Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Black Clash

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricketallblacks
187 Posts 45 Posters 4.7k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • RapidoR Rapido

    MN5 just doesn't understand roles.

    "I never said he was terrible, I said he had modest returns."

    Modest returns at stats relatively irrelevant to his role, like wondering what all the fuss was with Shane Bond when he has zero run outs from backward point. Or zero rescued run chases.

    Anyway. Also doesn't seem to understand difference between fan favourites from greats.

    I thought the 90s was his thing?

    MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by MN5
    #67

    @rapido said in Black Clash:

    MN5 just doesn't understand roles.

    "I never said he was terrible, I said he had modest returns."

    Modest returns at stats relatively irrelevant to his role, like wondering what all the fuss was with Shane Bond when he has zero run outs from backward point. Or zero rescued run chases.

    Anyway. Also doesn't seem to understand difference between fan favourites from greats.

    I thought the 90s was his thing?

    Fucken hell, you’d think I’d compared him to Justin Vaughan or someone judging from the grief I’m getting.

    It certainly proves he’s popular, I hope he does get a run in the Black Clash now !

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • KiwiMurphK Online
      KiwiMurphK Online
      KiwiMurph
      wrote on last edited by
      #68

      I think with Harry what is shows is how different ODI cricket was in the 90s vs now.

      In the 99 CWC 300 was only scored 3 times in the whole tournament.

      I read an article that said in 1999 the average strike rate of batsmen in ODIs was 73.47 and in 2019 the average strike rate was 92.18.

      Harry these days wouldn't be nearly as valuable as he was in the 90s. Different era.

      MN5M rotatedR 2 Replies Last reply
      1
      • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

        I think with Harry what is shows is how different ODI cricket was in the 90s vs now.

        In the 99 CWC 300 was only scored 3 times in the whole tournament.

        I read an article that said in 1999 the average strike rate of batsmen in ODIs was 73.47 and in 2019 the average strike rate was 92.18.

        Harry these days wouldn't be nearly as valuable as he was in the 90s. Different era.

        MN5M Online
        MN5M Online
        MN5
        wrote on last edited by MN5
        #69

        @kiwimurph said in Black Clash:

        I think with Harry what is shows is how different ODI cricket was in the 90s vs now.

        In the 99 CWC 300 was only scored 3 times in the whole tournament.

        I read an article that said in 1999 the average strike rate of batsmen in ODIs was 73.47 and in 2019 the average strike rate was 92.18.

        Harry these days wouldn't be nearly as valuable as he was in the 90s. Different era.

        Definitely, I was surprised he didn’t have more big moments but I might stop commenting now in case I get ripped apart again.

        SiamS G 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • MN5M MN5

          @kiwimurph said in Black Clash:

          I think with Harry what is shows is how different ODI cricket was in the 90s vs now.

          In the 99 CWC 300 was only scored 3 times in the whole tournament.

          I read an article that said in 1999 the average strike rate of batsmen in ODIs was 73.47 and in 2019 the average strike rate was 92.18.

          Harry these days wouldn't be nearly as valuable as he was in the 90s. Different era.

          Definitely, I was surprised he didn’t have more big moments but I might stop commenting now in case I get ripped apart again.

          SiamS Offline
          SiamS Offline
          Siam
          wrote on last edited by
          #70

          @mn5 mn5 looks to his left, points and exclaims " Hey isn't that George Bridge walking with Ian Foster?"

          Pheeww, (wipes brow)

          MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
          2
          • SiamS Siam

            @mn5 mn5 looks to his left, points and exclaims " Hey isn't that George Bridge walking with Ian Foster?"

            Pheeww, (wipes brow)

            MN5M Online
            MN5M Online
            MN5
            wrote on last edited by
            #71

            @siam said in Black Clash:

            @mn5 mn5 looks to his left, points and exclaims " Hey isn't that George Bridge walking with Ian Foster?"

            Pheeww, (wipes brow)

            On their way to get tips from Caleb Ralph

            1 Reply Last reply
            2
            • MN5M MN5

              @kiwimurph said in Black Clash:

              I think with Harry what is shows is how different ODI cricket was in the 90s vs now.

              In the 99 CWC 300 was only scored 3 times in the whole tournament.

              I read an article that said in 1999 the average strike rate of batsmen in ODIs was 73.47 and in 2019 the average strike rate was 92.18.

              Harry these days wouldn't be nearly as valuable as he was in the 90s. Different era.

              Definitely, I was surprised he didn’t have more big moments but I might stop commenting now in case I get ripped apart again.

              G Offline
              G Offline
              Godder
              wrote on last edited by
              #72

              @mn5 said in Black Clash:

              @kiwimurph said in Black Clash:

              I think with Harry what is shows is how different ODI cricket was in the 90s vs now.

              In the 99 CWC 300 was only scored 3 times in the whole tournament.

              I read an article that said in 1999 the average strike rate of batsmen in ODIs was 73.47 and in 2019 the average strike rate was 92.18.

              Harry these days wouldn't be nearly as valuable as he was in the 90s. Different era.

              Definitely, I was surprised he didn’t have more big moments but I might stop commenting now in case I get ripped apart again.

              He had a lot of not outs because his job was often to anchor the latter part of the innings while the other end did the hitting.

              MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • G Godder

                @mn5 said in Black Clash:

                @kiwimurph said in Black Clash:

                I think with Harry what is shows is how different ODI cricket was in the 90s vs now.

                In the 99 CWC 300 was only scored 3 times in the whole tournament.

                I read an article that said in 1999 the average strike rate of batsmen in ODIs was 73.47 and in 2019 the average strike rate was 92.18.

                Harry these days wouldn't be nearly as valuable as he was in the 90s. Different era.

                Definitely, I was surprised he didn’t have more big moments but I might stop commenting now in case I get ripped apart again.

                He had a lot of not outs because his job was often to anchor the latter part of the innings while the other end did the hitting.

                MN5M Online
                MN5M Online
                MN5
                wrote on last edited by
                #73

                @godder said in Black Clash:

                @mn5 said in Black Clash:

                @kiwimurph said in Black Clash:

                I think with Harry what is shows is how different ODI cricket was in the 90s vs now.

                In the 99 CWC 300 was only scored 3 times in the whole tournament.

                I read an article that said in 1999 the average strike rate of batsmen in ODIs was 73.47 and in 2019 the average strike rate was 92.18.

                Harry these days wouldn't be nearly as valuable as he was in the 90s. Different era.

                Definitely, I was surprised he didn’t have more big moments but I might stop commenting now in case I get ripped apart again.

                He had a lot of not outs because his job was often to anchor the latter part of the innings while the other end did the hitting.

                Fuck Harry. Worst NZ cricketer ever

                MajorPomM 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • MN5M MN5

                  @godder said in Black Clash:

                  @mn5 said in Black Clash:

                  @kiwimurph said in Black Clash:

                  I think with Harry what is shows is how different ODI cricket was in the 90s vs now.

                  In the 99 CWC 300 was only scored 3 times in the whole tournament.

                  I read an article that said in 1999 the average strike rate of batsmen in ODIs was 73.47 and in 2019 the average strike rate was 92.18.

                  Harry these days wouldn't be nearly as valuable as he was in the 90s. Different era.

                  Definitely, I was surprised he didn’t have more big moments but I might stop commenting now in case I get ripped apart again.

                  He had a lot of not outs because his job was often to anchor the latter part of the innings while the other end did the hitting.

                  Fuck Harry. Worst NZ cricketer ever

                  MajorPomM Offline
                  MajorPomM Offline
                  MajorPom
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #74

                  @mn5 said in Black Clash:

                  @godder said in Black Clash:

                  @mn5 said in Black Clash:

                  @kiwimurph said in Black Clash:

                  I think with Harry what is shows is how different ODI cricket was in the 90s vs now.

                  In the 99 CWC 300 was only scored 3 times in the whole tournament.

                  I read an article that said in 1999 the average strike rate of batsmen in ODIs was 73.47 and in 2019 the average strike rate was 92.18.

                  Harry these days wouldn't be nearly as valuable as he was in the 90s. Different era.

                  Definitely, I was surprised he didn’t have more big moments but I might stop commenting now in case I get ripped apart again.

                  He had a lot of not outs because his job was often to anchor the latter part of the innings while the other end did the hitting.

                  Fuck Harry. Worst NZ cricketer ever

                  Harry fan here as well. Best in the field, good at slowing the economy rate, anchor of a batsman saving us from some low scores on multiple times.

                  But mainly because of two thing.

                  1. The game where he hit two 6's and the tv camera's actually managed to follow the ball. For the young 'uns on the board, when players used to hit a 6 you used to stare at nothing as the definition / lighting was so bad you could never see the ball until it came down to the crowd and you saw people jumping for it.
                  2. Side on run out in the opening match of the 92 world cup.
                  MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • MajorPomM MajorPom

                    @mn5 said in Black Clash:

                    @godder said in Black Clash:

                    @mn5 said in Black Clash:

                    @kiwimurph said in Black Clash:

                    I think with Harry what is shows is how different ODI cricket was in the 90s vs now.

                    In the 99 CWC 300 was only scored 3 times in the whole tournament.

                    I read an article that said in 1999 the average strike rate of batsmen in ODIs was 73.47 and in 2019 the average strike rate was 92.18.

                    Harry these days wouldn't be nearly as valuable as he was in the 90s. Different era.

                    Definitely, I was surprised he didn’t have more big moments but I might stop commenting now in case I get ripped apart again.

                    He had a lot of not outs because his job was often to anchor the latter part of the innings while the other end did the hitting.

                    Fuck Harry. Worst NZ cricketer ever

                    Harry fan here as well. Best in the field, good at slowing the economy rate, anchor of a batsman saving us from some low scores on multiple times.

                    But mainly because of two thing.

                    1. The game where he hit two 6's and the tv camera's actually managed to follow the ball. For the young 'uns on the board, when players used to hit a 6 you used to stare at nothing as the definition / lighting was so bad you could never see the ball until it came down to the crowd and you saw people jumping for it.
                    2. Side on run out in the opening match of the 92 world cup.
                    MN5M Online
                    MN5M Online
                    MN5
                    wrote on last edited by MN5
                    #75

                    @majorrage said in Black Clash:

                    @mn5 said in Black Clash:

                    @godder said in Black Clash:

                    @mn5 said in Black Clash:

                    @kiwimurph said in Black Clash:

                    I think with Harry what is shows is how different ODI cricket was in the 90s vs now.

                    In the 99 CWC 300 was only scored 3 times in the whole tournament.

                    I read an article that said in 1999 the average strike rate of batsmen in ODIs was 73.47 and in 2019 the average strike rate was 92.18.

                    Harry these days wouldn't be nearly as valuable as he was in the 90s. Different era.

                    Definitely, I was surprised he didn’t have more big moments but I might stop commenting now in case I get ripped apart again.

                    He had a lot of not outs because his job was often to anchor the latter part of the innings while the other end did the hitting.

                    Fuck Harry. Worst NZ cricketer ever

                    Harry fan here as well. Best in the field, good at slowing the economy rate, anchor of a batsman saving us from some low scores on multiple times.

                    But mainly because of two thing.

                    1. The game where he hit two 6's and the tv camera's actually managed to follow the ball. For the young 'uns on the board, when players used to hit a 6 you used to stare at nothing as the definition / lighting was so bad you could never see the ball until it came down to the crowd and you saw people jumping for it.
                    2. Side on run out in the opening match of the 92 world cup.

                    Yeah he was bloody good in the the field wasn’t he ?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • D Offline
                      D Offline
                      Davesofthunder
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #76

                      Kieran Read paid the price for facing pace...

                      Check out the last pic

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

                        I think with Harry what is shows is how different ODI cricket was in the 90s vs now.

                        In the 99 CWC 300 was only scored 3 times in the whole tournament.

                        I read an article that said in 1999 the average strike rate of batsmen in ODIs was 73.47 and in 2019 the average strike rate was 92.18.

                        Harry these days wouldn't be nearly as valuable as he was in the 90s. Different era.

                        rotatedR Offline
                        rotatedR Offline
                        rotated
                        wrote on last edited by rotated
                        #77

                        @kiwimurph said in Black Clash:

                        I think with Harry what is shows is how different ODI cricket was in the 90s vs now.

                        In the 99 CWC 300 was only scored 3 times in the whole tournament.

                        I read an article that said in 1999 the average strike rate of batsmen in ODIs was 73.47 and in 2019 the average strike rate was 92.18.

                        Harry these days wouldn't be nearly as valuable as he was in the 90s. Different era.

                        Harry as a bowler would have been even more effective in T20 IMO. By the mid-point of his career his bowling revolved more around changes of pace and variation than bowling cutters - which is exactly what T20 bowling at his pace is all about. He also seemed to massively benefit from the batsman going after him rather than milking him.

                        As a batsman though it is tough to see that he would have been even a middle order player. He had a bit of that Ross Taylor thing where his hands moved five times faster than his feet for the first 25 balls of his innings and so was often bogged down early even though he was canny at finding the gaps once he got things going. The lack of a real top gear would make it tough for him to bat any higher than 8.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        2
                        • StargazerS Offline
                          StargazerS Offline
                          Stargazer
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #78

                          Back in 2023:

                          38eee1de-bd96-4986-b347-e0e19bcb67c1-image.png

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • StargazerS Offline
                            StargazerS Offline
                            Stargazer
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #79

                            Teams thus far:

                            Team Rugby:
                            Graham Henry - coach
                            Scott Robertson - manager
                            Kieran Read
                            Will Jordan
                            Jordie Barrett
                            Israel Dagg
                            Richie McCaw

                            Team Cricket:
                            Chris Martin
                            Daniel Vettori
                            Grant Elliott
                            Adam Parore
                            Anton Devcich
                            Jacob Oram
                            Kyle Mills
                            This year's wild card: Nick Cummins the Honey Badger!!

                            Canes4lifeC 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • StargazerS Stargazer

                              Teams thus far:

                              Team Rugby:
                              Graham Henry - coach
                              Scott Robertson - manager
                              Kieran Read
                              Will Jordan
                              Jordie Barrett
                              Israel Dagg
                              Richie McCaw

                              Team Cricket:
                              Chris Martin
                              Daniel Vettori
                              Grant Elliott
                              Adam Parore
                              Anton Devcich
                              Jacob Oram
                              Kyle Mills
                              This year's wild card: Nick Cummins the Honey Badger!!

                              Canes4lifeC Offline
                              Canes4lifeC Offline
                              Canes4life
                              wrote on last edited by Canes4life
                              #80

                              @Stargazer said in Black Clash:

                              Teams thus far:

                              Team Rugby:
                              Graham Henry - coach
                              Scott Robertson - manager
                              Kieran Read
                              Will Jordan
                              Jordie Barrett
                              Israel Dagg
                              Richie McCaw

                              Team Cricket:
                              Chris Martin
                              Daniel Vettori
                              Grant Elliott
                              Adam Parore
                              Anton Devcich
                              Jacob Oram
                              Kyle Mills
                              This year's wild card: Nick Cummins the Honey Badger!!

                              I assume Ruben Love will be in Team Rugby considering he was in the squad last year. Awesome to see the Honey Badger there, hopefully they get him mic'd up.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • NTAN Offline
                                NTAN Offline
                                NTA
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #81

                                Australian viewers

                                https://twitter.com/StanSportRugby/status/1615514340026712067

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                2
                                • MN5M Online
                                  MN5M Online
                                  MN5
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #82

                                  Despite myself I’m sure I’ll have a beer or two and watch this tonight all the while whinging that it must be fixed and the the cricket guys aren’t trying hard enough.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • StargazerS Offline
                                    StargazerS Offline
                                    Stargazer
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #83

                                    Final team lists:

                                    c83550a3-67b1-4c19-af4d-aae8e1d65f8b-image.png

                                    ab703cb4-f3f5-4652-a7a2-ab5d5bbb2384-image.png

                                    Also:

                                    The Ford Double Play returns to the T20 Black Clash!

                                    In this over, each run scored will earn double runs for their team 🏏

                                    2 runs = 4 Ford Double Play runs

                                    4 runs = 8 Ford Double play runs

                                    6 runs = 12 Ford Double Play runs etc.


                                    Unfortunately, the Alternative Commentary Collective are the commentary team again.

                                    A 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • StargazerS Stargazer

                                      Final team lists:

                                      c83550a3-67b1-4c19-af4d-aae8e1d65f8b-image.png

                                      ab703cb4-f3f5-4652-a7a2-ab5d5bbb2384-image.png

                                      Also:

                                      The Ford Double Play returns to the T20 Black Clash!

                                      In this over, each run scored will earn double runs for their team 🏏

                                      2 runs = 4 Ford Double Play runs

                                      4 runs = 8 Ford Double play runs

                                      6 runs = 12 Ford Double Play runs etc.


                                      Unfortunately, the Alternative Commentary Collective are the commentary team again.

                                      A Offline
                                      A Offline
                                      ARHS
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #84

                                      @Stargazer said in Black Clash:

                                      Unfortunately, the Alternative Commentary Collective are the commentary team again.

                                      I won't bother watching coz of that. But, I guess it caters for the audience they want.

                                      StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • A ARHS

                                        @Stargazer said in Black Clash:

                                        Unfortunately, the Alternative Commentary Collective are the commentary team again.

                                        I won't bother watching coz of that. But, I guess it caters for the audience they want.

                                        StargazerS Offline
                                        StargazerS Offline
                                        Stargazer
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #85

                                        @ARHS Yeah, I'll watch, but the mute button will be used a lot, tonight, until I get sick of it.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • MN5M Online
                                          MN5M Online
                                          MN5
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #86

                                          The ACC are pretty shite which is a shame cos Hauraki drive is rather amusing.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search