Stadium of Canterbury
-
@gt12 said in Stadium of Canterbury:
I like it!
My wife and I are on a medium term plan to move back to NZ and have bought land about an hour out of Christchurch.
Going to AB and Chiefs games under the roof will be awesome, and this should help the city develop.
Excellent!
Umm, the crusaders are from Christchurch, not the chiefs....
@Machpants said in Stadium of Canterbury:
@gt12 said in Stadium of Canterbury:
I like it!
My wife and I are on a medium term plan to move back to NZ and have bought land about an hour out of Christchurch.
Going to AB and Chiefs games under the roof will be awesome, and this should help the city develop.
Excellent!
Umm, the crusaders are from Christchurch, not the chiefs....
Except for when we kick their asses regular season or in the playoffs, or both!
-
I like it!
My wife and I are on a medium term plan to move back to NZ and have bought land about an hour out of Christchurch.
Going to AB and Chiefs games under the roof will be awesome, and this should help the city develop.
Excellent!
-
25,000 seater that will look like a click clack container with that see through roof.
What a waste. This is the perfect opportunity to build something that is future proof with the ever growing populations and they are going with a 25,000 seater.
@shark is not a happy camper, that is for sure
-
25,000 seater that will look like a click clack container with that see through roof.
What a waste. This is the perfect opportunity to build something that is future proof with the ever growing populations and they are going with a 25,000 seater.
@shark is not a happy camper, that is for sure
-
@Hooroo it should be a minimum of 35,000 to be a viable stadium for that area. Not bothered by the roof, something different.
Seems a waste of time having insurance if you can’t build a like for like replacement.
@Kirwan said in Stadium of Canterbury:
@Hooroo it should be a minimum of 35,000 to be a viable stadium for that area. Not bothered by the roof, something different.
Seems a waste of time having insurance if you can’t build a like for like replacement.
Totally agree.
Shark was mentioning on Facebook last night that with a stadium at 25k, it is only in competition for tests with Waikato Stadium, Albany etc. That makes it rather small. 3rd biggest city in NZ and growing.
-
@Hooroo it should be a minimum of 35,000 to be a viable stadium for that area. Not bothered by the roof, something different.
Seems a waste of time having insurance if you can’t build a like for like replacement.
@Kirwan said in Stadium of Canterbury:
Seems a waste of time having insurance if you can’t build a like for like replacement.
a 'like for like' rebuild isnt what they are planning...most insurance policies have specific clauses about rebuilding differently at different sites etc.
-
@Hooroo it should be a minimum of 35,000 to be a viable stadium for that area. Not bothered by the roof, something different.
Seems a waste of time having insurance if you can’t build a like for like replacement.
-
@Tim said in Stadium of Canterbury:
BTW, Dunedin's Forsyth Barr Stadium had a construction cost of $198M
How long ago was that built though?
-
2009 - 2011. How much have construction costs in NZ gone up in that time?
What are the additional costs from seismic measures?
-
2009 - 2011. How much have construction costs in NZ gone up in that time?
What are the additional costs from seismic measures?
-
@Tim lots!
@taniwharugby Love that deliberate net immigration increase from 10 to 20k per annum to 60 to 70k. Great policy for everyone.
-
For me this is a brilliant option. Cantabs should really get behind it and make sure it happens
More than 25000 is too much now. Play the big tests mostly in Auckland and let the rest of the country have a smaller stadium that at least will be part full for most matches. Even when its raining
10 or 20% full is a poor atmosphere. And looks terrible on TV and that's where the focus is now.
edit. The current stadium look shit on TV. Its a joke even when almost full.
-
@Kirwan said in Stadium of Canterbury:
@Hooroo it should be a minimum of 35,000 to be a viable stadium for that area. Not bothered by the roof, something different.
Seems a waste of time having insurance if you can’t build a like for like replacement.
Totally agree.
Shark was mentioning on Facebook last night that with a stadium at 25k, it is only in competition for tests with Waikato Stadium, Albany etc. That makes it rather small. 3rd biggest city in NZ and growing.
@Hooroo said in Stadium of Canterbury:
@Kirwan said in Stadium of Canterbury:
@Hooroo it should be a minimum of 35,000 to be a viable stadium for that area. Not bothered by the roof, something different.
Seems a waste of time having insurance if you can’t build a like for like replacement.
Totally agree.
Shark was mentioning on Facebook last night that with a stadium at 25k, it is only in competition for tests with Waikato Stadium, Albany etc. That makes it rather small. 3rd biggest city in NZ and growing.
Yeah, 30k would have been a nice number, with extra seating brought in to get to 35k, but personally I’m happy that it’s undercover as that will make attending games easier. My only problem is that no doubt my boy will end up a Crusaders fan, which will be unbearable.
-
@Hooroo said in Stadium of Canterbury:
@Kirwan said in Stadium of Canterbury:
@Hooroo it should be a minimum of 35,000 to be a viable stadium for that area. Not bothered by the roof, something different.
Seems a waste of time having insurance if you can’t build a like for like replacement.
Totally agree.
Shark was mentioning on Facebook last night that with a stadium at 25k, it is only in competition for tests with Waikato Stadium, Albany etc. That makes it rather small. 3rd biggest city in NZ and growing.
Yeah, 30k would have been a nice number, with extra seating brought in to get to 35k, but personally I’m happy that it’s undercover as that will make attending games easier. My only problem is that no doubt my boy will end up a Crusaders fan, which will be unbearable.
@gt12 said in Stadium of Canterbury:
@Hooroo said in Stadium of Canterbury:
@Kirwan said in Stadium of Canterbury:
@Hooroo it should be a minimum of 35,000 to be a viable stadium for that area. Not bothered by the roof, something different.
Seems a waste of time having insurance if you can’t build a like for like replacement.
Totally agree.
Shark was mentioning on Facebook last night that with a stadium at 25k, it is only in competition for tests with Waikato Stadium, Albany etc. That makes it rather small. 3rd biggest city in NZ and growing.
Yeah, 30k would have been a nice number, with extra seating brought in to get to 35k, but personally I’m happy that it’s undercover as that will make attending games easier. My only problem is that no doubt my boy will end up a Crusaders fan, which will be unbearable.
Just buy him a shirt from you franchise! That is usually enough to buy loyalty.
