• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Transgender debate, in sport, in general

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off Topic
1.4k Posts 71 Posters 71.9k Views
Transgender debate, in sport, in general
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    paremata
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by
    #853

    @MajorPom said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @booboo if she’s male, why was she assigned female at birth?

    The term “assigned at birth” is based around external genitalia obviously. It’s a recent turn of phrase the trans community have adopted along with gender identity to muddy things.

    Because of her testosterone she has male bone density and male strength . She’s intersex but presents as female .

    For what it’s worth her school principal thought she was a boy till she was 16 .

    Victor MeldrewV 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRage
    replied to paremata on last edited by MajorRage
    #854

    @paremata Actually my over arching point is not to compare the likes of Fallon Fox to CS. They are completely different scenarios. One is a dude, always been a dude who is now completely taking the piss. The other is a born female, who science has decided isn't actually female. They aren't the same.

    I don't think you have a point re Rousey, as we are talking about top level sport. Rousey had to beat those same people as well, thus the contenders have already had to face somebody far superior. The advantages CS has over them is kind of what my point is all about - Is testosterone the be all and end all? It could well be, and one of the readings that antipodean sent through makes a rather compelling case.

    @paremata said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    The term “assigned at birth” is based around external genitalia obviously. It’s a recent turn of phrase the trans community have adopted along with gender identity to muddy things.

    Because of her testosterone she has male bone density and male strength . She’s intersex but presents as female .

    Yes, I agree with the first part. But the reality is that doctors assign at birth based on what they see. Thus, it's clear to me that CS has female genitals. And as i firmly agree with a straight female/male divide sport, I struggle with saying CS needs to be in the male. Yes, she has advantages over a lot of females, but how much do they change things? As let's be clear, the female traits has her a long way behind the men, and no training she could ever do would change that.

    For what it’s worth her school principal thought she was a boy till she was 16 .

    I genuinely didn't know that. If this is the case, then why was she competing at youth level in the female division? (rhetorical question)

    BonesB boobooB 3 Replies Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by
    #855

    @MajorPom said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    The other is a born female

    Isn't that it though? Someone incorrectly decided SC is a female because no dick. When in actual fact, they're a bloke. Without a dick.

    MajorRageM 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRage
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #856

    @Bones said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @MajorPom said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    The other is a born female

    Isn't that it though? Someone incorrectly decided SC is a female because no dick. When in actual fact, they're a bloke. Without a dick.

    That is exactly it. Genetalia says she's female. Science says she's not.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by
    #857

    @MajorPom said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @Bones said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @MajorPom said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    The other is a born female

    Isn't that it though? Someone incorrectly decided SC is a female because no dick. When in actual fact, they're a bloke. Without a dick.

    That is exactly it. Genetalia says she's female. Science says she's not.

    Wait a fucking minute. Genitalia isn't science? Testes aren't male genitalia?

    MajorRageM 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRage
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #858

    @Bones said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @MajorPom said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @Bones said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @MajorPom said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    The other is a born female

    Isn't that it though? Someone incorrectly decided SC is a female because no dick. When in actual fact, they're a bloke. Without a dick.

    That is exactly it. Genetalia says she's female. Science says she's not.

    Wait a fucking minute. Genitalia isn't science? Testes aren't male genitalia?

    Wait a fucking minute yourself. Are you saying she doesn't have female genitalia at all?

    BonesB boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by Bones
    #859

    @MajorPom said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @Bones said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @MajorPom said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @Bones said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @MajorPom said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    The other is a born female

    Isn't that it though? Someone incorrectly decided SC is a female because no dick. When in actual fact, they're a bloke. Without a dick.

    That is exactly it. Genetalia says she's female. Science says she's not.

    Wait a fucking minute. Genitalia isn't science? Testes aren't male genitalia?

    Wait a fucking minute yourself. Are you saying she doesn't have female genitalia at all?

    No.

    I consider biology science though, so probably best we don't discuss that bit.

    MajorRageM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor Meldrew
    replied to paremata on last edited by
    #860

    @paremata said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    The term “assigned at birth” is based around external genitalia obviously. It’s a recent turn of phrase the trans community have adopted along with gender identity to muddy things.

    Bit bored so I did some googling. Some surprising figures,

    The term has little to do with the trans community and has been around in medical circles for decades. Google shows the sex of around 1 in 200 babies is indeterminate at birth and can weeks before it becomes clear and determined. Surprised by that - perhaps something which isn't talked about?

    Even then about 0.2% of births result in genital ambiguity and are classed as intersex. That intersex figure is even higher if you count things like hormone levels & Chromosomes. Surprised by those figures but they are referenced, so assume many are regarded as a medical condition treatable with surgery, drugs etc in the West.

    For what it’s worth her school principal thought she was a boy till she was 16 .

    Read she suffered real abuse at school as she looked like a boy and often forced to strip to show her genitals or lack thereof. Regarded as a freak, she had a pretty appalling childhood because of the way she was born

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor Meldrew
    replied to paremata on last edited by
    #861

    @paremata

    Thanks for that.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRage
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #862

    @Bones said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @MajorPom said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @Bones said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @MajorPom said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @Bones said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @MajorPom said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    The other is a born female

    Isn't that it though? Someone incorrectly decided SC is a female because no dick. When in actual fact, they're a bloke. Without a dick.

    That is exactly it. Genetalia says she's female. Science says she's not.

    Wait a fucking minute. Genitalia isn't science? Testes aren't male genitalia?

    Wait a fucking minute yourself. Are you saying she doesn't have female genitalia at all?

    No.

    I consider biology science though, so probably best we don't discuss that bit.

    So the conclusion is

    1. I think she has a vagina, which means that in my view the dr was correct to say she's female
    2. You think she doesn't really have a vagina, because she has internal testes (whatever that means), which means that she is actually male. Despite having a vagina. And tits.

    Lets just leave it there.

    BonesB antipodeanA 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by
    #863

    @MajorPom said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    The other is a born female, who science has decided isn't actually female. They aren't the same.

    First sentence: Semenya was born male, but incorrectly observed.

    Second sentence: agree.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by
    #864

    @MajorPom said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @antipodean said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @MajorPom said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @antipodean I’m not going to lie and say I know what all of those mean and the advantage they give.

    Everyone just talks about testosterone but what about all the other factors that make her female? And where does the testosterone levels produced stand on the male or female graphs?

    Emma Hilton is an expert - she's a developmental biologist. The point her and Sharron Davies are making is that Caster is a male, competing unfairly against females.

    Carol Hooven post is far more supportive of your views in my opinion. That does make me think.

    We diverge tho as you call Caster male, which doesn’t seem to support her (external) genetalia.

    She's XY.

    It's irrelevant if Caster produces enough testosterone to compete professionally against men because Caster is competing against females who don't have the benefit of testes providing testosterone. And the science is clear about the benefits to athleticism that brings.

    Woman do produce testosterone, hence why the question is valid and why the discussion of these levels / advantages vs other natural benefits is worth having.

    Not in any way comparable to the amount produced by a male with testes.

    I agree it's not the same as mentally ill, second rate male athletes taking the piss, but we either make female sport sacrosanct, or we send a very disturbing signal to young women everywhere.

    Ok, so what signal are we sending re CS? That despite being an athlete she can’t really compete as she’s too male for female and too female to stand a chance against men?

    She is a male and as such shouldn't be competing against females. If she's not good enough to compete against other males, too bad.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by
    #865

    @MajorPom said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    clear to me that CS has female genitals.

    Again, my reading is she (I'll use those pronouns out of respect) has internal male genitalia.

    But that's doing research via Twitter.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by
    #866

    @MajorPom said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @Bones said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @MajorPom said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @Bones said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @MajorPom said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    The other is a born female

    Isn't that it though? Someone incorrectly decided SC is a female because no dick. When in actual fact, they're a bloke. Without a dick.

    That is exactly it. Genetalia says she's female. Science says she's not.

    Wait a fucking minute. Genitalia isn't science? Testes aren't male genitalia?

    Wait a fucking minute yourself. Are you saying she doesn't have female genitalia at all?

    Dunno about @Bones but I'm saying that reports say she doesn't.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by
    #867

    @MajorPom said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @Bones said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @MajorPom said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @Bones said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @MajorPom said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @Bones said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @MajorPom said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    The other is a born female

    Isn't that it though? Someone incorrectly decided SC is a female because no dick. When in actual fact, they're a bloke. Without a dick.

    That is exactly it. Genetalia says she's female. Science says she's not.

    Wait a fucking minute. Genitalia isn't science? Testes aren't male genitalia?

    Wait a fucking minute yourself. Are you saying she doesn't have female genitalia at all?

    No.

    I consider biology science though, so probably best we don't discuss that bit.

    So the conclusion is

    1. I think she has a vagina, which means that in my view the dr was correct to say she's female
    2. You think she doesn't really have a vagina, because she has internal testes (whatever that means), which means that she is actually male. Despite having a vagina. And tits.

    Lets just leave it there.

    Nice try.

    I never said what I think.

    Tits was a lovely last second addition though.

    MajorRageM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by
    #868

    @MajorPom said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @Bones said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @MajorPom said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @Bones said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @MajorPom said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @Bones said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @MajorPom said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    The other is a born female

    Isn't that it though? Someone incorrectly decided SC is a female because no dick. When in actual fact, they're a bloke. Without a dick.

    That is exactly it. Genetalia says she's female. Science says she's not.

    Wait a fucking minute. Genitalia isn't science? Testes aren't male genitalia?

    Wait a fucking minute yourself. Are you saying she doesn't have female genitalia at all?

    No.

    I consider biology science though, so probably best we don't discuss that bit.

    So the conclusion is

    1. I think she has a vagina, which means that in my view the dr was correct to say she's female
    2. You think she doesn't really have a vagina, because she has internal testes (whatever that means), which means that she is actually male. Despite having a vagina. And tits.

    Lets just leave it there.

    Caster doesn't have a vagina. In the same way Caster doesn't have a uterus or ovaries.

    MajorRageM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRage
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #869

    @Bones It doesn't change anything about my over arching point. We had mainly been talking about at birth, where all of us are without tits.

    I do genuinely see both sides of the debate. But I also genuinely think that the female traits she has will always hold her back from competing against males. Thus, I'm not quite prepared to call her a "male with a vagina", which I think is the consensus here.

    How would I feel if she was competing against my daughter? I may well feel very different, but am trying to look at this from a neutral point of view.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRage
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #870

    @antipodean I know, as far your concerned, she's 100% male. That point is coming across loud and clear.

    I didn't want to go down the wormhole this far, as I think a lot of my thoughts are perhaps more emotionally based in that I genuinely feel extremely sorry for her.

    I'll take a second attempt at just leaving it there.

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by
    #871

    @MajorPom well yeah but you're clearly not, because you'd also assigned a purely make believe position to me based on disagreeing with your position that genitalia isn't science. Which is pretty hard to argue against.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #872

    Or for? I don't understand grammar. It's obviously not a science.

    MajorRageM 1 Reply Last reply
    0

Transgender debate, in sport, in general
Off Topic
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.