's normally a 50/50 chance of nudity if you see those two words. -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="NTA" data-cid="397323" data-time="1381739508">
<div>
<p>If it's your wife suggesting it, then there are probably no "key plot device" bits, just a whole bunch of women making stupid decisions</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>women making stupid decisions have led to some of the best times of my life....</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="NTA" data-cid="397265" data-time="1381704781">
<div>
<p>You're over thinking it. Just mark it on the M4L shits n tits scale:<br><br>
Shit - <strong>Vanilla Sky</strong><br>
Shit with tits - <strong>Eyes Wide Shut</strong><br>
Tits - <strong>Troy (Directors Cut only)</strong><br>
TITS! - <strong>American Pie</strong><br>
TIIIIIIIIITS! - <strong>Desperado (also slight muff from memory. mmm Salma)</strong><br>
Muff - <strong>Basic Instinct</strong></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>It's not easy to put movies in to those catagories. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Where would you put "Showgirls" which had fucking heaps of tits, and muff, and maybe Kyle MacLachlan's cock, but sucked, really really hard?</p> -
-
<p>that's normally the first bad decision</p>
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="mariner4life" data-cid="397345" data-time="1381746296">
<div>
<p>It's not easy to put movies in to those catagories. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Where would you put "Showgirls" which had fucking heaps of tits, and muff, and maybe Kyle MacLachlan's cock, but sucked, really really hard?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>I'm glad there's a comma after sucked in that post. I had to read it twice to check.</p> -
<blockquote class='ipsBlockquote' data-author="mariner4life" data-cid="397345" data-time="1381746296"><p>It's not easy to put movies in to those catagories. <br />
<br />
Where would you put "Showgirls" which had fucking heaps of tits, and muff</p></blockquote>
<br />
Stop right there.<br /> -
<p>you are a simple man</p>
-
<p>Is that like being an "owner/operator"</p>
-
[quote name="NTA" post="397389" timestamp="1381764443"]<br><br>
Stop right there.[/quote)<br><br>
If only life was as simple as you Nick. About Schmidt has tits and arse but it's Kathy bates tits and arse and I think we'd all like that kind of nudity qualified before we watch something of that traumatising nature. -
[quote name="jegga" post="397398" timestamp="1381767358"]
If only life was as simple as you Nick. About Schmidt has tits and arse but it's Kathy bates tits and arse and I think we'd all like that kind of nudity qualified before we watch something of that traumatising nature.[/quote]
Well then we are talking about a definition of tits. And like a five stars rating system, it's everyone's opinion.Ergo, those aren't tits, because Kathy Bates.
-
<p>GRAVITY - I'll give it an 8. The visuals are stunning (10), the suspense and sudden bursts of mayhem & action are fantastic (9), a lot the dialogue suffers (6) and I'm not sure about some of the science, but the film is short (90 mins) so a big recommendation to see it on a big-screen in 3D. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>I know Cauron likes to throw playful head-scratchers into his films, like the floating pig at Battersea power station in Children of Men, and this time there's a Marvin the Martian toy floating in a space station with a short pan past a dead person that had several audience members whispering "Carrot-Top...?!?!!" It carried a lot of conversation afterwards... was that really Carrot-top?</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="red terror" data-cid="397618" data-time="1381942149">
<div>
<p>GRAVITY - I'll give it an 8. The visuals are stunning (10), the suspense and sudden bursts of mayhem & action are fantastic (9), a lot the dialogue suffers (6) and I'm not sure about some of the science, but the film is short (90 mins) so a big recommendation to see it on a big-screen in 3D. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>I know Cauron likes to throw playful head-scratchers into his films, like the floating pig at Battersea power station in Children of Men, and this time there's a Marvin the Martian toy floating in a space station with a short pan past a dead person that had several audience members whispering "Carrot-Top...?!?!!" It carried a lot of conversation afterwards... was that really Carrot-top?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Been away RT?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Yeah, I liked Gravity too. Very claustrophobic.</p> -
<p>Work. Deadlines. Buried in them. Watch a movie now-and-again. Saw a trailer for the next Hobbit before Gravity. The dragon looks awesome.</p>
