Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Black Caps v Pakistan

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
1.2k Posts 51 Posters 46.7k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • CyclopsC Cyclops

    Looks like there are 445 instances of bowlers getting 10 in a match and 385 instances of batsmen getting over 200 (including triples and Lara's quad).

    So 10fers slightly more common. I don'thave time to dig much further now but would be interested to see that over time. My hunch is that 10fers have become less common and doubles more common. Murali has 5% of all 10fers, and Warne another 2% though so that might not be the case.

    RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    wrote on last edited by
    #1086

    @Cyclops said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    Looks like there are 445 instances of bowlers getting 10 in a match and 385 instances of batsmen getting over 200 (including triples and Lara's quad).

    So 10fers slightly more common. I don'thave time to dig much further now but would be interested to see that over time. My hunch is that 10fers have become less common and doubles more common. Murali has 5% of all 10fers, and Warne another 2% though so that might not be the case.

    In the TV commentary yesterday. They mentioned the NZ stats. I cant remember the exact number, but we had 2 more double hundreds than 10-fers.

    Something like 36 to 34, or 26 to 24.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • CyclopsC Offline
      CyclopsC Offline
      Cyclops
      wrote on last edited by
      #1087

      The other thing to consider is that a double requires one massive effort in a single innings, whereas 10fers (almost always) require sustained excellence over 2 innings.

      SnowyS rotatedR 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • CyclopsC Cyclops

        Looks like there are 445 instances of bowlers getting 10 in a match and 385 instances of batsmen getting over 200 (including triples and Lara's quad).

        So 10fers slightly more common. I don'thave time to dig much further now but would be interested to see that over time. My hunch is that 10fers have become less common and doubles more common. Murali has 5% of all 10fers, and Warne another 2% though so that might not be the case.

        SnowyS Offline
        SnowyS Offline
        Snowy
        wrote on last edited by
        #1088

        @Cyclops said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

        would be interested to see that over time. My hunch is that 10fers have become less common and doubles more common. Murali has 5% of all 10fers, and Warne another 2% though so that might not be the case.

        I don't really count anything Murali did. Just my opinion on his action, but it would even out the numbers quite a bit.

        Definitely be interesting over time as bats got better, pitches don't deteriorate as much (generally) 200 seems more common.

        The 10fer list is seriously dominated by spinners. That's not going to happen in NZ. In fact the only bowler in the top 5 who isn't a spinner is paddles.

        So my hunch is that your hunch is correct.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • CyclopsC Cyclops

          The other thing to consider is that a double requires one massive effort in a single innings, whereas 10fers (almost always) require sustained excellence over 2 innings.

          SnowyS Offline
          SnowyS Offline
          Snowy
          wrote on last edited by
          #1089

          @Cyclops said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

          The other thing to consider is that a double requires one massive effort in a single innings, whereas 10fers (almost always) require sustained excellence over 2 innings.

          Bar two, yes for bowlers (hence the "almost always" I suppose).

          Not sure that one of those is harder than the other. A batsman doesn't actually run for a lot of his runs, a bowler gets a good break to put his feet up. Both require some pretty intense concentration and physical effort.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • HoorooH Offline
            HoorooH Offline
            Hooroo
            wrote on last edited by Hooroo
            #1090

            How many people have a 200 and a 10wb? Gillespie & Kallis? Sobers?

            (I don't mean in the same test)

            BovidaeB 1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • BovidaeB Offline
              BovidaeB Offline
              Bovidae
              wrote on last edited by
              #1091

              Botham has. 208 and 4 x 10-wkts.

              1 Reply Last reply
              5
              • HoorooH Hooroo

                How many people have a 200 and a 10wb? Gillespie & Kallis? Sobers?

                (I don't mean in the same test)

                BovidaeB Offline
                BovidaeB Offline
                Bovidae
                wrote on last edited by
                #1092

                @Hooroo said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

                How many people have a 200 and a 10wb? Gillespie & Kallis? Sobers?

                The list might be smaller than we think. Neither Sobers, Kallis or Gillespie had a 10 wb.

                HoorooH SnowyS 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • BovidaeB Bovidae

                  @Hooroo said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

                  How many people have a 200 and a 10wb? Gillespie & Kallis? Sobers?

                  The list might be smaller than we think. Neither Sobers, Kallis or Gillespie had a 10 wb.

                  HoorooH Offline
                  HoorooH Offline
                  Hooroo
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #1093

                  @Bovidae said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

                  @Hooroo said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

                  How many people have a 200 and a 10wb? Gillespie & Kallis? Sobers?

                  The list might be smaller than we think. Neither Sobers, Kallis or Gillespie had a 10 wb.

                  Wow!

                  Astle? πŸ™‚

                  BovidaeB 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • BovidaeB Bovidae

                    @Hooroo said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

                    How many people have a 200 and a 10wb? Gillespie & Kallis? Sobers?

                    The list might be smaller than we think. Neither Sobers, Kallis or Gillespie had a 10 wb.

                    SnowyS Offline
                    SnowyS Offline
                    Snowy
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #1094

                    @Bovidae said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

                    The list might be smaller than we think.

                    It might not qualify as a list.

                    Is there really only one?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • HoorooH Hooroo

                      @Gunner said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

                      @Hooroo said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

                      @Gunner said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

                      Well work today is going to suck without the cricket commentary in the background!

                      Doesn't the Aussie v India test start today at the SCG?

                      You're probably right, but yea, nah.
                      I'll probably check in on the score from time to time, but that's about the limit of my interest in games that the BC's aren't playing.

                      I love Aussie cricket. It filled a hole between the 80's and the Hesson/McCullum era

                      ACT CrusaderA Offline
                      ACT CrusaderA Offline
                      ACT Crusader
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #1095

                      @Hooroo said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

                      @Gunner said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

                      @Hooroo said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

                      @Gunner said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

                      Well work today is going to suck without the cricket commentary in the background!

                      Doesn't the Aussie v India test start today at the SCG?

                      You're probably right, but yea, nah.
                      I'll probably check in on the score from time to time, but that's about the limit of my interest in games that the BC's aren't playing.

                      I love Aussie cricket. It filled a hole between the 80's and the Hesson/McCullum era

                      I quite like this India team. Bumrah is a gun and Ashwin is a master tactician with the ball.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • HoorooH Hooroo

                        @Bovidae said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

                        @Hooroo said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

                        How many people have a 200 and a 10wb? Gillespie & Kallis? Sobers?

                        The list might be smaller than we think. Neither Sobers, Kallis or Gillespie had a 10 wb.

                        Wow!

                        Astle? πŸ™‚

                        BovidaeB Offline
                        BovidaeB Offline
                        Bovidae
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #1096

                        @Hooroo Sadly, Nathan was restricted from bowling too many of his dangerous medium pacers. πŸ˜‰

                        @Snowy There could be others but none of usual suspects for all-rounders accomplished this feat.

                        gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
                        2
                        • BovidaeB Bovidae

                          @Hooroo Sadly, Nathan was restricted from bowling too many of his dangerous medium pacers. πŸ˜‰

                          @Snowy There could be others but none of usual suspects for all-rounders accomplished this feat.

                          gt12G Offline
                          gt12G Offline
                          gt12
                          wrote on last edited by gt12
                          #1097

                          @Bovidae said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

                          @Hooroo Sadly, Nathan was restricted from bowling too many of his dangerous medium pacers. πŸ˜‰

                          @Snowy There could be others but none of usual suspects for all-rounders accomplished this feat.

                          Shakib Al Hasan

                          https://www.espncricinfo.com/bangladesh/content/player/56143.html

                          BovidaeB 1 Reply Last reply
                          3
                          • gt12G gt12

                            @Bovidae said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

                            @Hooroo Sadly, Nathan was restricted from bowling too many of his dangerous medium pacers. πŸ˜‰

                            @Snowy There could be others but none of usual suspects for all-rounders accomplished this feat.

                            Shakib Al Hasan

                            https://www.espncricinfo.com/bangladesh/content/player/56143.html

                            BovidaeB Offline
                            BovidaeB Offline
                            Bovidae
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #1098

                            @gt12 I only looked at the pace bowlers so was surprised that one of Imran, Kapil Dev, Flintoff or Stokes didn't do it.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • CyclopsC Offline
                              CyclopsC Offline
                              Cyclops
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #1099

                              Wasim Akram is in the 200/10 club too

                              CyclopsC 1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • CyclopsC Cyclops

                                Wasim Akram is in the 200/10 club too

                                CyclopsC Offline
                                CyclopsC Offline
                                Cyclops
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #1100

                                @Cyclops said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

                                Wasim Akram is in the 200/10 club too

                                Jason Holder does, Stokes doesn't but might get a 10fer yet.

                                gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • gt12G Offline
                                  gt12G Offline
                                  gt12
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #1101

                                  Holder

                                  https://www.espncricinfo.com/westindies/content/player/391485.html

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • CyclopsC Cyclops

                                    @Cyclops said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

                                    Wasim Akram is in the 200/10 club too

                                    Jason Holder does, Stokes doesn't but might get a 10fer yet.

                                    gt12G Offline
                                    gt12G Offline
                                    gt12
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #1102

                                    @Cyclops said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

                                    @Cyclops said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

                                    Wasim Akram is in the 200/10 club too

                                    Jason Holder does, Stokes doesn't but might get a 10fer yet.

                                    Snap.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • CyclopsC Offline
                                      CyclopsC Offline
                                      Cyclops
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #1103

                                      So we're at three right? Shakib, Holder Botham. Which is the same as 100/10 in the same match (Botham, Shakib and Imran Khan). Dunno which is the tougher achievement.

                                      MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • SnowyS Offline
                                        SnowyS Offline
                                        Snowy
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #1104

                                        Well at least we have something that is a list now, albeit small.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • CyclopsC Offline
                                          CyclopsC Offline
                                          Cyclops
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #1105

                                          Oh and Akram, so 4 for the 200/10 career double.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search