@pakman said in The importance of the little men?:
@Smuts said in The importance of the little men?:
Hang on a second - Reinach was the disaster artist who failed to manage the back end of the Ellis Park test. He also had over 30 minutes at Eden Park to rescue a game that only needed the boks to scratch up 11 points.
Williams was far from perfect in both those games but given the armchair ride they got behind the bok pack neither of them can really say they delivered.
Sub either of them for White, Roigard or, the inexplicably unselected tourist, Faf, and the Boks win those games easily.
I think Reinach suits the current Boks game of heavy set piece focus, keeping ball close for a few phases and then launching shortish half field bombs, and ONLY THEN playing attacking rugby. Williams much more suited to having to chase the game.
Ellis Park ended wrong way, but I suspect Rassie has refined his tactics since the .
To be honest, Ellis Park match was lost due to.Boks being careless.with the ball and Wallabies punishing those turnovers and the crap cover defence. Libbok was main culprit, plus the lineout was dysfunctional, Marx and Bongi both poor throwing in. Match was over before Reinach got off the bench.
Your point stands, Reinach was a point of difference for the Boks in the back end of the championship (same as Roigard was for abs) and I think it's because he brought a combative, no nonsense mentality to the game and he is just a generally tidy and accurate player. He doesn't overcomplicate things, just hard nosed rugby and good option taking. Some of the younger Boks are more spectacular but they are also erratic and error prone.