Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Wales v All Blacks

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblackswales
1.0k Posts 84 Posters 6.5k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Young HamiltonsY Young Hamiltons

    The Death of Rugby’s Soul

    When the whistle eventually became louder than the war cry and the urge to hit hard and deliver.

    You used to feel it.
    The haka wasn’t just a dance—it was a warning.
    That what came next wasn’t going to be measured by overly rigid rules.
    It was going to be survived.

    Now, it’s paused.
    Replayed. Re-examined.
    Penalised.

    Footage rewound from angles wound up to the hilt.
    While we all wait.
    Flow dissected.
    Every tackle frozen. Every heartbeat held hostage to a technician’s click of the mouse.

    A great game has become a courtroom.
    And the joy it brought got traded for overly officious jurisprudence.

    We told ourselves this was progress.
    That safety demanded scrutiny.
    That fairness lived in the margins.

    But somewhere, the true gladiators left the field in the process.

    They're replaced by yellow cards that effectively kill the contest.
    Not for brutality—but for milliseconds.
    Late by a frame. High by an inch. Offside by a toe.

    It's so boring from the spectators.

    I blame league for causing it.
    They started it.
    But they've smartened up.
    Now their bunker doesn't intervene.
    They only can on a captain's challenge
    Otherwise the referees ruling stands
    And even if there is foul play they're generally put on report
    So the spectators aren't penalised

    And just like that, fourteen men fight fifteen or even less.
    Not because of dominance, but decimals.

    The Richie McCaw the greatest number 7 we ever saw?
    He'd be carded before halftime.
    Penalised for instinct.
    TMO'd out of greatness.

    The master of chaos.
    The lord of the dark arts.
    General of the unspoken war inside the war.

    He’d have been gone in 20 minutes.
    TMO’d. Yellowed. Cited. Sanitized.

    Not because he was dirty.
    Because he understood what real test rugby demanded.

    Because genius doesn’t slow down.

    It doesn’t ask for permission before it pounces.

    But the modern game does and it makes the game longer and more boring in the process.

    It has lost its aura just like the All Blacks have lost theirs

    It's not because of the players they're just scrutinised to the nth degree and penalised for unintentional contact in many cases

    And in doing so—
    it shackled the very thing that once made the All Blacks feared.

    They weren’t perfect.
    They were relentless.
    They turned chaos into clarity. Turnovers into terror.
    Felt inevitable before they ever crossed the line.

    Now?
    You wonder who’s next up on the monitor.
    Not who’s next up with the ball.

    The whistle controls the games momentum more than it ever has.
    The broadcasters are in in the act finding minor indescretions are replaying them over and over.
    The referee supposedly controls the result and yet the TMO has become the rugby god and the players mere underlings.
    And the aura? What aura?

    It slipped quietly through the cracks in the TMO rulebook.

    They don’t roar like they used to.
    Not even the haka is sacred any more. (especially the English)
    Not the crowd.
    Not the men in black.

    Something else moves first now.
    Before the player.
    Before the hit.
    Before the game.

    It’s the screen.

    Pause. Rewind. Freeze.

    The moment where history was made—
    Now becomes the moment it's unmade.

    This isn’t rugby. Not like we once knew it.
    The collisions used to write legends.
    Now they trigger immediate caution.
    Review.
    Judgement.

    TMO. Three dreaded letters that feel clinical.
    But what they cut away isn’t just foul play.
    It’s stifled instinct. Pace. Pressure. Flow.
    It’s the edge rugby once lived on.

    And with every yellow, every soft red—
    Every head clash treated like a crime—
    Another piece of that old game dies.

    They say it’s for safety.
    But what’s safe about a sport stripped of risk?

    Where the game’s best moments—
    A perfectly-timed cleanout
    A contest in the air
    A fierce breakdown counter—
    Now live under a microscope.

    Not in motion.
    In suspicion.

    The All Black aura?
    It wasn’t just the jersey.
    It was how they bent the game under pressure.
    How they played to the edge without the scrutiny of four camera angles
    and dared you to follow.

    But you can’t intimidate a referee.
    Or unsettle a TMO in a bunker.
    And you sure as hell can’t control a match
    When every action lives under such microscopic scrutiny.

    Rugby wasn’t built to be fair.
    It was built to be fierce.

    The beauty of it lived in the clash of chaos and control.

    And the best teams?
    They danced between both.

    Now?
    They tiptoe.

    And when you watch the men in black today
    Do you feel that old weight?
    That fear?
    That certainty they would find a way?

    Or do you see hesitation.
    Compliance.
    Adaptation.

    That’s not their failure.
    It’s the judicial system’s success.
    It tamed the game.
    And in doing so—
    It tamed its kings.

    Not with better rugby.
    But with better angles.

    And when the whistle blows now?
    It doesn’t feel like rugby.
    It feels like judgment.

    Not of the play.
    Of the player.
    Of the past.

    And that,
    more than any scoreboard,
    is how the All Black aura died along with the spectacle. Borrowed from a disappointed rugby fan.

    J Offline
    J Offline
    Jet
    wrote on last edited by
    #960

    @Young-Hamiltons said in Wales v All Blacks:

    The Death of Rugby’s Soul

    When the whistle eventually became louder than the war cry and the urge to hit hard and deliver.

    You used to feel it.
    The haka wasn’t just a dance—it was a warning.
    That what came next wasn’t going to be measured by overly rigid rules.
    It was going to be survived.

    Now, it’s paused.
    Replayed. Re-examined.
    Penalised.

    Footage rewound from angles wound up to the hilt.
    While we all wait.
    Flow dissected.
    Every tackle frozen. Every heartbeat held hostage to a technician’s click of the mouse.

    A great game has become a courtroom.
    And the joy it brought got traded for overly officious jurisprudence.

    We told ourselves this was progress.
    That safety demanded scrutiny.
    That fairness lived in the margins.

    But somewhere, the true gladiators left the field in the process.

    They're replaced by yellow cards that effectively kill the contest.
    Not for brutality—but for milliseconds.
    Late by a frame. High by an inch. Offside by a toe.

    It's so boring from the spectators.

    I blame league for causing it.
    They started it.
    But they've smartened up.
    Now their bunker doesn't intervene.
    They only can on a captain's challenge
    Otherwise the referees ruling stands
    And even if there is foul play they're generally put on report
    So the spectators aren't penalised

    And just like that, fourteen men fight fifteen or even less.
    Not because of dominance, but decimals.

    The Richie McCaw the greatest number 7 we ever saw?
    He'd be carded before halftime.
    Penalised for instinct.
    TMO'd out of greatness.

    The master of chaos.
    The lord of the dark arts.
    General of the unspoken war inside the war.

    He’d have been gone in 20 minutes.
    TMO’d. Yellowed. Cited. Sanitized.

    Not because he was dirty.
    Because he understood what real test rugby demanded.

    Because genius doesn’t slow down.

    It doesn’t ask for permission before it pounces.

    But the modern game does and it makes the game longer and more boring in the process.

    It has lost its aura just like the All Blacks have lost theirs

    It's not because of the players they're just scrutinised to the nth degree and penalised for unintentional contact in many cases

    And in doing so—
    it shackled the very thing that once made the All Blacks feared.

    They weren’t perfect.
    They were relentless.
    They turned chaos into clarity. Turnovers into terror.
    Felt inevitable before they ever crossed the line.

    Now?
    You wonder who’s next up on the monitor.
    Not who’s next up with the ball.

    The whistle controls the games momentum more than it ever has.
    The broadcasters are in in the act finding minor indescretions are replaying them over and over.
    The referee supposedly controls the result and yet the TMO has become the rugby god and the players mere underlings.
    And the aura? What aura?

    It slipped quietly through the cracks in the TMO rulebook.

    They don’t roar like they used to.
    Not even the haka is sacred any more. (especially the English)
    Not the crowd.
    Not the men in black.

    Something else moves first now.
    Before the player.
    Before the hit.
    Before the game.

    It’s the screen.

    Pause. Rewind. Freeze.

    The moment where history was made—
    Now becomes the moment it's unmade.

    This isn’t rugby. Not like we once knew it.
    The collisions used to write legends.
    Now they trigger immediate caution.
    Review.
    Judgement.

    TMO. Three dreaded letters that feel clinical.
    But what they cut away isn’t just foul play.
    It’s stifled instinct. Pace. Pressure. Flow.
    It’s the edge rugby once lived on.

    And with every yellow, every soft red—
    Every head clash treated like a crime—
    Another piece of that old game dies.

    They say it’s for safety.
    But what’s safe about a sport stripped of risk?

    Where the game’s best moments—
    A perfectly-timed cleanout
    A contest in the air
    A fierce breakdown counter—
    Now live under a microscope.

    Not in motion.
    In suspicion.

    The All Black aura?
    It wasn’t just the jersey.
    It was how they bent the game under pressure.
    How they played to the edge without the scrutiny of four camera angles
    and dared you to follow.

    But you can’t intimidate a referee.
    Or unsettle a TMO in a bunker.
    And you sure as hell can’t control a match
    When every action lives under such microscopic scrutiny.

    Rugby wasn’t built to be fair.
    It was built to be fierce.

    The beauty of it lived in the clash of chaos and control.

    And the best teams?
    They danced between both.

    Now?
    They tiptoe.

    And when you watch the men in black today
    Do you feel that old weight?
    That fear?
    That certainty they would find a way?

    Or do you see hesitation.
    Compliance.
    Adaptation.

    That’s not their failure.
    It’s the judicial system’s success.
    It tamed the game.
    And in doing so—
    It tamed its kings.

    Not with better rugby.
    But with better angles.

    And when the whistle blows now?
    It doesn’t feel like rugby.
    It feels like judgment.

    Not of the play.
    Of the player.
    Of the past.

    And that,
    more than any scoreboard,
    is how the All Black aura died along with the spectacle. Borrowed from a disappointed rugby fan.

    Thats a superbly written piece.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Mr Fish

      @MajorPom said in Wales v All Blacks:

      Overall, I have no problems with the referee, she did a good job and allowed the game to flow. CAn't complain about that.

      However, I have real issues with the double no award try. The process around both was absolutely infuriating. It maybe that the correct decisions were reached (more about that later), but the WR sanctioned process about it is complete and utter bullshit.

      1. Was it a clear knock-on? Perhaps, although I was unconvinced as no angles of the replay seemed to show it side on. If it had been called in realtime, fair enough, if it had been called immediate after the try, then again, fair enough. If the TMO can't spot the damn thing before the conversion, then why should they be given more time? There are shot clocks now to speed up the game, so the damn TMO should be under the same rule. Ridiculous to have it disallowed after the conversion. Again, this is no slight on the refereeing team, it's on whoever makes the fucking stupid soul destroying rules.

      2. The rear angle showed a hand underneath it, no question. However, it wasn't clear and obvious that it never touched the line from the other angle. Once Davidson had said "i have a clear grounding", then thats it. What is the point of showing a held up from a different angle? I squarely blame the TMO here. He kept pressing, and once again, seriously slowing the game down. The TMO should have said "you have the better view, thus if you have clear grounding, try is awarded".

      It's beyond belief that anybody from WR could watch that and feel satisfied that it's working as it should.

      Because the ball was held up before Davidson saw it grounded. It's no different to if the ball was knocked on before Davidson saw it grounded. If something's happened before the ball is grounded, that takes precedent, even if the referee hasn't seen it...

      MajorPomM Offline
      MajorPomM Offline
      MajorPom
      wrote on last edited by
      #961

      @Mr-Fish said in Wales v All Blacks:

      Because the ball was held up before Davidson saw it grounded. It's no different to if the ball was knocked on before Davidson saw it grounded. If something's happened before the ball is grounded, that takes precedent, even if the referee hasn't seen it...

      If the ball was held up, it needs to remain held up. We've seen plenty of instances before when it's initially held up then the attacker wrestles free to get it on the line.

      This ball was not 6 inches above the line, it was half an inch at most, with plenty of perspective available for it to have touched the ground & the ref saw it touch and awarded it. She hadn't blown the whistle, she hadn't called time off. Game was still in play.

      Maybe in the rules of the game, it was the 100% correct decision. Honestly, I don't really care. I just like a game ref'd by the ref. Not by the TMO.

      J 1 Reply Last reply
      5
      • MajorPomM MajorPom

        @Mr-Fish said in Wales v All Blacks:

        Because the ball was held up before Davidson saw it grounded. It's no different to if the ball was knocked on before Davidson saw it grounded. If something's happened before the ball is grounded, that takes precedent, even if the referee hasn't seen it...

        If the ball was held up, it needs to remain held up. We've seen plenty of instances before when it's initially held up then the attacker wrestles free to get it on the line.

        This ball was not 6 inches above the line, it was half an inch at most, with plenty of perspective available for it to have touched the ground & the ref saw it touch and awarded it. She hadn't blown the whistle, she hadn't called time off. Game was still in play.

        Maybe in the rules of the game, it was the 100% correct decision. Honestly, I don't really care. I just like a game ref'd by the ref. Not by the TMO.

        J Offline
        J Offline
        Jet
        wrote on last edited by
        #962

        @MajorPom said in Wales v All Blacks:

        @Mr-Fish said in Wales v All Blacks:

        Because the ball was held up before Davidson saw it grounded. It's no different to if the ball was knocked on before Davidson saw it grounded. If something's happened before the ball is grounded, that takes precedent, even if the referee hasn't seen it...

        If the ball was held up, it needs to remain held up. We've seen plenty of instances before when it's initially held up then the attacker wrestles free to get it on the line.

        This ball was not 6 inches above the line, it was half an inch at most, with plenty of perspective available for it to have touched the ground & the ref saw it touch and awarded it. She hadn't blown the whistle, she hadn't called time off. Game was still in play.

        Maybe in the rules of the game, it was the 100% correct decision. Honestly, I don't really care. I just like a game ref'd by the ref. Not by the TMO.

        100% this.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Victor MeldrewV Victor Meldrew

          @MajorPom said in Wales v All Blacks:

          There are shot clocks now to speed up the game, so the damn TMO should be under the same rule. Ridiculous to have it disallowed after the conversion.

          Bloody great idea.

          Applauding what looks a brilliant try, only to have some pistonwristedgibbon go back multiple phases to find a reason not to award it is killing the game.

          M Offline
          M Offline
          mohikamo
          wrote on last edited by
          #963

          @Victor-Meldrew

          everything should be on the clock

          scrums
          goal-kicks
          kick-offs
          line-outs
          TMO
          etc
          and even injuries, a lot of them are just rest breaks

          as soon as the ref blows the whistle, the clock should start
          40 seconds would be about right (same as NFL)
          and get the TMO to actually run the clock!
          all they are good for
          then the game gets restarted, no matter what

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • BonesB Bones

            @Mr-Fish held up before grounding is in no way the same as a knock on. The ball is grounded, that's all there is to it.

            M Offline
            M Offline
            Mr Fish
            wrote on last edited by
            #964

            @Bones said in Wales v All Blacks:

            @Mr-Fish held up before grounding is in no way the same as a knock on. The ball is grounded, that's all there is to it.

            I agree with you, the ball isn't held up for long enough and it should be play on. But my point was that the TMO wasn't disputing that the ball was eventually grounded, he was saying that it was held up first. It wasn't a case that it looked held up from one angle but grounded from another.

            BonesB MajorPomM 2 Replies Last reply
            1
            • M Mr Fish

              @Bones said in Wales v All Blacks:

              @Mr-Fish held up before grounding is in no way the same as a knock on. The ball is grounded, that's all there is to it.

              I agree with you, the ball isn't held up for long enough and it should be play on. But my point was that the TMO wasn't disputing that the ball was eventually grounded, he was saying that it was held up first. It wasn't a case that it looked held up from one angle but grounded from another.

              BonesB Offline
              BonesB Offline
              Bones
              wrote on last edited by
              #965

              @Mr-Fish said in Wales v All Blacks:

              @Bones said in Wales v All Blacks:

              @Mr-Fish held up before grounding is in no way the same as a knock on. The ball is grounded, that's all there is to it.

              I agree with you, the ball isn't held up for long enough and it should be play on. But my point was that the TMO wasn't disputing that the ball was eventually grounded, he was saying that it was held up first. It wasn't a case that it looked held up from one angle but grounded from another.

              Yeah, did she refer it or did the tmo interject? Pretty bad if he wasn't even asked and she's already said she's seen a try. Still, she's the one that wound it back with zero justification.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • B brodean

                @kidcalder said in Wales v All Blacks:

                @brodean said in Wales v All Blacks:

                I would have really liked to have seen Love get a run at 10. What are they afraid of?

                Thats RM jersey and BB is keepng it mediocre until he is available= no point anyone being allowed the opportunity to shine and make the changeover more complex

                25 minutes to go with the game well won and they could have moved him to 10 but instead they take him off for Reece.

                Dan54D Offline
                Dan54D Offline
                Dan54
                wrote on last edited by
                #966

                @brodean said in Wales v All Blacks:

                @kidcalder said in Wales v All Blacks:

                @brodean said in Wales v All Blacks:

                I would have really liked to have seen Love get a run at 10. What are they afraid of?

                Thats RM jersey and BB is keepng it mediocre until he is available= no point anyone being allowed the opportunity to shine and make the changeover more complex

                25 minutes to go with the game well won and they could have moved him to 10 but instead they take him off for Reece.

                Was he injured or something? I thought he looked gassed in second half, seemed to lose a bit of fizz after halftime.

                nostrildamusN P 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • Dan54D Dan54

                  @brodean said in Wales v All Blacks:

                  @kidcalder said in Wales v All Blacks:

                  @brodean said in Wales v All Blacks:

                  I would have really liked to have seen Love get a run at 10. What are they afraid of?

                  Thats RM jersey and BB is keepng it mediocre until he is available= no point anyone being allowed the opportunity to shine and make the changeover more complex

                  25 minutes to go with the game well won and they could have moved him to 10 but instead they take him off for Reece.

                  Was he injured or something? I thought he looked gassed in second half, seemed to lose a bit of fizz after halftime.

                  nostrildamusN Offline
                  nostrildamusN Offline
                  nostrildamus
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #967

                  @Dan54 said in Wales v All Blacks:

                  Was he injured or something? I thought he looked gassed in second half, seemed to lose a bit of fizz after halftime.

                  ankle

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • nostrildamusN nostrildamus

                    @sparky said in Wales v All Blacks:

                    @nostrildamus 60-61 according to Wikipedia. He was born in 1964.

                    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Devlin

                    I must have the wrong guy, he's practically an embryo!*

                    *dramatic Fern effect.

                    boobooB Offline
                    boobooB Offline
                    booboo
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #968

                    @nostrildamus said in Wales v All Blacks:

                    @sparky said in Wales v All Blacks:

                    @nostrildamus 60-61 according to Wikipedia. He was born in 1964.

                    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Devlin

                    I must have the wrong guy, he's practically an embryo!*

                    *dramatic Fern effect.

                    Murray Deaker? He was an alchy.

                    nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
                    2
                    • D Offline
                      D Offline
                      DurryMexted
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #969

                      Was a stark difference with Dmac and Love in the pivots. Front foot ball, defenders werent just sliding onto the next reciever, faster pace of play, variance in carrying and depth. Just seeing two guys keen to get their hands on the ball was extremely refreshing.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • boobooB booboo

                        @nostrildamus said in Wales v All Blacks:

                        @sparky said in Wales v All Blacks:

                        @nostrildamus 60-61 according to Wikipedia. He was born in 1964.

                        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Devlin

                        I must have the wrong guy, he's practically an embryo!*

                        *dramatic Fern effect.

                        Murray Deaker? He was an alchy.

                        nostrildamusN Offline
                        nostrildamusN Offline
                        nostrildamus
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #970

                        @booboo said in Wales v All Blacks:

                        Murray Deaker? He was an alchy.

                        That's it! Sorry Devlin!

                        MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
                        2
                        • nostrildamusN nostrildamus

                          @booboo said in Wales v All Blacks:

                          Murray Deaker? He was an alchy.

                          That's it! Sorry Devlin!

                          MN5M Offline
                          MN5M Offline
                          MN5
                          wrote on last edited by MN5
                          #971

                          @nostrildamus said in Wales v All Blacks:

                          @booboo said in Wales v All Blacks:

                          Murray Deaker? He was an alchy.

                          That's it! Sorry Devlin!

                          Devlin will be guttted someone is comparing him to Deaker in terms of age. They could easily be father and son.

                          I met him ( Devlin ) a few times while working in Radio in my late teens.

                          Really nice bloke ( although he has certainly gotten grumpier with age judging by hearing him )

                          very animated, freakishly skinny ( I can see why the Game of two halves guys gave him shit constantly ) arms like twigs.....

                          VERY passionate about sport.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          2
                          • MajorPomM MajorPom

                            Overall, I have no problems with the referee, she did a good job and allowed the game to flow. CAn't complain about that.

                            However, I have real issues with the double no award try. The process around both was absolutely infuriating. It maybe that the correct decisions were reached (more about that later), but the WR sanctioned process about it is complete and utter bullshit.

                            1. Was it a clear knock-on? Perhaps, although I was unconvinced as no angles of the replay seemed to show it side on. If it had been called in realtime, fair enough, if it had been called immediate after the try, then again, fair enough. If the TMO can't spot the damn thing before the conversion, then why should they be given more time? There are shot clocks now to speed up the game, so the damn TMO should be under the same rule. Ridiculous to have it disallowed after the conversion. Again, this is no slight on the refereeing team, it's on whoever makes the fucking stupid soul destroying rules.

                            2. The rear angle showed a hand underneath it, no question. However, it wasn't clear and obvious that it never touched the line from the other angle. Once Davidson had said "i have a clear grounding", then thats it. What is the point of showing a held up from a different angle? I squarely blame the TMO here. He kept pressing, and once again, seriously slowing the game down. The TMO should have said "you have the better view, thus if you have clear grounding, try is awarded".

                            It's beyond belief that anybody from WR could watch that and feel satisfied that it's working as it should.

                            boobooB Offline
                            boobooB Offline
                            booboo
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #972

                            @MajorPom said in Wales v All Blacks:

                            There are shot clocks now to speed up the game, so the damn TMO should be under the same rule.

                            Great point Major.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            2
                            • BonesB Bones

                              TMO clearly said stick with your on field decision. That Davidson went against all protocol with an absolute melt decision is not his fault.

                              boobooB Offline
                              boobooB Offline
                              booboo
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #973

                              @Bones said in Wales v All Blacks:

                              TMO clearly said stick with your on field decision. That Davidson went against all protocol with an absolute melt decision is not his fault.

                              What they say and what they mean are very different.

                              Davidson dutifully followed the ghost protocol.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M Mr Fish

                                @Bones said in Wales v All Blacks:

                                @Mr-Fish held up before grounding is in no way the same as a knock on. The ball is grounded, that's all there is to it.

                                I agree with you, the ball isn't held up for long enough and it should be play on. But my point was that the TMO wasn't disputing that the ball was eventually grounded, he was saying that it was held up first. It wasn't a case that it looked held up from one angle but grounded from another.

                                MajorPomM Offline
                                MajorPomM Offline
                                MajorPom
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #974

                                @Mr-Fish said in Wales v All Blacks:

                                @Bones said in Wales v All Blacks:

                                @Mr-Fish held up before grounding is in no way the same as a knock on. The ball is grounded, that's all there is to it.

                                I agree with you, the ball isn't held up for long enough and it should be play on. But my point was that the TMO wasn't disputing that the ball was eventually grounded, he was saying that it was held up first. It wasn't a case that it looked held up from one angle but grounded from another.

                                When the referee says “I have a clear grounding”, that should be it, over.

                                Puts his feet up and sends a selfie to his missus saying something like “easiest job ever”. The modern TMO is the literal definition of a solution looking for a problem.

                                And I fucking hate those fluffybunnies.

                                KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
                                11
                                • BonesB Bones

                                  TMO clearly said stick with your on field decision. That Davidson went against all protocol with an absolute melt decision is not his fault.

                                  J Offline
                                  J Offline
                                  Jet
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #975

                                  @Bones said in Wales v All Blacks:

                                  TMO clearly said stick with your on field decision. That Davidson went against all protocol with an absolute melt decision is not his fault.

                                  I know that this shouldnt be a reason to consider, but then again it should be.

                                  People are gambling on these games.

                                  Spread betting, try scorer bets etc.

                                  I totally understand them wanting to get things right, and wanting to protect themselves from future litigation over concussions etc.

                                  All I ask for is consistency. And we dont have that. Not even close.

                                  Imagine being Sam Cane watching the Autumn Internationals seeing the card roulette, non cards (Sasha) and red cards over turned in the court room.

                                  They stole his big day from him for a tackle less egregious than those unsanctioned or deemed non reds this very Autumn.

                                  I'd be suicidal.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  6
                                  • Dan54D Dan54

                                    @brodean said in Wales v All Blacks:

                                    @kidcalder said in Wales v All Blacks:

                                    @brodean said in Wales v All Blacks:

                                    I would have really liked to have seen Love get a run at 10. What are they afraid of?

                                    Thats RM jersey and BB is keepng it mediocre until he is available= no point anyone being allowed the opportunity to shine and make the changeover more complex

                                    25 minutes to go with the game well won and they could have moved him to 10 but instead they take him off for Reece.

                                    Was he injured or something? I thought he looked gassed in second half, seemed to lose a bit of fizz after halftime.

                                    P Offline
                                    P Offline
                                    pakman
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #976

                                    @Dan54 said in Wales v All Blacks:

                                    @brodean said in Wales v All Blacks:

                                    @kidcalder said in Wales v All Blacks:

                                    @brodean said in Wales v All Blacks:

                                    I would have really liked to have seen Love get a run at 10. What are they afraid of?

                                    Thats RM jersey and BB is keepng it mediocre until he is available= no point anyone being allowed the opportunity to shine and make the changeover more complex

                                    25 minutes to go with the game well won and they could have moved him to 10 but instead they take him off for Reece.

                                    Was he injured or something? I thought he looked gassed in second half, seemed to lose a bit of fizz after halftime.

                                    Razor mentioned Love had an ankle issue.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    2
                                    • MajorPomM MajorPom

                                      @Mr-Fish said in Wales v All Blacks:

                                      @Bones said in Wales v All Blacks:

                                      @Mr-Fish held up before grounding is in no way the same as a knock on. The ball is grounded, that's all there is to it.

                                      I agree with you, the ball isn't held up for long enough and it should be play on. But my point was that the TMO wasn't disputing that the ball was eventually grounded, he was saying that it was held up first. It wasn't a case that it looked held up from one angle but grounded from another.

                                      When the referee says “I have a clear grounding”, that should be it, over.

                                      Puts his feet up and sends a selfie to his missus saying something like “easiest job ever”. The modern TMO is the literal definition of a solution looking for a problem.

                                      And I fucking hate those fluffybunnies.

                                      KirwanK Offline
                                      KirwanK Offline
                                      Kirwan
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #977

                                      @MajorPom said in Wales v All Blacks:

                                      @Mr-Fish said in Wales v All Blacks:

                                      @Bones said in Wales v All Blacks:

                                      @Mr-Fish held up before grounding is in no way the same as a knock on. The ball is grounded, that's all there is to it.

                                      I agree with you, the ball isn't held up for long enough and it should be play on. But my point was that the TMO wasn't disputing that the ball was eventually grounded, he was saying that it was held up first. It wasn't a case that it looked held up from one angle but grounded from another.

                                      When the referee says “I have a clear grounding”, that should be it, over.

                                      Puts his feet up and sends a selfie to his missus saying something like “easiest job ever”. The modern TMO is the literal definition of a solution looking for a problem.

                                      And I fucking hate those fluffybunnies.

                                      I'm at the same point with rugby and cricket. Umpires/Refs making mistakes is part of the sport. Best is the enemy of good.

                                      Get rid of TMOs completely.

                                      MajorPomM 1 Reply Last reply
                                      4
                                      • KirwanK Kirwan

                                        @MajorPom said in Wales v All Blacks:

                                        @Mr-Fish said in Wales v All Blacks:

                                        @Bones said in Wales v All Blacks:

                                        @Mr-Fish held up before grounding is in no way the same as a knock on. The ball is grounded, that's all there is to it.

                                        I agree with you, the ball isn't held up for long enough and it should be play on. But my point was that the TMO wasn't disputing that the ball was eventually grounded, he was saying that it was held up first. It wasn't a case that it looked held up from one angle but grounded from another.

                                        When the referee says “I have a clear grounding”, that should be it, over.

                                        Puts his feet up and sends a selfie to his missus saying something like “easiest job ever”. The modern TMO is the literal definition of a solution looking for a problem.

                                        And I fucking hate those fluffybunnies.

                                        I'm at the same point with rugby and cricket. Umpires/Refs making mistakes is part of the sport. Best is the enemy of good.

                                        Get rid of TMOs completely.

                                        MajorPomM Offline
                                        MajorPomM Offline
                                        MajorPom
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #978

                                        @Kirwan disagree on the cricket. Actually think they have that pretty good It’s a slow game so doesn’t kill it.

                                        NRL bunker has it spot on for 80-90 min matches.

                                        KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
                                        5
                                        • MajorPomM MajorPom

                                          @Kirwan disagree on the cricket. Actually think they have that pretty good It’s a slow game so doesn’t kill it.

                                          NRL bunker has it spot on for 80-90 min matches.

                                          KirwanK Offline
                                          KirwanK Offline
                                          Kirwan
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #979

                                          @MajorPom said in Wales v All Blacks:

                                          @Kirwan disagree on the cricket. Actually think they have that pretty good It’s a slow game so doesn’t kill it.

                                          NRL bunker has it spot on for 80-90 min matches.

                                          I jumped onto the ashes and died of boredom watching them look for what felt like an hour looking for a sound rolling the tape forward and back.

                                          Was painful.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search