Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket
-
@majorrage said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Absolutely magnificent PR by team Smith.
Perfection.
You'll fall for anything.
Here's what should have been said
'As Aussies we're raised to be winners.
But I lost sight of our values and resorted to winning at any cost.
For that I will be enternally sorry.
I accept my punishment and if I ever get another chance to represent my country I will do so to the best of my ability, within the rules, win lose or draw."
Exit stage left.
-
Lehman goes.
Real talk, I've had a bit of fun with this over the last couple of days, it's been a good bit of chat about a sporting controversy.
But Jesus Christ this is fucking ridiculous. I fucking feel for all of them now, even warner. It's fucking ball tampering, not match fixing. Get a grip.
I don't get the sanctimony in the aussie press at all. Suddenly the "hard edge" is a stick to beat them with, but was celebrated not a couple of months ago. Get fucked.
@mariner4life said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Lehman goes.
Real talk, I've had a bit of fun with this over the last couple of days, it's been a good bit of chat about a sporting controversy.
But Jesus Christ this is fucking ridiculous. I fucking feel for all of them now, even warner. It's fucking ball tampering, not match fixing. Get a grip.
I don't get the sanctimony in the aussie press at all. Suddenly the "hard edge" is a stick to beat them with, but was celebrated not a couple of months ago. Get fucked.
I guess I'm not surprised at the severity of the sentences - I thought it would be either six months or a year.
I follow your point comparing ball tampering with match fixing, but in my mind they're somewhat in the same ballpark (not the crazy dismissals of that video a month or so ago where a whole team is throwing the match), but the Hansie Cronje/ Lou Vincent type of fixing where a couple of guys in a team are conscripted to throw their wickets away. Main difference is that the Aussies were doing it for the team not for their direct personal enrichment.
Maybe it's closer (ballpark) to having several players in a rugby team caught using PEDs. Basically it's premeditated cheating to try to give your team a significant advantage. As someone points out above, the immediate follow-up (tape rather than sandpaper, etc) wasn't flash either.
I can understand the anger in Oz as well. It's a bit like if a group of ABs were caught using PEDs - it kind of invalidates some of what has gone before and some of what will happen in the future - at least in terms of internet/media "banter". Every time the Aussies win, there will be "check the ball" comments somewhere. I'd be fucking furious if it was the ABs or the Black Caps.
And to avoid calls of naivety - I'd already be amazed if there had never been a single AB who has used PEDs - and the same goes for every other major international team.
Years ago I worked for a bank and probably knew/knew of about 300 various staff, of whom nine were sacked for fingers in the till. There's a proportion of cheats in the population.
-
@virgil said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Smart move by Warner to face the media for the first time with his wife and girls
Hard to kick him further when he’s holding one of his little girls.I hate him even more for that. He's effectively using them as a shield. Cowardly tosser.
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@virgil said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Smart move by Warner to face the media for the first time with his wife and girls
Hard to kick him further when he’s holding one of his little girls.I hate him even more for that. He's effectively using them as a shield. Cowardly tosser.
100% agree. Dragging his wee girls in front of the cameras as props to garner sympathy is beyond disgusting. This is about YOUR cheating, and YOUR bad behaviour on the field, you fucking asshole. Your teammates stood up and took it.
-
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@virgil said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Smart move by Warner to face the media for the first time with his wife and girls
Hard to kick him further when he’s holding one of his little girls.I hate him even more for that. He's effectively using them as a shield. Cowardly tosser.
100% agree. Dragging his wee girls in front of the cameras as props to garner sympathy is beyond disgusting. This is about YOUR cheating, and YOUR bad behaviour on the field, you fucking asshole. Your teammates stood up and took it.
@mokey said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@virgil said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Smart move by Warner to face the media for the first time with his wife and girls
Hard to kick him further when he’s holding one of his little girls.I hate him even more for that. He's effectively using them as a shield. Cowardly tosser.
100% agree. Dragging his wee girls in front of the cameras as props to garner sympathy is beyond disgusting. This is about YOUR cheating, and YOUR bad behaviour on the field, you fucking asshole. Your teammates stood up and took it.
That comment shows a fundamental lack of understanding of the line.
See there is this line.
Getting stuck into Davey about his Mrs on the field? That is absolutely over the line. They aren’t a part of the game, they didn’t ask to be involved - leave them out of this.
Davey has been caught cheating in an on field incident? Quick get the wife and kids, see if we can get granny Warner out of the nursing home too. Using your wife and kids as a shield in the media is absolutely within the line.
Your comment criticizing him for using his wife and kids like this is most certainly over the line. Leave them out of this.
-
@majorrage said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Absolutely magnificent PR by team Smith.
Perfection.
You'll fall for anything.
Here's what should have been said
'As Aussies we're raised to be winners.
But I lost sight of our values and resorted to winning at any cost.
For that I will be enternally sorry.
I accept my punishment and if I ever get another chance to represent my country I will do so to the best of my ability, within the rules, win lose or draw."
Exit stage left.
-
The level of vitriol towards Warner in this thread is ugly....and revealing. Some posters have shown they are cut from the same cloth as the man they are raging about.
-
The level of vitriol towards Warner in this thread is ugly....and revealing. Some posters have shown they are cut from the same cloth as the man they are raging about.
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
The level of vitriol towards Warner in this thread is ugly....and revealing. Some posters have shown they are cut from the same cloth as the man they are raging about.
Can't speak for the others here, but I never ran up to a dismissed batsman and yelled abuse straight in his face nor did I ever cheat. I would also never consider using my kids to shield me from a shit storm that was entirely my own making.
Warner is a cnut. Simply pointing that out does not then make someone a cnut themselves. That's weird logic right there.
-
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
The level of vitriol towards Warner in this thread is ugly....and revealing. Some posters have shown they are cut from the same cloth as the man they are raging about.
Can't speak for the others here, but I never ran up to a dismissed batsman and yelled abuse straight in his face nor did I ever cheat. I would also never consider using my kids to shield me from a shit storm that was entirely my own making.
Warner is a cnut. Simply pointing that out does not then make someone a cnut themselves. That's weird logic right there.
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
The level of vitriol towards Warner in this thread is ugly....and revealing. Some posters have shown they are cut from the same cloth as the man they are raging about.
Can't speak for the others here, but I never ran up to a dismissed batsman and yelled abuse straight in his face nor did I ever cheat. I would also never consider using my kids to shield me from a shit storm that was entirely my own making.
Warner is a cnut. Simply pointing that out does not then make someone a cnut themselves. That's weird logic right there.
If it was simply a case of pointing that out....then you would be right. But it isnt.
I think Warner is in all a nasty peice of work on thd field. But I can see context and scale. -
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
The level of vitriol towards Warner in this thread is ugly....and revealing. Some posters have shown they are cut from the same cloth as the man they are raging about.
Can't speak for the others here, but I never ran up to a dismissed batsman and yelled abuse straight in his face nor did I ever cheat. I would also never consider using my kids to shield me from a shit storm that was entirely my own making.
Warner is a cnut. Simply pointing that out does not then make someone a cnut themselves. That's weird logic right there.
If it was simply a case of pointing that out....then you would be right. But it isnt.
I think Warner is in all a nasty peice of work on thd field. But I can see context and scale.@baron-silas-greenback And for the record I have spoken to someone who has played with and against Warner about the very topic of sledging and abuse. And he is indeed pretty feral. Off the field he is apparently a bloody nice guy and less arrogant than most of his teamates. But nothing more than a number of other players. He just gets pumped on the field and crosses the line more often than others.
The reaction to him over this is disgusting and more feral than Warner. -
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
The level of vitriol towards Warner in this thread is ugly....and revealing. Some posters have shown they are cut from the same cloth as the man they are raging about.
Can't speak for the others here, but I never ran up to a dismissed batsman and yelled abuse straight in his face nor did I ever cheat. I would also never consider using my kids to shield me from a shit storm that was entirely my own making.
Warner is a cnut. Simply pointing that out does not then make someone a cnut themselves. That's weird logic right there.
If it was simply a case of pointing that out....then you would be right. But it isnt.
I think Warner is in all a nasty peice of work on thd field. But I can see context and scale.@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
The level of vitriol towards Warner in this thread is ugly....and revealing. Some posters have shown they are cut from the same cloth as the man they are raging about.
Can't speak for the others here, but I never ran up to a dismissed batsman and yelled abuse straight in his face nor did I ever cheat. I would also never consider using my kids to shield me from a shit storm that was entirely my own making.
Warner is a cnut. Simply pointing that out does not then make someone a cnut themselves. That's weird logic right there.
If it was simply a case of pointing that out....then you would be right. But it isnt.
I think Warner is in all a nasty peice of work on thd field. But I can see context and scale.What would be appropriate context and scale on this thread? Can you give examples of where this line was crossed? I don't see how the abuse he is copping here is any worse than any other sportsman who get shit on TSF.
-
I haven't seen any posters say that Davey's wife mum or sister are bush pigs. Even during the fuss over his wife I didn't read any rude comments directly aimed at her, I didn't for example read anyone say she was a slut or whore for example. I think it's safe to say we've all stayed behind the line Warner crossed with Quinton de Kock
-
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
The level of vitriol towards Warner in this thread is ugly....and revealing. Some posters have shown they are cut from the same cloth as the man they are raging about.
Can't speak for the others here, but I never ran up to a dismissed batsman and yelled abuse straight in his face nor did I ever cheat. I would also never consider using my kids to shield me from a shit storm that was entirely my own making.
Warner is a cnut. Simply pointing that out does not then make someone a cnut themselves. That's weird logic right there.
If it was simply a case of pointing that out....then you would be right. But it isnt.
I think Warner is in all a nasty peice of work on thd field. But I can see context and scale.What would be appropriate context and scale on this thread? Can you give examples of where this line was crossed? I don't see how the abuse he is copping here is any worse than any other sportsman who get shit on TSF.
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
The level of vitriol towards Warner in this thread is ugly....and revealing. Some posters have shown they are cut from the same cloth as the man they are raging about.
Can't speak for the others here, but I never ran up to a dismissed batsman and yelled abuse straight in his face nor did I ever cheat. I would also never consider using my kids to shield me from a shit storm that was entirely my own making.
Warner is a cnut. Simply pointing that out does not then make someone a cnut themselves. That's weird logic right there.
If it was simply a case of pointing that out....then you would be right. But it isnt.
I think Warner is in all a nasty peice of work on thd field. But I can see context and scale.What would be appropriate context and scale on this thread? Can you give examples of where this line was crossed? I don't see how the abuse he is copping here is any worse than any other sportsman who get shit on TSF.
No. Read back for yourself. If you still think this is still a appropriate level of vitriol... good on ya.
-
I haven't seen any posters say that Davey's wife mum or sister are bush pigs. Even during the fuss over his wife I didn't read any rude comments directly aimed at her, I didn't for example read anyone say she was a slut or whore for example. I think it's safe to say we've all stayed behind the line Warner crossed with Quinton de Kock
@canefan said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
I haven't seen any posters say that Davey's wife mum or sister are bush pigs. Even during the fuss over his wife I didn't read any rude comments directly aimed at her, I didn't for example read anyone say she was a slut or whore for example. I think it's safe to say we've all stayed behind the line Warner crossed with Quinton de Kock
You would be wrong then.
-
@canefan said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
I haven't seen any posters say that Davey's wife mum or sister are bush pigs. Even during the fuss over his wife I didn't read any rude comments directly aimed at her, I didn't for example read anyone say she was a slut or whore for example. I think it's safe to say we've all stayed behind the line Warner crossed with Quinton de Kock
You would be wrong then.
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@canefan said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
I haven't seen any posters say that Davey's wife mum or sister are bush pigs. Even during the fuss over his wife I didn't read any rude comments directly aimed at her, I didn't for example read anyone say she was a slut or whore for example. I think it's safe to say we've all stayed behind the line Warner crossed with Quinton de Kock
You would be wrong then.
In your opinion...without providing any evidence.
-
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
The level of vitriol towards Warner in this thread is ugly....and revealing. Some posters have shown they are cut from the same cloth as the man they are raging about.
Can't speak for the others here, but I never ran up to a dismissed batsman and yelled abuse straight in his face nor did I ever cheat. I would also never consider using my kids to shield me from a shit storm that was entirely my own making.
Warner is a cnut. Simply pointing that out does not then make someone a cnut themselves. That's weird logic right there.
If it was simply a case of pointing that out....then you would be right. But it isnt.
I think Warner is in all a nasty peice of work on thd field. But I can see context and scale.What would be appropriate context and scale on this thread? Can you give examples of where this line was crossed? I don't see how the abuse he is copping here is any worse than any other sportsman who get shit on TSF.
No. Read back for yourself. If you still think this is still a appropriate level of vitriol... good on ya.
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
The level of vitriol towards Warner in this thread is ugly....and revealing. Some posters have shown they are cut from the same cloth as the man they are raging about.
Can't speak for the others here, but I never ran up to a dismissed batsman and yelled abuse straight in his face nor did I ever cheat. I would also never consider using my kids to shield me from a shit storm that was entirely my own making.
Warner is a cnut. Simply pointing that out does not then make someone a cnut themselves. That's weird logic right there.
If it was simply a case of pointing that out....then you would be right. But it isnt.
I think Warner is in all a nasty peice of work on thd field. But I can see context and scale.What would be appropriate context and scale on this thread? Can you give examples of where this line was crossed? I don't see how the abuse he is copping here is any worse than any other sportsman who get shit on TSF.
No. Read back for yourself. If you still think this is still a appropriate level of vitriol... good on ya.
What was written yesterday or today that was so bad that posters here should be accused of being on the same level as him?
-
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
The level of vitriol towards Warner in this thread is ugly....and revealing. Some posters have shown they are cut from the same cloth as the man they are raging about.
Can't speak for the others here, but I never ran up to a dismissed batsman and yelled abuse straight in his face nor did I ever cheat. I would also never consider using my kids to shield me from a shit storm that was entirely my own making.
Warner is a cnut. Simply pointing that out does not then make someone a cnut themselves. That's weird logic right there.
If it was simply a case of pointing that out....then you would be right. But it isnt.
I think Warner is in all a nasty peice of work on thd field. But I can see context and scale.What would be appropriate context and scale on this thread? Can you give examples of where this line was crossed? I don't see how the abuse he is copping here is any worse than any other sportsman who get shit on TSF.
No. Read back for yourself. If you still think this is still a appropriate level of vitriol... good on ya.
What was written yesterday or today that was so bad that posters here should be accused of being on the same level as him?
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
The level of vitriol towards Warner in this thread is ugly....and revealing. Some posters have shown they are cut from the same cloth as the man they are raging about.
Can't speak for the others here, but I never ran up to a dismissed batsman and yelled abuse straight in his face nor did I ever cheat. I would also never consider using my kids to shield me from a shit storm that was entirely my own making.
Warner is a cnut. Simply pointing that out does not then make someone a cnut themselves. That's weird logic right there.
If it was simply a case of pointing that out....then you would be right. But it isnt.
I think Warner is in all a nasty peice of work on thd field. But I can see context and scale.What would be appropriate context and scale on this thread? Can you give examples of where this line was crossed? I don't see how the abuse he is copping here is any worse than any other sportsman who get shit on TSF.
No. Read back for yourself. If you still think this is still a appropriate level of vitriol... good on ya.
What was written yesterday or today that was so bad that posters here should be accused of being on the same level as him?
I'd bet that anything said on TSF about Warner, Smith, Bancroft, and the Aussie cricket team in general, is about 1000x more tame than the shitstorm raging at home this week
-
Whatever happened between Candice Warner and Sonny Bill Williams and multiple others has no place on the cricket pitch.
@canerbry said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Whatever happened between Candice Warner and Sonny Bill Williams and multiple others has no place on the cricket pitch.
@snowy said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@mariner4life said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
It was all in defense of a lady!
That is his wife you are referring to right?
The lady bit?
She married David fucking Warner. I did get your point but "lady" might be the wrong term.I could go on a rant about personal responsibility here but I will save you all by not doing it.
@nta said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@mariner4life lol **yeah she's kind of a skank, but Warner isn't the brightest.
If he wants to throw a hotdog down that hallway, that's his well-paid-for-mouthing-off-and-whacking-a-ball-with-a-stick choice.**
@mn5 said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
**'Kind of a skank.....'
That's like saying Don Bradman was kinda good.**
@crucial said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@taniwharugby said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
fark, I have no idea what the story was about DDD's missus...guess I should ask Uncle Google!
...and all his mates
@chester-draws said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Stay classy San Diego....
I'm pretty sure she did all the degrading she could manage -- to herself -- well before this thread started.
If calling a spade a spade earns a "knob end" then so be it.
@Snowy @jegga @canefan @Virgil @Rancid-Schnitzel @Sneakdefreak @KiwiMurph
I stopped looking after I found the first half dozen or so. If you had any kind of memory or had bothered to read the thread it was pretty bloody obvious. So I was corrct and you lot were wrong, you are welcome. Learn the lesson and move on.
-
@canerbry said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Whatever happened between Candice Warner and Sonny Bill Williams and multiple others has no place on the cricket pitch.
@snowy said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@mariner4life said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
It was all in defense of a lady!
That is his wife you are referring to right?
The lady bit?
She married David fucking Warner. I did get your point but "lady" might be the wrong term.I could go on a rant about personal responsibility here but I will save you all by not doing it.
@nta said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@mariner4life lol **yeah she's kind of a skank, but Warner isn't the brightest.
If he wants to throw a hotdog down that hallway, that's his well-paid-for-mouthing-off-and-whacking-a-ball-with-a-stick choice.**
@mn5 said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
**'Kind of a skank.....'
That's like saying Don Bradman was kinda good.**
@crucial said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@taniwharugby said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
fark, I have no idea what the story was about DDD's missus...guess I should ask Uncle Google!
...and all his mates
@chester-draws said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Stay classy San Diego....
I'm pretty sure she did all the degrading she could manage -- to herself -- well before this thread started.
If calling a spade a spade earns a "knob end" then so be it.
@Snowy @jegga @canefan @Virgil @Rancid-Schnitzel @Sneakdefreak @KiwiMurph
I stopped looking after I found the first half dozen or so. If you had any kind of memory or had bothered to read the thread it was pretty bloody obvious. So I was corrct and you lot were wrong, you are welcome. Learn the lesson and move on.
@baron-silas-greenback Yep. I think Warner is a dick. Note the bit about personal responsibility. He is reaping what he sowed.
-
@canerbry said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Whatever happened between Candice Warner and Sonny Bill Williams and multiple others has no place on the cricket pitch.
@snowy said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@mariner4life said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
It was all in defense of a lady!
That is his wife you are referring to right?
The lady bit?
She married David fucking Warner. I did get your point but "lady" might be the wrong term.I could go on a rant about personal responsibility here but I will save you all by not doing it.
@nta said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@mariner4life lol **yeah she's kind of a skank, but Warner isn't the brightest.
If he wants to throw a hotdog down that hallway, that's his well-paid-for-mouthing-off-and-whacking-a-ball-with-a-stick choice.**
@mn5 said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
**'Kind of a skank.....'
That's like saying Don Bradman was kinda good.**
@crucial said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@taniwharugby said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
fark, I have no idea what the story was about DDD's missus...guess I should ask Uncle Google!
...and all his mates
@chester-draws said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Stay classy San Diego....
I'm pretty sure she did all the degrading she could manage -- to herself -- well before this thread started.
If calling a spade a spade earns a "knob end" then so be it.
@Snowy @jegga @canefan @Virgil @Rancid-Schnitzel @Sneakdefreak @KiwiMurph
I stopped looking after I found the first half dozen or so. If you had any kind of memory or had bothered to read the thread it was pretty bloody obvious. So I was corrct and you lot were wrong, you are welcome. Learn the lesson and move on.
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@canerbry said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Whatever happened between Candice Warner and Sonny Bill Williams and multiple others has no place on the cricket pitch.
@snowy said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@mariner4life said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
It was all in defense of a lady!
That is his wife you are referring to right?
The lady bit?
She married David fucking Warner. I did get your point but "lady" might be the wrong term.I could go on a rant about personal responsibility here but I will save you all by not doing it.
@nta said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@mariner4life lol **yeah she's kind of a skank, but Warner isn't the brightest.
If he wants to throw a hotdog down that hallway, that's his well-paid-for-mouthing-off-and-whacking-a-ball-with-a-stick choice.**
@mn5 said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
**'Kind of a skank.....'
That's like saying Don Bradman was kinda good.**
@crucial said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@taniwharugby said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
fark, I have no idea what the story was about DDD's missus...guess I should ask Uncle Google!
...and all his mates
@chester-draws said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Stay classy San Diego....
I'm pretty sure she did all the degrading she could manage -- to herself -- well before this thread started.
If calling a spade a spade earns a "knob end" then so be it.
@Snowy @jegga @canefan @Virgil @Rancid-Schnitzel @Sneakdefreak @KiwiMurph
I stopped looking after I found the first half dozen or so. If you had any kind of memory or had bothered to read the thread it was pretty bloody obvious. So I was corrct and you lot were wrong, you are welcome. Learn the lesson and move on.
So nothing from yesterday or today then? Or was your post referring to comments written about his wife over a week ago?
