Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

The Cane vs Savea Debate

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
allblacks
323 Posts 52 Posters 14.8k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D DMX

    @ACT-Crusader said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

    @booboo said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

    @shark said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

    @Nepia said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

    @shark said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

    It's always worked well for the All Blacks when we've looked to alter our team structure and move away from our strengths because of another team's strength. We're going to have to import some Afrikaans.

    Odd for you to bring this up in this thread considering the benching of Cane last year was this exact scenario and England’s early run might have been stopped if we had his dominant tackling.

    Less so the benching of Cane than the selection of Barrett at 6 in order to counter England's line-out strength. Maybe Cane was collateral damage in that scenario, but do you seriously think an openside flankers' somewhat fabled tackling ability was going to make the difference? Nooo.

    Selection of Barrett over Cane is kinda the same thing

    Whilst I agree Cane's tackling ability has taken on mystical proportions I do think his presence in the SF would have made a difference.

    I don’t think it was. I think (and wrongly IMO) they focused on the lineout concerns first and it was just a straight call between Ardie and Cane. The Whitelock / Retallick / Barrett trio seemed in stone. Captain at 8.

    Again I think they misread it but that’s from my armchair 😎

    This is spot on, think I said the same in another post. The core of losing this game was Whitelock/Retallick/Read coming up empty. Ardie was probably our most consistent forward last year he was always going to win the head to head with Cane. Having Savea and Cane on the field at the same time was a pretty inspired decison and it had worked so well in the previous games, I just think Hansen outsmarted himself, but was not the losing of the game.

    rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    wrote on last edited by rotated
    #122

    @DMX said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

    This is spot on, think I said the same in another post. The core of losing this game was Whitelock/Retallick/Read coming up empty. Ardie was probably our most consistent forward last year he was always going to win the head to head with Cane. Having Savea and Cane on the field at the same time was a pretty inspired decison and it had worked so well in the previous games, I just think Hansen outsmarted himself, but was not the losing of the game.

    Cane pre-injury this isn't even a debate, but coming off the injury they were pretty close. Read however was absolutely past it and a liability and in a winner takes all scenario should have been the one to ride the pine. I can't think of an AB who went so off the boil for so long and was allowed to retain his spot (and I'm not having a go, I know a lot of it is injury related).

    A two year long brain explosion from Hansen there - didn't have the mettle to kill his darlings and when he did it was at reactionary and the wrong ones.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    3
    • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

      @Machpants said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

      @MN5 said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

      @taniwharugby said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

      @ACT-Crusader said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

      they focused on the lineout concerns first

      Yet did little to utilise the advantage of selecting an extra lock.

      Appeared we were gonna target thier line-out, but didn't, were we being trying to be tricky?

      It’s basically all Scott Barrett’s fault for only providing height, he should have played a lot more like Savea AND Cane as well.

      I put the blame solely on him.

      07 was his fault too

      no, that was Leon MacDonald's. So was 2003.

      I haven't worked out which Crusader to pin '99 on, but '95 was Mehrts.

      boobooB Offline
      boobooB Offline
      booboo
      wrote on last edited by
      #123

      @mariner4life said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

      @Machpants said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

      @MN5 said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

      @taniwharugby said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

      @ACT-Crusader said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

      they focused on the lineout concerns first

      Yet did little to utilise the advantage of selecting an extra lock.

      Appeared we were gonna target thier line-out, but didn't, were we being trying to be tricky?

      It’s basically all Scott Barrett’s fault for only providing height, he should have played a lot more like Savea AND Cane as well.

      I put the blame solely on him.

      07 was his fault too

      no, that was Leon MacDonald's. So was 2003.

      I haven't worked out which Crusader to pin '99 on, but '95 was Mehrts.

      How long have you been on the Fern, and you're not blaming Deans?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • rotatedR rotated

        @DMX said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

        This is spot on, think I said the same in another post. The core of losing this game was Whitelock/Retallick/Read coming up empty. Ardie was probably our most consistent forward last year he was always going to win the head to head with Cane. Having Savea and Cane on the field at the same time was a pretty inspired decison and it had worked so well in the previous games, I just think Hansen outsmarted himself, but was not the losing of the game.

        Cane pre-injury this isn't even a debate, but coming off the injury they were pretty close. Read however was absolutely past it and a liability and in a winner takes all scenario should have been the one to ride the pine. I can't think of an AB who went so off the boil for so long and was allowed to retain his spot (and I'm not having a go, I know a lot of it is injury related).

        A two year long brain explosion from Hansen there - didn't have the mettle to kill his darlings and when he did it was at reactionary and the wrong ones.

        M Offline
        M Offline
        Machpants
        wrote on last edited by
        #124

        @rotated the original retirement date of post lions should have been kept

        D 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • DonsteppaD Donsteppa

          @Crucial said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

          @Donsteppa said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

          @mariner4life said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

          @Machpants said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

          @MN5 said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

          @taniwharugby said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

          @ACT-Crusader said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

          they focused on the lineout concerns first

          Yet did little to utilise the advantage of selecting an extra lock.

          Appeared we were gonna target thier line-out, but didn't, were we being trying to be tricky?

          It’s basically all Scott Barrett’s fault for only providing height, he should have played a lot more like Savea AND Cane as well.

          I put the blame solely on him.

          07 was his fault too

          no, that was Leon MacDonald's. So was 2003.

          I haven't worked out which Crusader to pin '99 on, but '95 was Mehrts.

          Perennial favourite Reuben Thorne was the starting blindside in the 1999 semi final.

          Glad you pointed that out. I don't think anyone noticed 😉

          I remember a Stephen Jones article after the match saying something to the effect of: 'afterwards we had to check the programme to see if the All Blacks had selected a blindside'

          MN5M Offline
          MN5M Offline
          MN5
          wrote on last edited by
          #125

          @Donsteppa said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

          @Crucial said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

          @Donsteppa said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

          @mariner4life said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

          @Machpants said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

          @MN5 said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

          @taniwharugby said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

          @ACT-Crusader said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

          they focused on the lineout concerns first

          Yet did little to utilise the advantage of selecting an extra lock.

          Appeared we were gonna target thier line-out, but didn't, were we being trying to be tricky?

          It’s basically all Scott Barrett’s fault for only providing height, he should have played a lot more like Savea AND Cane as well.

          I put the blame solely on him.

          07 was his fault too

          no, that was Leon MacDonald's. So was 2003.

          I haven't worked out which Crusader to pin '99 on, but '95 was Mehrts.

          Perennial favourite Reuben Thorne was the starting blindside in the 1999 semi final.

          Glad you pointed that out. I don't think anyone noticed 😉

          I remember a Stephen Jones article after the match saying something to the effect of: 'afterwards we had to check the programme to see if the All Blacks had selected a blindside'

          That’s actually quite witty. Surely someone else wrote it ?

          1 Reply Last reply
          4
          • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

            @Chris-B said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

            Craig Green.

            Nepia will be along shortly

            MN5M Offline
            MN5M Offline
            MN5
            wrote on last edited by
            #126

            @mariner4life said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

            @Chris-B said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

            Craig Green.

            Nepia will be along shortly

            Since when is Craig Green from Hawke’s Bay ?

            NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • MN5M MN5

              @mariner4life said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

              @Chris-B said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

              Craig Green.

              Nepia will be along shortly

              Since when is Craig Green from Hawke’s Bay ?

              NepiaN Offline
              NepiaN Offline
              Nepia
              wrote on last edited by
              #127

              @MN5 said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

              @mariner4life said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

              @Chris-B said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

              Craig Green.

              Nepia will be along shortly

              Since when is Craig Green from Hawke’s Bay ?

              I’m as confused as you are by my mention. You’re right, he’s not from HB and conversely I always liked him as a player.

              MN5M mariner4lifeM 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • MN5M MN5

                @taniwharugby said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                @ACT-Crusader said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                they focused on the lineout concerns first

                Yet did little to utilise the advantage of selecting an extra lock.

                Appeared we were gonna target thier line-out, but didn't, were we being trying to be tricky?

                It’s basically all Scott Barrett’s fault for only providing height, he should have played a lot more like Savea AND Cane as well.

                I put the blame solely on him.

                J Offline
                J Offline
                junior
                wrote on last edited by
                #128

                @MN5 said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                @taniwharugby said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                @ACT-Crusader said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                they focused on the lineout concerns first

                Yet did little to utilise the advantage of selecting an extra lock.

                Appeared we were gonna target thier line-out, but didn't, were we being trying to be tricky?

                It’s basically all Scott Barrett’s fault for only providing height, he should have played a lot more like Savea AND Cane as well.

                I put the blame solely on him.

                I know you're being facetious, but having a third lock meant that we got completely owned at the breakdown by the two English flyers (and Itoje, who was also a menace there). What makes it so galling is that we got zero benefit at the line out despite having 4 jumpers - in fact we got owned at the line out too as they pinched more of our ball than we did of theirs

                1 Reply Last reply
                2
                • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

                  @Machpants said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                  @MN5 said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                  @taniwharugby said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                  @ACT-Crusader said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                  they focused on the lineout concerns first

                  Yet did little to utilise the advantage of selecting an extra lock.

                  Appeared we were gonna target thier line-out, but didn't, were we being trying to be tricky?

                  It’s basically all Scott Barrett’s fault for only providing height, he should have played a lot more like Savea AND Cane as well.

                  I put the blame solely on him.

                  07 was his fault too

                  no, that was Leon MacDonald's. So was 2003.

                  I haven't worked out which Crusader to pin '99 on, but '95 was Mehrts.

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  junior
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #129

                  @mariner4life said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                  @Machpants said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                  @MN5 said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                  @taniwharugby said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                  @ACT-Crusader said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                  they focused on the lineout concerns first

                  Yet did little to utilise the advantage of selecting an extra lock.

                  Appeared we were gonna target thier line-out, but didn't, were we being trying to be tricky?

                  It’s basically all Scott Barrett’s fault for only providing height, he should have played a lot more like Savea AND Cane as well.

                  I put the blame solely on him.

                  07 was his fault too

                  no, that was Leon MacDonald's. So was 2003.

                  I haven't worked out which Crusader to pin '99 on, but '95 was Mehrts.

                  Reuben Thorne was definitely at fault in 99

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • NepiaN Nepia

                    @MN5 said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                    @mariner4life said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                    @Chris-B said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                    Craig Green.

                    Nepia will be along shortly

                    Since when is Craig Green from Hawke’s Bay ?

                    I’m as confused as you are by my mention. You’re right, he’s not from HB and conversely I always liked him as a player.

                    MN5M Offline
                    MN5M Offline
                    MN5
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #130

                    @Nepia said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                    @MN5 said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                    @mariner4life said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                    @Chris-B said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                    Craig Green.

                    Nepia will be along shortly

                    Since when is Craig Green from Hawke’s Bay ?

                    I’m as confused as you are by my mention. You’re right, he’s not from HB and conversely I always liked him as a player.

                    I know right. Sort your shit @mariner4life....he’s no Zac Guildford

                    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • MN5M MN5

                      @Nepia said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                      @MN5 said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                      @mariner4life said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                      @Chris-B said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                      Craig Green.

                      Nepia will be along shortly

                      Since when is Craig Green from Hawke’s Bay ?

                      I’m as confused as you are by my mention. You’re right, he’s not from HB and conversely I always liked him as a player.

                      I know right. Sort your shit @mariner4life....he’s no Zac Guildford

                      mariner4lifeM Offline
                      mariner4lifeM Offline
                      mariner4life
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #131

                      @MN5 said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                      @Nepia said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                      @MN5 said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                      @mariner4life said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                      @Chris-B said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                      Craig Green.

                      Nepia will be along shortly

                      Since when is Craig Green from Hawke’s Bay ?

                      I’m as confused as you are by my mention. You’re right, he’s not from HB and conversely I always liked him as a player.

                      I know right. Sort your shit @mariner4life....he’s no Zac Guildford

                      wind your neck in, my shit is totally sorted

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • NepiaN Nepia

                        @MN5 said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                        @mariner4life said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                        @Chris-B said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                        Craig Green.

                        Nepia will be along shortly

                        Since when is Craig Green from Hawke’s Bay ?

                        I’m as confused as you are by my mention. You’re right, he’s not from HB and conversely I always liked him as a player.

                        mariner4lifeM Offline
                        mariner4lifeM Offline
                        mariner4life
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #132

                        @Nepia said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                        @MN5 said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                        @mariner4life said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                        @Chris-B said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                        Craig Green.

                        Nepia will be along shortly

                        Since when is Craig Green from Hawke’s Bay ?

                        I’m as confused as you are by my mention. You’re right, he’s not from HB and conversely I always liked him as a player.

                        so you are totally cool with the credit for 87 being given to him

                        Over, say a certain AB 7 who you think is the the GOAT

                        NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

                          @Nepia said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                          @MN5 said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                          @mariner4life said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                          @Chris-B said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                          Craig Green.

                          Nepia will be along shortly

                          Since when is Craig Green from Hawke’s Bay ?

                          I’m as confused as you are by my mention. You’re right, he’s not from HB and conversely I always liked him as a player.

                          so you are totally cool with the credit for 87 being given to him

                          Over, say a certain AB 7 who you think is the the GOAT

                          NepiaN Offline
                          NepiaN Offline
                          Nepia
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #133

                          @mariner4life said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                          @Nepia said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                          @MN5 said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                          @mariner4life said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                          @Chris-B said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                          Craig Green.

                          Nepia will be along shortly

                          Since when is Craig Green from Hawke’s Bay ?

                          I’m as confused as you are by my mention. You’re right, he’s not from HB and conversely I always liked him as a player.

                          so you are totally cool with the credit for 87 being given to him

                          Over, say a certain AB 7 who you think is the the GOAT

                          Oh, I don't think the credit should ever go to one person when we win (plus not mentioning Kaino in 2011 is more egregious than Green) but I'm on board with fully blaming Scott Barrett for last years loss. 😉

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • J junior

                            @shark said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                            @Nepia said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                            @shark said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                            It's always worked well for the All Blacks when we've looked to alter our team structure and move away from our strengths because of another team's strength. We're going to have to import some Afrikaans.

                            Odd for you to bring this up in this thread considering the benching of Cane last year was this exact scenario and England’s early run might have been stopped if we had his dominant tackling.

                            Less so the benching of Cane than the selection of Barrett at 6 in order to counter England's line-out strength. Maybe Cane was collateral damage in that scenario, but do you seriously think an openside flankers' somewhat fabled tackling ability was going to make the difference? Nooo.

                            Lol this is joe post, right? You're seriously saying in a match where the opposition regularly gained metres and smashed us in the breakdown - which were significant contributors to the result - that having a better tackler on the field wouldn't have helped?

                            sharkS Offline
                            sharkS Offline
                            shark
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #134

                            @junior said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                            @shark said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                            @Nepia said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                            @shark said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                            It's always worked well for the All Blacks when we've looked to alter our team structure and move away from our strengths because of another team's strength. We're going to have to import some Afrikaans.

                            Odd for you to bring this up in this thread considering the benching of Cane last year was this exact scenario and England’s early run might have been stopped if we had his dominant tackling.

                            Less so the benching of Cane than the selection of Barrett at 6 in order to counter England's line-out strength. Maybe Cane was collateral damage in that scenario, but do you seriously think an openside flankers' somewhat fabled tackling ability was going to make the difference? Nooo.

                            Lol this is joe post, right? You're seriously saying in a match where the opposition regularly gained metres and smashed us in the breakdown - which were significant contributors to the result - that having a better tackler on the field wouldn't have helped?

                            Do you think we would have won had Cane's possibly marginally better tacking ability been available from the start?? We were outplayed in numerous areas, so that's brilliant stuff.

                            Did you miss the bit where I said the bigger difference was selecting S Barrett out of position in order to counter England at set piece?? Which was clearly a big fail.

                            It's amazing how Cane's magical tackling was almost never mentioned in several years but now it's an elixir that could have won us a third consecutive RWC.

                            The All Blacks are often less physical than opposition sides, and particularly England and South Africa. But after one bad RWC loss some of you want to move away from our ball-running strength and select a defensive openside flanker. Wonderful. Next you'll want to play 10 man rugby.

                            mariner4lifeM antipodeanA rotatedR 3 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • sharkS shark

                              @junior said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                              @shark said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                              @Nepia said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                              @shark said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                              It's always worked well for the All Blacks when we've looked to alter our team structure and move away from our strengths because of another team's strength. We're going to have to import some Afrikaans.

                              Odd for you to bring this up in this thread considering the benching of Cane last year was this exact scenario and England’s early run might have been stopped if we had his dominant tackling.

                              Less so the benching of Cane than the selection of Barrett at 6 in order to counter England's line-out strength. Maybe Cane was collateral damage in that scenario, but do you seriously think an openside flankers' somewhat fabled tackling ability was going to make the difference? Nooo.

                              Lol this is joe post, right? You're seriously saying in a match where the opposition regularly gained metres and smashed us in the breakdown - which were significant contributors to the result - that having a better tackler on the field wouldn't have helped?

                              Do you think we would have won had Cane's possibly marginally better tacking ability been available from the start?? We were outplayed in numerous areas, so that's brilliant stuff.

                              Did you miss the bit where I said the bigger difference was selecting S Barrett out of position in order to counter England at set piece?? Which was clearly a big fail.

                              It's amazing how Cane's magical tackling was almost never mentioned in several years but now it's an elixir that could have won us a third consecutive RWC.

                              The All Blacks are often less physical than opposition sides, and particularly England and South Africa. But after one bad RWC loss some of you want to move away from our ball-running strength and select a defensive openside flanker. Wonderful. Next you'll want to play 10 man rugby.

                              mariner4lifeM Offline
                              mariner4lifeM Offline
                              mariner4life
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #135

                              @shark aaahhhh almost never mentioned? Fuck the internet is as slow as everything else in Christchurch

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              6
                              • BonesB Online
                                BonesB Online
                                Bones
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #136

                                Finding it interesting that Cane's game has been reduced down to just tackling. Evidence is there's a whole lot more to it than that. Are there no breakdowns or anything anymore?

                                antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
                                2
                                • BonesB Bones

                                  Finding it interesting that Cane's game has been reduced down to just tackling. Evidence is there's a whole lot more to it than that. Are there no breakdowns or anything anymore?

                                  antipodeanA Offline
                                  antipodeanA Offline
                                  antipodean
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #137

                                  @Bones said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                                  Finding it interesting that Cane's game has been reduced down to just tackling. Evidence is there's a whole lot more to it than that. Are there no breakdowns or anything anymore?

                                  The idea is to utterly minimise Cane's ability and effectiveness to the point you're asking why he's not playing field hockey instead.

                                  I suspect @shark is doing this in order to have some Canterbury player made captain.

                                  NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
                                  7
                                  • sharkS shark

                                    @junior said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                                    @shark said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                                    @Nepia said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                                    @shark said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                                    It's always worked well for the All Blacks when we've looked to alter our team structure and move away from our strengths because of another team's strength. We're going to have to import some Afrikaans.

                                    Odd for you to bring this up in this thread considering the benching of Cane last year was this exact scenario and England’s early run might have been stopped if we had his dominant tackling.

                                    Less so the benching of Cane than the selection of Barrett at 6 in order to counter England's line-out strength. Maybe Cane was collateral damage in that scenario, but do you seriously think an openside flankers' somewhat fabled tackling ability was going to make the difference? Nooo.

                                    Lol this is joe post, right? You're seriously saying in a match where the opposition regularly gained metres and smashed us in the breakdown - which were significant contributors to the result - that having a better tackler on the field wouldn't have helped?

                                    Do you think we would have won had Cane's possibly marginally better tacking ability been available from the start?? We were outplayed in numerous areas, so that's brilliant stuff.

                                    Did you miss the bit where I said the bigger difference was selecting S Barrett out of position in order to counter England at set piece?? Which was clearly a big fail.

                                    It's amazing how Cane's magical tackling was almost never mentioned in several years but now it's an elixir that could have won us a third consecutive RWC.

                                    The All Blacks are often less physical than opposition sides, and particularly England and South Africa. But after one bad RWC loss some of you want to move away from our ball-running strength and select a defensive openside flanker. Wonderful. Next you'll want to play 10 man rugby.

                                    antipodeanA Offline
                                    antipodeanA Offline
                                    antipodean
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #138

                                    @shark said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                                    It's amazing how Cane's magical tackling was almost never mentioned in several years but now it's an elixir that could have won us a third consecutive RWC.

                                    https://twitter.com/StevenLuatua/status/934502884166782976

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    2
                                    • antipodeanA antipodean

                                      @Bones said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                                      Finding it interesting that Cane's game has been reduced down to just tackling. Evidence is there's a whole lot more to it than that. Are there no breakdowns or anything anymore?

                                      The idea is to utterly minimise Cane's ability and effectiveness to the point you're asking why he's not playing field hockey instead.

                                      I suspect @shark is doing this in order to have some Canterbury player made captain.

                                      NepiaN Offline
                                      NepiaN Offline
                                      Nepia
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #139

                                      @antipodean said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                                      @Bones said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                                      Finding it interesting that Cane's game has been reduced down to just tackling. Evidence is there's a whole lot more to it than that. Are there no breakdowns or anything anymore?

                                      The idea is to utterly minimise Cane's ability and effectiveness to the point you're asking why he's not playing field hockey instead.

                                      I suspect @shark is doing this in order to have some Canterbury player made captain.

                                      Also the claim that selecting Cane would change the AB game style - a style that Cane has played in 60 odd tests. 😂

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      3
                                      • sharkS shark

                                        @junior said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                                        @shark said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                                        @Nepia said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                                        @shark said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                                        It's always worked well for the All Blacks when we've looked to alter our team structure and move away from our strengths because of another team's strength. We're going to have to import some Afrikaans.

                                        Odd for you to bring this up in this thread considering the benching of Cane last year was this exact scenario and England’s early run might have been stopped if we had his dominant tackling.

                                        Less so the benching of Cane than the selection of Barrett at 6 in order to counter England's line-out strength. Maybe Cane was collateral damage in that scenario, but do you seriously think an openside flankers' somewhat fabled tackling ability was going to make the difference? Nooo.

                                        Lol this is joe post, right? You're seriously saying in a match where the opposition regularly gained metres and smashed us in the breakdown - which were significant contributors to the result - that having a better tackler on the field wouldn't have helped?

                                        Do you think we would have won had Cane's possibly marginally better tacking ability been available from the start?? We were outplayed in numerous areas, so that's brilliant stuff.

                                        Did you miss the bit where I said the bigger difference was selecting S Barrett out of position in order to counter England at set piece?? Which was clearly a big fail.

                                        It's amazing how Cane's magical tackling was almost never mentioned in several years but now it's an elixir that could have won us a third consecutive RWC.

                                        The All Blacks are often less physical than opposition sides, and particularly England and South Africa. But after one bad RWC loss some of you want to move away from our ball-running strength and select a defensive openside flanker. Wonderful. Next you'll want to play 10 man rugby.

                                        rotatedR Offline
                                        rotatedR Offline
                                        rotated
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #140

                                        @shark said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                                        Do you think we would have won had Cane's possibly marginally better tacking ability been available from the start??

                                        If any tackling ability was available at the very start we may have won, yes.

                                        canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
                                        3
                                        • rotatedR rotated

                                          @shark said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                                          Do you think we would have won had Cane's possibly marginally better tacking ability been available from the start??

                                          If any tackling ability was available at the very start we may have won, yes.

                                          canefanC Online
                                          canefanC Online
                                          canefan
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #141

                                          @rotated said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                                          @shark said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:

                                          Do you think we would have won had Cane's possibly marginally better tacking ability been available from the start??

                                          If any tackling ability was available at the very start we may have won, yes.

                                          In our two best results of the tournament, the opening round win vs SA and the QF pumping of Ireland we started with Sam Cane and Ardie Savea. Hansen outsmarted himself in the SF. Enough said

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          2
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search