Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

All Blacks vs Springboks I

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
1.9k Posts 92 Posters 231.9k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

    @chris-b said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    @mariner4life said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    i don't really believe in all this "motivating the opposition" guff, this isn't park football

    but

    we are starting to talk this up to uncomfortable levels.

    Yeah - a couple of weeks ago, no-one thought the Aussies would get close to SA.

    In theory you'd think:

    NZ>Aus
    Aus>SA

    So NZ>SA

    But, it doesn't always happen that way.

    However, the Boks will be paying plenty on the TAB.

    this week franks the form either way

    Have the Wallabies been hugely improved by the changes at 10 and 12?

    or

    Are the Boks really just rubbish

    i get the feeling it's a bit from column A and a bit from column B. And we are going to have to be sharp to take advantage of whatever opportunities we get. And stay patient

    One thing is that it's starting to get warm in North Queensland. Are we the afternoon game or the night game?

    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #56

    @mariner4life said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    @chris-b said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    @mariner4life said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    i don't really believe in all this "motivating the opposition" guff, this isn't park football

    but

    we are starting to talk this up to uncomfortable levels.

    Yeah - a couple of weeks ago, no-one thought the Aussies would get close to SA.

    In theory you'd think:

    NZ>Aus
    Aus>SA

    So NZ>SA

    But, it doesn't always happen that way.

    However, the Boks will be paying plenty on the TAB.

    this week franks the form either way

    Have the Wallabies been hugely improved by the changes at 10 and 12?

    or

    Are the Boks really just rubbish

    i get the feeling it's a bit from column A and a bit from column B.

    I think you're right.

    But, if Laurie is right about them missing Super rugby, then they should be better for their games against Oz.

    Missing big Pieter-Steph and Kolbe won't have helped them. They might get Kolbe back for this game?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • mariner4lifeM Offline
      mariner4lifeM Offline
      mariner4life
      wrote on last edited by
      #57

      That point just after half time where they suddenly started playing up-tempo was weird. Faf took a quick tap, they panicked the Aussies, and scored immediately.

      And then just, reverted to type?

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

        @chris-b said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

        @mariner4life said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

        i don't really believe in all this "motivating the opposition" guff, this isn't park football

        but

        we are starting to talk this up to uncomfortable levels.

        Yeah - a couple of weeks ago, no-one thought the Aussies would get close to SA.

        In theory you'd think:

        NZ>Aus
        Aus>SA

        So NZ>SA

        But, it doesn't always happen that way.

        However, the Boks will be paying plenty on the TAB.

        this week franks the form either way

        Have the Wallabies been hugely improved by the changes at 10 and 12?

        or

        Are the Boks really just rubbish

        i get the feeling it's a bit from column A and a bit from column B. And we are going to have to be sharp to take advantage of whatever opportunities we get. And stay patient

        One thing is that it's starting to get warm in North Queensland. Are we the afternoon game or the night game?

        KiwiwombleK Online
        KiwiwombleK Online
        Kiwiwomble
        wrote on last edited by
        #58

        @mariner4life said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

        @chris-b said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

        @mariner4life said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

        i don't really believe in all this "motivating the opposition" guff, this isn't park football

        but

        we are starting to talk this up to uncomfortable levels.

        Yeah - a couple of weeks ago, no-one thought the Aussies would get close to SA.

        In theory you'd think:

        NZ>Aus
        Aus>SA

        So NZ>SA

        But, it doesn't always happen that way.

        However, the Boks will be paying plenty on the TAB.

        this week franks the form either way

        Have the Wallabies been hugely improved by the changes at 10 and 12?

        or

        Are the Boks really just rubbish

        i get the feeling it's a bit from column A and a bit from column B. And we are going to have to be sharp to take advantage of whatever opportunities we get. And stay patient

        One thing is that it's starting to get warm in North Queensland. Are we the afternoon game or the night game?

        an insightful and serious post...you've changed man

        mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

          @mariner4life said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

          @chris-b said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

          @mariner4life said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

          i don't really believe in all this "motivating the opposition" guff, this isn't park football

          but

          we are starting to talk this up to uncomfortable levels.

          Yeah - a couple of weeks ago, no-one thought the Aussies would get close to SA.

          In theory you'd think:

          NZ>Aus
          Aus>SA

          So NZ>SA

          But, it doesn't always happen that way.

          However, the Boks will be paying plenty on the TAB.

          this week franks the form either way

          Have the Wallabies been hugely improved by the changes at 10 and 12?

          or

          Are the Boks really just rubbish

          i get the feeling it's a bit from column A and a bit from column B. And we are going to have to be sharp to take advantage of whatever opportunities we get. And stay patient

          One thing is that it's starting to get warm in North Queensland. Are we the afternoon game or the night game?

          an insightful and serious post...you've changed man

          mariner4lifeM Offline
          mariner4lifeM Offline
          mariner4life
          wrote on last edited by
          #59

          @kiwiwomble said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

          @mariner4life said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

          @chris-b said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

          @mariner4life said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

          i don't really believe in all this "motivating the opposition" guff, this isn't park football

          but

          we are starting to talk this up to uncomfortable levels.

          Yeah - a couple of weeks ago, no-one thought the Aussies would get close to SA.

          In theory you'd think:

          NZ>Aus
          Aus>SA

          So NZ>SA

          But, it doesn't always happen that way.

          However, the Boks will be paying plenty on the TAB.

          this week franks the form either way

          Have the Wallabies been hugely improved by the changes at 10 and 12?

          or

          Are the Boks really just rubbish

          i get the feeling it's a bit from column A and a bit from column B. And we are going to have to be sharp to take advantage of whatever opportunities we get. And stay patient

          One thing is that it's starting to get warm in North Queensland. Are we the afternoon game or the night game?

          an insightful and serious post...you've changed man

          sorry, i'll revert to taking potshots at people

          1 Reply Last reply
          3
          • M Machpants

            @mariner4life said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

            @chris-b said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

            @mariner4life said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

            i don't really believe in all this "motivating the opposition" guff, this isn't park football

            but

            we are starting to talk this up to uncomfortable levels.

            Yeah - a couple of weeks ago, no-one thought the Aussies would get close to SA.

            In theory you'd think:

            NZ>Aus
            Aus>SA

            So NZ>SA

            But, it doesn't always happen that way.

            However, the Boks will be paying plenty on the TAB.

            this week franks the form either way

            Have the Wallabies been hugely improved by the changes at 10 and 12?

            or

            Are the Boks really just rubbish

            i get the feeling it's a bit from column A and a bit from column B. And we are going to have to be sharp to take advantage of whatever opportunities we get. And stay patient

            One thing is that it's starting to get warm in North Queensland. Are we the afternoon game or the night game?

            7pm NZ, next week we're the 10pm

            nzzpN Online
            nzzpN Online
            nzzp
            wrote on last edited by
            #60

            @machpants said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

            @mariner4life said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

            @chris-b said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

            @mariner4life said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

            i don't really believe in all this "motivating the opposition" guff, this isn't park football

            but

            we are starting to talk this up to uncomfortable levels.

            Yeah - a couple of weeks ago, no-one thought the Aussies would get close to SA.

            In theory you'd think:

            NZ>Aus
            Aus>SA

            So NZ>SA

            But, it doesn't always happen that way.

            However, the Boks will be paying plenty on the TAB.

            this week franks the form either way

            Have the Wallabies been hugely improved by the changes at 10 and 12?

            or

            Are the Boks really just rubbish

            i get the feeling it's a bit from column A and a bit from column B. And we are going to have to be sharp to take advantage of whatever opportunities we get. And stay patient

            One thing is that it's starting to get warm in North Queensland. Are we the afternoon game or the night game?

            7pm NZ, next week we're the 10pm

            I think it's 11pm

            yep, 11pm
            https://www.allblacks.com/fixtures/all-blacks/

            M 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mariner4lifeM Offline
              mariner4lifeM Offline
              mariner4life
              wrote on last edited by
              #61

              my info has us fir the 5pm kick off this weekend and the 8pm kick off for the final round

              1 Reply Last reply
              3
              • nzzpN nzzp

                @machpants said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                @mariner4life said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                @chris-b said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                @mariner4life said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                i don't really believe in all this "motivating the opposition" guff, this isn't park football

                but

                we are starting to talk this up to uncomfortable levels.

                Yeah - a couple of weeks ago, no-one thought the Aussies would get close to SA.

                In theory you'd think:

                NZ>Aus
                Aus>SA

                So NZ>SA

                But, it doesn't always happen that way.

                However, the Boks will be paying plenty on the TAB.

                this week franks the form either way

                Have the Wallabies been hugely improved by the changes at 10 and 12?

                or

                Are the Boks really just rubbish

                i get the feeling it's a bit from column A and a bit from column B. And we are going to have to be sharp to take advantage of whatever opportunities we get. And stay patient

                One thing is that it's starting to get warm in North Queensland. Are we the afternoon game or the night game?

                7pm NZ, next week we're the 10pm

                I think it's 11pm

                yep, 11pm
                https://www.allblacks.com/fixtures/all-blacks/

                M Offline
                M Offline
                Machpants
                wrote on last edited by Machpants
                #62

                @nzzp said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                @machpants said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                @mariner4life said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                @chris-b said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                @mariner4life said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                i don't really believe in all this "motivating the opposition" guff, this isn't park football

                but

                we are starting to talk this up to uncomfortable levels.

                Yeah - a couple of weeks ago, no-one thought the Aussies would get close to SA.

                In theory you'd think:

                NZ>Aus
                Aus>SA

                So NZ>SA

                But, it doesn't always happen that way.

                However, the Boks will be paying plenty on the TAB.

                this week franks the form either way

                Have the Wallabies been hugely improved by the changes at 10 and 12?

                or

                Are the Boks really just rubbish

                i get the feeling it's a bit from column A and a bit from column B. And we are going to have to be sharp to take advantage of whatever opportunities we get. And stay patient

                One thing is that it's starting to get warm in North Queensland. Are we the afternoon game or the night game?

                7pm NZ, next week we're the 10pm

                I think it's 11pm

                yep, 11pm
                https://www.allblacks.com/fixtures/all-blacks/

                Daylight savings, what a pile of arse that is

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • TimT Tim

                  This will be the team if ALB is fit:

                  1 Tu'inukuafe
                  2 Taylor
                  3 Laulala
                  4 Retallick
                  5 Barrett
                  6 Ioane
                  7 Papalii
                  8 Savea
                  9 Perenara
                  10 Barrett
                  11 Ioane
                  12 Havili
                  13 ALB
                  14 Reece
                  15 Barrett

                  16 Taukei'aho
                  17 Moody
                  18 Tu'ungafasi
                  19 Tuipulotu
                  20 Jacobson
                  21 Weber
                  22 DMac
                  23 Jordan

                  Chester DrawsC Offline
                  Chester DrawsC Offline
                  Chester Draws
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #63

                  @tim said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                  This will be the team if ALB is fit:

                  9 Perenara
                  10 Barrett

                  I don't see the B. Barrett has done anything this year to deserve being picked to start. People assume he is going to come right (blather about how class never goes, blah, blah, blah) but he doesn't add anything for me other than slightly better tackling. Nor has Foster ever seemed to pick him as his first choice.

                  If we start with Perenara, then the main criteria for the #10 will be who can best pick the ball up from around their ankles.

                  boobooB KiwiwombleK 2 Replies Last reply
                  1
                  • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

                    For all the talk of how dangerous the bombs of south Africa are, they put up appropriately 230 over the past 2 weeks, the wallabies dealt with them appallingly, and won both games

                    I am not worried.

                    Keep the ball for various sets of 5+ phases and we'll score more than they are capable of with their current game plan

                    No QuarterN Online
                    No QuarterN Online
                    No Quarter
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #64

                    @mariner4life said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                    For all the talk of how dangerous the bombs of south Africa are, they put up appropriately 230 over the past 2 weeks, the wallabies dealt with them appallingly, and won both games

                    I am not worried.

                    Keep the ball for various sets of 5+ phases and we'll score more than they are capable of with their current game plan

                    Those bombs are such an insanely low percentage play, I'm astounded anyone thinks they're a good idea? Even if you get the ball back, best case scenario is you've made about 10m? Actually scoring from them is very rare.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • No QuarterN Online
                      No QuarterN Online
                      No Quarter
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #65

                      The Boks will lift for us, the first 40 will be brutal. I expect them to run out of gas in the 2nd 40 though, but we'll have to play well and take our chances. The Boks are not Argentina, they know how to adjust to the game situation and get under the other teams skin etc. They've got some wiley old campaigners in their side.

                      L_n_PL 1 Reply Last reply
                      4
                      • BovidaeB Offline
                        BovidaeB Offline
                        Bovidae
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #66

                        24C and 68% humidity is the forecast at kickoff. Expect a high tempo game to run them off their feet.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        4
                        • MN5M MN5

                          @chris-b said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                          @mariner4life said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                          i don't really believe in all this "motivating the opposition" guff, this isn't park football

                          but

                          we are starting to talk this up to uncomfortable levels.

                          Yeah - a couple of weeks ago, no-one thought the Aussies would get close to SA.

                          In theory you'd think:

                          NZ>Aus
                          Aus>SA

                          So NZ>SA

                          But, it doesn't always happen that way.

                          However, the Boks will be paying plenty on the TAB.

                          It’s like when everyone thought since Frazier > Ali and then Foreman > Frazier then naturally Foreman > Ali was a logical conclusion.

                          I don’t know what this has to do with Rugby but shut the fuck up Laurie ‘funeral face” Mains. Predictions like that have a habit of blowing up in faces.

                          boobooB Offline
                          boobooB Offline
                          booboo
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #67

                          @mn5 said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                          @chris-b said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                          @mariner4life said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                          i don't really believe in all this "motivating the opposition" guff, this isn't park football

                          but

                          we are starting to talk this up to uncomfortable levels.

                          Yeah - a couple of weeks ago, no-one thought the Aussies would get close to SA.

                          In theory you'd think:

                          NZ>Aus
                          Aus>SA

                          So NZ>SA

                          But, it doesn't always happen that way.

                          However, the Boks will be paying plenty on the TAB.

                          It’s like when everyone thought since Frazier > Ali and then Foreman > Frazier then naturally Foreman > Ali was a logical conclusion.

                          I don’t know what this has to do with Rugby but shut the fuck up Laurie ‘funeral face” Mains. Predictions like that have a habit of blowing up in faces.

                          It has absolutely zero effect (unless the team starts to believe it). All it does is give opposition fans ammo to tease us if results go the other way.

                          MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
                          2
                          • Chester DrawsC Chester Draws

                            @tim said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                            This will be the team if ALB is fit:

                            9 Perenara
                            10 Barrett

                            I don't see the B. Barrett has done anything this year to deserve being picked to start. People assume he is going to come right (blather about how class never goes, blah, blah, blah) but he doesn't add anything for me other than slightly better tackling. Nor has Foster ever seemed to pick him as his first choice.

                            If we start with Perenara, then the main criteria for the #10 will be who can best pick the ball up from around their ankles.

                            boobooB Offline
                            boobooB Offline
                            booboo
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #68

                            @chester-draws said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                            @tim said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                            This will be the team if ALB is fit:

                            9 Perenara
                            10 Barrett

                            I don't see the B. Barrett has done anything this year to deserve being picked to start. People assume he is going to come right (blather about how class never goes, blah, blah, blah) but he doesn't add anything for me other than slightly better tackling. Nor has Foster ever seemed to pick him as his first choice.

                            If we start with Perenara, then the main criteria for the #10 will be who can best pick the ball up from around their ankles.

                            Not sure how to react to this.

                            Thought Barrett and TJP had played well in recent weeks.

                            Can I ask who your alternatives are?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            2
                            • Chester DrawsC Chester Draws

                              @tim said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                              This will be the team if ALB is fit:

                              9 Perenara
                              10 Barrett

                              I don't see the B. Barrett has done anything this year to deserve being picked to start. People assume he is going to come right (blather about how class never goes, blah, blah, blah) but he doesn't add anything for me other than slightly better tackling. Nor has Foster ever seemed to pick him as his first choice.

                              If we start with Perenara, then the main criteria for the #10 will be who can best pick the ball up from around their ankles.

                              KiwiwombleK Online
                              KiwiwombleK Online
                              Kiwiwomble
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #69

                              @chester-draws said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                              @tim said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                              This will be the team if ALB is fit:

                              9 Perenara
                              10 Barrett

                              I don't see the B. Barrett has done anything this year to deserve being picked to start. People assume he is going to come right (blather about how class never goes, blah, blah, blah) but he doesn't add anything for me other than slightly better tackling. Nor has Foster ever seemed to pick him as his first choice.

                              If we start with Perenara, then the main criteria for the #10 will be who can best pick the ball up from around their ankles.

                              so you're saying you want DMac to start?

                              M CrucialC 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

                                @chester-draws said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                                @tim said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                                This will be the team if ALB is fit:

                                9 Perenara
                                10 Barrett

                                I don't see the B. Barrett has done anything this year to deserve being picked to start. People assume he is going to come right (blather about how class never goes, blah, blah, blah) but he doesn't add anything for me other than slightly better tackling. Nor has Foster ever seemed to pick him as his first choice.

                                If we start with Perenara, then the main criteria for the #10 will be who can best pick the ball up from around their ankles.

                                so you're saying you want DMac to start?

                                M Offline
                                M Offline
                                Machpants
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #70

                                @kiwiwomble said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                                @chester-draws said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                                @tim said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                                This will be the team if ALB is fit:

                                9 Perenara
                                10 Barrett

                                I don't see the B. Barrett has done anything this year to deserve being picked to start. People assume he is going to come right (blather about how class never goes, blah, blah, blah) but he doesn't add anything for me other than slightly better tackling. Nor has Foster ever seemed to pick him as his first choice.

                                If we start with Perenara, then the main criteria for the #10 will be who can best pick the ball up from around their ankles.

                                so you're saying you want DMac to start?

                                And Christie, I guess

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • boobooB booboo

                                  @mn5 said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                                  @chris-b said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                                  @mariner4life said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                                  i don't really believe in all this "motivating the opposition" guff, this isn't park football

                                  but

                                  we are starting to talk this up to uncomfortable levels.

                                  Yeah - a couple of weeks ago, no-one thought the Aussies would get close to SA.

                                  In theory you'd think:

                                  NZ>Aus
                                  Aus>SA

                                  So NZ>SA

                                  But, it doesn't always happen that way.

                                  However, the Boks will be paying plenty on the TAB.

                                  It’s like when everyone thought since Frazier > Ali and then Foreman > Frazier then naturally Foreman > Ali was a logical conclusion.

                                  I don’t know what this has to do with Rugby but shut the fuck up Laurie ‘funeral face” Mains. Predictions like that have a habit of blowing up in faces.

                                  It has absolutely zero effect (unless the team starts to believe it). All it does is give opposition fans ammo to tease us if results go the other way.

                                  MN5M Offline
                                  MN5M Offline
                                  MN5
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #71

                                  @booboo said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                                  @mn5 said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                                  @chris-b said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                                  @mariner4life said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                                  i don't really believe in all this "motivating the opposition" guff, this isn't park football

                                  but

                                  we are starting to talk this up to uncomfortable levels.

                                  Yeah - a couple of weeks ago, no-one thought the Aussies would get close to SA.

                                  In theory you'd think:

                                  NZ>Aus
                                  Aus>SA

                                  So NZ>SA

                                  But, it doesn't always happen that way.

                                  However, the Boks will be paying plenty on the TAB.

                                  It’s like when everyone thought since Frazier > Ali and then Foreman > Frazier then naturally Foreman > Ali was a logical conclusion.

                                  I don’t know what this has to do with Rugby but shut the fuck up Laurie ‘funeral face” Mains. Predictions like that have a habit of blowing up in faces.

                                  It has absolutely zero effect (unless the team starts to believe it). All it does is give opposition fans ammo to tease us if results go the other way.

                                  True, I shouldn’t worry. After all I constantly interacted with foreigners in 2003 but thankfully these days I don’t whatsoever.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • D Offline
                                    D Offline
                                    Derpus
                                    wrote on last edited by Derpus
                                    #72

                                    Part of me wants the Springboks to show up for this one to keep the RC interesting for another week, and because it looks like the ABs are back to being better than everyone else by 20+ points which is a bit shite.

                                    On the other hand, fuck their garbage anti-rugby tactics and their whiny cnut of a coach. ABs by 30+

                                    canefanC nostrildamusN 2 Replies Last reply
                                    9
                                    • D Derpus

                                      Part of me wants the Springboks to show up for this one to keep the RC interesting for another week, and because it looks like the ABs are back to being better than everyone else by 20+ points which is a bit shite.

                                      On the other hand, fuck their garbage anti-rugby tactics and their whiny cnut of a coach. ABs by 30+

                                      canefanC Offline
                                      canefanC Offline
                                      canefan
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #73

                                      @derpus said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                                      Part of me wants the Springboks to show up for this one to keep the RC interesting for another week, and because it looks like the ABs are back to being better than everyone else by 20+ points which is a bit shite.

                                      On the other hand, fuck their garbage anti-rugby tactics and their whiny cnut of a coach. ABs by 30+

                                      They will put up a sterner fight guaranteed. I hope to see our quality shine through as the game wears on

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

                                        @chester-draws said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                                        @tim said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                                        This will be the team if ALB is fit:

                                        9 Perenara
                                        10 Barrett

                                        I don't see the B. Barrett has done anything this year to deserve being picked to start. People assume he is going to come right (blather about how class never goes, blah, blah, blah) but he doesn't add anything for me other than slightly better tackling. Nor has Foster ever seemed to pick him as his first choice.

                                        If we start with Perenara, then the main criteria for the #10 will be who can best pick the ball up from around their ankles.

                                        so you're saying you want DMac to start?

                                        CrucialC Offline
                                        CrucialC Offline
                                        Crucial
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #74

                                        @kiwiwomble said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                                        @chester-draws said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                                        @tim said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                                        This will be the team if ALB is fit:

                                        9 Perenara
                                        10 Barrett

                                        I don't see the B. Barrett has done anything this year to deserve being picked to start. People assume he is going to come right (blather about how class never goes, blah, blah, blah) but he doesn't add anything for me other than slightly better tackling. Nor has Foster ever seemed to pick him as his first choice.

                                        If we start with Perenara, then the main criteria for the #10 will be who can best pick the ball up from around their ankles.

                                        so you're saying you want DMac to start?

                                        Well he does have less distance to reach down and catch the ball.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        2
                                        • No QuarterN No Quarter

                                          The Boks will lift for us, the first 40 will be brutal. I expect them to run out of gas in the 2nd 40 though, but we'll have to play well and take our chances. The Boks are not Argentina, they know how to adjust to the game situation and get under the other teams skin etc. They've got some wiley old campaigners in their side.

                                          L_n_PL Offline
                                          L_n_PL Offline
                                          L_n_P
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #75

                                          @no-quarter said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

                                          The Boks will lift for us, the first 40 will be brutal. I expect them to run out of gas in the 2nd 40 though, but we'll have to play well and take our chances. The Boks are not Argentina, they know how to adjust to the game situation and get under the other teams skin etc. They've got some wiley old campaigners in their side.

                                          Ditto, they will lift and it will be tight. I'm thinking a bit like the RWC semifinal in 2015 where the Boks fought tooth-and-nail, but with added Bok injury breaks 😉

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search