Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

All Blacks 2022

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
allblacks
4.7k Posts 105 Posters 953.9k Views 5 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P pakman

    @Bones said in All Blacks 2022:

    @Frye said in All Blacks 2022:

    @Bones said in All Blacks 2022:

    @Frye said in All Blacks 2022:

    Gcobani Bobo on the SuperSport program suggested the coaches pick Faainganuku at 12 and honestly it's not the worst idea.

    Was there a worse one? Did someone suggest picking Franks at 12?

    Yes, Schalk Burger suggested @Bones

    Too many shots to the head that guy

    Takes one to know one?

    BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #3182

    @pakman said in All Blacks 2022:

    @Bones said in All Blacks 2022:

    @Frye said in All Blacks 2022:

    @Bones said in All Blacks 2022:

    @Frye said in All Blacks 2022:

    Gcobani Bobo on the SuperSport program suggested the coaches pick Faainganuku at 12 and honestly it's not the worst idea.

    Was there a worse one? Did someone suggest picking Franks at 12?

    Yes, Schalk Burger suggested @Bones

    Too many shots to the head that guy

    Takes one to know one?

    Hey.

    @booboo

    This guy thinks he's you

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • BonesB Bones

      @pakman said in All Blacks 2022:

      @Bones said in All Blacks 2022:

      @Frye said in All Blacks 2022:

      @Bones said in All Blacks 2022:

      @Frye said in All Blacks 2022:

      Gcobani Bobo on the SuperSport program suggested the coaches pick Faainganuku at 12 and honestly it's not the worst idea.

      Was there a worse one? Did someone suggest picking Franks at 12?

      Yes, Schalk Burger suggested @Bones

      Too many shots to the head that guy

      Takes one to know one?

      Hey.

      @booboo

      This guy thinks he's you

      boobooB Online
      boobooB Online
      booboo
      wrote on last edited by
      #3183

      @Bones said in All Blacks 2022:

      @pakman said in All Blacks 2022:

      @Bones said in All Blacks 2022:

      @Frye said in All Blacks 2022:

      @Bones said in All Blacks 2022:

      @Frye said in All Blacks 2022:

      Gcobani Bobo on the SuperSport program suggested the coaches pick Faainganuku at 12 and honestly it's not the worst idea.

      Was there a worse one? Did someone suggest picking Franks at 12?

      Yes, Schalk Burger suggested @Bones

      Too many shots to the head that guy

      Takes one to know one?

      Hey.

      @booboo

      This guy thinks he's you

      Takes one to know one.

      Wait ... what? ...

      1 Reply Last reply
      4
      • KiwiMurphK Offline
        KiwiMurphK Offline
        KiwiMurph
        wrote on last edited by KiwiMurph
        #3184

        Good news on Whitelock 🙂

        https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all-blacks/300619184/veteran-lock-sam-whitelock-cleared-to-plough-on-through-thumb-injury-for-all-blacks

        An All Blacks spokesperson told Stuff after a medical assessment on Tuesday when the squad assembled fully in Auckland, that the prognosis was encouraging enough for him to remain with the group with a view to playing a full part in the July series against Ireland.
        
        Whitelock’s thumb was said to be “improving” and the plan was for him to look after it for a few days, after which it was hoped he would be cleared to play a full part in the buildup for the opening test at Eden Park on July 2.
        
        O 1 Reply Last reply
        6
        • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

          Good news on Whitelock 🙂

          https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all-blacks/300619184/veteran-lock-sam-whitelock-cleared-to-plough-on-through-thumb-injury-for-all-blacks

          An All Blacks spokesperson told Stuff after a medical assessment on Tuesday when the squad assembled fully in Auckland, that the prognosis was encouraging enough for him to remain with the group with a view to playing a full part in the July series against Ireland.
          
          Whitelock’s thumb was said to be “improving” and the plan was for him to look after it for a few days, after which it was hoped he would be cleared to play a full part in the buildup for the opening test at Eden Park on July 2.
          
          O Offline
          O Offline
          Old Samurai Jack
          wrote on last edited by
          #3185

          @KiwiMurph Think that was a media-hyped-up story. First appeared in the Ferald after the interview where he said it was no problem, and from there made its way to even some Japanese English media sites.
          Got the impression the Ferald were trying the "he shouldn't have played in the final" angle.

          taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • O Old Samurai Jack

            @KiwiMurph Think that was a media-hyped-up story. First appeared in the Ferald after the interview where he said it was no problem, and from there made its way to even some Japanese English media sites.
            Got the impression the Ferald were trying the "he shouldn't have played in the final" angle.

            taniwharugbyT Offline
            taniwharugbyT Offline
            taniwharugby
            wrote on last edited by
            #3186

            @Old-Samurai-Jack just shows how selfish Razor is, putting the needs of the Crusaders above the national side, naughty boy.

            ToddyT 1 Reply Last reply
            4
            • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

              @Old-Samurai-Jack just shows how selfish Razor is, putting the needs of the Crusaders above the national side, naughty boy.

              ToddyT Offline
              ToddyT Offline
              Toddy
              wrote on last edited by
              #3187

              @taniwharugby said in All Blacks 2022:

              @Old-Samurai-Jack just shows how selfish Razor is, putting the needs of the Crusaders above the national side, naughty boy.

              Blackadder wouldn't have played him.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • KiwiMurphK Offline
                KiwiMurphK Offline
                KiwiMurph
                wrote on last edited by
                #3188

                https://www.rugbypass.com/news/time-for-the-all-blacks-to-fast-track-their-exciting-youngsters/

                ACT CrusaderA Chris B.C 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

                  https://www.rugbypass.com/news/time-for-the-all-blacks-to-fast-track-their-exciting-youngsters/

                  ACT CrusaderA Offline
                  ACT CrusaderA Offline
                  ACT Crusader
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #3189

                  @KiwiMurph funny, by my calendar the RWC is in 14 months and 2 weeks, not 18 months…

                  I know some think that there’s not a lot of time, but there’s still quite a bit of footy to be played before then. Plus all of our successful campaigns to date have seen a late surprise or left field selection or two that have had an impact in the tournament.

                  mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

                    @KiwiMurph funny, by my calendar the RWC is in 14 months and 2 weeks, not 18 months…

                    I know some think that there’s not a lot of time, but there’s still quite a bit of footy to be played before then. Plus all of our successful campaigns to date have seen a late surprise or left field selection or two that have had an impact in the tournament.

                    mariner4lifeM Online
                    mariner4lifeM Online
                    mariner4life
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #3190

                    @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks 2022:

                    @KiwiMurph funny, by my calendar the RWC is in 14 months and 2 weeks, not 18 months…

                    I know some think that there’s not a lot of time, but there’s still quite a bit of footy to be played before then. Plus all of our successful campaigns to date have seen a late surprise or left field selection or two that have had an impact in the tournament.

                    without putting any evidence in to it, i think the "continuity" angle of being settled 2 years out is wildly overrated if you look at the actual results.

                    Probably England 2003 is the one i remember where you knew 2 years out who was playing and how they would play.

                    Dan54D ACT CrusaderA 2 Replies Last reply
                    3
                    • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

                      @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks 2022:

                      @KiwiMurph funny, by my calendar the RWC is in 14 months and 2 weeks, not 18 months…

                      I know some think that there’s not a lot of time, but there’s still quite a bit of footy to be played before then. Plus all of our successful campaigns to date have seen a late surprise or left field selection or two that have had an impact in the tournament.

                      without putting any evidence in to it, i think the "continuity" angle of being settled 2 years out is wildly overrated if you look at the actual results.

                      Probably England 2003 is the one i remember where you knew 2 years out who was playing and how they would play.

                      Dan54D Offline
                      Dan54D Offline
                      Dan54
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #3191

                      @mariner4life said in All Blacks 2022:

                      @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks 2022:

                      @KiwiMurph funny, by my calendar the RWC is in 14 months and 2 weeks, not 18 months…

                      I know some think that there’s not a lot of time, but there’s still quite a bit of footy to be played before then. Plus all of our successful campaigns to date have seen a late surprise or left field selection or two that have had an impact in the tournament.

                      without putting any evidence in to it, i think the "continuity" angle of being settled 2 years out is wildly overrated if you look at the actual results.

                      Probably England 2003 is the one i remember where you knew 2 years out who was playing and how they would play.

                      Mate, I think the thing is most coaches have a pretty good idea who will be at WC, they tend to have a bit more knowledge of the team's plans than us plebs. I guess at most WCs we had a fairly good idea of team a couple of years out.

                      KiwiMurphK Chris B.C 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • Dan54D Dan54

                        @mariner4life said in All Blacks 2022:

                        @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks 2022:

                        @KiwiMurph funny, by my calendar the RWC is in 14 months and 2 weeks, not 18 months…

                        I know some think that there’s not a lot of time, but there’s still quite a bit of footy to be played before then. Plus all of our successful campaigns to date have seen a late surprise or left field selection or two that have had an impact in the tournament.

                        without putting any evidence in to it, i think the "continuity" angle of being settled 2 years out is wildly overrated if you look at the actual results.

                        Probably England 2003 is the one i remember where you knew 2 years out who was playing and how they would play.

                        Mate, I think the thing is most coaches have a pretty good idea who will be at WC, they tend to have a bit more knowledge of the team's plans than us plebs. I guess at most WCs we had a fairly good idea of team a couple of years out.

                        KiwiMurphK Offline
                        KiwiMurphK Offline
                        KiwiMurph
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #3192

                        @Dan54 said in All Blacks 2022:

                        @mariner4life said in All Blacks 2022:

                        @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks 2022:

                        @KiwiMurph funny, by my calendar the RWC is in 14 months and 2 weeks, not 18 months…

                        I know some think that there’s not a lot of time, but there’s still quite a bit of footy to be played before then. Plus all of our successful campaigns to date have seen a late surprise or left field selection or two that have had an impact in the tournament.

                        without putting any evidence in to it, i think the "continuity" angle of being settled 2 years out is wildly overrated if you look at the actual results.

                        Probably England 2003 is the one i remember where you knew 2 years out who was playing and how they would play.

                        Mate, I think the thing is most coaches have a pretty good idea who will be at WC, they tend to have a bit more knowledge of the team's plans than us plebs. I guess at most WCs we had a fairly good idea of team a couple of years out.

                        Well if you look at the last world cup cycle Erasmus didn't have his first test in charge until June 2018.

                        Michael Chieka in the cycle before that took over even later in the relative cycle (end of year tour 2014).

                        Dan54D 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • KiwiwombleK Online
                          KiwiwombleK Online
                          Kiwiwomble
                          wrote on last edited by Kiwiwomble
                          #3193

                          they look fitter than the last time they played for the BA's get them back in!

                          alt text

                          alt text

                          mariner4lifeM boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

                            they look fitter than the last time they played for the BA's get them back in!

                            alt text

                            alt text

                            mariner4lifeM Online
                            mariner4lifeM Online
                            mariner4life
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #3194

                            @Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks 2022:

                            they look fitter than the last time they played for the BA's get them back in!

                            alt text

                            sobs in longing

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

                              https://www.rugbypass.com/news/time-for-the-all-blacks-to-fast-track-their-exciting-youngsters/

                              Chris B.C Online
                              Chris B.C Online
                              Chris B.
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #3195

                              @KiwiMurph From that article:

                              It’s a similar story on the wings. With Jordie Barrett likely to stay at fullback, despite spending some time in the midfield for the Hurricanes throughout the season, that leaves Will Jordan, Sevu Reece, Caleb Clarke and Leicester Fainga’anuku competing for spots in the No 11 and No 14 jerseys. Jordan and Reece may be the more experienced figures, but Clarke and Fainga’anuku boast power that can’t be replicated by the current incumbents – and that power may be too hard for Foster and co to ignore.

                              Jesus. Big Leicester in over Will Jordan?

                              "Look, you can't be serious man. YOU CANNOT BE SERIOUS!" 🙂

                              boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

                                @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks 2022:

                                @KiwiMurph funny, by my calendar the RWC is in 14 months and 2 weeks, not 18 months…

                                I know some think that there’s not a lot of time, but there’s still quite a bit of footy to be played before then. Plus all of our successful campaigns to date have seen a late surprise or left field selection or two that have had an impact in the tournament.

                                without putting any evidence in to it, i think the "continuity" angle of being settled 2 years out is wildly overrated if you look at the actual results.

                                Probably England 2003 is the one i remember where you knew 2 years out who was playing and how they would play.

                                ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                ACT Crusader
                                wrote on last edited by ACT Crusader
                                #3196

                                @mariner4life

                                This is the England lineup that lost to France by 5 in the 2002 6Ns

                                Rowntree, Thompson, Vickery, Johnson (C), Kay, Hill, Back, Worsley, Bracken, Wilkinson, Cohen, Tindall, Greenwood, Healey, Robinson

                                West, Leonard, Grewcock, Corry, Duncombe, Paul, Luger
                                ——-
                                This is the lineup we played in 2002 at Twickenham (we lost by 3)

                                Woodman, Thompson, Vickery, Johnson (C), Grewcock
, Moody, Hill, 
Dallaglio
, Dawson, 
Wilkinson, Cohen, Tindall, Greenwood
, Simpson-Daniel
, Robinson

                                Regan, Leonard, Kay, Back, Healey, Johnston, Stimpson
                                ——-
                                This is the lineup we played at Welly in 2003 (we lost by 2)

                                Rowntree, Thompson, 
Leonard, Johnson (C), Kay, Hill
Back
, Dallaglio, Bracken, 
Wilkinson, Cohen, Greenwood, 
Tindall, 
Robinson, 
Lewsey

                                West, Vickery, Borthwick, Worsley, Gomarsall, Grayson, Luger 
                                ——-
                                This is the lineup that faced the Wallabies in the 2003 RWC final

                                Woodman, Thompson, Vickery, Johnson (C), Kay, Hill, Back, Dallaglio, Dawson, Wilkinson, Cohen, Tindall, Greenwood, Robinson, Lewsey

                                West, Leonard, Corry, Moody, Bracken, Catt, Balshaw
                                ————

                                8 of the 15 - Thompson, Johnson (C), Hill, Wilkinson, Cohen, Tindall, Greenwood, Robinson - started all those tests. Critically the hooker, best lock, 10-12-13 all the same.

                                Take it for what it’s worth.

                                Henry Paul in that French test 😂

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

                                  @Dan54 said in All Blacks 2022:

                                  @mariner4life said in All Blacks 2022:

                                  @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks 2022:

                                  @KiwiMurph funny, by my calendar the RWC is in 14 months and 2 weeks, not 18 months…

                                  I know some think that there’s not a lot of time, but there’s still quite a bit of footy to be played before then. Plus all of our successful campaigns to date have seen a late surprise or left field selection or two that have had an impact in the tournament.

                                  without putting any evidence in to it, i think the "continuity" angle of being settled 2 years out is wildly overrated if you look at the actual results.

                                  Probably England 2003 is the one i remember where you knew 2 years out who was playing and how they would play.

                                  Mate, I think the thing is most coaches have a pretty good idea who will be at WC, they tend to have a bit more knowledge of the team's plans than us plebs. I guess at most WCs we had a fairly good idea of team a couple of years out.

                                  Well if you look at the last world cup cycle Erasmus didn't have his first test in charge until June 2018.

                                  Michael Chieka in the cycle before that took over even later in the relative cycle (end of year tour 2014).

                                  Dan54D Offline
                                  Dan54D Offline
                                  Dan54
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #3197

                                  @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks 2022:

                                  @Dan54 said in All Blacks 2022:

                                  @mariner4life said in All Blacks 2022:

                                  @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks 2022:

                                  @KiwiMurph funny, by my calendar the RWC is in 14 months and 2 weeks, not 18 months…

                                  I know some think that there’s not a lot of time, but there’s still quite a bit of footy to be played before then. Plus all of our successful campaigns to date have seen a late surprise or left field selection or two that have had an impact in the tournament.

                                  without putting any evidence in to it, i think the "continuity" angle of being settled 2 years out is wildly overrated if you look at the actual results.

                                  Probably England 2003 is the one i remember where you knew 2 years out who was playing and how they would play.

                                  Mate, I think the thing is most coaches have a pretty good idea who will be at WC, they tend to have a bit more knowledge of the team's plans than us plebs. I guess at most WCs we had a fairly good idea of team a couple of years out.

                                  Well if you look at the last world cup cycle Erasmus didn't have his first test in charge until June 2018.

                                  Michael Chieka in the cycle before that took over even later in the relative cycle (end of year tour 2014).

                                  Yep very much exceptions to prove the rule though aren't they?

                                  KiwiwombleK KiwiMurphK 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Dan54D Dan54

                                    @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks 2022:

                                    @Dan54 said in All Blacks 2022:

                                    @mariner4life said in All Blacks 2022:

                                    @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks 2022:

                                    @KiwiMurph funny, by my calendar the RWC is in 14 months and 2 weeks, not 18 months…

                                    I know some think that there’s not a lot of time, but there’s still quite a bit of footy to be played before then. Plus all of our successful campaigns to date have seen a late surprise or left field selection or two that have had an impact in the tournament.

                                    without putting any evidence in to it, i think the "continuity" angle of being settled 2 years out is wildly overrated if you look at the actual results.

                                    Probably England 2003 is the one i remember where you knew 2 years out who was playing and how they would play.

                                    Mate, I think the thing is most coaches have a pretty good idea who will be at WC, they tend to have a bit more knowledge of the team's plans than us plebs. I guess at most WCs we had a fairly good idea of team a couple of years out.

                                    Well if you look at the last world cup cycle Erasmus didn't have his first test in charge until June 2018.

                                    Michael Chieka in the cycle before that took over even later in the relative cycle (end of year tour 2014).

                                    Yep very much exceptions to prove the rule though aren't they?

                                    KiwiwombleK Online
                                    KiwiwombleK Online
                                    Kiwiwomble
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #3198

                                    @Dan54 said in All Blacks 2022:

                                    @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks 2022:

                                    @Dan54 said in All Blacks 2022:

                                    @mariner4life said in All Blacks 2022:

                                    @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks 2022:

                                    @KiwiMurph funny, by my calendar the RWC is in 14 months and 2 weeks, not 18 months…

                                    I know some think that there’s not a lot of time, but there’s still quite a bit of footy to be played before then. Plus all of our successful campaigns to date have seen a late surprise or left field selection or two that have had an impact in the tournament.

                                    without putting any evidence in to it, i think the "continuity" angle of being settled 2 years out is wildly overrated if you look at the actual results.

                                    Probably England 2003 is the one i remember where you knew 2 years out who was playing and how they would play.

                                    Mate, I think the thing is most coaches have a pretty good idea who will be at WC, they tend to have a bit more knowledge of the team's plans than us plebs. I guess at most WCs we had a fairly good idea of team a couple of years out.

                                    Well if you look at the last world cup cycle Erasmus didn't have his first test in charge until June 2018.

                                    Michael Chieka in the cycle before that took over even later in the relative cycle (end of year tour 2014).

                                    Yep very much exceptions to prove the rule though aren't they?

                                    how do they prove it?

                                    Dan54D 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

                                      @Dan54 said in All Blacks 2022:

                                      @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks 2022:

                                      @Dan54 said in All Blacks 2022:

                                      @mariner4life said in All Blacks 2022:

                                      @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks 2022:

                                      @KiwiMurph funny, by my calendar the RWC is in 14 months and 2 weeks, not 18 months…

                                      I know some think that there’s not a lot of time, but there’s still quite a bit of footy to be played before then. Plus all of our successful campaigns to date have seen a late surprise or left field selection or two that have had an impact in the tournament.

                                      without putting any evidence in to it, i think the "continuity" angle of being settled 2 years out is wildly overrated if you look at the actual results.

                                      Probably England 2003 is the one i remember where you knew 2 years out who was playing and how they would play.

                                      Mate, I think the thing is most coaches have a pretty good idea who will be at WC, they tend to have a bit more knowledge of the team's plans than us plebs. I guess at most WCs we had a fairly good idea of team a couple of years out.

                                      Well if you look at the last world cup cycle Erasmus didn't have his first test in charge until June 2018.

                                      Michael Chieka in the cycle before that took over even later in the relative cycle (end of year tour 2014).

                                      Yep very much exceptions to prove the rule though aren't they?

                                      how do they prove it?

                                      Dan54D Offline
                                      Dan54D Offline
                                      Dan54
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #3199

                                      @Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks 2022:

                                      @Dan54 said in All Blacks 2022:

                                      @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks 2022:

                                      @Dan54 said in All Blacks 2022:

                                      @mariner4life said in All Blacks 2022:

                                      @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks 2022:

                                      @KiwiMurph funny, by my calendar the RWC is in 14 months and 2 weeks, not 18 months…

                                      I know some think that there’s not a lot of time, but there’s still quite a bit of footy to be played before then. Plus all of our successful campaigns to date have seen a late surprise or left field selection or two that have had an impact in the tournament.

                                      without putting any evidence in to it, i think the "continuity" angle of being settled 2 years out is wildly overrated if you look at the actual results.

                                      Probably England 2003 is the one i remember where you knew 2 years out who was playing and how they would play.

                                      Mate, I think the thing is most coaches have a pretty good idea who will be at WC, they tend to have a bit more knowledge of the team's plans than us plebs. I guess at most WCs we had a fairly good idea of team a couple of years out.

                                      Well if you look at the last world cup cycle Erasmus didn't have his first test in charge until June 2018.

                                      Michael Chieka in the cycle before that took over even later in the relative cycle (end of year tour 2014).

                                      Yep very much exceptions to prove the rule though aren't they?

                                      how do they prove it?

                                      Easy, get someone (who has got more time than myself) to go back and check who coached who in WCs, and how long they coached!:beaming_face_with_smiling_eyes:

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • Dan54D Dan54

                                        @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks 2022:

                                        @Dan54 said in All Blacks 2022:

                                        @mariner4life said in All Blacks 2022:

                                        @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks 2022:

                                        @KiwiMurph funny, by my calendar the RWC is in 14 months and 2 weeks, not 18 months…

                                        I know some think that there’s not a lot of time, but there’s still quite a bit of footy to be played before then. Plus all of our successful campaigns to date have seen a late surprise or left field selection or two that have had an impact in the tournament.

                                        without putting any evidence in to it, i think the "continuity" angle of being settled 2 years out is wildly overrated if you look at the actual results.

                                        Probably England 2003 is the one i remember where you knew 2 years out who was playing and how they would play.

                                        Mate, I think the thing is most coaches have a pretty good idea who will be at WC, they tend to have a bit more knowledge of the team's plans than us plebs. I guess at most WCs we had a fairly good idea of team a couple of years out.

                                        Well if you look at the last world cup cycle Erasmus didn't have his first test in charge until June 2018.

                                        Michael Chieka in the cycle before that took over even later in the relative cycle (end of year tour 2014).

                                        Yep very much exceptions to prove the rule though aren't they?

                                        KiwiMurphK Offline
                                        KiwiMurphK Offline
                                        KiwiMurph
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #3200

                                        @Dan54 said in All Blacks 2022:

                                        @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks 2022:

                                        @Dan54 said in All Blacks 2022:

                                        @mariner4life said in All Blacks 2022:

                                        @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks 2022:

                                        @KiwiMurph funny, by my calendar the RWC is in 14 months and 2 weeks, not 18 months…

                                        I know some think that there’s not a lot of time, but there’s still quite a bit of footy to be played before then. Plus all of our successful campaigns to date have seen a late surprise or left field selection or two that have had an impact in the tournament.

                                        without putting any evidence in to it, i think the "continuity" angle of being settled 2 years out is wildly overrated if you look at the actual results.

                                        Probably England 2003 is the one i remember where you knew 2 years out who was playing and how they would play.

                                        Mate, I think the thing is most coaches have a pretty good idea who will be at WC, they tend to have a bit more knowledge of the team's plans than us plebs. I guess at most WCs we had a fairly good idea of team a couple of years out.

                                        Well if you look at the last world cup cycle Erasmus didn't have his first test in charge until June 2018.

                                        Michael Chieka in the cycle before that took over even later in the relative cycle (end of year tour 2014).

                                        Yep very much exceptions to prove the rule though aren't they?

                                        Well if we're talking about coaches knowing who will be or won't be at the World Cup - both the 1987 Baby Blacks and the 1995 All Blacks came together very late and a lot of players wouldn't have been in the frame 2 years earlier.

                                        NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • KiwiMurphK Offline
                                          KiwiMurphK Offline
                                          KiwiMurph
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #3201

                                          Obviously the focus is on the Irish but this is good news. ABs first trip to RSA since 2018 I think.

                                          https://twitter.com/SARugbymag/status/1539837856415367171

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search