Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Black Clash

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricketallblacks
187 Posts 45 Posters 4.7k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Chris B.C Chris B.

    @mn5 said in Black Clash:

    Harry sure was a hero for someone who gave such modest returns. One hundy and one Michelle in 250 ODIs !!!!

    http://www.howstat.com/cricket/statistics/batting/BattingBestAggregateForPosition_ODI.asp

    Does that display No. 7?

    Harry says fuck you, regardless! 🙂

    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    wrote on last edited by
    #66

    @chris-b Also the 3rd most wickets for NZ in ODI's at the 9th lowest average. Although averages were much lower in pre T20 days. Satnav the only current NZ bowler averaging below 5.

    Fuck Harry was shit ...

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
    • RapidoR Rapido

      MN5 just doesn't understand roles.

      "I never said he was terrible, I said he had modest returns."

      Modest returns at stats relatively irrelevant to his role, like wondering what all the fuss was with Shane Bond when he has zero run outs from backward point. Or zero rescued run chases.

      Anyway. Also doesn't seem to understand difference between fan favourites from greats.

      I thought the 90s was his thing?

      MN5M Offline
      MN5M Offline
      MN5
      wrote on last edited by MN5
      #67

      @rapido said in Black Clash:

      MN5 just doesn't understand roles.

      "I never said he was terrible, I said he had modest returns."

      Modest returns at stats relatively irrelevant to his role, like wondering what all the fuss was with Shane Bond when he has zero run outs from backward point. Or zero rescued run chases.

      Anyway. Also doesn't seem to understand difference between fan favourites from greats.

      I thought the 90s was his thing?

      Fucken hell, you’d think I’d compared him to Justin Vaughan or someone judging from the grief I’m getting.

      It certainly proves he’s popular, I hope he does get a run in the Black Clash now !

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • KiwiMurphK Offline
        KiwiMurphK Offline
        KiwiMurph
        wrote on last edited by
        #68

        I think with Harry what is shows is how different ODI cricket was in the 90s vs now.

        In the 99 CWC 300 was only scored 3 times in the whole tournament.

        I read an article that said in 1999 the average strike rate of batsmen in ODIs was 73.47 and in 2019 the average strike rate was 92.18.

        Harry these days wouldn't be nearly as valuable as he was in the 90s. Different era.

        MN5M rotatedR 2 Replies Last reply
        1
        • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

          I think with Harry what is shows is how different ODI cricket was in the 90s vs now.

          In the 99 CWC 300 was only scored 3 times in the whole tournament.

          I read an article that said in 1999 the average strike rate of batsmen in ODIs was 73.47 and in 2019 the average strike rate was 92.18.

          Harry these days wouldn't be nearly as valuable as he was in the 90s. Different era.

          MN5M Offline
          MN5M Offline
          MN5
          wrote on last edited by MN5
          #69

          @kiwimurph said in Black Clash:

          I think with Harry what is shows is how different ODI cricket was in the 90s vs now.

          In the 99 CWC 300 was only scored 3 times in the whole tournament.

          I read an article that said in 1999 the average strike rate of batsmen in ODIs was 73.47 and in 2019 the average strike rate was 92.18.

          Harry these days wouldn't be nearly as valuable as he was in the 90s. Different era.

          Definitely, I was surprised he didn’t have more big moments but I might stop commenting now in case I get ripped apart again.

          SiamS G 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • MN5M MN5

            @kiwimurph said in Black Clash:

            I think with Harry what is shows is how different ODI cricket was in the 90s vs now.

            In the 99 CWC 300 was only scored 3 times in the whole tournament.

            I read an article that said in 1999 the average strike rate of batsmen in ODIs was 73.47 and in 2019 the average strike rate was 92.18.

            Harry these days wouldn't be nearly as valuable as he was in the 90s. Different era.

            Definitely, I was surprised he didn’t have more big moments but I might stop commenting now in case I get ripped apart again.

            SiamS Offline
            SiamS Offline
            Siam
            wrote on last edited by
            #70

            @mn5 mn5 looks to his left, points and exclaims " Hey isn't that George Bridge walking with Ian Foster?"

            Pheeww, (wipes brow)

            MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
            2
            • SiamS Siam

              @mn5 mn5 looks to his left, points and exclaims " Hey isn't that George Bridge walking with Ian Foster?"

              Pheeww, (wipes brow)

              MN5M Offline
              MN5M Offline
              MN5
              wrote on last edited by
              #71

              @siam said in Black Clash:

              @mn5 mn5 looks to his left, points and exclaims " Hey isn't that George Bridge walking with Ian Foster?"

              Pheeww, (wipes brow)

              On their way to get tips from Caleb Ralph

              1 Reply Last reply
              2
              • MN5M MN5

                @kiwimurph said in Black Clash:

                I think with Harry what is shows is how different ODI cricket was in the 90s vs now.

                In the 99 CWC 300 was only scored 3 times in the whole tournament.

                I read an article that said in 1999 the average strike rate of batsmen in ODIs was 73.47 and in 2019 the average strike rate was 92.18.

                Harry these days wouldn't be nearly as valuable as he was in the 90s. Different era.

                Definitely, I was surprised he didn’t have more big moments but I might stop commenting now in case I get ripped apart again.

                G Offline
                G Offline
                Godder
                wrote on last edited by
                #72

                @mn5 said in Black Clash:

                @kiwimurph said in Black Clash:

                I think with Harry what is shows is how different ODI cricket was in the 90s vs now.

                In the 99 CWC 300 was only scored 3 times in the whole tournament.

                I read an article that said in 1999 the average strike rate of batsmen in ODIs was 73.47 and in 2019 the average strike rate was 92.18.

                Harry these days wouldn't be nearly as valuable as he was in the 90s. Different era.

                Definitely, I was surprised he didn’t have more big moments but I might stop commenting now in case I get ripped apart again.

                He had a lot of not outs because his job was often to anchor the latter part of the innings while the other end did the hitting.

                MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • G Godder

                  @mn5 said in Black Clash:

                  @kiwimurph said in Black Clash:

                  I think with Harry what is shows is how different ODI cricket was in the 90s vs now.

                  In the 99 CWC 300 was only scored 3 times in the whole tournament.

                  I read an article that said in 1999 the average strike rate of batsmen in ODIs was 73.47 and in 2019 the average strike rate was 92.18.

                  Harry these days wouldn't be nearly as valuable as he was in the 90s. Different era.

                  Definitely, I was surprised he didn’t have more big moments but I might stop commenting now in case I get ripped apart again.

                  He had a lot of not outs because his job was often to anchor the latter part of the innings while the other end did the hitting.

                  MN5M Offline
                  MN5M Offline
                  MN5
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #73

                  @godder said in Black Clash:

                  @mn5 said in Black Clash:

                  @kiwimurph said in Black Clash:

                  I think with Harry what is shows is how different ODI cricket was in the 90s vs now.

                  In the 99 CWC 300 was only scored 3 times in the whole tournament.

                  I read an article that said in 1999 the average strike rate of batsmen in ODIs was 73.47 and in 2019 the average strike rate was 92.18.

                  Harry these days wouldn't be nearly as valuable as he was in the 90s. Different era.

                  Definitely, I was surprised he didn’t have more big moments but I might stop commenting now in case I get ripped apart again.

                  He had a lot of not outs because his job was often to anchor the latter part of the innings while the other end did the hitting.

                  Fuck Harry. Worst NZ cricketer ever

                  MajorPomM 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • MN5M MN5

                    @godder said in Black Clash:

                    @mn5 said in Black Clash:

                    @kiwimurph said in Black Clash:

                    I think with Harry what is shows is how different ODI cricket was in the 90s vs now.

                    In the 99 CWC 300 was only scored 3 times in the whole tournament.

                    I read an article that said in 1999 the average strike rate of batsmen in ODIs was 73.47 and in 2019 the average strike rate was 92.18.

                    Harry these days wouldn't be nearly as valuable as he was in the 90s. Different era.

                    Definitely, I was surprised he didn’t have more big moments but I might stop commenting now in case I get ripped apart again.

                    He had a lot of not outs because his job was often to anchor the latter part of the innings while the other end did the hitting.

                    Fuck Harry. Worst NZ cricketer ever

                    MajorPomM Away
                    MajorPomM Away
                    MajorPom
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #74

                    @mn5 said in Black Clash:

                    @godder said in Black Clash:

                    @mn5 said in Black Clash:

                    @kiwimurph said in Black Clash:

                    I think with Harry what is shows is how different ODI cricket was in the 90s vs now.

                    In the 99 CWC 300 was only scored 3 times in the whole tournament.

                    I read an article that said in 1999 the average strike rate of batsmen in ODIs was 73.47 and in 2019 the average strike rate was 92.18.

                    Harry these days wouldn't be nearly as valuable as he was in the 90s. Different era.

                    Definitely, I was surprised he didn’t have more big moments but I might stop commenting now in case I get ripped apart again.

                    He had a lot of not outs because his job was often to anchor the latter part of the innings while the other end did the hitting.

                    Fuck Harry. Worst NZ cricketer ever

                    Harry fan here as well. Best in the field, good at slowing the economy rate, anchor of a batsman saving us from some low scores on multiple times.

                    But mainly because of two thing.

                    1. The game where he hit two 6's and the tv camera's actually managed to follow the ball. For the young 'uns on the board, when players used to hit a 6 you used to stare at nothing as the definition / lighting was so bad you could never see the ball until it came down to the crowd and you saw people jumping for it.
                    2. Side on run out in the opening match of the 92 world cup.
                    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • MajorPomM MajorPom

                      @mn5 said in Black Clash:

                      @godder said in Black Clash:

                      @mn5 said in Black Clash:

                      @kiwimurph said in Black Clash:

                      I think with Harry what is shows is how different ODI cricket was in the 90s vs now.

                      In the 99 CWC 300 was only scored 3 times in the whole tournament.

                      I read an article that said in 1999 the average strike rate of batsmen in ODIs was 73.47 and in 2019 the average strike rate was 92.18.

                      Harry these days wouldn't be nearly as valuable as he was in the 90s. Different era.

                      Definitely, I was surprised he didn’t have more big moments but I might stop commenting now in case I get ripped apart again.

                      He had a lot of not outs because his job was often to anchor the latter part of the innings while the other end did the hitting.

                      Fuck Harry. Worst NZ cricketer ever

                      Harry fan here as well. Best in the field, good at slowing the economy rate, anchor of a batsman saving us from some low scores on multiple times.

                      But mainly because of two thing.

                      1. The game where he hit two 6's and the tv camera's actually managed to follow the ball. For the young 'uns on the board, when players used to hit a 6 you used to stare at nothing as the definition / lighting was so bad you could never see the ball until it came down to the crowd and you saw people jumping for it.
                      2. Side on run out in the opening match of the 92 world cup.
                      MN5M Offline
                      MN5M Offline
                      MN5
                      wrote on last edited by MN5
                      #75

                      @majorrage said in Black Clash:

                      @mn5 said in Black Clash:

                      @godder said in Black Clash:

                      @mn5 said in Black Clash:

                      @kiwimurph said in Black Clash:

                      I think with Harry what is shows is how different ODI cricket was in the 90s vs now.

                      In the 99 CWC 300 was only scored 3 times in the whole tournament.

                      I read an article that said in 1999 the average strike rate of batsmen in ODIs was 73.47 and in 2019 the average strike rate was 92.18.

                      Harry these days wouldn't be nearly as valuable as he was in the 90s. Different era.

                      Definitely, I was surprised he didn’t have more big moments but I might stop commenting now in case I get ripped apart again.

                      He had a lot of not outs because his job was often to anchor the latter part of the innings while the other end did the hitting.

                      Fuck Harry. Worst NZ cricketer ever

                      Harry fan here as well. Best in the field, good at slowing the economy rate, anchor of a batsman saving us from some low scores on multiple times.

                      But mainly because of two thing.

                      1. The game where he hit two 6's and the tv camera's actually managed to follow the ball. For the young 'uns on the board, when players used to hit a 6 you used to stare at nothing as the definition / lighting was so bad you could never see the ball until it came down to the crowd and you saw people jumping for it.
                      2. Side on run out in the opening match of the 92 world cup.

                      Yeah he was bloody good in the the field wasn’t he ?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • D Offline
                        D Offline
                        Davesofthunder
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #76

                        Kieran Read paid the price for facing pace...

                        Check out the last pic

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

                          I think with Harry what is shows is how different ODI cricket was in the 90s vs now.

                          In the 99 CWC 300 was only scored 3 times in the whole tournament.

                          I read an article that said in 1999 the average strike rate of batsmen in ODIs was 73.47 and in 2019 the average strike rate was 92.18.

                          Harry these days wouldn't be nearly as valuable as he was in the 90s. Different era.

                          rotatedR Offline
                          rotatedR Offline
                          rotated
                          wrote on last edited by rotated
                          #77

                          @kiwimurph said in Black Clash:

                          I think with Harry what is shows is how different ODI cricket was in the 90s vs now.

                          In the 99 CWC 300 was only scored 3 times in the whole tournament.

                          I read an article that said in 1999 the average strike rate of batsmen in ODIs was 73.47 and in 2019 the average strike rate was 92.18.

                          Harry these days wouldn't be nearly as valuable as he was in the 90s. Different era.

                          Harry as a bowler would have been even more effective in T20 IMO. By the mid-point of his career his bowling revolved more around changes of pace and variation than bowling cutters - which is exactly what T20 bowling at his pace is all about. He also seemed to massively benefit from the batsman going after him rather than milking him.

                          As a batsman though it is tough to see that he would have been even a middle order player. He had a bit of that Ross Taylor thing where his hands moved five times faster than his feet for the first 25 balls of his innings and so was often bogged down early even though he was canny at finding the gaps once he got things going. The lack of a real top gear would make it tough for him to bat any higher than 8.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          2
                          • StargazerS Offline
                            StargazerS Offline
                            Stargazer
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #78

                            Back in 2023:

                            38eee1de-bd96-4986-b347-e0e19bcb67c1-image.png

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • StargazerS Offline
                              StargazerS Offline
                              Stargazer
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #79

                              Teams thus far:

                              Team Rugby:
                              Graham Henry - coach
                              Scott Robertson - manager
                              Kieran Read
                              Will Jordan
                              Jordie Barrett
                              Israel Dagg
                              Richie McCaw

                              Team Cricket:
                              Chris Martin
                              Daniel Vettori
                              Grant Elliott
                              Adam Parore
                              Anton Devcich
                              Jacob Oram
                              Kyle Mills
                              This year's wild card: Nick Cummins the Honey Badger!!

                              Canes4lifeC 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • StargazerS Stargazer

                                Teams thus far:

                                Team Rugby:
                                Graham Henry - coach
                                Scott Robertson - manager
                                Kieran Read
                                Will Jordan
                                Jordie Barrett
                                Israel Dagg
                                Richie McCaw

                                Team Cricket:
                                Chris Martin
                                Daniel Vettori
                                Grant Elliott
                                Adam Parore
                                Anton Devcich
                                Jacob Oram
                                Kyle Mills
                                This year's wild card: Nick Cummins the Honey Badger!!

                                Canes4lifeC Offline
                                Canes4lifeC Offline
                                Canes4life
                                wrote on last edited by Canes4life
                                #80

                                @Stargazer said in Black Clash:

                                Teams thus far:

                                Team Rugby:
                                Graham Henry - coach
                                Scott Robertson - manager
                                Kieran Read
                                Will Jordan
                                Jordie Barrett
                                Israel Dagg
                                Richie McCaw

                                Team Cricket:
                                Chris Martin
                                Daniel Vettori
                                Grant Elliott
                                Adam Parore
                                Anton Devcich
                                Jacob Oram
                                Kyle Mills
                                This year's wild card: Nick Cummins the Honey Badger!!

                                I assume Ruben Love will be in Team Rugby considering he was in the squad last year. Awesome to see the Honey Badger there, hopefully they get him mic'd up.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • NTAN Offline
                                  NTAN Offline
                                  NTA
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #81

                                  Australian viewers

                                  https://twitter.com/StanSportRugby/status/1615514340026712067

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  2
                                  • MN5M Offline
                                    MN5M Offline
                                    MN5
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #82

                                    Despite myself I’m sure I’ll have a beer or two and watch this tonight all the while whinging that it must be fixed and the the cricket guys aren’t trying hard enough.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • StargazerS Offline
                                      StargazerS Offline
                                      Stargazer
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #83

                                      Final team lists:

                                      c83550a3-67b1-4c19-af4d-aae8e1d65f8b-image.png

                                      ab703cb4-f3f5-4652-a7a2-ab5d5bbb2384-image.png

                                      Also:

                                      The Ford Double Play returns to the T20 Black Clash!

                                      In this over, each run scored will earn double runs for their team 🏏

                                      2 runs = 4 Ford Double Play runs

                                      4 runs = 8 Ford Double play runs

                                      6 runs = 12 Ford Double Play runs etc.


                                      Unfortunately, the Alternative Commentary Collective are the commentary team again.

                                      A 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • StargazerS Stargazer

                                        Final team lists:

                                        c83550a3-67b1-4c19-af4d-aae8e1d65f8b-image.png

                                        ab703cb4-f3f5-4652-a7a2-ab5d5bbb2384-image.png

                                        Also:

                                        The Ford Double Play returns to the T20 Black Clash!

                                        In this over, each run scored will earn double runs for their team 🏏

                                        2 runs = 4 Ford Double Play runs

                                        4 runs = 8 Ford Double play runs

                                        6 runs = 12 Ford Double Play runs etc.


                                        Unfortunately, the Alternative Commentary Collective are the commentary team again.

                                        A Offline
                                        A Offline
                                        ARHS
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #84

                                        @Stargazer said in Black Clash:

                                        Unfortunately, the Alternative Commentary Collective are the commentary team again.

                                        I won't bother watching coz of that. But, I guess it caters for the audience they want.

                                        StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • A ARHS

                                          @Stargazer said in Black Clash:

                                          Unfortunately, the Alternative Commentary Collective are the commentary team again.

                                          I won't bother watching coz of that. But, I guess it caters for the audience they want.

                                          StargazerS Offline
                                          StargazerS Offline
                                          Stargazer
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #85

                                          @ARHS Yeah, I'll watch, but the mute button will be used a lot, tonight, until I get sick of it.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search